Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-15 Thread Emil Velikov 
On 7 June 2017 at 16:22, Jonathan Gray  wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:18:53PM +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> 2017-06-07 22:47 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
>> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:30:49PM +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> >> 2017-06-07 21:54 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
>> >> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> >> >> On 6 June 2017 at 07:30, Chih-Wei Huang  
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
>> >> >> >>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Oh... I didn't notice that.
>> >> >> >> Let me check.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
>> >> >> > the same context:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > #elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
>> >> >> > (__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
>> >> >> > #include 
>> >> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> >> >> > #elif defined(__DragonFly__)
>> >> >> > #include 
>> >> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> >> >> > #elif defined(__APPLE__)
>> >> >> > #include 
>> >> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> >> >> > #elif ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
>> >> >> Your guess is as good as mine. Jonathan, any ideas if/who this is
>> >> >> supposed to work for you guys?
>> >> >
>> >> > I have no idea where that block comes from as the latest
>> >> > src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c
>> >>
>> >> Sorry. A little off-topic.
>> >> Yes, the original patch is about os_process.c.
>> >> But now we are talking about xmlconfig.c
>> >> (in src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/ )
>> >
>> > You miss the other relevant part of that file
>> >
>> > #if !defined(GET_PROGRAM_NAME)
>> > #if defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(NetBSD) || defined(__UCLIBC__) || 
>> > defined(ANDROID)
>> > /* This is a hack. It's said to work on OpenBSD, NetBSD and GNU.
>> >  * Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. reported it's also working with UCLIBC. It's
>> >  * used as a last resort, if there is no documented facility available. */
>> > static const char *__getProgramName () {
>> > extern const char *__progname;
>> > char * arg = strrchr(__progname, '/');
>> > if (arg)
>> > return arg+1;
>> > else
>> > return __progname;
>> > }
>> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() __getProgramName()
>> > #else
>> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() ""
>> > #warning "Per application configuration won't work with your OS 
>> > version."
>> > #endif
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > __progname exists since BSD 4.4,  OpenBSD has had getprogname() since
>> > 5.4 in 2013.  This should all be simplified to look like or use the
>> > gallium code.
>>
>> No. I didn't miss the part.
>
> __progname was never mentioned in any mail I read.
>
>> That's exact what I asked.
>> OpenBSD has getprogname().
>> Why should it fall back to the hack?
>
> Clearly the code is older than 2013.
Right - so we were a bit to sparse :-\

Chih-Wei, Jonathan any interest in cleaning up the xmlconfig.c ifdef
spaghetti and adding a proper Android fix for gallium?

-Emil
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-07 Thread Jonathan Gray 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:18:53PM +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> 2017-06-07 22:47 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:30:49PM +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> >> 2017-06-07 21:54 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
> >> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> >> On 6 June 2017 at 07:30, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
> >> >> >>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
> >> >> >>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Oh... I didn't notice that.
> >> >> >> Let me check.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
> >> >> > the same context:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > #elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
> >> >> > (__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
> >> >> > #include 
> >> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> >> >> > #elif defined(__DragonFly__)
> >> >> > #include 
> >> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> >> >> > #elif defined(__APPLE__)
> >> >> > #include 
> >> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> >> >> > #elif ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
> >> >> Your guess is as good as mine. Jonathan, any ideas if/who this is
> >> >> supposed to work for you guys?
> >> >
> >> > I have no idea where that block comes from as the latest
> >> > src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c
> >>
> >> Sorry. A little off-topic.
> >> Yes, the original patch is about os_process.c.
> >> But now we are talking about xmlconfig.c
> >> (in src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/ )
> >
> > You miss the other relevant part of that file
> >
> > #if !defined(GET_PROGRAM_NAME)
> > #if defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(NetBSD) || defined(__UCLIBC__) || 
> > defined(ANDROID)
> > /* This is a hack. It's said to work on OpenBSD, NetBSD and GNU.
> >  * Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. reported it's also working with UCLIBC. It's
> >  * used as a last resort, if there is no documented facility available. */
> > static const char *__getProgramName () {
> > extern const char *__progname;
> > char * arg = strrchr(__progname, '/');
> > if (arg)
> > return arg+1;
> > else
> > return __progname;
> > }
> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() __getProgramName()
> > #else
> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() ""
> > #warning "Per application configuration won't work with your OS 
> > version."
> > #endif
> > #endif
> >
> > __progname exists since BSD 4.4,  OpenBSD has had getprogname() since
> > 5.4 in 2013.  This should all be simplified to look like or use the
> > gallium code.
> 
> No. I didn't miss the part.

__progname was never mentioned in any mail I read.

> That's exact what I asked.
> OpenBSD has getprogname().
> Why should it fall back to the hack?

Clearly the code is older than 2013.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-07 Thread Chih-Wei Huang 
2017-06-07 22:47 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:30:49PM +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> 2017-06-07 21:54 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
>> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> >> On 6 June 2017 at 07:30, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
>> >> >>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
>> >> >>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Oh... I didn't notice that.
>> >> >> Let me check.
>> >> >
>> >> > Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
>> >> > the same context:
>> >> >
>> >> > #elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
>> >> > (__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
>> >> > #include 
>> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> >> > #elif defined(__DragonFly__)
>> >> > #include 
>> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> >> > #elif defined(__APPLE__)
>> >> > #include 
>> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> >> > #elif ...
>> >> >
>> >> > Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
>> >> Your guess is as good as mine. Jonathan, any ideas if/who this is
>> >> supposed to work for you guys?
>> >
>> > I have no idea where that block comes from as the latest
>> > src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c
>>
>> Sorry. A little off-topic.
>> Yes, the original patch is about os_process.c.
>> But now we are talking about xmlconfig.c
>> (in src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/ )
>
> You miss the other relevant part of that file
>
> #if !defined(GET_PROGRAM_NAME)
> #if defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(NetBSD) || defined(__UCLIBC__) || 
> defined(ANDROID)
> /* This is a hack. It's said to work on OpenBSD, NetBSD and GNU.
>  * Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. reported it's also working with UCLIBC. It's
>  * used as a last resort, if there is no documented facility available. */
> static const char *__getProgramName () {
> extern const char *__progname;
> char * arg = strrchr(__progname, '/');
> if (arg)
> return arg+1;
> else
> return __progname;
> }
> #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() __getProgramName()
> #else
> #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() ""
> #warning "Per application configuration won't work with your OS 
> version."
> #endif
> #endif
>
> __progname exists since BSD 4.4,  OpenBSD has had getprogname() since
> 5.4 in 2013.  This should all be simplified to look like or use the
> gallium code.

No. I didn't miss the part.
That's exact what I asked.
OpenBSD has getprogname().
Why should it fall back to the hack?


-- 
Chih-Wei
Android-x86 project
http://www.android-x86.org
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-07 Thread Jonathan Gray 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:30:49PM +0800, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> 2017-06-07 21:54 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> On 6 June 2017 at 07:30, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
> >> >>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
> >> >>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh... I didn't notice that.
> >> >> Let me check.
> >> >
> >> > Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
> >> > the same context:
> >> >
> >> > #elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
> >> > (__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
> >> > #include 
> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> >> > #elif defined(__DragonFly__)
> >> > #include 
> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> >> > #elif defined(__APPLE__)
> >> > #include 
> >> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> >> > #elif ...
> >> >
> >> > Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
> >> Your guess is as good as mine. Jonathan, any ideas if/who this is
> >> supposed to work for you guys?
> >
> > I have no idea where that block comes from as the latest
> > src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c
> 
> Sorry. A little off-topic.
> Yes, the original patch is about os_process.c.
> But now we are talking about xmlconfig.c
> (in src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/ )

You miss the other relevant part of that file

#if !defined(GET_PROGRAM_NAME)
#if defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(NetBSD) || defined(__UCLIBC__) || 
defined(ANDROID)
/* This is a hack. It's said to work on OpenBSD, NetBSD and GNU.
 * Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. reported it's also working with UCLIBC. It's
 * used as a last resort, if there is no documented facility available. */
static const char *__getProgramName () {
extern const char *__progname;
char * arg = strrchr(__progname, '/');
if (arg)
return arg+1;
else
return __progname;
}
#define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() __getProgramName()
#else
#define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() ""
#warning "Per application configuration won't work with your OS 
version."
#endif
#endif

__progname exists since BSD 4.4,  OpenBSD has had getprogname() since
5.4 in 2013.  This should all be simplified to look like or use the
gallium code.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-07 Thread Chih-Wei Huang 
2017-06-07 21:54 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Gray :
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 6 June 2017 at 07:30, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
>> >>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
>> >>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
>> >>
>> >> Oh... I didn't notice that.
>> >> Let me check.
>> >
>> > Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
>> > the same context:
>> >
>> > #elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
>> > (__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
>> > #include 
>> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> > #elif defined(__DragonFly__)
>> > #include 
>> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> > #elif defined(__APPLE__)
>> > #include 
>> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
>> > #elif ...
>> >
>> > Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
>> Your guess is as good as mine. Jonathan, any ideas if/who this is
>> supposed to work for you guys?
>
> I have no idea where that block comes from as the latest
> src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c

Sorry. A little off-topic.
Yes, the original patch is about os_process.c.
But now we are talking about xmlconfig.c
(in src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/ )


> is still
> #elif defined(__GLIBC__) || defined(__CYGWIN__)
>   name = program_invocation_short_name;
> #elif defined(PIPE_OS_BSD) || defined(PIPE_OS_APPLE)
>   /* *BSD and OS X */
>   name = getprogname();
> #elif defined(PIPE_OS_HAIKU)
>   image_info info;
>   get_image_info(B_CURRENT_TEAM, );
>   name = info.name;
> #else
> #warning unexpected platform in os_process.c
>   return FALSE;
> #endif



-- 
Chih-Wei
Android-x86 project
http://www.android-x86.org
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-07 Thread Jonathan Gray 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 6 June 2017 at 07:30, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
> > 2017-06-06 13:06 GMT+08:00 Chih-Wei Huang :
> >> 2017-06-05 21:04 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
> >>> On 4 June 2017 at 04:31, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
>  Android bionic is derived from OpenBSD. So the logics of BSD
>  almost apply to Android as well.
> 
> >>> Having platform FOO define both PIPE_OS_BSD and PIPE_OS_LINUX does not
> >>> seem so obvious bth.
> >>
> >> Yeah.. but that's true.
> >> Android is a BSD-style userspace
> >> running on a Linux kernel.
> >>
>  It fixes the warnings
> 
>  external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:43:2: warning: 
>  unexpected platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]
>   ^
>  external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:97:2: warning: 
>  unexpected platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]
> >>>
> >>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
> >>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
> >>
> >> Oh... I didn't notice that.
> >> Let me check.
> >
> > Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
> > the same context:
> >
> > #elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
> > (__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
> > #include 
> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> > #elif defined(__DragonFly__)
> > #include 
> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> > #elif defined(__APPLE__)
> > #include 
> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> > #elif ...
> >
> > Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
> Your guess is as good as mine. Jonathan, any ideas if/who this is
> supposed to work for you guys?

I have no idea where that block comes from as the latest
src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c
is still

#elif defined(__GLIBC__) || defined(__CYGWIN__)
  name = program_invocation_short_name;
#elif defined(PIPE_OS_BSD) || defined(PIPE_OS_APPLE)
  /* *BSD and OS X */
  name = getprogname();
#elif defined(PIPE_OS_HAIKU)
  image_info info;
  get_image_info(B_CURRENT_TEAM, );
  name = info.name;
#else
#warning unexpected platform in os_process.c
  return FALSE;
#endif

> 
> > Android definitely has getprogname().
> > (at least since Lollipop as I know)
> >
> > Should I add:
> >
> > #elif defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(ANDROID)
> > #include 
> > #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> > #elif...
> >
> > I either don't understand why not all the BSD OSes
> > which has getprogname() share the same if case.
> >
> It should be doable but need a bit of cleanup:
>  - doubt we're can use GLIBC earlier than v2 // not BSD related
>  - the FreeBSD/NetBSD version checks could(?) be dropped
> For each case, please check (CC) some people using the respective platform.
> Mesa git log and the respective upstream repos should have contact points.
> 
> Thanks
> Emil
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-07 Thread Emil Velikov 
On 6 June 2017 at 07:30, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
> 2017-06-06 13:06 GMT+08:00 Chih-Wei Huang :
>> 2017-06-05 21:04 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>>> On 4 June 2017 at 04:31, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
 Android bionic is derived from OpenBSD. So the logics of BSD
 almost apply to Android as well.

>>> Having platform FOO define both PIPE_OS_BSD and PIPE_OS_LINUX does not
>>> seem so obvious bth.
>>
>> Yeah.. but that's true.
>> Android is a BSD-style userspace
>> running on a Linux kernel.
>>
 It fixes the warnings

 external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:43:2: warning: 
 unexpected platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]
  ^
 external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:97:2: warning: 
 unexpected platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]
>>>
>>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
>>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
>>
>> Oh... I didn't notice that.
>> Let me check.
>
> Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
> the same context:
>
> #elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
> (__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
> #include 
> #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> #elif defined(__DragonFly__)
> #include 
> #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> #elif defined(__APPLE__)
> #include 
> #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> #elif ...
>
> Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
Your guess is as good as mine. Jonathan, any ideas if/who this is
supposed to work for you guys?

> Android definitely has getprogname().
> (at least since Lollipop as I know)
>
> Should I add:
>
> #elif defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(ANDROID)
> #include 
> #define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
> #elif...
>
> I either don't understand why not all the BSD OSes
> which has getprogname() share the same if case.
>
It should be doable but need a bit of cleanup:
 - doubt we're can use GLIBC earlier than v2 // not BSD related
 - the FreeBSD/NetBSD version checks could(?) be dropped
For each case, please check (CC) some people using the respective platform.
Mesa git log and the respective upstream repos should have contact points.

Thanks
Emil
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-06 Thread Chih-Wei Huang 
2017-06-06 13:06 GMT+08:00 Chih-Wei Huang :
> 2017-06-05 21:04 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>> On 4 June 2017 at 04:31, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
>>> Android bionic is derived from OpenBSD. So the logics of BSD
>>> almost apply to Android as well.
>>>
>> Having platform FOO define both PIPE_OS_BSD and PIPE_OS_LINUX does not
>> seem so obvious bth.
>
> Yeah.. but that's true.
> Android is a BSD-style userspace
> running on a Linux kernel.
>
>>> It fixes the warnings
>>>
>>> external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:43:2: warning: 
>>> unexpected platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]
>>>  ^
>>> external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:97:2: warning: 
>>> unexpected platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]
>>
>> These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
>> about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?
>
> Oh... I didn't notice that.
> Let me check.

Well, I saw several BSD OSes define
the same context:

#elif defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__NetBSD_Version__) &&
(__NetBSD_Version__ >= 106000100)
#include 
#define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
#elif defined(__DragonFly__)
#include 
#define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
#elif defined(__APPLE__)
#include 
#define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
#elif ...

Not sure why has no OpenBSD?
Android definitely has getprogname().
(at least since Lollipop as I know)

Should I add:

#elif defined(__OpenBSD__) || defined(ANDROID)
#include 
#define GET_PROGRAM_NAME() getprogname()
#elif...

I either don't understand why not all the BSD OSes
which has getprogname() share the same if case.


-- 
Chih-Wei
Android-x86 project
http://www.android-x86.org
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Android: define PIPE_OS_BSD

2017-06-05 Thread Emil Velikov 
On 4 June 2017 at 04:31, Chih-Wei Huang  wrote:
> Android bionic is derived from OpenBSD. So the logics of BSD
> almost apply to Android as well.
>
Having platform FOO define both PIPE_OS_BSD and PIPE_OS_LINUX does not
seem so obvious bth.

> It fixes the warnings
>
> external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:43:2: warning: unexpected 
> platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]
>  ^
> external/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_process.c:97:2: warning: unexpected 
> platform in os_process.c [-W#warnings]

These are are due to program_invocation_short_name/getprogname. How
about updating the file alike xmlconfig.c?

-Emil
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev