Re: [meta-freescale] A simple example of using AIOP on LS1088ARDB board?

2019-01-11 Thread Zhenhua Luo
The detailed guide of AIOP is available in 
https://nxp.sdlproducts.com/LiveContent/web/pub.xql?c=t=home=QorIQ_LSDK_18.12=en-US#addHistory=true=GUID-7878A5F9-3B22-4F89-9709-12D3A856A48F.xml=GUID-7878A5F9-3B22-4F89-9709-12D3A856A48F_id==false=lcContent.loadDocGUID-7878A5F9-3B22-4F89-9709-12D3A856A48F.
  


Best Regards,

Zhenhua

> -Original Message-
> From: Otavio Salvador 
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 9:16 PM
> To: john matt ; Zhenhua Luo
> 
> Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List 
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] A simple example of using AIOP on LS1088ARDB
> board?
> 
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:45 PM john matt  wrote:
> > I am new to DPAA2/AIOP, and I am wondering if someone can provide a
> simple example programming the AIOP to manipulate the packet headers. I did
> find examples here:
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
> com%2Fqoriq-open-
> source%2Faiopsldata=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.luo%40nxp.com%7C3e5452
> 488175453cff5608d676fdc3c9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> 7C0%7C636827229620894677sdata=QVoepzgJFiqxydWGTDu2Zn0q0sRjYV
> budEk05BTJOzI%3Dreserved=0, but I am not able to cross compile them
> to LS1088ARDB which is running 2.5 distro.
> >
> >
> > Could you guys please provide some references for cross compiling the  
> > aiopsl
> examples for LS1088ARDB.
> >
> > I created my esdk with yocto, but it does not hasthe headers (e.g., 
> > fsl_types.h).
> 
> Adding Zhenhua Luo on Cc.
> 
> --
> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.o
> ssystems.com.brdata=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.luo%40nxp.com%7C3e5452
> 488175453cff5608d676fdc3c9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> 7C0%7C636827229620894677sdata=qi3kFtN3AdpPsusctOZEy08qhI5vu5w
> qQxk2s%2FIIkX4%3Dreserved=0
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcode.os
> systems.com.brdata=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.luo%40nxp.com%7C3e54524
> 88175453cff5608d676fdc3c9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7
> C0%7C636827229620894677sdata=EPYAYWpz58gjxNSG6rmzOod%2BSSs
> YcjXFcnOaRAr4Cqo%3Dreserved=0
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854  Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
___
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale


Re: [meta-freescale] [PATCH] wic:mx8: Fix the image creation

2019-01-11 Thread Daiane Angolini
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:39 PM Fabio Berton
 wrote:
>
> Hi Daiane!
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:36 PM Daiane Angolini
>  wrote:
> >
> > imx8 family boards use u-boot as boot loader in addition to some other
> > binaries. The final bootloader binary is gathered by mkimage into a file
> > called imx-boot.
> >
> > Add the wks file to create the wic image tailored for imx8 family.
> > Fix the symbolic link file create to point to imx-boot (so it works for
> > all the imx8 flavors).
> > Set the wks file as default for all imx8.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daiane Angolini 
> > ---
> >  conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc|  3 +++
> >  recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb  |  2 +-
> >  recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb |  2 +-
> >  wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks| 19 +++
> >  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks
> >
> > diff --git a/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc 
> > b/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc
> > index 572e8e5e..005b71e1 100644
> > --- a/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc
> > +++ b/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc
> > @@ -301,7 +301,10 @@ WKS_FILE_DEPENDS ?= " \
> >  bmap-tools-native \
> >  "
> >
> > +WKS_FILE_DEPENDS_mx8 += "imx-boot"
> > +
> >  SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE ?= "imx-uboot-bootpart.wks"
> > +SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE_mx8 ?= "imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks"
>
> Why duplicate imx- prefix?

Because I replaced "uboot" by "imx-boot", which is the file name, and
didn't realized there were 2 imx.

What filename would you suggest?

Daiane
>
> >  SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE_mxs ?= "imx-uboot-mxs-bootpart.wks.in"
> >
> >  WKS_FILE ?= "${SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE}"
> > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb 
> > b/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb
> > index 5ffddd0e..b232ed52 100644
> > --- a/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb
> > +++ b/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb
> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ do_deploy() {
> >  install -m 0644 ${S}/${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}-${target} ${DEPLOYDIR}
> >  done
> >  cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
> > -ln -sf ${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}-${IMAGE_IMXBOOT_TARGET} 
> > ${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}
> > +ln -sf ${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}-${IMAGE_IMXBOOT_TARGET} ${BOOT_NAME}
> >  cd -
> >  }
> >  addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile
> > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb 
> > b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb
> > index 705ff164..86eca196 100644
> > --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb
> > +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ do_deploy_append_mx8m() {
> >  install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}
> >  install -m 0777 
> > ${B}/${config}/arch/arm/dts/${UBOOT_DTB_NAME}  ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}
> >  install -m 0777 ${B}/${config}/tools/mkimage  
> > ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}/mkimage_uboot
> > -install -m 0777 ${B}/${config}/u-boot-nodtb.bin  
> > ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}/u-boot-nodtb.bin-${MACHINE}-${UBOOT_CONFIG}
> > +install -m 0777 ${B}/${config}/u-boot-nodtb.bin  
> > ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}/u-boot-nodtb.bin
> >  fi
> >  done
> >  unset  j
> > diff --git a/wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks b/wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks
> > new file mode 100644
> > index ..8bbcd6c0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +# short-description: Create SD card image with a boot partition
> > +# long-description:
> > +# Create an image that can be written onto a SD card using dd for use
> > +# with i.MX SoC family
> > +# It uses u-boot
> > +#
> > +# The disk layout used is:
> > +#  - -- -- --
> > +# | | imx-boot | boot |rootfs   |
> > +#  - -- -- --
> > +# ^ ^  ^  ^
> > +# | |  |  |
> > +# 0 33kiB4MiB  16MiB + rootfs + IMAGE_EXTRA_SPACE (default 
> > 10MiB)
> > +#
> > +part u-boot --source rawcopy --sourceparams="file=imx-boot" --ondisk 
> > mmcblk --no-table --align 33
> > +part /boot --source bootimg-partition --ondisk mmcblk --fstype=vfat 
> > --label boot --active --align 4096 --size 16
> > +part / --source rootfs --ondisk mmcblk --fstype=ext4 --label root --align 
> > 4096
> > +
> > +bootloader --ptable msdos
> > \ No newline at end of file
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > --
> > ___
> > meta-freescale mailing list
> > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
> --
> ___
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
-- 
___
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale


Re: [meta-freescale] A simple example of using AIOP on LS1088ARDB board?

2019-01-11 Thread john matt
Hi Zhenhuam

Thank you very much for quick response. I do have  quick follow up
question.  What I am trying to achieve is to write the packets from ingress
flow to the DDR, and read those packets from my application.

How to configure the WRIOP to write packets coming from ETH8 of LS1088ardb
to a memory address at X (Assume X is any valid memory address in DDR)? I
know WRIOP has Buffer manager and allocates memory, and might be writing
the data already to DDR to some memory address. So my question is how to
set this address in DDR and size of this buffer in user space? I have tried
"restool", and I also explored the objects created by restool. I have not
able to find any definite reference that points me to set the address and
size of the buffer pool for the ingress flow (incoming packets).

Kind  regards,
John.


On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:58 PM Zhenhua Luo  wrote:

> The detailed guide of AIOP is available in
> https://nxp.sdlproducts.com/LiveContent/web/pub.xql?c=t=home=QorIQ_LSDK_18.12=en-US#addHistory=true=GUID-7878A5F9-3B22-4F89-9709-12D3A856A48F.xml=GUID-7878A5F9-3B22-4F89-9709-12D3A856A48F_id==false=lcContent.loadDocGUID-7878A5F9-3B22-4F89-9709-12D3A856A48F.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Zhenhua
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Otavio Salvador 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 9:16 PM
> > To: john matt ; Zhenhua Luo
> > 
> > Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List 
> > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] A simple example of using AIOP on
> LS1088ARDB
> > board?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:45 PM john matt 
> wrote:
> > > I am new to DPAA2/AIOP, and I am wondering if someone can provide a
> > simple example programming the AIOP to manipulate the packet headers. I
> did
> > find examples here:
> >
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
> > com%2Fqoriq-open-
> > source%2Faiopsldata=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.luo%40nxp.com%7C3e5452
> > 488175453cff5608d676fdc3c9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> > 7C0%7C636827229620894677sdata=QVoepzgJFiqxydWGTDu2Zn0q0sRjYV
> > budEk05BTJOzI%3Dreserved=0, but I am not able to cross compile them
> > to LS1088ARDB which is running 2.5 distro.
> > >
> > >
> > > Could you guys please provide some references for cross compiling the
> aiopsl
> > examples for LS1088ARDB.
> > >
> > > I created my esdk with yocto, but it does not hasthe headers (e.g.,
> fsl_types.h).
> >
> > Adding Zhenhua Luo on Cc.
> >
> > --
> > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.o
> > ssystems.com.brdata=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.luo%40nxp.com%7C3e5452
> > 488175453cff5608d676fdc3c9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> > 7C0%7C636827229620894677sdata=qi3kFtN3AdpPsusctOZEy08qhI5vu5w
> > qQxk2s%2FIIkX4%3Dreserved=0
> >
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcode.os
> > systems.com.brdata=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.luo%40nxp.com%7C3e54524
> > 88175453cff5608d676fdc3c9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7
> > C0%7C636827229620894677sdata=EPYAYWpz58gjxNSG6rmzOod%2BSSs
> > YcjXFcnOaRAr4Cqo%3Dreserved=0
> > Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854  Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
>
-- 
___
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale


Re: [meta-freescale] [PATCH] wic:mx8: Fix the image creation

2019-01-11 Thread Fabio Berton
Hi Daiane!

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:36 PM Daiane Angolini
 wrote:
>
> imx8 family boards use u-boot as boot loader in addition to some other
> binaries. The final bootloader binary is gathered by mkimage into a file
> called imx-boot.
>
> Add the wks file to create the wic image tailored for imx8 family.
> Fix the symbolic link file create to point to imx-boot (so it works for
> all the imx8 flavors).
> Set the wks file as default for all imx8.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daiane Angolini 
> ---
>  conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc|  3 +++
>  recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb  |  2 +-
>  recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb |  2 +-
>  wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks| 19 +++
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks
>
> diff --git a/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc 
> b/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc
> index 572e8e5e..005b71e1 100644
> --- a/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc
> +++ b/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc
> @@ -301,7 +301,10 @@ WKS_FILE_DEPENDS ?= " \
>  bmap-tools-native \
>  "
>
> +WKS_FILE_DEPENDS_mx8 += "imx-boot"
> +
>  SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE ?= "imx-uboot-bootpart.wks"
> +SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE_mx8 ?= "imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks"

Why duplicate imx- prefix?

>  SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE_mxs ?= "imx-uboot-mxs-bootpart.wks.in"
>
>  WKS_FILE ?= "${SOC_DEFAULT_WKS_FILE}"
> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb 
> b/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb
> index 5ffddd0e..b232ed52 100644
> --- a/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb
> +++ b/recipes-bsp/imx-mkimage/imx-boot_0.2.bb
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ do_deploy() {
>  install -m 0644 ${S}/${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}-${target} ${DEPLOYDIR}
>  done
>  cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
> -ln -sf ${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}-${IMAGE_IMXBOOT_TARGET} 
> ${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}
> +ln -sf ${BOOT_CONFIG_MACHINE}-${IMAGE_IMXBOOT_TARGET} ${BOOT_NAME}
>  cd -
>  }
>  addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile
> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb 
> b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb
> index 705ff164..86eca196 100644
> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb
> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2017.03.bb
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ do_deploy_append_mx8m() {
>  install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}
>  install -m 0777 
> ${B}/${config}/arch/arm/dts/${UBOOT_DTB_NAME}  ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}
>  install -m 0777 ${B}/${config}/tools/mkimage  
> ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}/mkimage_uboot
> -install -m 0777 ${B}/${config}/u-boot-nodtb.bin  
> ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}/u-boot-nodtb.bin-${MACHINE}-${UBOOT_CONFIG}
> +install -m 0777 ${B}/${config}/u-boot-nodtb.bin  
> ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BOOT_TOOLS}/u-boot-nodtb.bin
>  fi
>  done
>  unset  j
> diff --git a/wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks b/wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks
> new file mode 100644
> index ..8bbcd6c0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/wic/imx-imx-boot-bootpart.wks
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +# short-description: Create SD card image with a boot partition
> +# long-description:
> +# Create an image that can be written onto a SD card using dd for use
> +# with i.MX SoC family
> +# It uses u-boot
> +#
> +# The disk layout used is:
> +#  - -- -- --
> +# | | imx-boot | boot |rootfs   |
> +#  - -- -- --
> +# ^ ^  ^  ^
> +# | |  |  |
> +# 0 33kiB4MiB  16MiB + rootfs + IMAGE_EXTRA_SPACE (default 10MiB)
> +#
> +part u-boot --source rawcopy --sourceparams="file=imx-boot" --ondisk mmcblk 
> --no-table --align 33
> +part /boot --source bootimg-partition --ondisk mmcblk --fstype=vfat --label 
> boot --active --align 4096 --size 16
> +part / --source rootfs --ondisk mmcblk --fstype=ext4 --label root --align 
> 4096
> +
> +bootloader --ptable msdos
> \ No newline at end of file
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> --
> ___
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
-- 
___
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale


Re: [meta-freescale] [PATCH 01/41] fmc: update to c7576ab

2019-01-11 Thread Daiane Angolini
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:50 PM Daiane Angolini  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:50 PM C.r. Guo  wrote:
> >
> > From: Chunrong Guo 
> >
> > *update to lsdk 1812 tag
> > include the following changes:
> > c7576ab - Resolved compile warning on ubuntu with aarch64-linux-gnu-g++ v7.3
>
> Would you, please, rebase your patchset and send it again?
>
> I have faced conflicts at least on patch 6 and 11.

Hi Chunrong Guo,

I have created a PR with your v2. Could you, please take a look on this?

https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/pull/34/commits

I saw some patches has [rocko] on subject, could you, please elaborate
what does it mean? Would it be a cherry pick to be backported to
rocko?

Thanks a lot,
Daiane

>
> Thanks in advance,
> Daiane
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo 
> > ---
> >  dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-dpaa/fmc/fmc_git.bb | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-dpaa/fmc/fmc_git.bb 
> > b/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-dpaa/fmc/fmc_git.bb
> > index 4812ca3..cbf8e24 100644
> > --- a/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-dpaa/fmc/fmc_git.bb
> > +++ b/dynamic-layers/openembedded-layer/recipes-dpaa/fmc/fmc_git.bb
> > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PR = "r2"
> >  DEPENDS = "libxml2 fmlib tclap"
> >
> >  SRC_URI = 
> > "git://source.codeaurora.org/external/qoriq/qoriq-components/fmc;nobranch=1"
> > -SRCREV = "09a497fe92aa6cf784140b9084bccf497700"
> > +SRCREV = "c7576ab7fb6fb09b68ebc40531e5452fc89e5cd5"
> >
> >  S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > --
> > ___
> > meta-freescale mailing list
> > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
-- 
___
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale


Re: [meta-freescale] Status of i.MX8 support

2019-01-11 Thread Daiane Angolini
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 6:13 AM Teemu K  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:25 AM Teemu K  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Interesting since linux-fslc-imx doesn't list mx8 as
> > 'compatible_machine', but linux-imx does.
> >
> > When setting preferred provider for virtual/kernel to linux-fslc-imx I
> > got this error:
> > "ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'virtual/kernel'
> > linux-imx PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped:
> > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel set to linux-fslc-imx, not
> > linux-imx"
>
> I updated to latest version of thud-branch which seems to be same as
> master. I saw that lots of new patches has been applied there
> including one that said to fix the u-boot/image creation issue.
>
> Yet today when I did fresh built no u-boot nor image was created. I
> was able to manually compile u-boot, but I'm not sure which command to
> use for manually forcing the wic - image creation.
Hi Teemu,

This is the line in BSP where the image file time is setup:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-freescale/tree/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc#n289

You may have some configuration on top of the BSP which prevents it to
create the wic image.

Could you, please, test the following line to try to see which
configuration you have on your side?

bitbake -e | grep  IMAGE_FSTYPES

Regards,
Daiane
>
> -Teemu
> --
> ___
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
-- 
___
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale


Re: [meta-freescale] Status of i.MX8 support

2019-01-11 Thread Teemu K
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:25 AM Teemu K  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Interesting since linux-fslc-imx doesn't list mx8 as
> 'compatible_machine', but linux-imx does.
>
> When setting preferred provider for virtual/kernel to linux-fslc-imx I
> got this error:
> "ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'virtual/kernel'
> linux-imx PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped:
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel set to linux-fslc-imx, not
> linux-imx"

I updated to latest version of thud-branch which seems to be same as
master. I saw that lots of new patches has been applied there
including one that said to fix the u-boot/image creation issue.

Yet today when I did fresh built no u-boot nor image was created. I
was able to manually compile u-boot, but I'm not sure which command to
use for manually forcing the wic - image creation.

-Teemu
-- 
___
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale