Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk v3 1/3] dpdk_18.05: Make the LICENSE more accurate
Thanks, I have merged these and created warrior as well. Thanks, Anuj On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 18:27 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > Adjust the LICENSE according to the license files. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao > --- > v3: A new patch. > > recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb b/recipes- > extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb > index f914214b6e7e..108d6838aa6b 100644 > --- a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb > +++ b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ include dpdk.inc > > SRCREV = "a5dce6286cc56655320d975c67b0dbe08693" > > -LICENSE = "BSD & LGPLv2 & GPLv2" > +LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & LGPLv2.1 & GPLv2" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://license/gpl- > 2.0.txt;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263 \ > file://license/lgpl- > 2.1.txt;md5=4b54a1fd55a448865a0b32d41598759d \ > file://license/bsd-3- > clause.txt;md5=0f00d99239d922ffd13cabef83b33444" -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] (no subject)
Hi Richard On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 13:57 +0800, Richard Liu wrote: > Q1: why I must set the MACHINE to“intel-corei7-64”? my cpu is atom > E3845 Soc， not i7, if i set it to intel-core i7, dose the kernel can > do best performance? I just want to build a kernel for atom（not for > i7）. In my opinion, generic kernel is not as good as customization > kernel. intel-corei7-64 is a MACHINE name used by meta-intel and doesn't mean that it is specific to i7. You can use this machine value for Atom. > > Q2: What is the latest version of the kernel supported for Atom > E3845, can you give me the refer link? in the former refer link, the > kernel version is 4.14.18, can i modify it to 5.0? I'd request that you try out the latest 4.14 on warrior (or 4.19) instead of 4.14.18 from rocko and report back if you see issues. linux-intel doesn't have a 5.0 recipe since it's only based on LTS kernels. You can switch to using 5.0 linux-yocto kernel though when using warrior branch: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-yocto" > > Q3: I found that the kernel code was retrieved from > https://github.com/intel/linux-intel-lts.git, is there any > difference bettween intel kernel (geted from github.com/intel/linux- > intel-lts.git) and official kernel(download from www.kernel.org)? linux-intel carries Intel specific patches and backports that aren't part of stable/mainline kernel. > > Q4: what is the difference between these branch ? ( > root@BUILD-Server:/home/work/yocto/yocto_build/tmp/work-shared/intel- > corei7-64/kernel-source# git branch -a) > 4.14/base > 4.14/base-yocto There is no difference. If you compare the branches, they should be same. Thanks, Anuj -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] [meta-dpdk v3 1/3] dpdk_18.05: Make the LICENSE more accurate
Adjust the LICENSE according to the license files. Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao --- v3: A new patch. recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb index f914214b6e7e..108d6838aa6b 100644 --- a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb +++ b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ include dpdk.inc SRCREV = "a5dce6286cc56655320d975c67b0dbe08693" -LICENSE = "BSD & LGPLv2 & GPLv2" +LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & LGPLv2.1 & GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://license/gpl-2.0.txt;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263 \ file://license/lgpl-2.1.txt;md5=4b54a1fd55a448865a0b32d41598759d \ file://license/bsd-3-clause.txt;md5=0f00d99239d922ffd13cabef83b33444" -- 2.14.4 -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] [meta-dpdk v3 2/3] Move two patches to the version specific bb
These two patches can't be applied to the new version DPDK, so move
them to the version specific bb.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
v3: No change.
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk.inc| 2 --
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_17.11.3.bb | 6 +-
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb | 2 ++
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk.inc b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk.inc
index 92042bb74d5d..a0e081a3a8fe 100644
--- a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk.inc
+++ b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk.inc
@@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
SRC_URI = "git://dpdk.org/dpdk${STABLE};branch=${BRANCH} \
file://dpdk-16.04-add-RTE_KERNELDIR_OUT-to-split-kernel-bu.patch \
file://dpdk-16.07-add-sysroot-option-within-app-makefile.patch \
- file://dpdk-16.07-dpdk-fix-for-parellel-make-issue.patch \
- file://dpdk-17.02-dpdk-fix-installation-warning-and-issue.patch \
"
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "null"
diff --git a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_17.11.3.bb
b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_17.11.3.bb
index b4b002332be7..7fc89d2d7cc8 100644
--- a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_17.11.3.bb
+++ b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_17.11.3.bb
@@ -8,4 +8,8 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2 & GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.GPL;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe\
file://LICENSE.LGPL;md5=4fbd65380cdd255951079008b364516c"
-SRC_URI += "file://dpdk-17.11-Fix-strncpy-error-for-GCC8.patch"
+SRC_URI += "\
+file://dpdk-16.07-dpdk-fix-for-parellel-make-issue.patch \
+file://dpdk-17.02-dpdk-fix-installation-warning-and-issue.patch \
+file://dpdk-17.11-Fix-strncpy-error-for-GCC8.patch \
+"
diff --git a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb
b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb
index 108d6838aa6b..b6897a82c873 100644
--- a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb
+++ b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://license/gpl-2.0.txt;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4
file://license/bsd-3-clause.txt;md5=0f00d99239d922ffd13cabef83b33444"
SRC_URI += "\
+file://dpdk-16.07-dpdk-fix-for-parellel-make-issue.patch \
+file://dpdk-17.02-dpdk-fix-installation-warning-and-issue.patch \
file://dpdk-16.04-dpdk-enable-ip_fragmentation-in-common_base-config.patch \
file://0001-examples-Fix-maybe-uninitialized-warning.patch \
"
--
2.14.4
--
___
meta-intel mailing list
meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] [meta-dpdk v3 3/3] Introduce the v18.11.1 bb
This is the latest LTS version.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
v3: Drop the two unneeded patches and adjust the LICENSE.
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.11.1.bb | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.11.1.bb
diff --git a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.11.1.bb
b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.11.1.bb
new file mode 100644
index ..2d0434651bc4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.11.1.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+include dpdk.inc
+
+STABLE = "-stable"
+BRANCH = "18.11"
+SRCREV = "16ece46735c9b70b7033ca7ae095930e9038d9fd"
+
+LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & LGPLv2.1 & GPLv2"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://license/gpl-2.0.txt;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263 \
+
file://license/lgpl-2.1.txt;md5=4b54a1fd55a448865a0b32d41598759d \
+
file://license/bsd-3-clause.txt;md5=0f00d99239d922ffd13cabef83b33444"
+
+do_install_append () {
+# Remove the unneeded dir
+rm -rf ${D}/${INSTALL_PATH}/${RTE_TARGET}/app
+}
--
2.14.4
--
___
meta-intel mailing list
meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk v2 2/2] Introduce the v18.11.1 bb
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:48:52AM +, Mittal, Anuj wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 14:54 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > > If not, we should probably just remove it in do_install_append and
> > not
> > > carry this patch.
> >
> > Do you mean something like this in the dpdk_18.11.1.bb:
> > do_install_append () {
> > # Remove the unneeded dir
> > dir=${D}/${INSTALL_PATH}/${RTE_TARGET}/app
> > test -d $dir && rm -rf $dir
> > }
>
> Yes but I don't think you need to check if the dir is present when
> using -f with rm.
OK, I will remove the test.
Thanks,
Kevin
>
> Thanks,
> Anuj
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
meta-intel mailing list
meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] minimal image disk size for old ATOM SOM
Hi, I haven't tried to deploy or to compile it yet. I first wandered if building the minimal core image (without any customization) will give result of image < 1GB. Anyway, I guess it is something that I will know only after making the build. I hope it will be < 1GB... Thanks, ranran On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 4:53 AM Mittal, Anuj wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 11:50 +0300, Ranran wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We use older ATM (ATOM N450, advantech SOM-7562), with very limited > > disk size of 1G (we now check if we can increase it to 16G). > > > > Is meta-intel can be used for ATOM N450 ? > > What's the estimated size of the minimal core image ? Is it below 1GB > > ? > > The image size would depend on what is included in the image. You can > and should customize it according to your use case. Have you tried to > build and boot the image? Do you see any problems? -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
