Re: Arrays and Matrix Algebra
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:17:49 -0500 Subject: Re: metacard digest, Vol 1 #133 - 9 msgs From: Gregory Lypny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the response. But, actually, my question was whether MC treats numerically-indexed arrays in the usual row-column sense that's used for matrix math. As for the question of buying MC or Revolution, there is nothing about Revolution (as appealing as the face lift is) that can justify a switch from MC for me. Greg I don't understand very well what you mean, btw try this: --- #matrix4 #button go global matrix,m,n,out on mouseUp put 3 into m put 4 into n put 1 into x repeat with i=1 to m repeat with j=1 to n put x into matrix[i,j] put x+1 into x end repeat end repeat put empty into out repeat with i=1 to m repeat with j=1 to n put matrix[i,j] after out end repeat put return after out end repeat put return after out put out end mouseUp --- is this what you want? as for MetaCard or Revolution, it is a matter of price: maybe upgrading from old MC to Rev is cheaper tha from old MC to 2.4.1? who knows? bye crob ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Re: Arrays and Matrix Algebra
Just wanted to confirm the correct way to set up arrays to be able to do matrix math. If I have an array named X, does MetaCard treat x[3,4] as the fourth element in the third row of X and x[8,2] as the second element in the eigth row? Regards, Greg Greg, I don't really follow this list much anymore (or use Metacard much either), but you might find my library of scripts useful...I remember writing some for matrix math, etc. You can find it at: http://www.phbeads.com/pub/metacard/ HTH, Dave ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Re: Arrays and Matrix Algebra
I guess we'll have to experiment with some actual calculations. Any word on this, Scott? Greg On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 12:03 PM, metacard- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 2 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 23:39:39 +0100 Subject: Re: Arrays and Matrix Algebra From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dr. Wolfgang Rost) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] am 14.03.2002 17:51 Uhr schrieb Gregory Lypny unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Everyone, Just wanted to confirm the correct way to set up arrays to be able to do matrix math. If I have an array named X, does MetaCard treat x[3,4] as the fourth element in the third row of X and x[8,2] as the second element in the eigth row? Regards, Greg Gregory Lypny Associate Professor Concordia University They had the best selection, The were poisoned by protection, There was nothing that they needed, They had nothing left to find. - Neil Young E-mail forum: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit Pareto at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca Visit Borsa at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca/Borsa_Classroom Crash site for notes and quizzes at http://homepage.mac.com/gregorylypny/FileSharing1.html ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard Hi Greg, I think so, but the worse (sorry, my English is very poor, I'm a German, or so?) is, that, how Scott me just mailed, you can't adress row's and column's in array's. So I think, a 2-dimensional array brings no advantage and must just be handled like a 1-dimensional one. Is it right? Regards Wolfgang Dr. Wolfgang Rost, Psychologist and Software-Developer, Germany ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Arrays and Matrix Algebra
Hi Everyone, Just wanted to confirm the correct way to set up arrays to be able to do matrix math. If I have an array named X, does MetaCard treat x[3,4] as the fourth element in the third row of X and x[8,2] as the second element in the eigth row? Regards, Greg Gregory Lypny Associate Professor Concordia University They had the best selection, The were poisoned by protection, There was nothing that they needed, They had nothing left to find. - Neil Young E-mail forum: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit Pareto at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca Visit Borsa at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca/Borsa_Classroom Crash site for notes and quizzes at http://homepage.mac.com/gregorylypny/FileSharing1.html ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Re: Arrays and Matrix Algebra
am 14.03.2002 17:51 Uhr schrieb Gregory Lypny unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Everyone, Just wanted to confirm the correct way to set up arrays to be able to do matrix math. If I have an array named X, does MetaCard treat x[3,4] as the fourth element in the third row of X and x[8,2] as the second element in the eigth row? Regards, Greg Gregory Lypny Associate Professor Concordia University They had the best selection, The were poisoned by protection, There was nothing that they needed, They had nothing left to find. - Neil Young E-mail forum: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit Pareto at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca Visit Borsa at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca/Borsa_Classroom Crash site for notes and quizzes at http://homepage.mac.com/gregorylypny/FileSharing1.html ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard Hi Greg, I think so, but the worse (sorry, my English is very poor, I'm a German, or so?) is, that, how Scott me just mailed, you can't adress row's and column's in array's. So I think, a 2-dimensional array brings no advantage and must just be handled like a 1-dimensional one. Is it right? Regards Wolfgang Dr. Wolfgang Rost, Psychologist and Software-Developer, Germany ___ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
