Re: Break from the past?

2005-01-29 Thread Klaus Major
Hi friends,
So in short, the question is:  Are we comfortable with the final 
release of MC IDE v2.6
being compatible only with engine v2.6 and later?
yes!
I may have been the only one who was pushing for continued backward 
compatibility, and I'm over it now. :)
I'm sure you feel better now! ;-)
--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
Regards
Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Break from the past?

2005-01-29 Thread Alejandro Tejada
on Fri, 28 Jan 2005 
Richard Gaskin wrote:

 Are we comfortable
 with the final release 
 of MC IDE v2.6 being compatible only with engine
 v2.6 and later?

Scott Rossi respond:

 I vote yes and suggest perhaps leaving a
 non-enhanced version of the IDE
 (including the older libURL) available for use with
 older version of the
 engine.

I vote for this option too.

Most Developers like to have access to
many options while working in their code.

Keep up(loaded) your good work! :-)

al

=
Visit my site:
http://www.geocities.com/capellan2000/




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Break from the past?

2005-01-29 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
Yes.
On 29-Jan-05, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So in short, the question is:  Are we comfortable with the final 
release
of MC IDE v2.6 being compatible only with engine v2.6 and later?

--
John R. Vokey, PhD
Professor
B.E.R.G. - Behaviour and Evolution Research Group
Micro-Cognition Laboratory
Department of Psychology  Neuroscience
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4
CANADA
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Break from the past?

2005-01-29 Thread FlexibleLearning





Richard:
So in short, the question is: Are we comfortable with the final 
release of MC IDE v2.6 being compatible only with engine v2.6 and 
later?Jacqueline:
It would be okay with me. I keep the old IDEs for each version 
anyway.

I concur with Jacqueline.

/H
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Break from the past?

2005-01-28 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:

 So in short, the question is:  Are we comfortable with the final release
 of MC IDE v2.6 being compatible only with engine v2.6 and later?

I vote yes and suggest perhaps leaving a non-enhanced version of the IDE
(including the older libURL) available for use with older version of the
engine.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Development  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Break from the past?

2005-01-28 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 1/28/05 1:49 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
So in short, the question is:  Are we comfortable with the final release 
of MC IDE v2.6 being compatible only with engine v2.6 and later?
It would be okay with me. I keep the old IDEs for each version anyway.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard