[meteorite-list] Carbon Nanotubes Go Magnetic
http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/3/4 Carbon nanotubes go magnetic Belle Dume PhysicsWeb 8 March 2004 Physicists have shown that carbon nanotubes can become magnetized when they are placed in contact with a magnetic material. Michael Coey of Trinity College in Dublin and colleagues believe the mechanism relies on the transfer of spin - carried by electrons - from the magnetic substrate to the nanotube (O Céspedes et al. 2004 J. Phys.: CM 16 L155). It is widely believed that graphite and other forms of carbon can have ferromagnetic properties, but the effects are so weak that physicists are not sure if the magnetism is due to tiny amounts of iron-rich impurities, or if it is an intrinsic property of the carbon. In 2002 Coey's group measured the magnetic properties of a meteorite sample and found that only two-thirds of the magnetization could be accounted for by magnetic minerals present in the sample. The rest, they argued, must come from the carbon. In particular, they proposed that ferromagnetic nanocrystals in the sample induced a magnetic moment in the carbon via proximity effects. Subsequent theoretical work by Mauro Ferreira and Stefano Sanvito showed that a measurable magnetic moment could be produced in carbon nanostructures if they were placed close to a ferromagnetic surface. Now, the team has confirmed these predictions in experiments with multi-walled carbon nanotubes that have been shown to be free from magnetic impurities. Coey says that the main challenge in his experiment was to measure the tiny magnetic moment of the nanotubes over the large background magnetic moment coming from the magnetic material. To overcome this, the team placed the nanotubes onto ferromagnetic substrates that had been uniformly magnetized in one direction. This ensured that no stray fields were produced by the substrate. However, the nanotubes did produce a sizeable stray field when placed on the surface, and the Dublin team was able to measure this with a magnetic force microscope. Moreover, nanotubes placed on non-magnetic substrates, such as silicon or gold, showed no magnetization. The group calculated the average room temperature magnetization in the nanotubes to be 0.1 Bohr magnetons per carbon atom. By comparison, the figure for iron is 2.2. This work opens new avenues for magneto-electronics, Coey told PhysicsWeb. For instance, one can foresee devices where the magnetic and electrical contacts are separated. The magnetic contact could be used to magnetically polarize the nanotubes - and to manipulate the spins - while the non-magnetic contacts are used as current/voltage electrodes. __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
AW: [meteorite-list] eBay ad - Ensisheim fragment - delete if necessary!
Dear Dave, Please notice, that Ensisheim is not the "oldest witnessed and recorded fall with material still existant" as you state onyou eBay sales page. It has been replaced by Nogata whichfell in 861 A.D.(see information from MetBase below). However, this does not reduce the value of Ensisheim as material of Nogata isn't available on the market. Joern ___ Joern Koblitz MetBase Editor The MetBase Library of Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences Benquestrasse 27 D-28209 Bremen, Germany phone: +49 421 24 100 24 fax: +49 421 24 100 99 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NOGATA, JAPAN, L6 CHONDRITE After detonations and a brilliant flash at night, a stone fell which was recovered from a hole in the ground the following morning. The stone of 472g in weight has been kept in a Shinto shrine since its fall. Petrography, mineralogy, and chemical composition, M.Shima et al., Meteoritics, 1980, 15, p.365 (abs.). Description, analysis, olivine Fa25.1, 19.45% total Fe, M.Shima et al., Meteoritics, 1983, 18, p.87. The date of fall is May 19, 861, the oldest known meteorite of which material is preserved, M.Shima and S.Murayama, Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus., Tokyo, 1992, Ser. E, Vol. 15, p.27. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Dave Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Samstag, 6. März 2004 18:57An: metlistBetreff: [meteorite-list] eBay ad - Ensisheim fragment - delete if necessary! Hi I have a part slice of Ensisheim on eBay for sale. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=3239item=2230148857 thanks dave IMCA #0092 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here IMSTP.gif
[meteorite-list] What happened to the M-List server?
Not Found The requested URL /pipermail/meteorite-list/2004-March/date.html was not found on this server. Hey ART!!! What happened to the List??! Bob V. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Norton Book burning / giveaway!
Hello list, I always thought the world of O. Richard Norton, I just thought he was the greatest meteorite guy around. I have both of his books and thought I was learning a lot from them. Well I was informed by an (unnamed) prominent list member that the books are incorrect so I have no further use for them, so I am giving them away! You see, I was discussing science with this member and I said; I do not understand scientists and their way of thinking, (I am no scientist) and I do not know if they would do something out of laziness, just like I don't know why they needed 900 lbs of the Old Woman meteorite for study... And I was told by this list member; They didn't need 900 lbs of the Old Woman for study...why don't you get that story straight too. It appears you are the lazy one - get on the internet and do some of your own research...you don't have to be a scientist to do that! Well Richard Norton said on page 254 in Rocks from Space Smithsonian researchers removed a piece of the meteorite (about 15% of it's bulk) for study (15% of 3 tons = 900 pounds). Richard Norton even has a picture on that page of the 900 pound end piece right after the Smithsonian cut it! So in conclusion, Richard Norton must have been lazy and did not do any research before writing these books! My suggestion, A big Norton book burning, the books are wrong and if you quote them, you will get nasty emails too! Actually, I still think the world of Richard Norton, I just wish the list member who said this to me would get his facts strait before sending nasty emails! And I will keep my books after all! : ) Thanks, Tom peregrineflier IMCA #6168 __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Amgala material Arrives from the Hupe's
Hi List , I have just received my Amgala individual from the Hupe's . Very nice material feels like velvet in the hand . Thanks for bringing this one home guys. Best Regards to All , Steven Drummond "The Unknown Collector" :-)
[meteorite-list] speaking of nwa 1955...
dho 008 is being sold by the guys from CometShop as an L3.2 however i have seen refrences to it as an H/L3-4 does anyone have any additional insight into the classification of this stone? TIA stan _ Frustrated with dial-up? Lightning-fast Internet access for as low as $29.95/month. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/ __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Norton Book burning / giveaway!
Hi Tom and all, You had me going until I got to the bottom of your email. I don't know what un-informed person told you that bit of information but it is obvious they need to do a bit of research if they are capable of understanding it. Richard Norton is certainly one of the best informed people around and his books are really excellent. One of the books I recommend most often to people wanting to know more about meteorites. He covers so much ground so very well for meteorite affectionados. I seriously doubt that any book published has perfect information in it. This is for three reasons. First things change or are learned that changes the facts in books from the time they are written. Second even if research is done very well (think of all the odds and ends you would have to chase down in a book that size) there can always be misunderstood or misrepresented information. Third when you send a book out to be printed, there can be typos beyond the authors control. Why we have additional printings for correcting some items. Even printing a 24 page catalog like I have done in the past had more mistakes than I liked. I could certainly take my lessons from Richard and get it done better. It's great to have books still in print by the author. Best! --AL __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Bernd commentary on NWA 1955
There is also Tieschitz which has been classified as an H/L3.6. Fell july 15,1878. That is somewhat between a 3 and a 4. Howard Wu"stan ." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: uniqueNWA 1955 which is the only type H/L 3-4.With regards to the excusivity of nwa 1955 as an H/L 3-4 does anyone have any more information about Dho008? the Cometshop guys have been selling it as an L3.2, however I have seen refrence to it as an H/L. Any further insight would be apreciated...Stan_Frustrated with dial-up? Lightning-fast Internet access for as low as $29.95/month. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/__Meteorite-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now
[meteorite-list] OT- Our position regarding the IMCA
Dear List members, We recognize that the List and IMCA are two different entities. Since they cross over sometimes we thought we would state our position regarding the IMCA. If you are not interested please just delete this message and no harm will have been done. It was mentioned that my brother, Greg and I do not belong to the IMCA. We have been members since its inception and fully endorse the efforts of this group. We do not post often because the group is managing itself pretty well. In our opinion, the IMCA is evolving into a highly respected entity by going to non-profit corporation status. It seems like the natural thing to do since the IMCA is more and more becoming a recognized authority on such important subjects such as authenticity. Although the group has limitations regarding ebay issues, Ken is doing a professional job contacting sellers who are marketing questionable items. I am sure this has reduced the number of frauds being committed by accident or otherwise and for this we should all be thankful. It takes a lot of effort to contact these vendors and for this the IMCA should be applauded. Almost everybody including ourselves has been scammed at one time or another and it leaves a bad taste that lasts a long time. If some buyers can be spared this I do not see a problem in trying to prevent it. As far as law suites go, we would be willing to pay for lab time and a professional scientist's report on questionable material if legal action was brought to bear against the IMCA. We hope to see IMCA become the benchmark on authenticity that only a coherent group as a whole can produce. The IMCA can only reach this goal as a collective group, more powerful than any single individual. We fully endorse the IMCA, Adam and Greg Hupe The Hupe Collection IMCA 2185 __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] CV3 SALE
This is the CV3 that was floating around Tucson in the $8 to $15 a gram range. Edwin thompson was the cheapest dealer in Tucson at $5 a gram. This is a killer looking meteorite. Meteorites dont come much nicer looking that this. You want this in your collection. Take a 10% discount from my listed prices: http://www.meteoriteshop.com/cv3salepage.htm I am still revovering from two months of travelling and am nursing some serious South American sunburns right now but I should get ebay auctions up and running again in the next couple days and should get smaller pieces of the CV3 on ebay for $5 a gram by this weekend anyway Sincerely DEAN BESSEY www.meteoriteshop.com http://www.meteoriteshop.com/cv3salepage.htm __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] NASA Rovers Watching Solar Eclipses By Mars Moons
Donald Savage Headquarters, Washington March 8, 2004 (Phone: 202/358-1547) Guy Webster Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. (Phone: 818/354-5011) RELEASE: 04-085 NASA ROVERS WATCHING SOLAR ECLIPSES BY MARS MOONS NASA's Mars Exploration Rovers have become eclipse watchers. Though the Viking Landers in the 1970s observed the shadow of one Mars' two moons, Phobos, moving across the landscape, and Mars Pathfinder in 1997 observed Phobos emerge at night from the shadow of Mars, no previous mission has ever directly observed a moon pass in front of the sun from the surface of another world. The current rovers began their eclipse-watching campaign this month. Opportunity's panoramic camera caught Mars' smaller moon, Deimos, as a speck crossing the disc of the sun on March 4. The same camera then captured an image of the larger moon, Phobos, grazing the edge of the sun's disc on March 7. Rover controllers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, Calif., are planning to use the panoramic cameras on both Opportunity and Spirit for several similar events in the next six weeks. Dr. Jim Bell of Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., lead scientist for those cameras, expects the most dramatic images may be the one of Phobos planned for March 10. Scientifically, we're interested in timing these events to possibly allow refinement of the orbits and orbital evolution of these natural satellites, Bell said. It's also exciting, historic and just plain cool to be able to observe eclipses on another planet at all, he said. Depending on the orientation of Phobos as it passes between the sun and the rovers, the images might also add new information about the elongated shape of that moon. Phobos is about 27 kilometers long by about 18 kilometers across its smallest dimension (17 miles by 11 miles). Deimos' dimensions are about half as much, but the pair's difference in size as they appear from Mars' surface is even greater, because Phobos flies in a much lower orbit. The rovers' panoramic cameras observe the sun nearly every martian day as a way to gain information about how Mars' atmosphere affects the sunlight. The challenge for the eclipse observations is in the timing. Deimos crosses the sun's disc in only about 50 to 60 seconds. Phobos moves even more quickly, crossing the sun in only 20 to 30 seconds. Scientists use the term transit for an eclipse in which the intervening body covers only a fraction of the more-distant body. For example, from Earth, the planet Venus will be seen to transit the sun on June 8, for the first time since 1882. Transits of the sun by Mercury and transits of Jupiter by Jupiter's moons are more common observations from Earth. From Earth, our moon and the sun have the appearance of almost identically sized discs in the sky, so the moon almost exactly covers the sun during a total solar eclipse. Because Mars is farther from the sun than Earth is, the sun looks only about two-thirds as wide from Mars as it does from Earth. However, Mars' moons are so small that even Phobos covers only about half of the sun's disc during an eclipse seen from Mars. JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the Mars Exploration Rover project for NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington. Images and additional information about the project are available from JPL at: Images of those two events are available online at: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/200403 08a.html http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov and from Cornell University at: http://athena.cornell.edu -end- __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] NWA 1929 howardite
Good evening list.I just aquired my 9 gram slice of NWA 1929 from the hupes'.It is an absolute beauty.And to get for the price that I got it!You should all get a piece of this beauty.I know the price will go up soon.Thanks again to the brothers hupe' for making this available to us collecters. steve from chicago = Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120 I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728 Illinois Meteorites website url http://stormbringer60120.com http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/illinoismeteorites/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Norton Book burning / giveaway!
Hi, I agree. Norton's The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Meteorites is certainly the best comprehensive meteorite book available. Best equipped with great pictures and despite there might be some details in the chapter about the irons, which are perhaps to be discussed, I warmthly recommend it to all, who don't have it yet. No better book around and you will enjoy it even after many years. Cheers! Martin A. - Original Message - From: almitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:28 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Norton Book burning / giveaway! Hi Tom and all, You had me going until I got to the bottom of your email. I don't know what un-informed person told you that bit of information but it is obvious they need to do a bit of research if they are capable of understanding it. Richard Norton is certainly one of the best informed people around and his books are really excellent. One of the books I recommend most often to people wanting to know more about meteorites. He covers so much ground so very well for meteorite affectionados. I seriously doubt that any book published has perfect information in it. This is for three reasons. First things change or are learned that changes the facts in books from the time they are written. Second even if research is done very well (think of all the odds and ends you would have to chase down in a book that size) there can always be misunderstood or misrepresented information. Third when you send a book out to be printed, there can be typos beyond the authors control. Why we have additional printings for correcting some items. Even printing a 24 page catalog like I have done in the past had more mistakes than I liked. I could certainly take my lessons from Richard and get it done better. It's great to have books still in print by the author. Best! --AL __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Re: Norton Book burning / giveaway!
x-html!x-stuff-for-pete id=0
!doctype html public -//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN
htmlheadstyle type=text/css!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { margin-top: 0 ; margin-bottom: 0 }
--/styletitleRe: Norton Book burning /
giveaway!/title/headbody
divfont color=#00Tom posted:/font/div
divfont color=#00br/font/div
divfont color=#00gt; So in conclusion, Richard Norton must
have been lazy and did not do any research before writing these
books! My suggestion, A big Norton book burning, the books are wrong
and if you quote them, you will get nasty emails too!/font/div
divfont color=#00br/font/div
divfont color=#00Tom, I don't understand your post.
/font/div
divfont color=#00br/font/div
divfont color=#00First you quote some harsh (and almost
certainly false) criticisms about Richard Norton's work, and then go
on to say you don't agree with them, and are going to keep Richard's
books after all. Do you realize that your comments go into the
Meteorite List archives permanently, where anyone can read them? What
is your purpose in posting this material? I doubt it's news to anyone
that there is occasionally an incorrect or apocryphal piece of
information even in the best-researched book, and that
widely-accepted facts can sometimes later be shown to be inaccurate
(look at the debate regarding the authenticity of the quot;Nakhla
dogquot; reports)./font/div
divfont color=#00br/font/div
divfont color=#00Richard and Dorothy Norton are among the
most well-liked and respected people in the meteorite field, so why
would you want to post comments like these -- whether you said them
or not? Many collectors became part of the meteorite collecting world
specifically because of the Nortons' book, quot;Rocks from
Space.quot; In addition, Richard's articles are widely and regularly
published; Dorothy and Richard are both Harvey Award winners; and
many List members (including myself) regard them as
friends./font/div
divfont color=#00br/font/div
divfont color=#00I don't understand why you would send a
post to the M-List with quot;Norton book burningquot; in the title.
Please explain./font/div
divfont color=#00br/font/div
divfont color=#00br/font/div
divfont color=#00Geoff N./font/div
divfont color=#00www.paleozoic.org/font/div
/body
/html
/x-html
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Re: Norton book burning/giveaway [trying again]
Dear Listees: My previous post came through with HTML tags included, for some reason. Sorry about that. Am re-sending. *** Tom posted: So in conclusion, Richard Norton must have been lazy and did not do any research before writing these books! My suggestion, A big Norton book burning, the books are wrong and if you quote them, you will get nasty emails too! Tom, I don't understand your post. First you quote some harsh (and almost certainly false) criticisms about Richard Norton's work, and then go on to say you don't agree with them, and are going to keep Richard's books after all. Do you realize that your comments go into the Meteorite List archives permanently, where anyone can read them? What is your purpose in posting this material? I doubt it's news to anyone that there is occasionally an incorrect or apocryphal piece of information even in the best-researched book, and that widely-accepted facts can sometimes later be shown to be inaccurate (look at the debate regarding the authenticity of the Nakhla dog. Richard and Dorothy Norton are among the most well-liked and respected people in the meteorite field, so why would you want to post comments like these -- whether you said them or not? Many collectors became part of the meteorite collecting world specifically because of the Nortons' book Rocks from Space; In addition, Richard's articles are widely and regularly published; Dorothy and Richard are both Harvey Award winners; and many List members (including myself) regard them as friends. I don't understand why you would send a post to the M-List with Norton book burning in the title. Please explain. Geoff N. www.paleozoic.org __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Amgala Meteorite
I just received my Amgala meteorite from Mike Farmer. These are absolutely awesome specimens. Nice thick black crust and no weathering at all. I urge anyone who hasnt gotten one from Mike, to get one before he runs out! Thanks Mike Bob Evans
Re: [meteorite-list] Amgala Meteorite
Bob/List: I received my large piece from Mike today as well. It is exceptional! I echo Bob's comments, get em' while you can, they are beautiful! Terry B. StarMeteorites
[meteorite-list] Lets burn somone instead of something!
Dear List, Wasn't someone leaving the list after some whiny story? And then they came back, and back again, now they want to crucify one of the most amazing persons in the meteorite world. I say sets burn someone else like the one who won't stay away. Stupid is as stupid does. Dave F. (who is keeping his Rocks From Space books as they area signed and highly cherished treasures!) __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
RE: [meteorite-list] Re: Norton book burning/giveaway
Geoff: You don't understand the original post? I guess you haven't been paying attention to previous postings by this individual. It is just another lame attempt to be cute. EG: "Look at me! I'm still here!" Don't you remember the thread about the value of him being hit by a meteorite? I know the valueless wasted bandwidth.Randy From: Notkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [meteorite-list] Re: Norton book burning/giveaway [trying again] Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:55:54 -0700 Dear Listees: My previous post came through with HTML tags included, for some reason. Sorry about that. Am re-sending. *** Tom posted: "So in conclusion, Richard Norton must have been lazy and did not do any research before writing these books! My suggestion, A big Norton book burning, the books are wrong and if you quote them, you will get nasty emails too!" Tom, I don't understand your post. First you quote some harsh (and almost certainly false) criticisms about Richard Norton's work, and then go on to say you don't agree with them, and are going to keep Richard's books after all. Do you realize that your comments go into the Meteorite List archives permanently, where anyone can read them? What is your purpose in posting this material? I doubt it's news to anyone that there is occasionally an incorrect or apocryphal piece of information even in the best-researched book, and that widely-accepted facts can sometimes later be shown to be inaccurate (look at the debate regarding the authenticity of the "Nakhla dog." Richard and Dorothy Norton are among the most well-liked and respected people in the meteorite field, so why would you want to post comments like these -- whether you said them or not? Many collectors became part of the meteorite collecting world specifically because of the Nortons' book "Rocks from Space"; In addition, Richard's articles are widely and regularly published; Dorothy and Richard are both Harvey Award winners; and many List members (including myself) regard them as friends. I don't understand why you would send a post to the M-List with "Norton book burning" in the title. Please explain. Geoff N. www.paleozoic.org __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Get business advice and resources to improve your work life, from bCentral. __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Lets burn somone instead of something!
Hello List, Dave wrote; Dear List, Wasn't someone leaving the list after some whiny story? And then they came back, and back again, now they want to crucify one of the most amazing persons in the meteorite world. I say sets burn someone else like the one who won't stay away. Stupid is as stupid does. Dave F. (who is keeping his Rocks From Space books as they area signed and highly cherished treasures!) Dave, I in no way crucified the Norton's, read the post again, it was sarcasm!!! I am sorry I have not left the list, something came up that enabled me to stay online!!! I hope things go down hill for me from here on out so you don't have to misunderstand anything I post! Thanks, Tom peregrineflier IMCA #6168 - Original Message - From: David Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 6:41 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Lets burn somone instead of something! Dear List, Wasn't someone leaving the list after some whiny story? And then they came back, and back again, now they want to crucify one of the most amazing persons in the meteorite world. I say sets burn someone else like the one who won't stay away. Stupid is as stupid does. Dave F. (who is keeping his Rocks From Space books as they area signed and highly cherished treasures!) __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Another Bernd commentary: NWA 3099 (L/LL3)
G'day all, For those of you who purchased NWA 3099 or are just interested, I spoke with Bernd over the past couple of weeks regarding this particularlyremarkable meteorite. Bernd had some interesting things to say it which are posted at the end of the page here: http://www.meteoritesaustralia.com/features/nwa3099.html Cheers, Jeff KuykenI.M.C.A. #3085www.meteorites.com.au
