Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread Darren Garrison
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:04:05 -0700, you wrote:

My question still has not seemed to be answered.  My concern is about 
someone who bids over and over with no apparent competition.  They single 
handedly raise the price from $10.00 to $30.00 to $60.00 to $80.00, etc.

It is not possible for someone-- with nobody else bidding against him-- to in
any way change the price from the opening price (in a non-reserve auction).
Let's say there is an item with a starting bid of 99 cents.  Only one person
bids on it.  He could modify his bid 1500 times and the auction price isn't
going to go above 99 cents if nobody is bidding against him.  And, even after
the close of the auction, you'll never see what his maximum bid price was, only
what the auction closed at.  What you are describing doesn't happen.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread GREG LINDH

   Hi Darren,

I appreciate the link that you gave me which explains the bidding system 
on EBAY.  I'll have to go back and check out EBAY more carefully.  Perhaps I 
thought this has occurred and maybe I was wrong.  I'll go and take a better 
look at it.
Thanks for not shooting me and for giving a kind and thoughtful reply.

Regards,
  Greg Lindh



- Original Message - 
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:04:05 -0700, you wrote:

 My question still has not seemed to be answered.  My concern is about
 someone who bids over and over with no apparent competition.  They single
 handedly raise the price from $10.00 to $30.00 to $60.00 to $80.00, 
 etc.

 It is not possible for someone-- with nobody else bidding against him-- to 
 in
 any way change the price from the opening price (in a non-reserve 
 auction).
 Let's say there is an item with a starting bid of 99 cents.  Only one 
 person
 bids on it.  He could modify his bid 1500 times and the auction price 
 isn't
 going to go above 99 cents if nobody is bidding against him.  And, even 
 after
 the close of the auction, you'll never see what his maximum bid price was, 
 only
 what the auction closed at.  What you are describing doesn't happen.
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread GREG LINDH

   Hi Norm,

Thanks for your thoughtful reply.  I'm understanding the process better 
because of those who took the time to actually explain EBAY to me.

Regards,
 Greg Lindh



- Original Message - 
From: Norm Lehrman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 Greg,

 You are not understanding the bidding process.
 Suppose you bid $10.  Then I bid $100.  I am am shown
 as having bid $11.  You then bid $12.  I am
 immediately shown as bidding $13.  You then bid $14, I
 am automatically shown as having bid $15.  I have not
 made another bid.  This is all totally automatic until
 we get to my initial maximum ($100).  When you bid
 $101, I will finally have to enter a new bid, for the
 first time, to keep in the race.  Now I bid $150.  I
 am shown as bidding $102. etc, etc.

 Cheers,
 Norm

 --- GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Dave,
 
  I don't think my analysis of the EBAY situation
  is silly at all.  There
  is no reason to artificially up the price of an
  item.  What I do is wait
  until the last 30 seconds or so and then pop in and
  place a bid.  I have
  always won, but unfortunately I pay a higher price
  than necessary because
  someone has bid over and over again *for no apparent
  reason*.  They're not
  scaring anyone away by doing this.  They just make
  the item cost a ton more.
  Again, I ask why?
 
  Greg Lindh
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Dave Freeman mjwy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?
 
 
   Don't be so silly, the person is raising their bid
  so that if you bid, you
   won't out bid them. If you want to win the
  auction, you have to bid higher
   than their bid.
   For fun, start out and bid very low, bid again,
  bid four or five times to
   what is your maximum bid. It will let other
  bidders THINK you are serious
   about winning...ORTHAT
  other bidders may think
   you are fixing your bid
   Dave F.
  
   GREG LINDH wrote:
  
  To all,
  
   I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.
  I have purchased 13
   meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by
  bidding on EBAY.  I've
   noticed that many times someone will bid for an
  item and continually bid
   the
   item up even though nobody is bidding against
  them.  They may start out by
   bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person
  raises the price to
   $30.00,
   then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They
  artificially and unnecessarily
   raise the price so that the item finally sells for
  a *much* higher price
   than it would have gone for if this hadn't been
  done.
   Either the bidder is a moron or he is working
  with the seller to up
   the
   price.
   Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?
  
   Greg Lindh
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
  
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread Daniel Svensson

hello,

I think I might have an explanation:
if there is a secret reserve you can raise your bid several times without 
anyone else bidding
until you reach the limit of the secret reserve. In this case it will look 
like someone is bidding with themselfes.


Why are people bidding before the last 30 seconds? Well this bidding is 
probably often raising the final price, but I see at least some possible 
reasons:

1. The person cannot bid at end of auction for practical reasons
2. They dont want to win, but want to raise the final price (for some 
reason)

3. It is fun!

I hope this can be helpfull.

/Daniel Svensson




   Hi Darren,

I appreciate the link that you gave me which explains the bidding 
system
on EBAY.  I'll have to go back and check out EBAY more carefully.  Perhaps 
I

thought this has occurred and maybe I was wrong.  I'll go and take a better
look at it.
Thanks for not shooting me and for giving a kind and thoughtful 
reply.


Regards,
  Greg Lindh



- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:04:05 -0700, you wrote:

 My question still has not seemed to be answered.  My concern is 
about
 someone who bids over and over with no apparent competition.  They 
single

 handedly raise the price from $10.00 to $30.00 to $60.00 to $80.00,
 etc.

 It is not possible for someone-- with nobody else bidding against him-- 
to

 in
 any way change the price from the opening price (in a non-reserve
 auction).
 Let's say there is an item with a starting bid of 99 cents.  Only one
 person
 bids on it.  He could modify his bid 1500 times and the auction price
 isn't
 going to go above 99 cents if nobody is bidding against him.  And, even
 after
 the close of the auction, you'll never see what his maximum bid price 
was,

 only
 what the auction closed at.  What you are describing doesn't happen.
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread GREG LINDH

   Hi Daniel,

I've gotten a number of reasoned answers (though not from everyone) and 
to those who offered true help, like yourself, I say thanks.

Greg Lindh





- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 hello,

 I think I might have an explanation:
 if there is a secret reserve you can raise your bid several times without
 anyone else bidding
 until you reach the limit of the secret reserve. In this case it will look
 like someone is bidding with themselfes.

 Why are people bidding before the last 30 seconds? Well this bidding is
 probably often raising the final price, but I see at least some possible
 reasons:
 1. The person cannot bid at end of auction for practical reasons
 2. They dont want to win, but want to raise the final price (for some
 reason)
 3. It is fun!

 I hope this can be helpfull.

 /Daniel Svensson


 
 Hi Darren,
 
  I appreciate the link that you gave me which explains the bidding
 system
 on EBAY.  I'll have to go back and check out EBAY more carefully. 
 Perhaps
 I
 thought this has occurred and maybe I was wrong.  I'll go and take a 
 better
 look at it.
  Thanks for not shooting me and for giving a kind and thoughtful
 reply.
 
  Regards,
Greg Lindh
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:05 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?
 
 
   On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:04:05 -0700, you wrote:
  
   My question still has not seemed to be answered.  My concern is
 about
   someone who bids over and over with no apparent competition.  They
 single
   handedly raise the price from $10.00 to $30.00 to $60.00 to $80.00,
   etc.
  
   It is not possible for someone-- with nobody else bidding against 
   him-- 
 to
   in
   any way change the price from the opening price (in a non-reserve
   auction).
   Let's say there is an item with a starting bid of 99 cents.  Only one
   person
   bids on it.  He could modify his bid 1500 times and the auction price
   isn't
   going to go above 99 cents if nobody is bidding against him.  And, 
   even
   after
   the close of the auction, you'll never see what his maximum bid price
 was,
   only
   what the auction closed at.  What you are describing doesn't happen.
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - EBAY Goodies ending tonight

2007-04-12 Thread Jim Strope

Good Morning Meteorite Lovers

I have auctions ending tonight, ebay ID catchafallingstar.com.  ALL started
at 99 Cents!!!

Full recap on ebay at the following link:
http://members.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPageuserid=catchafallingstar.com

Also a recap with photos is on Paul and Jim's website:
http://www.meteorite.com/meteorites/ebay/catch_a_falling_star_meteorites.htm

Thanks for looking 

Jim Strope
421 Fourth Street
Glen Dale, WV  26038

http://www.catchafallingstar.com


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] EBAY not fixed. I just REALLY wanted it!!!

2007-04-12 Thread Rob McCafferty
Greg

I buy, I don't sell. I'm so hopeless when it comes to
mailing stuff that I'd get murdered on the feedback
for taking weeks to get round to posting the stuff.

Anyway, I'm going to explain it simply as there may be
times when you fall victim to me by what you describe.

Normally, I wait until the auction is about to end and
then try to snipe it (outbid everyone else at the last
minute). This usually works for me because I'm usually
prepared to pay more for something I really want than
others. Sometimes it doesn't.

The reason it may not work is because someone
outsnipes me (not a real word but who cares).

Other times its because of what happened to you.

Living in the UK, I cannot often be up at 3am when the
auctions end so if I really REALLY want something,
I'll put in an outrageous bid which I'm pretty sure
nobody will outbid/snipe.

Fortunately, it doesn't declare this full amount as my
bid. It only places the amount to make me highest
bidder.

Whenever someone tries to outbid me, ebay will
increase my bid up to but not beyond the maxmimum I
was prepared to go.

Often, My max bid on something I havetohave may be
2-3times market value of the meteorite I want.
Nobody's going to bid this high and nobody's going to
snipe that high either. So I win. 

Best of all, the following morning when I check
expecting to have delicate parts of my body removed by
my wife for spending so much, I find that the price I
have to pay is much lower than I was prepared to go.
I've taken a couple of real gems this way. 
244mg of NWA3163 spring to mind as my favourite :)

I'm pretty sure Dave F was not trying to be rude. The
problem with written text is context is often hard to
determine unless you're Shakespeare, Hemmingway,
Tolstoy etc...

Good luck with the bidding in future.

Rob McC

--- GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
Hi Daniel,
 
 I've gotten a number of reasoned answers (though
 not from everyone) and 
 to those who offered true help, like yourself, I say
 thanks.
 
 Greg Lindh
 
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Daniel Svensson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?
 
 
  hello,
 
  I think I might have an explanation:
  if there is a secret reserve you can raise your
 bid several times without
  anyone else bidding
  until you reach the limit of the secret reserve.
 In this case it will look
  like someone is bidding with themselfes.
 
  Why are people bidding before the last 30 seconds?
 Well this bidding is
  probably often raising the final price, but I see
 at least some possible
  reasons:
  1. The person cannot bid at end of auction for
 practical reasons
  2. They dont want to win, but want to raise the
 final price (for some
  reason)
  3. It is fun!
 
  I hope this can be helpfull.
 
  /Daniel Svensson
 
 
  
  Hi Darren,
  
   I appreciate the link that you gave me which
 explains the bidding
  system
  on EBAY.  I'll have to go back and check out EBAY
 more carefully. 
  Perhaps
  I
  thought this has occurred and maybe I was wrong. 
 I'll go and take a 
  better
  look at it.
   Thanks for not shooting me and for giving
 a kind and thoughtful
  reply.
  
   Regards,
 Greg Lindh
  
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: meteorite-list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:05 AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding
 fixed?
  
  
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:04:05 -0700, you wrote:
   
My question still has not seemed to be
 answered.  My concern is
  about
someone who bids over and over with no
 apparent competition.  They
  single
handedly raise the price from $10.00 to
 $30.00 to $60.00 to $80.00,
etc.
   
It is not possible for someone-- with nobody
 else bidding against 
him-- 
  to
in
any way change the price from the opening
 price (in a non-reserve
auction).
Let's say there is an item with a starting bid
 of 99 cents.  Only one
person
bids on it.  He could modify his bid 1500
 times and the auction price
isn't
going to go above 99 cents if nobody is
 bidding against him.  And, 
even
after
the close of the auction, you'll never see
 what his maximum bid price
  was,
only
what the auction closed at.  What you are
 describing doesn't happen.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
 __
 

Re: [meteorite-list] Test

2007-04-12 Thread Mike Jensen

Sorry just a test.

--
Mike
--
Mike Jensen
Jensen Meteorites
16730 E Ada PL
Aurora, CO 80017-3137
303-337-4361
IMCA 4264
website: www.jensenmeteorites.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] test

2007-04-12 Thread Tim Heitz


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] NEW Plutonic Angrite - NWA 4590 Tamassint

2007-04-12 Thread Greg Hupe

Dear List Members,

Yesterday I announced my new NomCom Approved Angrite which has a different 
lithology than the other known angrites. It is NWA 4590 Tamassint and is a 
Plutonic Angrite. For those who do not want to go to eBay to look up the 
complete information, here is the approved classification and a link to an 
abstract. This new angrite is gorgeous!!


Link to Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstract on NWA 4590:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/1522.pdf

Here is the NomCom Approved classification submitted to the Meteoritical 
Bulletin:


==

Northwest Africa 4590
Morocco/Algeria

Find: June 2006

Achondrite (angrite)



History: Scattered fragments from a small stone which appears to have 
shattered upon landing recently were found covering an area of ~40 m2 in the 
Morocco-Algeria border zone, 21 km SSW of Tamassint oasis and 18 km S of 
Agoult, Morocco.  Greg Hupé purchased all the recovered material in June 
2006 from a Moroccan dealer in Tagounite. He then traveled to Morocco and 
was shown the location by the original finder, and measured GPS coordinates. 
Physical characteristics: Fragments totaling 212.8 g of a very friable 
specimen composed of coarse yellow-green, black and white grains; very fresh 
with preserved shiny, black fusion crust on some pieces, and minor pale 
orange terrestrial weathering coatings on some broken surfaces.


Petrography: (A. Irving and S. Kuehner, UWS) Coarse grained (mostly 0.6-1.6 
mm, but some olivine grains up to 12 mm) with a plutonic igneous (cumulate) 
texture, and composed of clinopyroxene (33%, with rare pigeonite exsolution 
lamellae), pure anorthite (28%), olivine (14 %, with prominent subparallel 
exsolution lamellae (10-50 microns wide) of kirschsteinite), kirschsteinite 
(5%, with thin exsolution lamellae of olivine), ulvöspinel (18%), and 
accessory glass, troilite merrillite, Ca silicophosphate and metal 
(kamacite).  Some anorthite occurs as subhedral grains partially enclosed 
within large ulvöspinel grains, but most occurs as intercumulus aggregates. 
Clinopyroxene is strongly zoned with paler colored, corroded cores 
surrounded by darker purple-brown mantles and distinct rims.  Thin (5-50 
microns wide) discontinuous, curvilinear zones of glass are present on some 
grain boundaries (notably those between anorthite and ulvöspinel, but also 
around and cutting across troilite grains), and are associated with 
secondary clinopyroxene, kirschsteinite, olivine, anorthite and troilite 
grains; these films of glass+daughter minerals truncate kirschteinite 
exsolution lamellae in adjacent olivine.  This angrite is unlike other known 
specimens, having neither a fine grained quench or ophitic/intesertal 
basaltic texture nor a coarse metamorphic texture (Irving et al., 2006; 
Kuehner et al., 2007).


Geochemistry: Clinopyroxene (Fs20.8-33.3Wo53-54.9, FeO/MnO = 85-278), 
olivine host (Fa72.6-74.7Ln3.5-3.6, FeO/MnO = 70-87), kirschsteinite 
lamellae (Fa44.7-45.4Ln46-47.2, FeO/MnO = 73-82), kirschsteinite host 
(Fa46.6-47.5Ln43.6-45.5, FeO/MnO = 63-68), olivine lamellae 
(Fa75-76.7Ln2.7-2.8, FeO/MnO = 71-74).  Oxygen Isotopes (D. Rumble, CIW): 
analyses of two aliquots of acid-washed mineral fragments by laser 
fluorination gave, respectively, d18O = 3.845, 3.881; d17O = 1.927, 1.967; 
D17O = 0.0956, 0.0745 per mil.


Classification:  Achondrite (angrite).

Specimens: A total of 20.01 g of sample, two polished thin sections and two 
polished mounts are on deposit at UWS, and 4 g at Harper.  Mr. G. M. Hupé 
holds the main mass.




Irving, A. J., Kuehner, S. M., Rumble, D. and Hupé, G. M. (2006) A fresh 
plutonic igneous angrite containing grain boundary glass from Tamassint, 
Northwest Africa.  EOS, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 87, Fall Meet. Suppl., 
Abstract P51E-1245.




Kuehner, S. M. and Irving, A. J. (2007) Grain boundary glasses in the 
Tamassint plutonic angrite: Evidence for rapid decompressive partial melting 
and cooling on Mercury?  Lunar Planet. Sci. XXXVIII, Abstract #1522.


==



Here are some links to photographs of NWA 4590 Tamassint:

Group image of NWA 4590 Tamassint:

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4590/nwa4590group.jpg



Microscopic image of matrix at 12x magnification::

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4590/nwa4590micro.jpg



Close-up image of fusion crust at 10x magnification:

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4590/nwa4590crust.jpg



Optical thin section image in cross-polarized light showing kirschsteinite 
and olivine (blue to green), clinopyroxene (yellow-brown to dark grey), 
intercumulus anorthite (white to pale grey) and ulvöspinel (black). Width of 
field is 2cm:


http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4590/nwa4590xpl.jpg



Thank you for looking and enjoy!



Best regards,
Greg



Greg Hupe
The Hupe Collection
NaturesVault (eBay)
[EMAIL 

[meteorite-list] Fwd: Giving credit where (official) credit is due

2007-04-12 Thread wahlperry

Bob ,

Please stop emailing me. I would appreciate it in the future if you 
would share any of your concerns with Met List and not me. If anyone in 
this hobby is going to ruin it for the rest of us it will be you. With 
the rumored phone calls to the BLM and various Universities snooping 
for information I am sure this hobby will suffer.


Sonny





-
---
See what's free at AOL.com.
Attached Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Giving credit where (official) credit is due
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:56 PM

Hi Sonny,

That's a very good point.

So good, in fact, that when I brought it up with the
NomComm (several years ago) that's when they
instituted having to supply specific data along with a
request for a provisional number.  But if you're still
not comfortable with that, then by all means, don't
get provisional numbers for that locality.

But all of this is moot, because there are bigger
issues, at hand, which require looking at the bigger
picture.  There appears to be some changes in the
works.  I may have to post to the List in order to
address these broader issues.

I don't have any of the details but rumor has it that
somebody who found a bunch of meteorites on public
lands has offended the hardliners at the Smithsonian
by claiming that they all belong to the finder, which
challenges the S.I.s claim of ownership of all finds
on public lands.  As a result, the status quo that we
in California have been trying so hard to preserve is
now out the window.  The S.I. has up'd the ante.  They
have reacted by requesting a separate type specimen be
delivered to the S.I. for any find made on public
lands!

But I don't know how much of this is true, and I don't
want to spread a false rumor.

Bob V.

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



In a message dated 4/11/2007 12:34:22 P.M. Pacific
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But  that's all I'm asking of
Sonny; to get the credit he deserves by securing
it
with provisional names and numbers.

Otherwise, some other person  could make another
find
from his study area unknowingly, and go ahead of
him
with getting that area named and 001 number
approved,
and worse, get  published before Sonny could get
proper
credit.

That's only one of  many good reasons,
Bob V.



Hi Bob,

I appreciate your concern. But lets try this one
more time! The reason  I do
not wish to get a provisional number or name until
all of the of the field
work is complete is for this reason. Because of the
loop hole you figured out
many years ago! Not to say you that would do this.
Example; Lets say a
meteorite hunter has been working an area for a few
years with many finds and
received provisional numbers on all of his finds.
Another is curious about  this
location. All he would have to do is say he found a
couple meteorites from  that
location and request provisional numbers. The
Nomenclature may  reply  Ok
Bob,your provisional numbers will be 35 and 36! Bob
never  hunted this
location, has just found out that  34 meteorites
were recovered  from this location.
What a better resource for gaining information
regarding a new location.

This is a problem we have to address as a meteorite
hunting community. I do
not know the answer. We should come up with an idea
on how to solve this
problem. What the current system in place does is
give confirmation of first
meteorite found and credit to the finder.
Unfortunately it can also be a source
of information to someone digging for data. It is
not the fault of the
Nomenclature but a system that is in place. This is
the reason I choose to wait  on
submitting information.

Sonny



** See what's
free at http://www.aol.com.








AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Hayabusa Update - April 4, 2007

2007-04-12 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.isas.ac.jp/e/snews/2007/0406.shtml

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
Tokyo, Japan

April 4th, 2007

Status of the Hayabusa

As already reported, the spacecraft Hayabusa had been out of communication
due to the leakage of the RCS (Reaction Control System) propellant for 7
weeks since Dec 9th, 2005, until the communication was resumed in Jan, 2006.
The operations carried out since then included the baking of the spacecraft,
slow recharging of the lithium-ion battery, the closure of the capsule lid,
the attitude control and spin management tests with the new attitude control
strategy via Xe cold-gas thrusters taking the advantage of the solar
radiation pressure torque, and the test operations of the ion engines;

A new trouble in an electric heater circuitry at the RCS occurred in Nov,
2006. It was conceived related and due to the RCS propellant leakage
incident in 2005. Since the potential RCS propellant was anticipated frozen,
the baking operation was again performed to vaporize the potentially-frozen
material in order to avoid abrupt vaporization that might cause the attitude
tumbled. Small perturbation disturbance in the spin motion was detected
actually during this baking operation, but it was within an admissible range
and not critical. The project team identified the baking and out-gassing
operation was successfully performed.

Four cells among the 11 lithium-ion battery cells were not functional caused
by the short-circuit phenomenon occurred during the out-of-communication
period in Dec, 2005, while no solar power was available owing to the tumbled
spacecraft motion. The battery power was indispensable for inserting the
sample-catcher into the recovery capsule, and also for the lid-closure
operation that includes the latching and sealing of the lid. The seven
healthy battery cells, thus, had been slowly recharged at a minimum current,
until the recharging operation was successfully completed in Sept, 2006.
Simultaneously in parallel to this operation, the ground simulation tests
using a similarly and artificially-built short-circuited cell to the onboard
battery cells were carried out in order to evaluate the operational safety
associated with the sample-catcher insertion operation. After the safety was
securely confirmed, the sample-catcher was actually transferred into the
recovery capsule, and latched and sealed successfully on Jan 17th to 18th,
2007.

The spacecraft has been undergoing the new attitude control scheme on orbit
since Feb, 2007. The new scheme takes it into account that two of the three
reaction wheels are lost and not available and the chemical thrusters
propellant is completely lost. The attitude control and spin management
maneuver are performed via Xe cold-gas thrusters and the solar radiation
pressure was made good use of to make the ion engines thrust vector aligned
to the intended acceleration direction. Under the new attitude control
scheme, the ion engines have been successfully ignited and operated in the
preparation tests so far done toward the return cruise.

The spacecraft plans to start the actual return cruise in the beginning to
the middle of April, 2007. Though the operation of the Hayabusa is still a
challenge with full of difficulty, the project will make its best effort
taking an aim at returning it to the earth in June, 2010.

* The amount of Xe gas left on the spacecraft is more than 30kg while the
cruise flight requires less than 20kg. Thus Xe gas is adequate for the rest
of flight even taking the attitude control into account.

[NOTE: Images supporting this release are available at
http://www.isas.ac.jp/e/snews/2007/0406.shtml ]

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread valparint
Greg, can you supply an ebay listing number where this has occurred? It 
would help clarify your question.

Ebay introduced a new policy several months ago that does have a very 
negative impact on bidding, IMHO. On auctions that go over $200 bidders 
can no longer see who they are bidding against. Ebay replaces user IDs 
with bidder 1, bidder 2, etc. This makes it next to impossible to 
detect shill bidding. They justify this with a bunch of crap about 
protecting the ebay community.

I found it very useful to know who the competition was for a particular 
item and it was educational to look at the bidders won-auction histories. 
Sometimes researching this led to new sellers of interest. No more.

I wrote several emails to ebay about this and got the standard party-line 
canned-response about how ebay is protecting the community from 
phishing. They didn't bother to respond to my last missile.

When you think about if from ebay's point of view, they are most 
interested in keeping sellers happy and driving up prices because that's 
how they make money. They pay lip service to bidders by promising honest 
auctions and providing a process for dispute resolution but after a 
certain point it becomes a money loser for them. Their resolution process 
is akin to dealing with the IRS.

As a bidder, you have to know what your top number is and bid it. Doesn't 
really matter if you bid it now or bid it later because ebay will adjust 
your bid to go only as high as it needs to.

Paul Swartz



To all,

 I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.  I have purchased 13
 meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by bidding on EBAY.  I've
 noticed that many times someone will bid for an item and continually bid
 the
 item up even though nobody is bidding against them.  They may start out 
 by
 bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person raises the price to
 $30.00,
 then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They artificially and 
 unnecessarily
 raise the price so that the item finally sells for a *much* higher price
 than it would have gone for if this hadn't been done.
 Either the bidder is a moron or he is working with the seller to up
 the
 price.
 Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?

 Greg Lindh

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NEW Plutonic Angrite - NWA 4590 Tamassint

2007-04-12 Thread Rob McCafferty
Greg,

In light of recent comments about new rocks getting
scant discussion, I will make some input on this one. 

I have to spend some time to pore/paw? over the Lunar
and Planetary Science stuff in detail but it it seems
interesting at a glance through. The great diversity
of minerals in this rock and the fact that there are
seemingly angrites of many different types and form
make this new rock a great discovery.

I used to think they were simply melted CVs but the
structure of this seems to throw this into question.
Probably wrong but it's very interesting. Can't wait
until the messenger probe finally does it's stuff and
starts sending back answers on Mercury. How
embarrasing that here we are 46 years to the day since
Gagarin's flight and we still know very little about
one of our nearest neighbours.

I somehow doubt that Mercury is the APB. Even with the
bizaar theories of how mercury formed, these rocks
should match the FeO characteristics we have for
Mercury, surely? They are unlikely to have spent 4
billion years finding their way to earth.

Amazing stuff, non-the-less. I'd love to be wrong. I
can't help think they have an inkling of suspicion
when they even have a name for them. Hermean
meteorites? How interesting. I've never heard the term
used before...but it has a certain ring to it.

Rob McC

--- Greg Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear List Members,
 
 Yesterday I announced my new NomCom Approved Angrite
 which has a different 
 lithology than the other known angrites. It is NWA
 4590 Tamassint and is a 
 Plutonic Angrite. For those who do not want to go to
 eBay to look up the 
 complete information, here is the approved
 classification and a link to an 
 abstract. This new angrite is gorgeous!!
 
 Link to Lunar and Planetary Science Conference
 abstract on NWA 4590:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/1522.pdf
 
 Here is the NomCom Approved classification submitted
 to the Meteoritical 
 Bulletin:
 

==
 
 Northwest Africa 4590
 Morocco/Algeria
 
 Find: June 2006
 
 Achondrite (angrite)
 
 
 
 History: Scattered fragments from a small stone
 which appears to have 
 shattered upon landing recently were found covering
 an area of ~40 m2 in the 
 Morocco-Algeria border zone, 21 km SSW of Tamassint
 oasis and 18 km S of 
 Agoult, Morocco.  Greg Hupé purchased all the
 recovered material in June 
 2006 from a Moroccan dealer in Tagounite. He then
 traveled to Morocco and 
 was shown the location by the original finder, and
 measured GPS coordinates. 
 Physical characteristics: Fragments totaling 212.8 g
 of a very friable 
 specimen composed of coarse yellow-green, black and
 white grains; very fresh 
 with preserved shiny, black fusion crust on some
 pieces, and minor pale 
 orange terrestrial weathering coatings on some
 broken surfaces.
 
 Petrography: (A. Irving and S. Kuehner, UWS) Coarse
 grained (mostly 0.6-1.6 
 mm, but some olivine grains up to 12 mm) with a
 plutonic igneous (cumulate) 
 texture, and composed of clinopyroxene (33%, with
 rare pigeonite exsolution 
 lamellae), pure anorthite (28%), olivine (14 %, with
 prominent subparallel 
 exsolution lamellae (10-50 microns wide) of
 kirschsteinite), kirschsteinite 
 (5%, with thin exsolution lamellae of olivine),
 ulvöspinel (18%), and 
 accessory glass, troilite merrillite, Ca
 silicophosphate and metal 
 (kamacite).  Some anorthite occurs as subhedral
 grains partially enclosed 
 within large ulvöspinel grains, but most occurs as
 intercumulus aggregates. 
 Clinopyroxene is strongly zoned with paler colored,
 corroded cores 
 surrounded by darker purple-brown mantles and
 distinct rims.  Thin (5-50 
 microns wide) discontinuous, curvilinear zones of
 glass are present on some 
 grain boundaries (notably those between anorthite
 and ulvöspinel, but also 
 around and cutting across troilite grains), and are
 associated with 
 secondary clinopyroxene, kirschsteinite, olivine,
 anorthite and troilite 
 grains; these films of glass+daughter minerals
 truncate kirschteinite 
 exsolution lamellae in adjacent olivine.  This
 angrite is unlike other known 
 specimens, having neither a fine grained quench or
 ophitic/intesertal 
 basaltic texture nor a coarse metamorphic texture
 (Irving et al., 2006; 
 Kuehner et al., 2007).
 
 Geochemistry: Clinopyroxene (Fs20.8-33.3Wo53-54.9,
 FeO/MnO = 85-278), 
 olivine host (Fa72.6-74.7Ln3.5-3.6, FeO/MnO =
 70-87), kirschsteinite 
 lamellae (Fa44.7-45.4Ln46-47.2, FeO/MnO = 73-82),
 kirschsteinite host 
 (Fa46.6-47.5Ln43.6-45.5, FeO/MnO = 63-68), olivine
 lamellae 
 (Fa75-76.7Ln2.7-2.8, FeO/MnO = 71-74).  Oxygen
 Isotopes (D. Rumble, CIW): 
 analyses of two aliquots of acid-washed mineral
 fragments by laser 
 fluorination gave, respectively, d18O = 3.845,
 3.881; d17O = 1.927, 1.967; 
 D17O = 0.0956, 0.0745 per mil.
 
 Classification:  Achondrite (angrite).
 
 Specimens: A total of 20.01 g of sample, two
 

Re: [meteorite-list] Fwd: Giving credit where (official) credit is due

2007-04-12 Thread JKGwilliam

To Bob, Sonny and List,
I know I'm going to open a can of worms with this reply, but I'm 
having a hard time keeping quiet.  I know it is List policy to not 
post personal emails and it appears that Sonny has done just 
that.  However, I stand in support of Sonny on this issue and find it 
offensive that Bob V. would insinuate or speculate that someone 
else has irritated or offended the Smithsonian Institute to the 
point that they are clamping down on meteorite hunters.


Bob Verish wrote: (quoted from below)

...I don't have any of the details but rumor has it that

somebody who found a bunch of meteorites on public
lands has offended the hardliners at the Smithsonian
by claiming that they all belong to the finder, which
challenges the S.I.s claim of ownership of all finds
on public lands.  As a result, the status quo that we
in California have been trying so hard to preserve is
now out the window.  The S.I. has up'd the ante.  They
have reacted by requesting a separate type specimen be
delivered to the S.I. for any find made on public
lands!

But I don't know how much of this is true, and I don't
want to spread a false rumor.


If anyone has  offended the hardliners at the SI, I think we need 
to look no farther that Bob Verish's side yard.  Claiming that LA001 
and LA002 were found in an old crate of agates and jaspers ( see 
Meteorite Magazine August 2000) in his side yard is more than likely 
the real cause of any rancor or animosity expressed by the 
SI.  Shorty after Bob's rediscovery of his valuable twins, I had a 
long talk, in person,  with Roy Clark Jr.  He was of the very strong 
opinion that not only did the two Martian meteorites come from public 
lands, but that Bob also knew exactly where they came from.  Now, 
that's just his opinion, and may or may not be mine as well, but I 
can see where that particular incident could possibly be the REAL 
issue that could create problems between meteorite hunters and the SI.


Let's pin the tail on the right donkey.  Let's give credit where credit is due.

In closing, I will say the following.  Any other time I've crossed 
swords with Bob V. he's bombarded me with condescending and 
derogatory emails.  So, to keep the dog at bay, I forewarn Mr. Verish 
that I reserve the right to forward to this Meteorite List any emails 
he sends to me personally.


Regards,

John Gwilliam





At 08:16 AM 4/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Bob ,

Please stop emailing me. I would appreciate it in the future if you 
would share any of your concerns with Met List and not me. If anyone 
in this hobby is going to ruin it for the rest of us it will be you. 
With the rumored phone calls to the BLM and various Universities 
snooping for information I am sure this hobby will suffer.


Sonny





-
---
See what's free at AOL.com.
Attached Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Giving credit where (official) credit is due
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:56 PM

Hi Sonny,

That's a very good point.

So good, in fact, that when I brought it up with the
NomComm (several years ago) that's when they
instituted having to supply specific data along with a
request for a provisional number.  But if you're still
not comfortable with that, then by all means, don't
get provisional numbers for that locality.

But all of this is moot, because there are bigger
issues, at hand, which require looking at the bigger
picture.  There appears to be some changes in the
works.  I may have to post to the List in order to
address these broader issues.

I don't have any of the details but rumor has it that
somebody who found a bunch of meteorites on public
lands has offended the hardliners at the Smithsonian
by claiming that they all belong to the finder, which
challenges the S.I.s claim of ownership of all finds
on public lands.  As a result, the status quo that we
in California have been trying so hard to preserve is
now out the window.  The S.I. has up'd the ante.  They
have reacted by requesting a separate type specimen be
delivered to the S.I. for any find made on public
lands!

But I don't know how much of this is true, and I don't
want to spread a false rumor.

Bob V.

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



In a message dated 4/11/2007 12:34:22 P.M. Pacific
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But  that's all I'm asking of
Sonny; to get the credit he deserves by securing
it
with provisional names and numbers.

Otherwise, some other person  could make another
find
from his study area unknowingly, and go ahead of
him
with getting that area named and 001 number
approved,
and worse, get  published before Sonny could get
proper
credit.

That's only one of  many good reasons,
Bob V.



Hi Bob,

I appreciate your concern. But lets try this one
more time! The reason  I do
not wish to get a provisional number or name until
all of the of the field
work is complete is for this reason. Because of the
loop hole 

[meteorite-list] An apology.

2007-04-12 Thread GREG LINDH

   To the List,

I've been responding to messages from people on the List by sending them 
a reply and then carbon copying my message to the Meteorite List.  I was 
told that this was bad protocol.  I thought that I was doing things 
correctly.  I thought that this was like a forum and everyone kind of shared 
communications.  From now on, I'll make sure I look at who sent me the post 
and I'll only post it on the List if the List was carbon copied when the 
message was sent to me.
Would that be the correct procedure?
Any information here would be appreciated.  I want to do what's right.
Thanks.

Greg Lindh 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] EBAY not fixed. I just REALLY wanted it!!!

2007-04-12 Thread GREG LINDH

   Hi Rob,

Thanks so much for your reply.  Last night I got some very good 
explanations to my question.  Your answer just adds to my understanding.  I 
can now see how one person *seems* to be deliberately bidding up the price 
of an item, when in reality this is not necessarily the case.
Again, thanks for taking the time to explain.

Greg Lindh



- Original Message - 
From: Rob McCafferty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] EBAY not fixed. I just REALLY wanted it!!!


 Greg

 I buy, I don't sell. I'm so hopeless when it comes to
 mailing stuff that I'd get murdered on the feedback
 for taking weeks to get round to posting the stuff.

 Anyway, I'm going to explain it simply as there may be
 times when you fall victim to me by what you describe.

 Normally, I wait until the auction is about to end and
 then try to snipe it (outbid everyone else at the last
 minute). This usually works for me because I'm usually
 prepared to pay more for something I really want than
 others. Sometimes it doesn't.

 The reason it may not work is because someone
 outsnipes me (not a real word but who cares).

 Other times its because of what happened to you.

 Living in the UK, I cannot often be up at 3am when the
 auctions end so if I really REALLY want something,
 I'll put in an outrageous bid which I'm pretty sure
 nobody will outbid/snipe.

 Fortunately, it doesn't declare this full amount as my
 bid. It only places the amount to make me highest
 bidder.

 Whenever someone tries to outbid me, ebay will
 increase my bid up to but not beyond the maxmimum I
 was prepared to go.

 Often, My max bid on something I havetohave may be
 2-3times market value of the meteorite I want.
 Nobody's going to bid this high and nobody's going to
 snipe that high either. So I win.

 Best of all, the following morning when I check
 expecting to have delicate parts of my body removed by
 my wife for spending so much, I find that the price I
 have to pay is much lower than I was prepared to go.
 I've taken a couple of real gems this way.
 244mg of NWA3163 spring to mind as my favourite :)

 I'm pretty sure Dave F was not trying to be rude. The
 problem with written text is context is often hard to
 determine unless you're Shakespeare, Hemmingway,
 Tolstoy etc...

 Good luck with the bidding in future.

 Rob McC

 --- GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Hi Daniel,
 
  I've gotten a number of reasoned answers (though
  not from everyone) and
  to those who offered true help, like yourself, I say
  thanks.
 
  Greg Lindh
 
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Daniel Svensson
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:24 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?
 
 
   hello,
  
   I think I might have an explanation:
   if there is a secret reserve you can raise your
  bid several times without
   anyone else bidding
   until you reach the limit of the secret reserve.
  In this case it will look
   like someone is bidding with themselfes.
  
   Why are people bidding before the last 30 seconds?
  Well this bidding is
   probably often raising the final price, but I see
  at least some possible
   reasons:
   1. The person cannot bid at end of auction for
  practical reasons
   2. They dont want to win, but want to raise the
  final price (for some
   reason)
   3. It is fun!
  
   I hope this can be helpfull.
  
   /Daniel Svensson
  
  
   
   Hi Darren,
   
I appreciate the link that you gave me which
  explains the bidding
   system
   on EBAY.  I'll have to go back and check out EBAY
  more carefully.
   Perhaps
   I
   thought this has occurred and maybe I was wrong.
  I'll go and take a
   better
   look at it.
Thanks for not shooting me and for giving
  a kind and thoughtful
   reply.
   
Regards,
  Greg Lindh
   
   
   
   - Original Message -
   From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: meteorite-list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 12:05 AM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding
  fixed?
   
   
 On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:04:05 -0700, you wrote:

 My question still has not seemed to be
  answered.  My concern is
   about
 someone who bids over and over with no
  apparent competition.  They
   single
 handedly raise the price from $10.00 to
  $30.00 to $60.00 to $80.00,
 etc.

 It is not possible for someone-- with nobody
  else bidding against
 him-- 
   to
 in
 any way change the price from the opening
  price (in a non-reserve
 auction).
 Let's say there is an item with a starting bid
  of 99 cents.  Only one
 person
 bids on it.  He could modify his bid 1500
  times and the auction price
 isn't
 going to go above 99 cents if nobody is
  bidding against him.  

Re: [meteorite-list] NEW Plutonic Angrite - NWA 4590 Tamassint

2007-04-12 Thread David Weir

Hello Rob and List,

I'd like to chime in on this angrite subject, one I find very exciting 
as attested to by my continued purchases of different angrite specimens. 
I have been following the ongoing reasoned discussions by some very 
smart investigators about a possible angrite-Mercury relationship. The 
newest angrite members have certainly opened some new avenues which lend 
some credibility to such a relationship. The decompression event which 
was proposed after studies on NWA 2999 was shortly thereafter explained 
by a different mechanism -- cooling under low pressure and oxidizing 
conditions. However, studies of this new angrite NWA 4590 reveal glass 
along mineral grain boundaries that incorporates re-precipitated primary 
minerals, which is thought to have formed by a rapid melting and cooling 
event consistent with decompression, as in the collisional stripping of 
the lithosphere of a large planet.


One of the biggest hurdles for a Mercury connection was the 
significantly higher FeO content for the angrites versus what is 
observed on the surface of Mercury. The latest hypothesis out of UWS 
suggests the angrite material may represent an ancient, higher-FeO 
lithosphere from Mercury that has long since been removed through 
impact-related dissemination. As you point out, this material would have 
to enter a stable orbit around the Sun until relatively recently. In 
return for accepting this probability, we get a great many APB 
characteristics answered, such as its great age, planetary size, 
chemistry (e.g., the reversal of the Fe/Mn ratios for olivine and 
pyroxene as compared to those measured for other planetary bodies), the 
large exogenous meteoritical component appropriate for Mercury's 
location, and other characteristics. If not Mercury, the solution to 
this group's origin is still an exciting story and I'm keeping up.


David
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - ebay auctions

2007-04-12 Thread Dave Harris

Hi,
some rocks for you to peruse and hopefully buy...

Carichic Meteorite H5, ex Glenn Huss 4.26g, ex AML
http://tinyurl.com/2w4zbh

DaG 192 Meteorite CO3 0.5g - Rare carbonaceous chondr.

http://tinyurl.com/3ddypt

Very Rare - Chiang Khan Meteorite H6 0.09g - crusted!
http://tinyurl.com/32tzjd


and for those interested in Ammonites

http://tinyurl.com/3b2f7e



thanks

 
Dave
IMCA #0092
Sec.BIMS
www.bimsociety.org
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] An apology.

2007-04-12 Thread Art

Hi Greg;

No need to apologize; unless your replies are personal in nature then
you are doing the right thing as the List is meant to be a threaded
discussion.  The main thing to think about before you hit the send
button is whether your reply is really relevant to everyone.  It's
kind of a subjective policy so just use your best judgement.

Here are 2 examples:

email:  What is the best kind of metal detector for meteorite hunting?
reply: The Fischer  because 
- this should be CC'd to the List as the info. could benefit the List members

email:  I saw a show last night about meteorites that was good.
reply: Cool, I saw it too.
- this should not be CC'd to the List as it does not really add value

Regards, Art
Meteorite Mailing List

On 4/12/07, GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  To the List,

   I've been responding to messages from people on the List by sending them
a reply and then carbon copying my message to the Meteorite List.  I was
told that this was bad protocol.  I thought that I was doing things
correctly.  I thought that this was like a forum and everyone kind of shared
communications.  From now on, I'll make sure I look at who sent me the post
and I'll only post it on the List if the List was carbon copied when the
message was sent to me.
   Would that be the correct procedure?
   Any information here would be appreciated.  I want to do what's right.
   Thanks.

   Greg Lindh

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread GREG LINDH

   Hi Paul,

I've gotten a lot of useful information from other members on the List. 
I think I understand EBAY a lot more now.  I still remember seeing bidding 
that is hard for me to explain.  If it happens again, I'll e-mail the item 
number to you and perhaps there will be a good and logical reason for it.
Thanks for your help.

Greg Lindh




- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 Greg, can you supply an ebay listing number where this has occurred? It
 would help clarify your question.

 Ebay introduced a new policy several months ago that does have a very
 negative impact on bidding, IMHO. On auctions that go over $200 bidders
 can no longer see who they are bidding against. Ebay replaces user IDs
 with bidder 1, bidder 2, etc. This makes it next to impossible to
 detect shill bidding. They justify this with a bunch of crap about
 protecting the ebay community.

 I found it very useful to know who the competition was for a particular
 item and it was educational to look at the bidders won-auction histories.
 Sometimes researching this led to new sellers of interest. No more.

 I wrote several emails to ebay about this and got the standard party-line
 canned-response about how ebay is protecting the community from
 phishing. They didn't bother to respond to my last missile.

 When you think about if from ebay's point of view, they are most
 interested in keeping sellers happy and driving up prices because that's
 how they make money. They pay lip service to bidders by promising honest
 auctions and providing a process for dispute resolution but after a
 certain point it becomes a money loser for them. Their resolution process
 is akin to dealing with the IRS.

 As a bidder, you have to know what your top number is and bid it. Doesn't
 really matter if you bid it now or bid it later because ebay will adjust
 your bid to go only as high as it needs to.

 Paul Swartz



 To all,
 
  I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.  I have purchased 13
  meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by bidding on EBAY.  I've
  noticed that many times someone will bid for an item and continually bid
  the
  item up even though nobody is bidding against them.  They may start out
  by
  bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person raises the price to
  $30.00,
  then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They artificially and
  unnecessarily
  raise the price so that the item finally sells for a *much* higher price
  than it would have gone for if this hadn't been done.
  Either the bidder is a moron or he is working with the seller to up
  the
  price.
  Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?
 
  Greg Lindh

 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] No, Thank YOU

2007-04-12 Thread Impactika
In a message dated 4/11/2007 10:31:08 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Hi all,
My son and I just got home  from a Diamondbacks
game(they lost).  I noticed that I've received  50
emails over the last 24 hours from list members
wishing me well. Many  asking me to think about coming
back.

I'm very moved! Thank you  all!

I will definitely take 6-12 months off and who knows
if I can  cure my skin problems maybe I will come back
again. With people like Paul  Harris, Geoff Notkin,
Cindy Sue, Mike Farmer, John Birdsell, John  Gwilliam,
Maria and the other 43 friends that emailed it can't
be all  badright?

For now Ken has asked to post some of my  recent
adventures on the IMCA website. 

Thanks again,

Ruben  Garcia
Phoenix,  Arizona
http://www.mr-meteorite.com
--

No!!  Thank You!
 
For all the meteorites you found.
For all the hunting tales.
And for allowing us to move them to the IMCA site. 
 
Take care of your health.
And best of luck in whatever you decide to do next.

Anne M. Black
www.IMPACTIKA.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
President,  I.M.C.A. Inc.
www.IMCA.cc
 



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Sonic Boom in Florida?

2007-04-12 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070411/NEWS01/70411023/1006/news01

It had thunder of a sonic boom, resident says
BY DON WALKER
FLORIDA TODAY
April 11, 2007

The explosion was heard miles away.

At Pineda Crossing, near the Suntree subdivision, John Panik said he was
having trouble sleeping, got out of bed and turned on the television
just before 3 a.m.

I was sitting there and suddenly there was a loud boom, Panik said.
It shook the windows - not like a big rattle, but a little one. I
thought, 'That's not normal.'

The clock read 3:30 a.m. Panik called the Brevard County Sheriff's
Office, and was told by dispatcher they'd send a deputy out to check out
the area. He also contacted Patrick Air Force Base, and was told they
didn't know anything about it.

I thought it was a sonic boom, he said. That's what I told the
sheriff. Like the shuttle returning, but usually you hear two booms, not
one.

This morning, reports of the explosion were all over the television.

Everybody freaked out. My wife said, 'Oh, you did hear something,'
Panik said.

There have also been calls to FLORIDA TODAY from residents in Satellite
Beach who heard the explosion.

This story is developing. If you heard the explosion and would like to
comment, please contact Walker at 242-3527 or e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Please include name and a phone number.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread Metorman46
Hello Greg;

I think one of the  other list members was close to solving the problem for 
you. RESERVE, I know i  have wanted to seriously bid an item that had a reserve 
price and to get to the  reserve without going over what i could afford i 
would bid in 10.00 increments  until i reached the reserve or quit when i came 
to 
an amount i didn't want to  exceed.


This may be what you are seeing on ebay.

Hope this  helps;Herman Archer IMCA # 2770  




** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] pics of us

2007-04-12 Thread Dave Harris
Hi

What was the URL for the list of us bods on the Metlist?


ta!
 
Dave
IMCA #0092
Sec.BIMS
www.bimsociety.org
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-12 Thread harlan trammell
NO ONE would ever shill bid on ebay, would they? ebay bidding fixed? - surely you jest?
i will be gradually switching over to yahoo mail (it has 100 FREE megs of storage). please cc to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:42:58 EDTHello Greg;I think one of the other list members was close to solving the problem foryou. RESERVE, I know i have wanted to seriously bid an item that had a reserveprice and to get to the reserve without going over what i could afford iwould bid in 10.00 increments until i reached the reserve or quit when i came toan amount i didn't want to exceed.This may be what you are seeing on ebay.Hope this helps;Herman Archer IMCA # 2770** See what's free at 
http://www.aol.com.__Meteorite-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Download Messenger. Join the i’m Initiative. Help make a difference today. 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - NWA 4537 New Aubrite on Ebay

2007-04-12 Thread M come Meteorite Meteorites
I have put the unique piece for sale, the other its ready
for a trade, of this Aubrite NWA 4537. The auction its here

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=016sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3...

other pieces coming in this days on ebay

Matteo

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Ad Meteorite sale Ebay auctions ending soon

2007-04-12 Thread David Kitt Deyarmin

The text at this web pager is very hard to read

http://jensenmeteorites.com/April.htm
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NEW Plutonic Angrite - NWA 4590 Tamassint

2007-04-12 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi,

Here's a nice discussion of the FeO of Mercury:
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Oct01/MercuryMtg.html

We used to think FeO was 5-6%; now the thinking
is 2-3%, which gives us this interesting sequence for
the inner planets: Mercury 3%, Venus 7%, Earth 8%,
Mars 18% FeO, making an inverse relationship between
FeO and the amount of iron in their cores (?).

There's the suggestion that David mentioned, that it's
old Mercurian crust from the Big Whack that's been hanging
around for 4+ billion years. David said to Rob: As you
point out, this material would have to enter a stable orbit
around the Sun until relatively recently. That sounds like
he means a close inner system orbit.

If you mean an inner solar system orbit, there is no
stable place for a rubble collection, sunward asteroid belt,
or other assortments of planetary leftovers that far
downtown. And, oddly, the inner system has been
searched for various supposed asteroids, the Vulcanoids,
many times with no success.

There is no quiet home life for small bodies in the
inner system as long as there are large bodies in the
neighborhood throwing, if not their weight, their gravity
around. There IS a place where large collections of small
bodies can persist for a long, long time, a giant junkyard
and planetary leftover surplus yard from 1.6 to 4.2 AU
(more or less), called the Asteroid Zone.

It is full of stuff from the inner system. Remember the
recent SRI study that showed that the dynamics of the
many large iron cores in the Zone demonstrate that they
likely came from very close in (from sunward of Mercury
out to sunward of Venus)? Of course, there no identified
parent bodies, but that failing is common for many types
of meteorites.

A radical theory! Meteorites come from the Asteroid
Zone!!! No, wait... Is that a new idea?


Sterling K. Webb

- Original Message - 
From: Rob McCafferty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greg Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NEW Plutonic Angrite - NWA 4590 Tamassint


Greg,

In light of recent comments about new rocks getting
scant discussion, I will make some input on this one.

I have to spend some time to pore/paw? over the Lunar
and Planetary Science stuff in detail but it it seems
interesting at a glance through. The great diversity
of minerals in this rock and the fact that there are
seemingly angrites of many different types and form
make this new rock a great discovery.

I used to think they were simply melted CVs but the
structure of this seems to throw this into question.
Probably wrong but it's very interesting. Can't wait
until the messenger probe finally does it's stuff and
starts sending back answers on Mercury. How
embarrasing that here we are 46 years to the day since
Gagarin's flight and we still know very little about
one of our nearest neighbours.

I somehow doubt that Mercury is the APB. Even with the
bizaar theories of how mercury formed, these rocks
should match the FeO characteristics we have for
Mercury, surely? They are unlikely to have spent 4
billion years finding their way to earth.

Amazing stuff, non-the-less. I'd love to be wrong. I
can't help think they have an inkling of suspicion
when they even have a name for them. Hermean
meteorites? How interesting. I've never heard the term
used before...but it has a certain ring to it.

Rob McC

--- Greg Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear List Members,

 Yesterday I announced my new NomCom Approved Angrite
 which has a different
 lithology than the other known angrites. It is NWA
 4590 Tamassint and is a
 Plutonic Angrite. For those who do not want to go to
 eBay to look up the
 complete information, here is the approved
 classification and a link to an
 abstract. This new angrite is gorgeous!!

 Link to Lunar and Planetary Science Conference
 abstract on NWA 4590:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/1522.pdf

 Here is the NomCom Approved classification submitted
 to the Meteoritical
 Bulletin:


==

 Northwest Africa 4590
 Morocco/Algeria

 Find: June 2006

 Achondrite (angrite)



 History: Scattered fragments from a small stone
 which appears to have
 shattered upon landing recently were found covering
 an area of ~40 m2 in the
 Morocco-Algeria border zone, 21 km SSW of Tamassint
 oasis and 18 km S of
 Agoult, Morocco.  Greg Hupé purchased all the
 recovered material in June
 2006 from a Moroccan dealer in Tagounite. He then
 traveled to Morocco and
 was shown the location by the original finder, and
 measured GPS coordinates.
 Physical characteristics: Fragments totaling 212.8 g
 of a very friable
 specimen composed of coarse yellow-green, black and
 white grains; very fresh
 with preserved shiny, black fusion crust on some
 pieces, and minor pale
 orange terrestrial weathering 

Re: [meteorite-list] NEW Plutonic Angrite - NWA 4590 Tamassint

2007-04-12 Thread Rob McCafferty
Amazing stuff Sterling. I'm thinking this makes
Angrites less likely to come from Mercury but does
anyone have a CRE of Angrites? I just had it in my
mind that it was only a few million to a few hundred
million years which I think puts another nail in the
coffin. 
If they're 4000MYr or so then obviously I need to
remortgage my house and buy Greg's 30k chunk of this
new angrite. 
I'm not accepting any ages of angrites from Greg or
his friends or family at this point. hehe!

Rob McC

--- Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Here's a nice discussion of the FeO of Mercury:
 http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Oct01/MercuryMtg.html
 
 We used to think FeO was 5-6%; now the thinking
 is 2-3%, which gives us this interesting sequence
 for
 the inner planets: Mercury 3%, Venus 7%, Earth 8%,
 Mars 18% FeO, making an inverse relationship between
 FeO and the amount of iron in their cores (?).
 
 There's the suggestion that David mentioned,
 that it's
 old Mercurian crust from the Big Whack that's been
 hanging
 around for 4+ billion years. David said to Rob: As
 you
 point out, this material would have to enter a
 stable orbit
 around the Sun until relatively recently. That
 sounds like
 he means a close inner system orbit.
 
 If you mean an inner solar system orbit, there
 is no
 stable place for a rubble collection, sunward
 asteroid belt,
 or other assortments of planetary leftovers that far
 downtown. And, oddly, the inner system has been
 searched for various supposed asteroids, the
 Vulcanoids,
 many times with no success.
 
 There is no quiet home life for small bodies in
 the
 inner system as long as there are large bodies in
 the
 neighborhood throwing, if not their weight, their
 gravity
 around. There IS a place where large collections of
 small
 bodies can persist for a long, long time, a giant
 junkyard
 and planetary leftover surplus yard from 1.6 to 4.2
 AU
 (more or less), called the Asteroid Zone.
 
 It is full of stuff from the inner system.
 Remember the
 recent SRI study that showed that the dynamics of
 the
 many large iron cores in the Zone demonstrate that
 they
 likely came from very close in (from sunward of
 Mercury
 out to sunward of Venus)? Of course, there no
 identified
 parent bodies, but that failing is common for many
 types
 of meteorites.
 
 A radical theory! Meteorites come from the
 Asteroid
 Zone!!! No, wait... Is that a new idea?
 
 
 Sterling K. Webb
 





   

Now that's room service!  Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD/Trade Books: looking for O'Keefe(1976) swap for Mason or Burke?

2007-04-12 Thread Phil Morgan
I'm looking for a copy of O'keefe's 1976 Tektites and Their Origin 
(Developments in Petrology) and wondered if by any chance anyone would 
entertain a copy of Cosmic Debris (Burke) or Meteorites (Mason) in trade. 
Both are ex-library hardback.


Please respond off-list.

Thanks and Regards,
Phil



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NEW Plutonic Angrite - NWA 4590 Tamassint

2007-04-12 Thread David Weir

Hello Sterling and hopeful Hermean collectors,

The angrites have FeO contents in the general range of ~25 wt%, so if 
they are from Mercury this does not conform to your inverse iron core 
ordering, unless the core of Mercury was not fully differentiated before 
the impact-related dissemination occurred. Some angrites like NWA 2999 
do contain too much iron to be consistent with representing a completely 
differentiated body. As for the stable orbit, the iron cores of early 
differentiated bodies which formed near Mercury and now stored in the 
inner asteroid belt is a good point, although I was thinking about 
possible Lagrange-like regions. Storage in the the inner asteroid belt 
is definitely more reasonable.


For Rob, here is some CRE age info:

The results of CRE age studies (Eugster et al., 2002) utilizing 
cosmogenic nuclide data indicate that the CRE age of D'Orbigny (12.3 
+/-0.9 m.y.) is significantly different from that of other angrites 
studied: Sah 99555 (6.6 +/-0.8 m.y.), Asuka 881371 (5.4 +/-0.7 m.y.), 
Angra dos Reis (55.5 +/-1.2 m.y.), LEW 86010 (17.6 +/-1.0 m.y.), and LEW 
87051 (~0.2 m.y.). All or most of these angrites represent unique 
ejection events on the angrite parent body. I don't have CRE data yet 
for the latest finds.


David

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list