Re: [meteorite-list] Article : 21st Century Meteorite Falls, Part Two

[Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list]

Hi Carl and List,

I am just guessing about Morocco. It seems like Tissint really
hammered home the notion of chasing meteorite falls there.

We have seen a total of 4 witnessed falls in California since 2000 :

Red Canyon Lake (2007)
Sutter's Mill (2012)
Novato (2012)
Creston (2015)

The only other California fall in the Met Bull is San Juan Capistrano,
which was way back in 1973.

Four out of five California falls happened in the last 10 years.

I agree about lunar falls - we are long overdue. I wonder if one of
those fireballs that was chased without a recovery was actually a
lunar fall - maybe the hunters walked right over it and didn't
realize. (Unlikely now I think). I always wonder how many lunar
meteorites are laying around the USA and are overlooked because they
don't look like typical meteorites and they are metal-poor. There has
to some out there somewhere.  We haven't had a single lunar find
anywhere in the USA (yet).

There has only been 1 winonaite fall : Pontlyfni (UK, 1931)

There have been zero CH falls.

There might be others, but I can't think of them right offhand.

Best regards,

MikeG

www.galactic-stone.com





On 10/20/16, Carl Agee  wrote:
> Always an interesting topic!
>
> A couple of things come to mind:
>
> Morocco has 8 falls in the 21st century, which you suggest has to do
> with the meteorite-savvy population and desert terrain. California has
> a very similar area and population density -- also a west facing coast
> line, a fair amount of desert, and a mountain range. How many 21st
> century falls in CA?
>
> We are over-due for a lunar falls! There are now 265 classified lunars
> -- all of them finds. Compare that with 5 martian falls and 177
> classified finds, or for example mesosiderites with 6 falls and 261
> classified finds. Aubrites have 9 falls and 63 finds.
>
> Brachinites have no falls (40 finds), any others?
>
> Carl
>
>
> *
> Carl B. Agee
> Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
> Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
> MSC03 2050
> University of New Mexico
> Albuquerque NM 87131-1126
>
> Tel: (505) 750-7172
> Fax: (505) 277-3577
> Email: a...@unm.edu
> http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/
> http://compres.us/about-us/compres-president
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Galactic Stone & Ironworks via
> Meteorite-list  wrote:
>> "...In the first 10 years of the 21st Century, we have seen 58 new
>> meteorite falls (as of this writing). As we close out the first decade
>> of this new century, let us examine some of the facts and numbers
>> surrounding these recent falls. For the purposes of this article, we
>> will only examine those falls which have been officially recognized by
>> the Meteoritical Society. There have been a few documented falls that
>> have not been approved yet (Zunhua and Cartersville), so these falls
>> will not be included in this analysis..."
>>
>> I wrote the above introductory paragraph nearly 6 years ago (early
>> 2010) when I did my first analysis of recent meteorite fall
>> statistics. More than 5 years later, we have had 40 more
>> officially-recognized falls. In that same span of time, we have also
>> had Breja, Addison, Oslo, Mahbse Aarraid, and the recent White
>> Mountains fall that are well documented falls that have not been
>> approved or published in the Met Bull.  A quick look at the overall
>> numbers shows a very slight increase in the number of approved falls
>> in the last 6 years compared to the previous 9.5 years. This is likely
>> due, in part, to increased awareness of meteorites and increased
>> recovery rates.
>>
>> Also, it seems that NonCom has been moving a bit faster to approve new
>> falls and publish them in the Met Bull. Taking all of these recent
>> falls into account, we have now had 98 official falls since the year
>> 2000. If one chooses to include the recent unofficial falls which will
>> likely be approved in the near future, then we have had over 100
>> meteorite falls in the 21st century.
>>
>> So, in the first 16 years (2000-2016) of this century, we have
>> averaged just over 6 approved falls per year.  This represents an
>> uptick in the average number of approved falls compared to the
>> previous period of 2000-2010 where the average was 5. This is not so
>> clear cut though, because a couple of older falls were approved in the
>> years since, including Zunhua (as it was known in 2010), which was
>> approved in late 2015 as Xinglongquan. For tidy conversational
>> purposes, it's safe to say that we expect about 5 to 6 new approved
>> falls each year. A number of 5 per year being more conservative and
>> closer to 6 if you take into account that some falls are not recovered
>> or approved until a year or more after the date of their fall.
>>
>> Now let's take a look at the numbers and have some fun with them :
>> Which petrologic type do you think was the most common type recovered
>> during 

[meteorite-list] NASA’s Plan to Hunt for Fossils on Mars

[Paul via Meteorite-list]

NASA's Amazing 2020 Mars Mission to Search for
Ancient Fossils --"Unlike Earth, Mars is a Beautifully
Preserved Fossil" The Daily Galaxy, ‎October 19, 2016‎
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2016/10/nasas-amazing-2020-mars-mission-to-search-for-ancient-fossils-unlike-earth-mars-is-a-beautifully-pre.html

NASA’s Bold Plan to Hunt for Fossils on Mars
National Geographic, October 17, 2016
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/10/alien-fossils-nasa-exploring-mars-2020-space-science/

NASA Plans To Search For Martians: Where Will They
Begin The Hunt? Science World Report, Oct. 18, 2016‎
http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/50281/20161018/nasa-plans-search-martians-where-will-begin-hunt.htm

Yours,

Paul H.

__

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Re: [meteorite-list] Article : 21st Century Meteorite Falls, Part Two

[finbarr connolly via Meteorite-list]

I find the relatively static number of falls very surprising, considering
the proliferation of cameras compared to earlier times. Still waiting for
our first British Isles fall of the 21st century!

Finbarr.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Carl Agee via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Always an interesting topic!
>
> A couple of things come to mind:
>
> Morocco has 8 falls in the 21st century, which you suggest has to do
> with the meteorite-savvy population and desert terrain. California has
> a very similar area and population density -- also a west facing coast
> line, a fair amount of desert, and a mountain range. How many 21st
> century falls in CA?
>
> We are over-due for a lunar falls! There are now 265 classified lunars
> -- all of them finds. Compare that with 5 martian falls and 177
> classified finds, or for example mesosiderites with 6 falls and 261
> classified finds. Aubrites have 9 falls and 63 finds.
>
> Brachinites have no falls (40 finds), any others?
>
> Carl
>
>
> *
> Carl B. Agee
> Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
> Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
> MSC03 2050
> University of New Mexico
> Albuquerque NM 87131-1126
>
> Tel: (505) 750-7172
> Fax: (505) 277-3577
> Email: a...@unm.edu
> http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/
> http://compres.us/about-us/compres-president
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Galactic Stone & Ironworks via
> Meteorite-list  wrote:
> > "...In the first 10 years of the 21st Century, we have seen 58 new
> > meteorite falls (as of this writing). As we close out the first decade
> > of this new century, let us examine some of the facts and numbers
> > surrounding these recent falls. For the purposes of this article, we
> > will only examine those falls which have been officially recognized by
> > the Meteoritical Society. There have been a few documented falls that
> > have not been approved yet (Zunhua and Cartersville), so these falls
> > will not be included in this analysis..."
> >
> > I wrote the above introductory paragraph nearly 6 years ago (early
> > 2010) when I did my first analysis of recent meteorite fall
> > statistics. More than 5 years later, we have had 40 more
> > officially-recognized falls. In that same span of time, we have also
> > had Breja, Addison, Oslo, Mahbse Aarraid, and the recent White
> > Mountains fall that are well documented falls that have not been
> > approved or published in the Met Bull.  A quick look at the overall
> > numbers shows a very slight increase in the number of approved falls
> > in the last 6 years compared to the previous 9.5 years. This is likely
> > due, in part, to increased awareness of meteorites and increased
> > recovery rates.
> >
> > Also, it seems that NonCom has been moving a bit faster to approve new
> > falls and publish them in the Met Bull. Taking all of these recent
> > falls into account, we have now had 98 official falls since the year
> > 2000. If one chooses to include the recent unofficial falls which will
> > likely be approved in the near future, then we have had over 100
> > meteorite falls in the 21st century.
> >
> > So, in the first 16 years (2000-2016) of this century, we have
> > averaged just over 6 approved falls per year.  This represents an
> > uptick in the average number of approved falls compared to the
> > previous period of 2000-2010 where the average was 5. This is not so
> > clear cut though, because a couple of older falls were approved in the
> > years since, including Zunhua (as it was known in 2010), which was
> > approved in late 2015 as Xinglongquan. For tidy conversational
> > purposes, it's safe to say that we expect about 5 to 6 new approved
> > falls each year. A number of 5 per year being more conservative and
> > closer to 6 if you take into account that some falls are not recovered
> > or approved until a year or more after the date of their fall.
> >
> > Now let's take a look at the numbers and have some fun with them :
> > Which petrologic type do you think was the most common type recovered
> > during the first 16 years of this century?
> >
> > Well, it's safe to say that it is an ordinary chondrite. No surprises
> there.
> >
> > More specifically, we have a tie between L6 and H5 chondrites at 23 each.
> >
> > Anyone want to guess what the third most common type is?
> > The third most common is the L5 chondrite with 10 approvals.
> > Well, surely the fourth most common is probably an H chondrite, right?
> Wrong.
> >
> > The fourth most common type is the eucrites with 7.
> >
> > Wait, that seems like too many Vestans! How can eucrite be in the top
> > 4 common types? The answer is simple, it's because we are playing
> > semantics with petrologic grades here.
> >
> > There have been 23 L6 chondrites, 23 H5 chondrites, 10 L5 chondrites,
> > and 7 eucrites. But, there are many subtypes of H and L chondrites
> > that are 

[meteorite-list] AD- fresh lunar and oriented iron for Sale

[meteoritesnwa--- via Meteorite-list]

Dear list members I hope everybody doing well . I have a nice regmaglybte iron 
with 2 deep impression  fresh the weight 98,2kg Also a fresh lunar 50% crusted 
complet piece  uniq not paired  (2kg ) And others itmes for sale Please contact 
me off list if you are interested for price and pictures Best regards @++__

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Re: [meteorite-list] Article : 21st Century Meteorite Falls, Part Two

[Carl Agee via Meteorite-list]

Always an interesting topic!

A couple of things come to mind:

Morocco has 8 falls in the 21st century, which you suggest has to do
with the meteorite-savvy population and desert terrain. California has
a very similar area and population density -- also a west facing coast
line, a fair amount of desert, and a mountain range. How many 21st
century falls in CA?

We are over-due for a lunar falls! There are now 265 classified lunars
-- all of them finds. Compare that with 5 martian falls and 177
classified finds, or for example mesosiderites with 6 falls and 261
classified finds. Aubrites have 9 falls and 63 finds.

Brachinites have no falls (40 finds), any others?

Carl


*
Carl B. Agee
Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
MSC03 2050
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque NM 87131-1126

Tel: (505) 750-7172
Fax: (505) 277-3577
Email: a...@unm.edu
http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/
http://compres.us/about-us/compres-president



On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Galactic Stone & Ironworks via
Meteorite-list  wrote:
> "...In the first 10 years of the 21st Century, we have seen 58 new
> meteorite falls (as of this writing). As we close out the first decade
> of this new century, let us examine some of the facts and numbers
> surrounding these recent falls. For the purposes of this article, we
> will only examine those falls which have been officially recognized by
> the Meteoritical Society. There have been a few documented falls that
> have not been approved yet (Zunhua and Cartersville), so these falls
> will not be included in this analysis..."
>
> I wrote the above introductory paragraph nearly 6 years ago (early
> 2010) when I did my first analysis of recent meteorite fall
> statistics. More than 5 years later, we have had 40 more
> officially-recognized falls. In that same span of time, we have also
> had Breja, Addison, Oslo, Mahbse Aarraid, and the recent White
> Mountains fall that are well documented falls that have not been
> approved or published in the Met Bull.  A quick look at the overall
> numbers shows a very slight increase in the number of approved falls
> in the last 6 years compared to the previous 9.5 years. This is likely
> due, in part, to increased awareness of meteorites and increased
> recovery rates.
>
> Also, it seems that NonCom has been moving a bit faster to approve new
> falls and publish them in the Met Bull. Taking all of these recent
> falls into account, we have now had 98 official falls since the year
> 2000. If one chooses to include the recent unofficial falls which will
> likely be approved in the near future, then we have had over 100
> meteorite falls in the 21st century.
>
> So, in the first 16 years (2000-2016) of this century, we have
> averaged just over 6 approved falls per year.  This represents an
> uptick in the average number of approved falls compared to the
> previous period of 2000-2010 where the average was 5. This is not so
> clear cut though, because a couple of older falls were approved in the
> years since, including Zunhua (as it was known in 2010), which was
> approved in late 2015 as Xinglongquan. For tidy conversational
> purposes, it's safe to say that we expect about 5 to 6 new approved
> falls each year. A number of 5 per year being more conservative and
> closer to 6 if you take into account that some falls are not recovered
> or approved until a year or more after the date of their fall.
>
> Now let's take a look at the numbers and have some fun with them :
> Which petrologic type do you think was the most common type recovered
> during the first 16 years of this century?
>
> Well, it's safe to say that it is an ordinary chondrite. No surprises there.
>
> More specifically, we have a tie between L6 and H5 chondrites at 23 each.
>
> Anyone want to guess what the third most common type is?
> The third most common is the L5 chondrite with 10 approvals.
> Well, surely the fourth most common is probably an H chondrite, right? Wrong.
>
> The fourth most common type is the eucrites with 7.
>
> Wait, that seems like too many Vestans! How can eucrite be in the top
> 4 common types? The answer is simple, it's because we are playing
> semantics with petrologic grades here.
>
> There have been 23 L6 chondrites, 23 H5 chondrites, 10 L5 chondrites,
> and 7 eucrites. But, there are many subtypes of H and L chondrites
> that are approved by NonCom, compared to the much smaller clan of
> eucrites. In total, there were 42 L chondrites and 40 H chondrites of
> various petrologic grades (L3, L4, L5, L6, etc) compared to just 7
> eucrites. Throw in the 10 LL chondrites that were approved and the
> numbers become more lopsided in favor of ordinary chondrites over
> eucrites - 92 to 7.
>
> After the ordinary chondrites and eucrites, the most numerous of
> meteorites recovered from 2000 to 2016 were carbonaceous chondrites
> followed by a 

[meteorite-list] Article : 21st Century Meteorite Falls, Part Two

[Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list]

"...In the first 10 years of the 21st Century, we have seen 58 new
meteorite falls (as of this writing). As we close out the first decade
of this new century, let us examine some of the facts and numbers
surrounding these recent falls. For the purposes of this article, we
will only examine those falls which have been officially recognized by
the Meteoritical Society. There have been a few documented falls that
have not been approved yet (Zunhua and Cartersville), so these falls
will not be included in this analysis..."

I wrote the above introductory paragraph nearly 6 years ago (early
2010) when I did my first analysis of recent meteorite fall
statistics. More than 5 years later, we have had 40 more
officially-recognized falls. In that same span of time, we have also
had Breja, Addison, Oslo, Mahbse Aarraid, and the recent White
Mountains fall that are well documented falls that have not been
approved or published in the Met Bull.  A quick look at the overall
numbers shows a very slight increase in the number of approved falls
in the last 6 years compared to the previous 9.5 years. This is likely
due, in part, to increased awareness of meteorites and increased
recovery rates.

Also, it seems that NonCom has been moving a bit faster to approve new
falls and publish them in the Met Bull. Taking all of these recent
falls into account, we have now had 98 official falls since the year
2000. If one chooses to include the recent unofficial falls which will
likely be approved in the near future, then we have had over 100
meteorite falls in the 21st century.

So, in the first 16 years (2000-2016) of this century, we have
averaged just over 6 approved falls per year.  This represents an
uptick in the average number of approved falls compared to the
previous period of 2000-2010 where the average was 5. This is not so
clear cut though, because a couple of older falls were approved in the
years since, including Zunhua (as it was known in 2010), which was
approved in late 2015 as Xinglongquan. For tidy conversational
purposes, it's safe to say that we expect about 5 to 6 new approved
falls each year. A number of 5 per year being more conservative and
closer to 6 if you take into account that some falls are not recovered
or approved until a year or more after the date of their fall.

Now let's take a look at the numbers and have some fun with them :
Which petrologic type do you think was the most common type recovered
during the first 16 years of this century?

Well, it's safe to say that it is an ordinary chondrite. No surprises there.

More specifically, we have a tie between L6 and H5 chondrites at 23 each.

Anyone want to guess what the third most common type is?
The third most common is the L5 chondrite with 10 approvals.
Well, surely the fourth most common is probably an H chondrite, right? Wrong.

The fourth most common type is the eucrites with 7.

Wait, that seems like too many Vestans! How can eucrite be in the top
4 common types? The answer is simple, it's because we are playing
semantics with petrologic grades here.

There have been 23 L6 chondrites, 23 H5 chondrites, 10 L5 chondrites,
and 7 eucrites. But, there are many subtypes of H and L chondrites
that are approved by NonCom, compared to the much smaller clan of
eucrites. In total, there were 42 L chondrites and 40 H chondrites of
various petrologic grades (L3, L4, L5, L6, etc) compared to just 7
eucrites. Throw in the 10 LL chondrites that were approved and the
numbers become more lopsided in favor of ordinary chondrites over
eucrites - 92 to 7.

After the ordinary chondrites and eucrites, the most numerous of
meteorites recovered from 2000 to 2016 were carbonaceous chondrites
followed by a sprinkling of achondrites of different types.

Worthy of note, thus far there has only been one iron fall (Kavarpura,
2006) and no pallasite falls.

There have been 39 hammer falls to date since Jan 01, 2000 - that is
roughly 40% of known falls.

Number of official falls by country :

USA : 17
India : 12
Morocco : 8
China : 5
Mauritania : 4
Australia : 3
Brazil : 3
Canada : 3
Germany : 3
Nigeria : 3
Turkey : 3
Argentina : 2
Burkina Faso : 2
Czech Republic : 2
Denmark : 2
France : 2
Iran : 2
Kenya : 2
Russia :  2
Spain : 2
Sudan : 2
Algeria : 1
Cambodia : 1
Colombia : 1
Croatia : 1
Ecuador : 1
Italy : 1
Japan : 1
Lesotho : 1
Libya : 1
Madagascar : 1
Mali : 1
Mexico : 1
Norway : 1
Pakistan : 1
Peru : 1
Poland : 1
Romania : 1
Slovakia : 1
Slovenia : 1
South Korea : 1
Tunisia : 1
Uganda : 1
Uzbekistan : 1
Western Sahara : 1
Yemen  : 1
Zimbabwe : 1

A few things we can surmise from these country numbers. Obviously the
USA had the most falls. This is largely due to the number of cameras
and observers watching the skies, combined with a robust system of
quickly tracking down falls to recover them. India is somewhat
surprising with the second-most number of falls, and this is due in
part to how densely-populated that nation is. Morocco, despite it's
small geographic size, 

Re: [meteorite-list] AD

[Jeff Tougint via Meteorite-list]

Doesn't everyone own a Campo del Cielo meteorite..?? I meant, own 10 of
them!!

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:32 AM, CRAIG MOODY via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Hello List Members. I am selling a rather large etched slice of Silicated
> Campo del Cielo. It weighs in at 1,940g; Polished and beautifully etched on
> both sides. It comes with it's own custom display case and easel if you
> want to display it standing up. Make me an offer here if you like, and it
> would save ebay's ridiculous fees.
>
> http://www.ebay.ca/itm/112160436604?ssPageName=STRK:
> MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1586.l2649
>
>
> Thanks for looking!
> Craig Moody
> Canada
> __
>
> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the
> Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
__

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

[meteorite-list] Calcalong Creek sample needed for research

[Romain Tartese via Meteorite-list]

Dear all, 

For research purposes we are looking for a tiny chip from the interior of the 
Calcalong Creek lunar meteorite.
Please drop me an email off list if you think you may be able to provide this.
Cheers, 
Romain
-- 
Romain Tartèse
Post Doctoral Research Associate
Institut de Minéralogie, de Physique des Matériaux et de Cosmochimie (IMPMC)
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle
Laboratoire de Minéralogie, 61 rue Buffon
75005 Paris - France
+447490868677
---
http://sites.google.com/site/romaintartese/__

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Re: [meteorite-list] AD - Great new items added!! Timbuktu is Official!! Mesosiderite B4!

[Ruben Garcia via Meteorite-list]

I think it was timbuk3 that did "future so bright I gotta wear shades"  but
either was it was a cool reference!
On Oct 19, 2016 10:15 AM, "Mendy Ouzillou via Meteorite-list" <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Keith and Dana,
>
> Congratulations on Timbuktu! It is a really beautiful Meso. The future is
> so
> bright (regarding this meteorite), I got to wear sunglasses!
>
> Best,
>
> Mendy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Meteorite-list [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com]
> On
> Behalf Of KD Meteorites via Meteorite-list
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 11:42 AM
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] AD - Great new items added!! Timbuktu is
> Official!! Mesosiderite B4!
>
> Hello, All!
>
> We have finally been approved - Timbuktu, Mesosiderite B4! We have them
> listed on our website and available here:
>
> http://kdmeteorites.com/TimbuktuMeteoriteForSale.html
>
> We also have several other new items - a Mount Dooling slice and an
> individual; Carver slices, Glorieta Pallasite small slices, and Udei
> Station. You can see all of them here:
>
> http://kdmeteorites.com/WhatsNewAtKDMeteorites.html
>
> Thank you for looking; and remember you can always do a layaway if you need
> to!!
>
> Cheers,
> Dana
>
> --
> Keith and Dana Jenkerson
> kdmeteorites.com
> 39990 Bethel Church RD
> Osawatomie, KS., 66064
> 928-399-0140
> __
>
> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the
> Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> __
>
> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the
> Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
__

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

[Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list]

Today's Meteorite Picture of the Day: Zag

Contributed by: Steve Brittenham

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=10/20/2016
__

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list