[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
Wednesday, Feb 21 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Ribbeck Contributed by: Enrico Hoff http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=02/21/2024 __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] uk meteor w/ at least one fragmentation- must be several videos?
Looks to be at least 50km off the coast over the North Sea. Chris *** Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory https://www.cloudbait.com On 2/20/2024 3:53 PM, drtanuki via Meteorite-list wrote: List, uk meteor w/ at least one fragmentation-- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVTr64row18 May be rocks on the ground if over land. Dirk Ross __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Pakepake 005
What's happening here, folks. I'm not endorsing this finder, in any way, but all of these maybe's, assume, could, possibles can be detrimental to Anyone's reputation. If anyone has what it takes to Prove it is misrepresented--Do So. I've heard of several sellers that sold meteorites that turned out to be the wrong classification, this was not by intent==instead it was misrepresented to them. Know anyone that got duped or sold some? What's next; bind it to a chair and throw it in a river to see if it floats or sinks. Assuming conclusions is a Horrible path for the entire meteorite community. John > On 02/20/2024 5:12 PM EST Korotev, Randy via Meteorite-list > wrote: > > > See the field photo at the bottom of the MetBull writeup: > https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=81448 > > Yes, I suppose it could be faked. > > There are two ordinary chondrites reported from nearby, 6 km and 13 km away. > > Randy Korotev > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] uk meteor w/ at least one fragmentation- must be several videos?
List, uk meteor w/ at least one fragmentation-- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVTr64row18 May be rocks on the ground if over land. Dirk Ross __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites
Dear List, The meteorite and details look suspect? https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Pakepake+005=names=contains=50=ge==All=name=All=All0=Normal%20table=81448 Dirk Ross On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 07:41:55 AM GMT+9, Anne Black via Meteorite-list wrote: Yes John, But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected. Anne Black IMPACTIKA.com impact...@aol.com On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list wrote: Hello, my best.. Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related topics--right? Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without foundation. I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why. As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor. Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, (Privately). Regards, John Lutzon __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Pakepake 005
See the field photo at the bottom of the MetBull writeup: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=81448 Yes, I suppose it could be faked. There are two ordinary chondrites reported from nearby, 6 km and 13 km away. Randy Korotev __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites
Anne, Of course! 100%! But, again, before such analyses are completed to prove such, it's premature to assume foul play. Click "Recent Comments" on MPOD. John > On 02/20/2024 3:08 PM EST Anne Black wrote: > > > Yes John, > > But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan > desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the > records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected. > > Anne Black > IMPACTIKA.com > impact...@aol.com > > > On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via > Meteorite-list wrote: > > > > Hello, my best.. > > Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related > topics--right? > Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was > picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find > appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without > foundation. > > I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer > keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why. > > As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor. > Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, > (Privately). > > Regards, John Lutzon > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites
Yes John, But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected. Anne blackimpactika.comimpact...@aol.com On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list wrote: Hello, my best.. Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related topics--right? Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without foundation. I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why. As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor. Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, (Privately). Regards, John Lutzon __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
