Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question
Yeah, missed the last “.” Would have been easier if the phone had a key! And a lot faster! Took me a lot of work on spacing the “-“. The iPhone runs them all together into a line! Paul Kurimsky Sent from my iPhone kd...@flash.net > On Mar 25, 2023, at 8:53 PM, Sean T. Murray via Meteorite-list > wrote: > > :D I love the random puzzle :) > > -Original Message- From: John Lutzon > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 11:34 PM > To: Sean T. Murray > Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question > > > Ha, no big deal..Just no spelling bee's for him. It's the thought that > counts. > --- .-.. --- ..- - > > > - Original Message - From: "Sean T. Murray" > To: "Paul Kurimsky" ; "John Lutzon" > Cc: "Meteorite List" > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 11:21 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question > > > Agree with JR? > > I think you missed a "." :-) > > Sean > > -Original Message- From: Paul Kurimsky via Meteorite-list > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 6:55 PM > To: John Lutzon > Cc: Meteorite List > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question > > - - -. .-. . ..- - .. - …. .- - - .-. !!! > > Paul Kurimsky > Sent from my iPhone > kd...@flash.net > > >> On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list >> wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find >> another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems >> to >> be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known >> location object -- Liberty Bell 7. >> >> So, to ET: >> If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, >> somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered >> would >>it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART >> probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the >>added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows >> up here from out there it Is ET >>I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature >> superconductor to land in my mailbox mailbox will be for >> sale. >> >> JL >> .--- .-.. --- ..- - >> >> __ >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question
:D I love the random puzzle :) -Original Message- From: John Lutzon Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 11:34 PM To: Sean T. Murray Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question Ha, no big deal..Just no spelling bee's for him. It's the thought that counts. --- .-.. --- ..- - - Original Message - From: "Sean T. Murray" To: "Paul Kurimsky" ; "John Lutzon" Cc: "Meteorite List" Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 11:21 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question Agree with JR? I think you missed a "." :-) Sean -Original Message- From: Paul Kurimsky via Meteorite-list Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 6:55 PM To: John Lutzon Cc: Meteorite List Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question - - -. .-. . ..- - .. - …. .- - - .-. !!! Paul Kurimsky Sent from my iPhone kd...@flash.net On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list wrote: Hello, Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems to be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known location object -- Liberty Bell 7. So, to ET: If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered would it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows up here from out there it Is ET I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature superconductor to land in my mailbox mailbox will be for sale. JL .--- .-.. --- ..- - __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question
Yep! :) Paul Kurimsky Sent from my iPhone kd...@flash.net > On Mar 24, 2023, at 8:34 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list > wrote: > > > Ha, no big deal..Just no spelling bee's for him. It's the thought that > counts. > .--- .-.. --- ..- - > > > - Original Message - > From: "Sean T. Murray" > To: "Paul Kurimsky" ; "John Lutzon" > Cc: "Meteorite List" > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 11:21 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question > > > Agree with JR? > > I think you missed a "." :-) > > Sean > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Kurimsky via Meteorite-list > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 6:55 PM > To: John Lutzon > Cc: Meteorite List > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question > > .- - -. .-. . ..- - .. - …. .- - - .-. !!! > > Paul Kurimsky > Sent from my iPhone > kd...@flash.net > > >> On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list >> wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find >> another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems >> to >> be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known >> location object -- Liberty Bell 7. >> >> So, to ET: >> If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, >> somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered >> would >>it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART >> probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the >>added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows >> up here from out there it Is ET >>I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature >> superconductor to land in my mailbox mailbox will be for >> sale. >> >> JL >> .--- .-.. --- ..- - >> >> __ >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question
Ha, no big deal..Just no spelling bee's for him. It's the thought that counts. .--- .-.. --- ..- - - Original Message - From: "Sean T. Murray" To: "Paul Kurimsky" ; "John Lutzon" Cc: "Meteorite List" Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 11:21 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question Agree with JR? I think you missed a "." :-) Sean -Original Message- From: Paul Kurimsky via Meteorite-list Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 6:55 PM To: John Lutzon Cc: Meteorite List Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question .- - -. .-. . ..- - .. - …. .- - - .-. !!! Paul Kurimsky Sent from my iPhone kd...@flash.net > On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list > wrote: > > > Hello, > > Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find > another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems > to > be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known > location object -- Liberty Bell 7. > > So, to ET: > If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, > somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered > would > it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART > probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the > added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows > up here from out there it Is ET > I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature > superconductor to land in my mailbox mailbox will be for > sale. > >JL > .--- .-.. --- ..- - > > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question
Agree with JR? I think you missed a "." :-) Sean -Original Message- From: Paul Kurimsky via Meteorite-list Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 6:55 PM To: John Lutzon Cc: Meteorite List Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question .- - -. .-. . ..- - .. - …. .- - - .-. !!! Paul Kurimsky Sent from my iPhone kd...@flash.net On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list wrote: Hello, Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems to be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known location object -- Liberty Bell 7. So, to ET: If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered would it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows up here from out there it Is ET I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature superconductor to land in my mailbox mailbox will be for sale. JL .--- .-.. --- ..- - __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] ET Question
.- - -. .-. . ..- - .. - …. .- - - .-. !!! Paul Kurimsky Sent from my iPhone kd...@flash.net > On Mar 24, 2023, at 1:55 PM, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list > wrote: > > > Hello, > > Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find > another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems > to > be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known > location object -- Liberty Bell 7. > > So, to ET: > If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, > somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered > would > it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART > probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the > added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows up > here from out there it Is ET > I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature > superconductor to land in my mailbox mailbox will be for > sale. > >JL > .--- .-.. --- ..- - > > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] ET Question
Hello, Little green men, I think not. Spending 7 figures to Possibly find another fall/classification over a mile underwater seems to be a waste of resources. It took 22 years to recover a large, known location object -- Liberty Bell 7. So, to ET: If Voyager, which is presently 14+ billion miles out, somehow crashed where it too was observed & recovered would it be considered ET. Same with the remnants of the DART probe. To me, it seems like a bunch of semantics with the added waste of time and someone else's money. If it shows up here from out there it Is ET I'm still waiting for a large chunk of a room temperature superconductor to land in my mailbox mailbox will be for sale. JL .--- .-.. --- ..- - __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
