[meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Stragglers
Hi Listees, I am wondering about the following meteorites and why they haven't made it into the Bulletin yet : 1) Zunhua 2) Cartersville 3) Breja 4) Kosice I know these things can take time, and much depends on the person who is submitting the paperwork to NonCom. But Zunhua is now over 3 years old, and it's not in the Bulletin. So I am wondering what the hold up is? Assuming the original paperwork was lost or not submitted to NonCom, couldn't some else go ahead and do that or does the original classifier have to do it? All of these are witnessed falls and should be a shoe in for the Bulletin. Best regards, MikeG - Galactic Stone Ironworks - Meteorites Amber (Michael Gilmer) Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Galactic-Stone-Ironworks/218849894809686 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 - __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Stragglers
What about the Montney fall? That fell July 17, 2005. Almost 6 years ago. Chris. Spratt Victoria, BC __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Stragglers
There are no restrictions on who can submit. You just need to have that authoritative classification and type specimen location. Jeff On 5/19/2011 12:54 PM, Galactic Stone Ironworks wrote: Hi Listees, I am wondering about the following meteorites and why they haven't made it into the Bulletin yet : 1) Zunhua 2) Cartersville 3) Breja 4) Kosice I know these things can take time, and much depends on the person who is submitting the paperwork to NonCom. But Zunhua is now over 3 years old, and it's not in the Bulletin. So I am wondering what the hold up is? Assuming the original paperwork was lost or not submitted to NonCom, couldn't some else go ahead and do that or does the original classifier have to do it? All of these are witnessed falls and should be a shoe in for the Bulletin. Best regards, MikeG - Galactic Stone Ironworks - Meteorites Amber (Michael Gilmer) Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Galactic-Stone-Ironworks/218849894809686 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 - __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Stragglers
Add Red Dry Lake (Ca) 001 to that list. I am wondering why the committee has refused to accept the classification when everything has been documented and I understand that all requirements now made? (emails from: Robert Verish, J. Grossman, and others, 2000, 2004, 2010. (I first had this submitted this to U of A in 2000 [by way of R. Norton who personally submitted it for me] and a classification of a thin section was made but the classification was withheld. Robert Verish subsequently was able to verify the coordiates.) This is an important find to document due the the number of specimens subsequently found. Ron Hartman - Original Message - From: Jeff Grossman jngross...@gmail.com To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 6:29 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Stragglers There are no restrictions on who can submit. You just need to have that authoritative classification and type specimen location. Jeff On 5/19/2011 12:54 PM, Galactic Stone Ironworks wrote: Hi Listees, I am wondering about the following meteorites and why they haven't made it into the Bulletin yet : 1) Zunhua 2) Cartersville 3) Breja 4) Kosice I know these things can take time, and much depends on the person who is submitting the paperwork to NonCom. But Zunhua is now over 3 years old, and it's not in the Bulletin. So I am wondering what the hold up is? Assuming the original paperwork was lost or not submitted to NonCom, couldn't some else go ahead and do that or does the original classifier have to do it? All of these are witnessed falls and should be a shoe in for the Bulletin. Best regards, MikeG - Galactic Stone Ironworks - Meteorites Amber (Michael Gilmer) Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Galactic-Stone-Ironworks/218849894809686 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 - __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
