Re: [meteorite-list] Pakepake 005

2024-02-20 Thread John Lutzon via Meteorite-list
  What's happening here, folks. I'm not endorsing this finder, in any way, but 
all of these maybe's, assume, could, possibles can be detrimental to Anyone's 
reputation. If anyone has what it takes to Prove it is misrepresented--Do So. 
I've heard of several sellers that sold meteorites that turned out to be the 
wrong classification, this was not by intent==instead it was misrepresented to 
them. Know anyone that got duped or sold some? 
   What's next; bind it to a chair and throw it in a river to see if it floats 
or sinks.
 Assuming conclusions is a Horrible path for the entire meteorite community.
John   

> On 02/20/2024 5:12 PM EST Korotev, Randy via Meteorite-list 
>  wrote:
> 
>  
> See the field photo at the bottom of the MetBull writeup:
>   https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=81448
> 
> Yes, I suppose it could be faked.
> 
> There are two ordinary chondrites reported from nearby, 6 km and 13 km away.
> 
> Randy Korotev
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Pakepake 005

2024-02-20 Thread Korotev, Randy via Meteorite-list
See the field photo at the bottom of the MetBull writeup:
  https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=81448

Yes, I suppose it could be faked.

There are two ordinary chondrites reported from nearby, 6 km and 13 km away.

Randy Korotev
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list