Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Hi Greg, This is a very exciting meteorite, every day reveals just a little bit more... What other meteorite has the honor of being used to calibrate systems to be used on a spacecraft destined to return samples from an asteroid? :) I know they will be using a couple different Carbonaceous meteorites also for the calibration including Moapa Valley CM1 and Murchison. Sonny -Original Message- From: Greg Hupé To: meteorite-list Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 7:26 pm Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull Hey all,I think Jeff stated it pretty clearly as far as the speed of the name approval. I believe that this week, or even next, is the deadline for abstracts to be submitted for the August conference in Australia, and that is why the name was approved so quickly with a 'placeholder' classification. I have seen this happen several times in the past. It does help the scientists get the info out in the next conference with an officially approved name, but it does lead to confusion in the initial MetBull entry. I think everyone needs to remember, as Jeff has stated a few times, that work is still under way by many labs around the world, and that the initial 'class' info will be defined as the abstracts and other future analysis proceeds.This is a very exciting meteorite, every day reveals just a little bit more... What other meteorite has the honor of being used to calibrate systems to be used on a spacecraft destined to return samples from an asteroid? :)Best Regards,GregGreg HupéThe Hupé Collectiongmhupe@centurylink.netwww.LunarRock.comNaturesVault (eBay & Facebook)http://www.facebook.com/NaturesVaultIMCA 3163Click here for my current eBay auctions:http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvault-Original Message- From: Michael GilmerSent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:02 PMTo: Jeff GrossmanCc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comSubject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBullHi Jeff and List,I think the speedy approval and publication is a great service to themeteorite community as a whole (science and laypeople alike), becauseit provides authoritative data during an event that is stillunfolding, and this might help prevent some misunderstandings ormisinformation that could have resulted without a publishedclassification. Great job on getting it done quick. :)On the other hand, I am a bit puzzled by the temporary "place-holder"type of "C - Carbonaceous". I understand what it means and why it wasselected. However, this seems unusual for an approval that ispublished in the database. We don't see this very often. In thepast, the release of an approved classification was usually withhelduntil a more definitive conclusion was reached on the petrologic type.In other words, we don't see too many of these "placeholder"classification types. Am I wrong, or did Sutter's Mill merit thisbecause of it's important and unusual nature?Best regards,MikeG-- ---Galactic Stone & Ironworks - MikeGWeb: http://www.galactic-stone.comFacebook: http://www.facebook.com/galacticstoneTwitter: http://twitter.com/GalacticStoneRSS: http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516---On 5/22/12, Jeff Grossman wrote:> Yes, that is what I meant.>> On 5/22/2012 7:08 PM, Matson, Robert D. wrote:>> Hi Greg,>>>>> Wow - that classification was fast, exactly one month. I guess now it>>> needs to be compared to the other C's and if there are three alike,>>> perhaps a brand new C-chondrite group.>> Don't read too much into the simple "C" classification. This is very>> preliminary, and the classification will no doubt gain specificity as>> analyses at multiple labs are performed. (This is what Jeff meant>> in the "be patient" comment below.) For now, think of "C" as a>> placeholder: we know it's a carbonaceous chondrite. ;-) --Rob>>>> -Original Message->>>> From: Jeff Grossman>> Sent: 22 May 2012 21:31:47 GMT>> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull>>>> For those of you who are disappointed in the classification, be patient.>> Science sometimes takes time. I'm sure various groups will be refining>> this in coming days and weeks.>>>> Jeff>>>> __>>>> Visit the Archives at>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html>> Meteorite-list mailing list>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/me
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Hey all, I think Jeff stated it pretty clearly as far as the speed of the name approval. I believe that this week, or even next, is the deadline for abstracts to be submitted for the August conference in Australia, and that is why the name was approved so quickly with a 'placeholder' classification. I have seen this happen several times in the past. It does help the scientists get the info out in the next conference with an officially approved name, but it does lead to confusion in the initial MetBull entry. I think everyone needs to remember, as Jeff has stated a few times, that work is still under way by many labs around the world, and that the initial 'class' info will be defined as the abstracts and other future analysis proceeds. This is a very exciting meteorite, every day reveals just a little bit more... What other meteorite has the honor of being used to calibrate systems to be used on a spacecraft destined to return samples from an asteroid? :) Best Regards, Greg Greg Hupé The Hupé Collection gmh...@centurylink.net www.LunarRock.com NaturesVault (eBay & Facebook) http://www.facebook.com/NaturesVault IMCA 3163 Click here for my current eBay auctions: http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvault -Original Message- From: Michael Gilmer Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:02 PM To: Jeff Grossman Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull Hi Jeff and List, I think the speedy approval and publication is a great service to the meteorite community as a whole (science and laypeople alike), because it provides authoritative data during an event that is still unfolding, and this might help prevent some misunderstandings or misinformation that could have resulted without a published classification. Great job on getting it done quick. :) On the other hand, I am a bit puzzled by the temporary "place-holder" type of "C - Carbonaceous". I understand what it means and why it was selected. However, this seems unusual for an approval that is published in the database. We don't see this very often. In the past, the release of an approved classification was usually withheld until a more definitive conclusion was reached on the petrologic type. In other words, we don't see too many of these "placeholder" classification types. Am I wrong, or did Sutter's Mill merit this because of it's important and unusual nature? Best regards, MikeG -- --- Galactic Stone & Ironworks - MikeG Web: http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone Twitter: http://twitter.com/GalacticStone RSS: http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 --- On 5/22/12, Jeff Grossman wrote: Yes, that is what I meant. On 5/22/2012 7:08 PM, Matson, Robert D. wrote: Hi Greg, Wow - that classification was fast, exactly one month. I guess now it needs to be compared to the other C's and if there are three alike, perhaps a brand new C-chondrite group. Don't read too much into the simple "C" classification. This is very preliminary, and the classification will no doubt gain specificity as analyses at multiple labs are performed. (This is what Jeff meant in the "be patient" comment below.) For now, think of "C" as a placeholder: we know it's a carbonaceous chondrite. ;-) --Rob -Original Message- From: Jeff Grossman Sent: 22 May 2012 21:31:47 GMT To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull For those of you who are disappointed in the classification, be patient. Science sometimes takes time. I'm sure various groups will be refining this in coming days and weeks. Jeff __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Hi Jeff and List, I think the speedy approval and publication is a great service to the meteorite community as a whole (science and laypeople alike), because it provides authoritative data during an event that is still unfolding, and this might help prevent some misunderstandings or misinformation that could have resulted without a published classification. Great job on getting it done quick. :) On the other hand, I am a bit puzzled by the temporary "place-holder" type of "C - Carbonaceous". I understand what it means and why it was selected. However, this seems unusual for an approval that is published in the database. We don't see this very often. In the past, the release of an approved classification was usually withheld until a more definitive conclusion was reached on the petrologic type. In other words, we don't see too many of these "placeholder" classification types. Am I wrong, or did Sutter's Mill merit this because of it's important and unusual nature? Best regards, MikeG -- --- Galactic Stone & Ironworks - MikeG Web: http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone Twitter: http://twitter.com/GalacticStone RSS: http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 --- On 5/22/12, Jeff Grossman wrote: > Yes, that is what I meant. > > On 5/22/2012 7:08 PM, Matson, Robert D. wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >>> Wow - that classification was fast, exactly one month. I guess now it >>> needs to be compared to the other C's and if there are three alike, >>> perhaps a brand new C-chondrite group. >> Don't read too much into the simple "C" classification. This is very >> preliminary, and the classification will no doubt gain specificity as >> analyses at multiple labs are performed. (This is what Jeff meant >> in the "be patient" comment below.) For now, think of "C" as a >> placeholder: we know it's a carbonaceous chondrite. ;-) --Rob >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: Jeff Grossman >> Sent: 22 May 2012 21:31:47 GMT >> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull >> >> For those of you who are disappointed in the classification, be patient. >> Science sometimes takes time. I'm sure various groups will be refining >> this in coming days and weeks. >> >> Jeff >> >> __ >> >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > __ > > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
It is important, and we really needed to get the name announced in order not to impede science (e.g., the MetSoc abstracts are due in a matter of days) and to end the controversy around what to call it. If you read Zolensky's description in the bulletin, it's clear that he thinks the meteorite is CM like. But it is not your normal CM2 from this description. This could ultimately go a number of ways in the final analysis... anything from a CM to an ungrouped C chondrite, or maybe something else. There is no reason to jump to conclusions. I'm betting that the MetSoc abstracts will tell us much more. Jeff On 5/22/2012 8:02 PM, Michael Gilmer wrote: Hi Jeff and List, I think the speedy approval and publication is a great service to the meteorite community as a whole (science and laypeople alike), because it provides authoritative data during an event that is still unfolding, and this might help prevent some misunderstandings or misinformation that could have resulted without a published classification. Great job on getting it done quick. :) On the other hand, I am a bit puzzled by the temporary "place-holder" type of "C - Carbonaceous". I understand what it means and why it was selected. However, this seems unusual for an approval that is published in the database. We don't see this very often. In the past, the release of an approved classification was usually withheld until a more definitive conclusion was reached on the petrologic type. In other words, we don't see too many of these "placeholder" classification types. Am I wrong, or did Sutter's Mill merit this because of it's important and unusual nature? Best regards, MikeG __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Based on the few in hand specimens I've seen, and under scope my fragment collected (with crust) from Suzzane Matin's hammmer-stone (yes, the real one) and then tempered and coupled with my complete lack of credentialed meteorologic petrologic knowledge, yet with a sprinkling of reads (eg. all of Norton, a couple Dodd, a few others), I hold onto hope that a new C class is at hand, but doubt it, but how fantadtic would that be!! What are the odds of that?? Robert Ward's initial find probably pegged it to a teaa CM. But, what of that redish inclusions??? Richard Montgomery - Original Message - From: "karmaka" To: "met-list" Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:25 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 Martin Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
I personally like the Sutter's Mill name but let's not forget that Lotus has a post office and the finds are "centered" closer to Lotus than to Sutter's Mill which is in Coloma. Just so happens that the Coloma post office is right next to Sutter's Mill. I am by no means an expert, but I would have expected the name to be Lotus first (since the first find was in Lotus Park and where many other specimens were found), Coloma and may then Sutter's Mill. Mendy > > From: Jeff Grossman >To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:43 PM >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull > >The guidelines were not relaxed... they were changed. > >On 5/22/2012 5:32 PM, meteorh...@aol.com wrote: >> Glad to see they stuck with Sutter's Mill as the name. In an era where we >> no longer need to turn to the index in the back of a physical atlas to >> locate where in it a particular meteorite was found, it is good to see the >> guidelines for the name being relaxed a bit. >> >> Steve Arnold >> Host of Meteorite Men >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >> -Original Message- >> From: "karmaka" >> Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com >> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 23:25:17 >> To: met-list >> Reply-To: karmaka >> Subject: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull >> >> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und >> endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. >> http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos >> >> >> __ >> >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> __ >> >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > >__ > >Visit the Archives at >http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Yes, that is what I meant. On 5/22/2012 7:08 PM, Matson, Robert D. wrote: Hi Greg, Wow - that classification was fast, exactly one month. I guess now it needs to be compared to the other C's and if there are three alike, perhaps a brand new C-chondrite group. Don't read too much into the simple "C" classification. This is very preliminary, and the classification will no doubt gain specificity as analyses at multiple labs are performed. (This is what Jeff meant in the "be patient" comment below.) For now, think of "C" as a placeholder: we know it's a carbonaceous chondrite. ;-) --Rob -Original Message- From: Jeff Grossman Sent: 22 May 2012 21:31:47 GMT To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull For those of you who are disappointed in the classification, be patient. Science sometimes takes time. I'm sure various groups will be refining this in coming days and weeks. Jeff __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Hi Greg, > Wow - that classification was fast, exactly one month. I guess now it > needs to be compared to the other C's and if there are three alike, > perhaps a brand new C-chondrite group. Don't read too much into the simple "C" classification. This is very preliminary, and the classification will no doubt gain specificity as analyses at multiple labs are performed. (This is what Jeff meant in the "be patient" comment below.) For now, think of "C" as a placeholder: we know it's a carbonaceous chondrite. ;-) --Rob -Original Message- From: Jeff Grossman Sent: 22 May 2012 21:31:47 GMT To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull For those of you who are disappointed in the classification, be patient. Science sometimes takes time. I'm sure various groups will be refining this in coming days and weeks. Jeff __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Wow - that classification was fast, exactly one month. I guess now it needs to be compared to the other C's and if there are three alike, perhaps a brand new C-chondrite group. GregS -Original Message- From: Jeff Grossman Sent: 22 May 2012 21:31:47 GMT To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull For those of you who are disappointed in the classification, be patient. Science sometimes takes time. I'm sure various groups will be refining this in coming days and weeks. Jeff On 5/22/2012 5:25 PM, karmaka wrote: > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 > > Martin > > > > Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und > endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. > http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos > > > __ > > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Me too Jim, I get rebellious every once in a while and call my Ash Creeks by the name of West since I still can't find "Ash Creek" in my list of Texas Post Office locations. And since we can alter over time from that rule, it is good to see new ones are being adapted even now. Steve Arnold Host of Meteorite Men Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: "Jim Wooddell" Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:44:50 To: met-list Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull Hi Steve and all! I was a little worried. What was good, I think, was that Sutter's Mill was already in GNIS and had a number where as some of the other locations did not! I am glad to see the name stuck.because that's what it is known as! Jim Jim Wooddell http://k7wfr.us - Original Message - From: To: "karmaka" ; "met-list" Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:32 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull > Glad to see they stuck with Sutter's Mill as the name. In an era where we > no longer need to turn to the index in the back of a physical atlas to > locate where in it a particular meteorite was found, it is good to see the > guidelines for the name being relaxed a bit. > > Steve Arnold > Host of Meteorite Men > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -Original Message- > From: "karmaka" > Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com > Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 23:25:17 > To: met-list > Reply-To: karmaka > Subject: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull > > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 > > Martin > > > > Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern > und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. > http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos > > > __ > > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > __ > > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
I personally like Sutter's Mill. It's seems appropriate since most of the specimens were found within a mile of the old Mill site. And most agree including the scientists there. Dan Miller On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote: > The guidelines were not relaxed... they were changed. > > > On 5/22/2012 5:32 PM, meteorh...@aol.com wrote: >> >> Glad to see they stuck with Sutter's Mill as the name. In an era where we >> no longer need to turn to the index in the back of a physical atlas to >> locate where in it a particular meteorite was found, it is good to see the >> guidelines for the name being relaxed a bit. >> >> Steve Arnold >> Host of Meteorite Men >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >> -Original Message- >> From: "karmaka" >> Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com >> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 23:25:17 >> To: met-list >> Reply-To: karmaka >> Subject: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull >> >> >> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern >> und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. >> http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos >> >> >> __ >> >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> __ >> >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > __ > > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Hi Steve and all! I was a little worried. What was good, I think, was that Sutter's Mill was already in GNIS and had a number where as some of the other locations did not! I am glad to see the name stuck.because that's what it is known as! Jim Jim Wooddell http://k7wfr.us - Original Message - From: To: "karmaka" ; "met-list" Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:32 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull Glad to see they stuck with Sutter's Mill as the name. In an era where we no longer need to turn to the index in the back of a physical atlas to locate where in it a particular meteorite was found, it is good to see the guidelines for the name being relaxed a bit. Steve Arnold Host of Meteorite Men Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: "karmaka" Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 23:25:17 To: met-list Reply-To: karmaka Subject: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 Martin Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
The guidelines were not relaxed... they were changed. On 5/22/2012 5:32 PM, meteorh...@aol.com wrote: Glad to see they stuck with Sutter's Mill as the name. In an era where we no longer need to turn to the index in the back of a physical atlas to locate where in it a particular meteorite was found, it is good to see the guidelines for the name being relaxed a bit. Steve Arnold Host of Meteorite Men Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: "karmaka" Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 23:25:17 To: met-list Reply-To: karmaka Subject: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 Martin Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
Glad to see they stuck with Sutter's Mill as the name. In an era where we no longer need to turn to the index in the back of a physical atlas to locate where in it a particular meteorite was found, it is good to see the guidelines for the name being relaxed a bit. Steve Arnold Host of Meteorite Men Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: "karmaka" Sender: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 23:25:17 To: met-list Reply-To: karmaka Subject: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 Martin Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
For those of you who are disappointed in the classification, be patient. Science sometimes takes time. I'm sure various groups will be refining this in coming days and weeks. Jeff On 5/22/2012 5:25 PM, karmaka wrote: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 Martin Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] SUTTER'S MILL in MetBull
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Sutter%27s+Mill&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=55529 Martin Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben. http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
