Re: [meteorite-list] Size Counts concerning Pluto?

2006-08-23 Thread E.P. Grondine
Hi Dirk, all - 

The problem is that there are a whole lot more plutos
which are being discovered.  A whole whole lot more.

I wonder what the public's reaction was when Ceres was
demoted back in the 1800's? It would make a good side
bar for someone.

good hunting,
Ed

--- drtanuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello List,
   It appears that the only reason for dropping poor
 Pluto from the list of planets is an American
 cultural
 bias in that SIZE COUNTS.  Pluto, as do the rest of
 the planets, orbits the Sun in a somewhat regular
 manner as a planet; therefore leave its
 classification
 alone.
   Science may change the status of Pluto; but Pluto
 will still exist as it has without any concern of
 Man`s (new-school-biased? Astronomer`s) scheme of
 things. 
   Sincerely, Pluto fan for  9.Dirk Ross...Tokyo 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Size Counts concerning Pluto?

2006-08-23 Thread Larry Lebofsky
Hi all:

I have been trying to stay out of the recent discussion until something really 
happens at the IAU. For me, I am concerned with it becoming too personal.

However, two things. When we (DPS) spoke to Rick Binzel last week, the IAU 
committee (Rick was on it) was concerned that world opinion would be that the 
US (ie Lowell Obs) would want to keep Pluto as a plane because is was 
discovered by an American.

Also, if you look at the original counterproposal (being the dominant object) 
which will get rid of Pluto as a planet, it was proposed by a group that 
included 2 from Uruguay, 5 from France, 2 Brazil, 3 Italy, 1 Chech., 1 
Argentina, 1 Mexico, 1 Russia, and 2 US. Not quite American dominated unless 
you mean (North and SOuth America).

Larry

PS OPINION: No matter what ends up being the science behind defining a planet 
(original definition gives us 5 since Earth was not a planet), Pluto, for 
historical reasons, should remain a planet. OPINION: dwarf planet is a stupid 
term and raises all sorts of misconceptions for kids, etc. Why not go with 
size-challenged to be politically correct?

Quoting drtanuki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hello List,
   It appears that the only reason for dropping poor
 Pluto from the list of planets is an American cultural
 bias in that SIZE COUNTS.  Pluto, as do the rest of
 the planets, orbits the Sun in a somewhat regular
 manner as a planet; therefore leave its classification
 alone.
   Science may change the status of Pluto; but Pluto
 will still exist as it has without any concern of
 Man`s (new-school-biased? Astronomer`s) scheme of
 things. 
   Sincerely, Pluto fan for  9.Dirk Ross...Tokyo 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


-- 
Dr. Larry A. Lebofsky
Senior Research Scientist
Co-editor, Meteorite  If you give a man a fish,   
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory   you feed him for a day.
1541 East University   If you teach a man to fish,
University of Arizonayou feed him for a lifetime.
Tucson, AZ 85721-0063 ~Chinese Proverb
Phone:  520-621-6947
FAX:520-621-8364
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list