Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-16 Thread Graham Ensor
But is was more than a decade later that Viking got evidence that made
them realize what they hadwould the investigations have been
different if they had known...or am I completely wrong with that?

Graham

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Gary Fujihara fuj...@mac.com wrote:
 Indeed Zagami had an even shorter terrestrial age when first recovered and 
 analyzed in laboratories around the world than the new Martian shergottite.  
 What was missing were the suite of analytical technology today that can 
 provide far greater insight into the meteorite that were not available in 
 1962, particularly in short-lived radionuclides.

 gary

 On Jan 15, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Rob Wesel wrote:

 Zagami has and even shorter terrestrial age and has been in ample supply for 
 study for the last 50 years.

 Rob Wesel
 --
 Nakhla Dog Meteorites
 www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
 www.facebook.com/Nakhla.Dog.Meteorites
 www.facebook.com/Rob.Wesel
 --
 We are the music makers...
 and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
 Willy Wonka, 1971



 --
 From: Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com
 Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:43 AM
 To: Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com
 Cc: Meteorite Central meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no 
 lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

 Hi Shawn and List,

 It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
 but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
 they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
 for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
 a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
 pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
 it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
 thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
 bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
 science billions of dollars.  :)

 Best regards,

 MikeG
 --
 *

 Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)

 Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
 Facebook -  http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone

 ***



 On 1/14/12, Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com wrote:
 MikeG  Listers

 MikeG
 you said

 I probably should have clarified - the 21st century. So basically the
 last
 ~12 years. It's hard to find a fall (pun intended) in the last
 12 years that
 is more important (overall) than this Martian. In
 terms of scientific value,
 Tagish Lake is probably high on the list of
 the most important in the 21st
 century.

 I would have to agree on Tagish Lake its very important and I would say 
 more
 important then TATA in regards of scientists have no clue which parent body
 it came from, and the presolar grains it has and the large amount of
 nanodiamonds found within the meteorite. With the TATA meteorite, this 
 makes
 about 79 classified meteorite from Mars. In ratio to parent body, thats 
 alot
 of meteorite from one location in space considered science has no clue 
 where
 Tagish Lakes parent body is. So in repect to science, TATA is just another
 Mars meteorite, another one to add to the growing list of Martianites :)

 On the other hand, ALMAHATA SITTA is by far the most signficate fall in the
 last 12 years

 Shawn Alan
 IMCA 1633
 eBay Store
 http://www.ebay.com/sch/ph0t0phl0w/m.html?







 [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit Martian Fall. The most significant fall of
 this century?
 Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritemike
 at gmail.com
 Thu Jan 12 21:23:07 EST 2012
    * Previous message: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit
 Martian Fall. The most significant fall of this century?
    * Next message: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit Martian
 Fall. The most significant fall of this century?
    * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject
 ] [ author ]
 

 Hi Count and List,

 I probably should have clarified -
 the 21st century. So basically the
 last ~12 years. It's hard to find a fall
 (pun intended) in the last
 12 years that is more important (overall) than
 this Martian. In
 terms of scientific value, Tagish Lake is probably high on
 the list of
 the most important in the 21st century.

 If NonCom
 approves it as a fall and if a lot of good research comes
 out of this
 meteorite, then it's
 surely one of the most interesting
 falls of the 50
 years.

 Let's all cross our fingers and hope that MetSoc approves this as
 a
 named fall and that they approve it quickly once they have the data
 required to do so. :)

 Best regards,

 MikeG

 --
 *

 Galactic Stone
  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber

Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-16 Thread Galactic Stone Ironworks
Hi Graham and List,

Very good point.  Up until the time when we could sample the Martian
atmosphere, Martian meteorites were only a theory.  And even after the
Viking data was compared to some of the meteorites on hand, the
Martian-origin theory still had some opposition, mainly from
scientists who could not model a scenario in which ejected Martian
material would be delivered to Earth.

The low terrestrial age of Tata-Tanzrou combined with the superior
technology available today, makes this new fall an incredibly rare
opportunity to study very fresh Martian material.  Not to mention the
fact that we know much much more about Martian geochemistry now than
we did back in 1962.

The Martian falls that came before this new one still stand tall as
meteorites of the highest significance, but Tata-Tanzrou may be poised
to join them based on what it may possibly reveal.  Think about it -
the cores of those larger unbroken stones are nearly pristine!  :)

Best regards,

MikeG
-- 
*

Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook -  http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone

***



On 1/16/12, Graham Ensor graham.en...@gmail.com wrote:
 But is was more than a decade later that Viking got evidence that made
 them realize what they hadwould the investigations have been
 different if they had known...or am I completely wrong with that?

 Graham

 On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Gary Fujihara fuj...@mac.com wrote:
 Indeed Zagami had an even shorter terrestrial age when first recovered and
 analyzed in laboratories around the world than the new Martian
 shergottite.  What was missing were the suite of analytical technology
 today that can provide far greater insight into the meteorite that were
 not available in 1962, particularly in short-lived radionuclides.

 gary

 On Jan 15, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Rob Wesel wrote:

 Zagami has and even shorter terrestrial age and has been in ample supply
 for study for the last 50 years.

 Rob Wesel
 --
 Nakhla Dog Meteorites
 www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
 www.facebook.com/Nakhla.Dog.Meteorites
 www.facebook.com/Rob.Wesel
 --
 We are the music makers...
 and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
 Willy Wonka, 1971



 --
 From: Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com
 Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:43 AM
 To: Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com
 Cc: Meteorite Central meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no
 lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

 Hi Shawn and List,

 It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
 but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
 they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
 for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
 a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
 pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
 it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
 thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
 bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
 science billions of dollars.  :)

 Best regards,

 MikeG
 --
 *

 Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)

 Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
 Facebook -  http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone

 ***



 On 1/14/12, Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com wrote:
 MikeG  Listers

 MikeG
 you said

 I probably should have clarified - the 21st century. So basically the
 last
 ~12 years. It's hard to find a fall (pun intended) in the last
 12 years that
 is more important (overall) than this Martian. In
 terms of scientific value,
 Tagish Lake is probably high on the list of
 the most important in the 21st
 century.

 I would have to agree on Tagish Lake its very important and I would say
 more
 important then TATA in regards of scientists have no clue which parent
 body
 it came from, and the presolar grains it has and the large amount of
 nanodiamonds found within the meteorite. With the TATA meteorite, this
 makes
 about 79 classified meteorite from Mars. In ratio to parent body, thats
 alot
 of meteorite from one location in space considered science has no clue
 where
 Tagish Lakes parent body is. So in repect to science, TATA is just
 another
 Mars meteorite, another one to add to the growing list of Martianites
 :)

 On the other hand, ALMAHATA SITTA is by far the most signficate fall in
 the
 last 12 years

Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-15 Thread Jeff Grossman
...except that it is unlikely that the primary target of a sample return 
mission to Mars would be basalt!  That is not to say that this isn't an 
exciting event. But it does not accomplish what a sample return mission 
would, nor does it make such a mission less important.


Jeff

On 1/15/2012 2:43 PM, Galactic Stone  Ironworks wrote:

Hi Shawn and List,

It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
science billions of dollars.  :)

Best regards,

MikeG


__
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-15 Thread Graham Ensor
It still seems strange to me that we have not found any sedimentary
meteorites from Mars.what are the main thoughts on why? There are
many very fragile meteorites so I cannot imagine it is because they
would not surviveor are we just not identifying them?

Graham


On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jeff Grossman jngross...@gmail.com wrote:
 ...except that it is unlikely that the primary target of a sample return
 mission to Mars would be basalt!  That is not to say that this isn't an
 exciting event. But it does not accomplish what a sample return mission
 would, nor does it make such a mission less important.

 Jeff


 On 1/15/2012 2:43 PM, Galactic Stone  Ironworks wrote:

 Hi Shawn and List,

 It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
 but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
 they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
 for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
 a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
 pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
 it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
 thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
 bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
 science billions of dollars.  :)

 Best regards,

 MikeG


 __
 HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-15 Thread Galactic Stone Ironworks
Hi Jeff and List,

I didn't mean to demean the value of an actual sample return mission.
I think most of us would love to see a sample return mission for Mars
or any other planetary body.  Perhaps a Martian sample return mission
would be one of the precursors to an eventual colony on Mars.  A
self-sufficient colony on another world is a dream I would love to see
come true in my lifetime, but unless I live well past 100, I doubt
I'll see it.

Back to the new Mars meteorite, I wish a scientist would explain why a
fresh sample like this is valuable for research.  In other words, how
much detrimental effect does oxidation and weathering have on
specimens used for research purposes?  Does it waste valuable
instrument time trying to sort out the effects of weathering from
native properties present in the sample?

Best regards,

MikeG

-- 
*

Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook -  http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone

***



On 1/15/12, Jeff Grossman jngross...@gmail.com wrote:
 ...except that it is unlikely that the primary target of a sample return
 mission to Mars would be basalt!  That is not to say that this isn't an
 exciting event. But it does not accomplish what a sample return mission
 would, nor does it make such a mission less important.

 Jeff

 On 1/15/2012 2:43 PM, Galactic Stone  Ironworks wrote:
 Hi Shawn and List,

 It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
 but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
 they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
 for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
 a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
 pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
 it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
 thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
 bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
 science billions of dollars.  :)

 Best regards,

 MikeG

 __
 HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-15 Thread Rob Wesel
Zagami has and even shorter terrestrial age and has been in ample supply for 
study for the last 50 years.


Rob Wesel
--
Nakhla Dog Meteorites
www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
www.facebook.com/Nakhla.Dog.Meteorites
www.facebook.com/Rob.Wesel
--
We are the music makers...
and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971



--
From: Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:43 AM
To: Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com
Cc: Meteorite Central meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no 
lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)



Hi Shawn and List,

It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
science billions of dollars.  :)

Best regards,

MikeG
--
*

Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook -  http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone

***



On 1/14/12, Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com wrote:

MikeG  Listers

MikeG
you said

I probably should have clarified - the 21st century. So basically the
last
~12 years. It's hard to find a fall (pun intended) in the last
12 years that
is more important (overall) than this Martian. In
terms of scientific value,
Tagish Lake is probably high on the list of
the most important in the 21st
century.

I would have to agree on Tagish Lake its very important and I would say 
more
important then TATA in regards of scientists have no clue which parent 
body

it came from, and the presolar grains it has and the large amount of
nanodiamonds found within the meteorite. With the TATA meteorite, this 
makes
about 79 classified meteorite from Mars. In ratio to parent body, thats 
alot
of meteorite from one location in space considered science has no clue 
where
Tagish Lakes parent body is. So in repect to science, TATA is just 
another

Mars meteorite, another one to add to the growing list of Martianites :)

On the other hand, ALMAHATA SITTA is by far the most signficate fall in 
the

last 12 years

Shawn Alan
IMCA 1633
eBay Store
http://www.ebay.com/sch/ph0t0phl0w/m.html?







[meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit Martian Fall. The most significant fall of
this century?
Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritemike
at gmail.com
Thu Jan 12 21:23:07 EST 2012
* Previous message: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit
Martian Fall. The most significant fall of this century?
* Next message: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit Martian
Fall. The most significant fall of this century?
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject
] [ author ]


Hi Count and List,

I probably should have clarified -
the 21st century. So basically the
last ~12 years. It's hard to find a fall
(pun intended) in the last
12 years that is more important (overall) than
this Martian. In
terms of scientific value, Tagish Lake is probably high on
the list of
the most important in the 21st century.

If NonCom
approves it as a fall and if a lot of good research comes
out of this
meteorite, then it's
surely one of the most interesting
falls of the 50
years.

Let's all cross our fingers and hope that MetSoc approves this as
a
named fall and that they approve it quickly once they have the data
required to do so. :)

Best regards,

MikeG

--
*

Galactic Stone
 Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone

***




On 1/12/12,
Count Deiro countdeiro at
earthlink.net wrote:










I only know that there are papers published making the

argument that certain


SNC's and Alan Hills 84001 show

evidence of fossilized life forms. There are


other

scientists who dispute this. Nakhla has the more compelling artifacts


and is used more often to prove the hypothesis.







Regards,







Count Deiro



IMCA 3536











-Original

Message-


From: dorifry dorifry at

embarqmail.com


Sent: Jan 12, 2012 2:15 PM



To: Count Deiro

Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-15 Thread Gary Fujihara
Indeed Zagami had an even shorter terrestrial age when first recovered and 
analyzed in laboratories around the world than the new Martian shergottite.  
What was missing were the suite of analytical technology today that can provide 
far greater insight into the meteorite that were not available in 1962, 
particularly in short-lived radionuclides.

gary

On Jan 15, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Rob Wesel wrote:

 Zagami has and even shorter terrestrial age and has been in ample supply for 
 study for the last 50 years.
 
 Rob Wesel
 --
 Nakhla Dog Meteorites
 www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
 www.facebook.com/Nakhla.Dog.Meteorites
 www.facebook.com/Rob.Wesel
 --
 We are the music makers...
 and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
 Willy Wonka, 1971
 
 
 
 --
 From: Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com
 Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:43 AM
 To: Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com
 Cc: Meteorite Central meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no 
 lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)
 
 Hi Shawn and List,
 
 It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
 but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
 they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
 for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
 a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
 pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
 it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
 thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
 bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
 science billions of dollars.  :)
 
 Best regards,
 
 MikeG
 -- 
 *
 
 Galactic Stone  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)
 
 Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
 Facebook -  http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
 
 ***
 
 
 
 On 1/14/12, Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com wrote:
 MikeG  Listers
 
 MikeG
 you said
 
 I probably should have clarified - the 21st century. So basically the
 last
 ~12 years. It's hard to find a fall (pun intended) in the last
 12 years that
 is more important (overall) than this Martian. In
 terms of scientific value,
 Tagish Lake is probably high on the list of
 the most important in the 21st
 century.
 
 I would have to agree on Tagish Lake its very important and I would say more
 important then TATA in regards of scientists have no clue which parent body
 it came from, and the presolar grains it has and the large amount of
 nanodiamonds found within the meteorite. With the TATA meteorite, this makes
 about 79 classified meteorite from Mars. In ratio to parent body, thats alot
 of meteorite from one location in space considered science has no clue where
 Tagish Lakes parent body is. So in repect to science, TATA is just another
 Mars meteorite, another one to add to the growing list of Martianites :)
 
 On the other hand, ALMAHATA SITTA is by far the most signficate fall in the
 last 12 years
 
 Shawn Alan
 IMCA 1633
 eBay Store
 http://www.ebay.com/sch/ph0t0phl0w/m.html?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit Martian Fall. The most significant fall of
 this century?
 Galactic Stone  Ironworks meteoritemike
 at gmail.com
 Thu Jan 12 21:23:07 EST 2012
* Previous message: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit
 Martian Fall. The most significant fall of this century?
* Next message: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit Martian
 Fall. The most significant fall of this century?
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject
 ] [ author ]
 
 
 Hi Count and List,
 
 I probably should have clarified -
 the 21st century. So basically the
 last ~12 years. It's hard to find a fall
 (pun intended) in the last
 12 years that is more important (overall) than
 this Martian. In
 terms of scientific value, Tagish Lake is probably high on
 the list of
 the most important in the 21st century.
 
 If NonCom
 approves it as a fall and if a lot of good research comes
 out of this
 meteorite, then it's
 surely one of the most interesting
 falls of the 50
 years.
 
 Let's all cross our fingers and hope that MetSoc approves this as
 a
 named fall and that they approve it quickly once they have the data
 required to do so. :)
 
 Best regards,
 
 MikeG
 
 --
 *
 
 Galactic Stone
  Ironworks - Meteorites  Amber (Michael Gilmer)
 
 Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
 Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
 News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone

Re: [meteorite-list] Tata-Foumzgit-Tanzrou Martian Fall. (Why no lunar falls? and freshest lunar?)

2012-01-15 Thread cdtucson

Graham,
I'm sure you saw this article about the Stone-6 experiments but, as a reminder. 
It does say that sedimentary rocks would survive and that  sedimentary rocks 
developed a white or no crust at all. see link;

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Stone_6_Artificial_Meteorite_Shows_Martian_Impactors_Could_Carry_Traces_Of_Life_999.html

Carl 
Meteoritemax

--
Cheers

 Graham Ensor graham.en...@gmail.com wrote: 
 It still seems strange to me that we have not found any sedimentary
 meteorites from Mars.what are the main thoughts on why? There are
 many very fragile meteorites so I cannot imagine it is because they
 would not surviveor are we just not identifying them?
 
 Graham
 
 
 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jeff Grossman jngross...@gmail.com wrote:
  ...except that it is unlikely that the primary target of a sample return
  mission to Mars would be basalt!  That is not to say that this isn't an
  exciting event. But it does not accomplish what a sample return mission
  would, nor does it make such a mission less important.
 
  Jeff
 
 
  On 1/15/2012 2:43 PM, Galactic Stone  Ironworks wrote:
 
  Hi Shawn and List,
 
  It is true that science has access to dozens(!) of Martian meteorites,
  but all of them have been sitting on Earth for thousands of years and
  they have experienced alteration and oxidation during that long wait
  for discovery.  This is the first Martian (or any planetary) that has
  a terrestrial age measured in months.  That is exciting.  It is so
  pristine and fresh, that scientists should be very keen to research
  it.  Due to it's lack of oxidation and alteration, it is the next best
  thing to sample recovery mission.  Imagine how much it would cost to
  bring back a sizeable sample from Mars.  Mother Nature just saved
  science billions of dollars.  :)
 
  Best regards,
 
  MikeG
 
 
  __
  HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
  Visit the Archives at
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 __
 HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list