[meteorite-list] paleo meteorite

2008-02-15 Thread steve arnold
Hi list.Which of the paleo meteorite has the pebbles
in them?To me that one is the coolest.

Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
   The Asteroid Belt!
  http://chicagometeorites.net/
  Collecting Meteorites since 06/19/1999
  Ebay I.D. Illinoismeteorites



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Paleo Meteorite

2008-02-15 Thread Greg Hupe

Hi Steve and List,

NWA 2828 has the pebbles that helped to classify this Paleometeorite. Here 
is a link to one of the slices I had that illustrates this occurrence 
including a few other photos of NWA 2828:


NWA 2828 EL3:
Photograph of a 24.9g NWA 2828 slice with rhyolite pebble (image 1):

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa2828/nwa2828pebble.jpg



Photograph of magnified radial pyroxene chondrule (image 2):

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa2828/nwa2828chondrule.jpg



Photograph of magnified whitish enstatite-rich clast (image 3):

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa2828/nwa2828clast.jpg



Photograph of a 14.3g complete slice of NWA 2828 (image 4):

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa2828/nwa2828slice.jpg



I have plenty of the Blue material, a List member in the recent past 
posted that this may be aubrite material but chondrules were found there 
too, sorry. So far, NWA 4799 is the first and only true aubrite from 
Northwest Africa! Here are some links to this Truly amazing Aubrite. Do 
not forget that when I announced NWA 4799 that I also offered a 100% Money 
Back Guarantee that it will remain classified as an Aubrite. I believe 
this is important because of the NWA 2828 reclassification to EL3 and the 
beliefs of some who think the pairings to NWA 2828 are aubrites:




NWA 4799 True Aubrite:

Image of 26.7 gram polished half of largest stone:

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4799/nwa4799a.jpg



Image of large whitish enstatite grains at 26x magnification:

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4799/nwa4799c.jpg



Image of large enstatite grain and veins of goethite from alteration of 
metal at 20x magnification (lower left shows small metal grain):


http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4799/nwa4799d.jpg



Image of large enstatite grains at 32x magnification:

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4799/nwa4799e.jpg





Enjoy!
Greg


Greg Hupe
The Hupe Collection
NaturesVault (eBay)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LunarRock.com
IMCA 3163

Click here for my current eBay auctions: 
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvault




- Original Message - 
From: steve arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:32 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] paleo meteorite



Hi list.Which of the paleo meteorite has the pebbles
in them?To me that one is the coolest.

Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
  The Asteroid Belt!
 http://chicagometeorites.net/
 Collecting Meteorites since 06/19/1999
 Ebay I.D. Illinoismeteorites





Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] PALEO Meteorite||||Was Very Rare NWA2828

2007-01-06 Thread dean bessey
--- Matt Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How long does it take to be considered paleo? All
 the means is old.
 Please shed some light on this for me...
 Matt Morgan
 
I dont think that Paleo is a proper way to describe
them as these meteorites are not paleolithic.
Paleolithic is an era starting just before mesolithic
(13,000 or somewhere around that years ago - I cant
remember exactly) going back to the dawn of man which
is around 2.5 million years ago. 
Well there is dispute when the first man showed up but
it certainly wasnt 110 million years ago like the Lake
murrey paleo meteorite which is a Cretaceous
meteorite - not a paleolithic one.
Relic, which has also been used is a much better
word to describe these meteorites.
Cheers
DEAN
www.meteoriteshop.com





__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] PALEO Meteorite||||Was Very Rare NWA2828

2007-01-06 Thread Darren Garrison
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:41:40 -0800 (PST), you wrote:

I dont think that Paleo is a proper way to describe
them as these meteorites are not paleolithic.
Paleolithic is an era starting just before mesolithic

Paleo just means old-- paleolithic is the old stone age.  Also used in
paleozoic.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleozoic
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] PALEO Meteorite||||Was Very Rare NWA2828

2007-01-06 Thread Mark
Hi Dean and List

Dean, I do agree. Paleo-anything has an anthropomorphic connotation about 
it. Relic has a manmade feel to it. Fossil denotes something once extent, 
now dead and what we have are it's mineralized bones and traces.

Prius means before, maybe that would be less of a problem.

Mark Ferguson
- Original Message - 
From: dean bessey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:41 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] PALEO MeteoriteWas Very Rare NWA2828


 --- Matt Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How long does it take to be considered paleo? All
 the means is old.
 Please shed some light on this for me...
 Matt Morgan

 I dont think that Paleo is a proper way to describe
 them as these meteorites are not paleolithic.
 Paleolithic is an era starting just before mesolithic
 (13,000 or somewhere around that years ago - I cant
 remember exactly) going back to the dawn of man which
 is around 2.5 million years ago.
 Well there is dispute when the first man showed up but
 it certainly wasnt 110 million years ago like the Lake
 murrey paleo meteorite which is a Cretaceous
 meteorite - not a paleolithic one.
 Relic, which has also been used is a much better
 word to describe these meteorites.
 Cheers
 DEAN
 www.meteoriteshop.com





 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
 http://mail.yahoo.com
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list