Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot?
Tom, you it seems are an idiot. You are calling a retired NASA scientist an idiot. I am in shock, just when I thought you could go no lower, it has happened. Please think before you type. No reply to me needed. Mike Farmer - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:03 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Hello List, I bought an unclassified meteorite on ebay, cut it, thought it was really nice, unlike anything I had seen, so I sent it in for classification. Later, I sent a picture to the list and someone commented that it looked like NWA 869. So when the classification was complete, to avoid any trouble, I asked Ted Bunch if there was any possibility of NWA 2906 being paired with 869, he said; I have over 50 reference slices of 869 - we are doing a research project on this stone. In addition, I helped T. Boswell sort out odd balls from 400 kg 869. I have seen a lot of 869 and it does have many variations. Your stone is not 869. I quoted Ted on my auction; http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=6554595054 But someone on the list says he can tell from the pictures that it is NWA 869 and that I am an idiot for trying to sell it as something other than 869. So I am trying to figure this out, should I think Ted Bunch is an idiot even after he had just finished classifying this stone, ran a thin section through the probe and studied it under a microscope.? Or should I assume the guy who thinks he can tell from the picture is an idiot? I do not want to be selling something that is not what I said it was. If it is 869 I will make it clear, but I have to know who to believe, the meteorite scientist who studied it, or the unknown guy that can tell more from a picture than the guy who studied it. . Thanks, Tom peregrineflier __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot?
I have 5 meteorites paired to NWA 869 in my NWA list, this why NomCom not give a unique number for the all meteorites paired Matteo --- Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hello List, I bought an unclassified meteorite on ebay, cut it, thought it was really nice, unlike anything I had seen, so I sent it in for classification. Later, I sent a picture to the list and someone commented that it looked like NWA 869. So when the classification was complete, to avoid any trouble, I asked Ted Bunch if there was any possibility of NWA 2906 being paired with 869, he said; I have over 50 reference slices of 869 - we are doing a research project on this stone. In addition, I helped T. Boswell sort out odd balls from 400 kg 869. I have seen a lot of 869 and it does have many variations. Your stone is not 869. I quoted Ted on my auction; http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=6554595054 But someone on the list says he can tell from the pictures that it is NWA 869 and that I am an idiot for trying to sell it as something other than 869. So I am trying to figure this out, should I think Ted Bunch is an idiot even after he had just finished classifying this stone, ran a thin section through the probe and studied it under a microscope.? Or should I assume the guy who thinks he can tell from the picture is an idiot? I do not want to be selling something that is not what I said it was. If it is 869 I will make it clear, but I have to know who to believe, the meteorite scientist who studied it, or the unknown guy that can tell more from a picture than the guy who studied it. . Thanks, Tom peregrineflier __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato Via Triestina 126/A - 30030 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITALY Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sale Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.it Collection Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.info MSN Messanger: spacerocks at hotmail.com EBAY.COM:http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/mcomemeteorite/ ___ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot?
You are calling a retired NASA scientist an idiot. No, if you read it, I am calling the other guy an idiot It would seem you do not understand sarcasm! Or are you saying the guy who can tell from the picture is correct, therefore I am calling Ted an idiot? Thanks, Tom peregrineflier - Original Message - From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:18 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Tom, you it seems are an idiot. You are calling a retired NASA scientist an idiot. I am in shock, just when I thought you could go no lower, it has happened. Please think before you type. No reply to me needed. Mike Farmer - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:03 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Hello List, I bought an unclassified meteorite on ebay, cut it, thought it was really nice, unlike anything I had seen, so I sent it in for classification. Later, I sent a picture to the list and someone commented that it looked like NWA 869. So when the classification was complete, to avoid any trouble, I asked Ted Bunch if there was any possibility of NWA 2906 being paired with 869, he said; I have over 50 reference slices of 869 - we are doing a research project on this stone. In addition, I helped T. Boswell sort out odd balls from 400 kg 869. I have seen a lot of 869 and it does have many variations. Your stone is not 869. I quoted Ted on my auction; http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=6554595054 But someone on the list says he can tell from the pictures that it is NWA 869 and that I am an idiot for trying to sell it as something other than 869. So I am trying to figure this out, should I think Ted Bunch is an idiot even after he had just finished classifying this stone, ran a thin section through the probe and studied it under a microscope.? Or should I assume the guy who thinks he can tell from the picture is an idiot? I do not want to be selling something that is not what I said it was. If it is 869 I will make it clear, but I have to know who to believe, the meteorite scientist who studied it, or the unknown guy that can tell more from a picture than the guy who studied it. . Thanks, Tom peregrineflier __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.12/77 - Release Date: 8/18/2005 __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot?
I dont really know Tom, but the subject of the email was quite clear. Either way, it is a dumb email, and you should really rethink what you write. Mike - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:23 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? You are calling a retired NASA scientist an idiot. No, if you read it, I am calling the other guy an idiot It would seem you do not understand sarcasm! Or are you saying the guy who can tell from the picture is correct, therefore I am calling Ted an idiot? Thanks, Tom peregrineflier - Original Message - From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:18 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Tom, you it seems are an idiot. You are calling a retired NASA scientist an idiot. I am in shock, just when I thought you could go no lower, it has happened. Please think before you type. No reply to me needed. Mike Farmer - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:03 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Hello List, I bought an unclassified meteorite on ebay, cut it, thought it was really nice, unlike anything I had seen, so I sent it in for classification. Later, I sent a picture to the list and someone commented that it looked like NWA 869. So when the classification was complete, to avoid any trouble, I asked Ted Bunch if there was any possibility of NWA 2906 being paired with 869, he said; I have over 50 reference slices of 869 - we are doing a research project on this stone. In addition, I helped T. Boswell sort out odd balls from 400 kg 869. I have seen a lot of 869 and it does have many variations. Your stone is not 869. I quoted Ted on my auction; http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=6554595054 But someone on the list says he can tell from the pictures that it is NWA 869 and that I am an idiot for trying to sell it as something other than 869. So I am trying to figure this out, should I think Ted Bunch is an idiot even after he had just finished classifying this stone, ran a thin section through the probe and studied it under a microscope.? Or should I assume the guy who thinks he can tell from the picture is an idiot? I do not want to be selling something that is not what I said it was. If it is 869 I will make it clear, but I have to know who to believe, the meteorite scientist who studied it, or the unknown guy that can tell more from a picture than the guy who studied it. . Thanks, Tom peregrineflier __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.12/77 - Release Date: 8/18/2005 __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot?
Tom, see, that email makes perfect sense, very clear and consise, while the first one was a poor attempt at sarcasm that confused the message and was hard to udnerstand. Mike - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:34 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Mike and list, I did think about it. It makes me mad that some one said Ted was wrong when he said it is not paired with 869. I think the world of Ted, but someone thinks they know more than him, just by looking at a picture, sure they may be similar, but that does not make them paired! Thanks, Tom peregrineflier - Original Message - From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:26 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? I dont really know Tom, but the subject of the email was quite clear. Either way, it is a dumb email, and you should really rethink what you write. Mike - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:23 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? You are calling a retired NASA scientist an idiot. No, if you read it, I am calling the other guy an idiot It would seem you do not understand sarcasm! Or are you saying the guy who can tell from the picture is correct, therefore I am calling Ted an idiot? Thanks, Tom peregrineflier - Original Message - From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:18 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Tom, you it seems are an idiot. You are calling a retired NASA scientist an idiot. I am in shock, just when I thought you could go no lower, it has happened. Please think before you type. No reply to me needed. Mike Farmer - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:03 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Hello List, I bought an unclassified meteorite on ebay, cut it, thought it was really nice, unlike anything I had seen, so I sent it in for classification. Later, I sent a picture to the list and someone commented that it looked like NWA 869. So when the classification was complete, to avoid any trouble, I asked Ted Bunch if there was any possibility of NWA 2906 being paired with 869, he said; I have over 50 reference slices of 869 - we are doing a research project on this stone. In addition, I helped T. Boswell sort out odd balls from 400 kg 869. I have seen a lot of 869 and it does have many variations. Your stone is not 869. I quoted Ted on my auction; http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=6554595054 But someone on the list says he can tell from the pictures that it is NWA 869 and that I am an idiot for trying to sell it as something other than 869. So I am trying to figure this out, should I think Ted Bunch is an idiot even after he had just finished classifying this stone, ran a thin section through the probe and studied it under a microscope.? Or should I assume the guy who thinks he can tell from the picture is an idiot? I do not want to be selling something that is not what I said it was. If it is 869 I will make it clear, but I have to know who to believe, the meteorite scientist who studied it, or the unknown guy that can tell more from a picture than the guy who studied it. . Thanks, Tom peregrineflier __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.12/77 - Release Date: 8/18/2005 __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.12/77 - Release Date: 8/18/2005 __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot?
Tom Hello. I do believe Ted Bunch is correct. after he TED had just finished classifying this stone, ran a thin section through the probe and studied it under a microscope. compared to seeing a picture and trying to give his own analysis... I think we know who is the idiot on this call. Terry Boswell - Original Message - From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: met list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:03 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Is Ted Bunch an idiot? Hello List, I bought an unclassified meteorite on ebay, cut it, thought it was really nice, unlike anything I had seen, so I sent it in for classification. Later, I sent a picture to the list and someone commented that it looked like NWA 869. So when the classification was complete, to avoid any trouble, I asked Ted Bunch if there was any possibility of NWA 2906 being paired with 869, he said; I have over 50 reference slices of 869 - we are doing a research project on this stone. In addition, I helped T. Boswell sort out odd balls from 400 kg 869. I have seen a lot of 869 and it does have many variations. Your stone is not 869. I quoted Ted on my auction; http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=6554595054 But someone on the list says he can tell from the pictures that it is NWA 869 and that I am an idiot for trying to sell it as something other than 869. So I am trying to figure this out, should I think Ted Bunch is an idiot even after he had just finished classifying this stone, ran a thin section through the probe and studied it under a microscope.? Or should I assume the guy who thinks he can tell from the picture is an idiot? I do not want to be selling something that is not what I said it was. If it is 869 I will make it clear, but I have to know who to believe, the meteorite scientist who studied it, or the unknown guy that can tell more from a picture than the guy who studied it. . Thanks, Tom peregrineflier __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
