Re: [meteorite-list] NYT article on Chebarkul meteorite

2013-02-19 Thread Galactic Stone Ironworks
The NYT is tabloid pseudo-news along the lines of the National
Enquirer.  They are the same publication that put out that hit-piece
against meteorites last year where all of us were declared as a black
market of illegal activity.  It was little else besides slanderous
statements, half-truths, and propaganda.  In my eyes, what shred of
journalistic integrity the NYT had (and that of the article's author)
went out the window after they published that mess.

I recall the IMCA even wrote a quasi-official (or official?) statement
to rebut the lies and errors in the NYT article.  You know an article
is really really bad when the meteorite community feels it necessary
to put together and release an official rebuttal.

Of course, this NYT tripe will get picked up by tons of news wires and
aggregators  who will republish and churn it back out endlessly.
While it's new, unknowing people will repost and like or recommend
the article Facebook, further spreading the misinformation via social
media.  It's like a dirty herpes virus and I'm sure I won't be the
only today playing damage control on Facebook with this latest NYT
torpedo-job.

This type of event is what makes me excited to wake up every morning
and be involved in some small way with the world of meteorites and
meteoritics.  It's the reason almost everyone reading this is a member
of a mailing-list like this - because Cherbarkul is what meteorite
falls are all about.  This is good good stuff and I loathe to see
another rehash of the slanderous BS put out into the media.  So if you
are reading this, and later on you see a discussion in a
forum/list/site somewhere about this event and somebody is quoting or
referencing these craptastic NYT articles - please chime in politely
but firmly and correct the misconceptions.  It will be tedious, but
it's necessary.

Best regards,

MikeG

-- 
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
-





On 2/19/13, Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum dori...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 A quote from the article: While trade in material from meteorites is
 largely illegal, there is a flourishing global market, with fragments widely

 available for sale on the Internet, usually at modest prices.



 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/world/europe/russian-scientists-say-they-found-meteorite-fragments.html?_r=0

 Phil Whitmer
 Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NYT article on Chebarkul meteorite

2013-02-19 Thread Mark Ford
Since the NYT has accused us 'all' of undertaking 'largely illegal activities' 
by trading meteorites -  I say we bring a class action of libel.. ?

M.

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com 
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Galactic 
Stone  Ironworks
Sent: 19 February 2013 16:38
To: Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum
Cc: Meteorite list
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NYT article on Chebarkul meteorite

The NYT is tabloid pseudo-news along the lines of the National Enquirer.  They 
are the same publication that put out that hit-piece against meteorites last 
year where all of us were declared as a black market of illegal activity.  It 
was little else besides slanderous statements, half-truths, and propaganda.  In 
my eyes, what shred of journalistic integrity the NYT had (and that of the 
article's author) went out the window after they published that mess.

I recall the IMCA even wrote a quasi-official (or official?) statement to rebut 
the lies and errors in the NYT article.  You know an article is really really 
bad when the meteorite community feels it necessary to put together and release 
an official rebuttal.

Of course, this NYT tripe will get picked up by tons of news wires and 
aggregators  who will republish and churn it back out endlessly.
While it's new, unknowing people will repost and like or recommend
the article Facebook, further spreading the misinformation via social media.  
It's like a dirty herpes virus and I'm sure I won't be the only today playing 
damage control on Facebook with this latest NYT torpedo-job.

This type of event is what makes me excited to wake up every morning and be 
involved in some small way with the world of meteorites and meteoritics.  It's 
the reason almost everyone reading this is a member of a mailing-list like this 
- because Cherbarkul is what meteorite falls are all about.  This is good good 
stuff and I loathe to see another rehash of the slanderous BS put out into the 
media.  So if you are reading this, and later on you see a discussion in a 
forum/list/site somewhere about this event and somebody is quoting or 
referencing these craptastic NYT articles - please chime in politely but firmly 
and correct the misconceptions.  It will be tedious, but it's necessary.

Best regards,

MikeG

--
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone Pinterest - 
http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
-





On 2/19/13, Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum dori...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 A quote from the article: While trade in material from meteorites is
 largely illegal, there is a flourishing global market, with fragments widely

 available for sale on the Internet, usually at modest prices.



 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/world/europe/russian-scientists-say-they-found-meteorite-fragments.html?_r=0

 Phil Whitmer
 Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NYT article on Chebarkul meteorite

2013-02-19 Thread Galactic Stone Ironworks
The problem is, there are a few bad apples in the meteorite world.
But they are an extreme minority in relation to the greater numbers of
reputable and decent people involved with meteorites.  That is true
for every group of people on Earth, no matter how big or small.  If
you chooses to be biased, selective, and narrowly-focus on a single
negative anecdote, then anything can be made to look bad.  The art of
the spin

To twist the words of the Byrds' song :

To everything - spin spin spin.

There is a reason - spin spin spin.

And a time for every purpose under attack.

A time to be born, a time to lie,

A time to libel, a time to slander,

A time to kill, a time to shill,

A time to laugh, because that article i craap

...








On 2/19/13, Mark Ford mark.f...@southernscientific.co.uk wrote:
 Since the NYT has accused us 'all' of undertaking 'largely illegal
 activities' by trading meteorites -  I say we bring a class action of
 libel.. ?

 M.

 -Original Message-
 From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
 [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Galactic
 Stone  Ironworks
 Sent: 19 February 2013 16:38
 To: Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum
 Cc: Meteorite list
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NYT article on Chebarkul meteorite

 The NYT is tabloid pseudo-news along the lines of the National Enquirer.
 They are the same publication that put out that hit-piece against meteorites
 last year where all of us were declared as a black market of illegal
 activity.  It was little else besides slanderous statements, half-truths,
 and propaganda.  In my eyes, what shred of journalistic integrity the NYT
 had (and that of the article's author) went out the window after they
 published that mess.

 I recall the IMCA even wrote a quasi-official (or official?) statement to
 rebut the lies and errors in the NYT article.  You know an article is really
 really bad when the meteorite community feels it necessary to put together
 and release an official rebuttal.

 Of course, this NYT tripe will get picked up by tons of news wires and
 aggregators  who will republish and churn it back out endlessly.
 While it's new, unknowing people will repost and like or recommend
 the article Facebook, further spreading the misinformation via social media.
  It's like a dirty herpes virus and I'm sure I won't be the only today
 playing damage control on Facebook with this latest NYT torpedo-job.

 This type of event is what makes me excited to wake up every morning and be
 involved in some small way with the world of meteorites and meteoritics.
 It's the reason almost everyone reading this is a member of a mailing-list
 like this - because Cherbarkul is what meteorite falls are all about.  This
 is good good stuff and I loathe to see another rehash of the slanderous BS
 put out into the media.  So if you are reading this, and later on you see a
 discussion in a forum/list/site somewhere about this event and somebody is
 quoting or referencing these craptastic NYT articles - please chime in
 politely but firmly and correct the misconceptions.  It will be tedious, but
 it's necessary.

 Best regards,

 MikeG

 --
 -
 Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
 Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
 Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone Pinterest -
 http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
 RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
 -





 On 2/19/13, Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum dori...@embarqmail.com
 wrote:
 A quote from the article: While trade in material from meteorites is
 largely illegal, there is a flourishing global market, with fragments
 widely

 available for sale on the Internet, usually at modest prices.



 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/world/europe/russian-scientists-say-they-found-meteorite-fragments.html?_r=0

 Phil Whitmer
 Joshua Tree Earth  Space Museum

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



-- 
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516