Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules

2005-03-11 Thread Darren Garrison
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:17:53 -0500, Anita Westlake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Check out this article on the birth of chondrules:

http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=132866


For some reason, Rednova always crashed my web browser.  Anyone else have 
that problem?
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules

2005-03-11 Thread Tom Knudson
Mine too!
Thanks, Tom
peregrineflier 
IMCA 6168
http://www.frontiernet.net/~peregrineflier/Peregrineflier.htm
http://fstop.proboards24.com/
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules


On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:17:53 -0500, Anita Westlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Check out this article on the birth of chondrules:

http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=132866


For some reason, Rednova always crashed my web browser.  Anyone else have
that problem?
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release Date: 3/9/2005



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules

2005-03-11 Thread Meteoriteshow
Same with me, unless it is opened before I click on the link.

Frédéric Beroud
www.meteoriteshow.com
IMCA # 2491 (http://www.meteoritecollectors.org/)

- Original Message -
From: Tom Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules


 Mine too!
 Thanks, Tom
 peregrineflier 
 IMCA 6168
 http://www.frontiernet.net/~peregrineflier/Peregrineflier.htm
 http://fstop.proboards24.com/
 - Original Message -
 From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules


 On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:17:53 -0500, Anita Westlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 Check out this article on the birth of chondrules:
 
 http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=132866
 

 For some reason, Rednova always crashed my web browser.  Anyone else
have
 that problem?
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release Date: 3/9/2005



 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules

2005-03-11 Thread Peter Marmet


Darren Garrison wrote:

 For some reason, Rednova always crashed my web browser.  Anyone else have 
 that problem?


Here it works fine. Here's the text:

Giant Planet Birth Linked to That of Meteorites

Carnegie -- Scientists now believe that the formation of Jupiter, the 
heavy-weight champion
of the Solar System's planets, may have spawned some of the tiniest and oldest 
constituents
of our Solar System -- millimeter-sized spheres called chondrules, the major 
component of
primitive meteorites.

The study, by theorists Dr. Alan Boss of the Carnegie Institution and Prof. 
Richard H.
Durisen of Indiana University, is published in the March 10, 2005, issue of The
Astrophysical Journal (Letters).

Understanding what formed the chondrules has been one of biggest problems in 
the field for
over a century, commented Boss. Scientists realized several years ago that a 
shock wave
was probably responsible for generating the heat that cooked these meteoritic 
components.
But no one could explain convincingly how the shock front was generated in the 
solar nebula
some 4.6 billion years ago.

These latest calculations show how a shock front could have formed as a result 
of spiral
arms roiling the solar nebula at Jupiter's orbit. The shock front extended into 
the inner
solar nebula, where the compressed gas and radiation heated the dust particles 
as they
struck the shock front at 20,000 mph, thereby creating chondrules, he 
explained.

This calculation has probably removed the last obstacle to acceptance of how 
chondrules
were melted, remarked theorist Dr. Steven Desch of Arizona State University, 
who showed
several years ago that shock waves could do the job. Meteoriticists have 
recognized that
the ways chondrules are melted by shocks are consistent with everything we know 
about
chondrules. But without a proven source of shocks, they have remained mostly 
unconvinced
about how chondrules were melted.The work of Boss and Durisen demonstrates that 
our early
solar nebula experienced the right types of shocks, at the right times, and at 
the right
places in the nebula to melt chondrules. I think for many meteoriticists, this 
closes the
deal. With nebular shocks identified as the culprit, we can finally begin to 
understand what
the chondrules are telling us about the earliest stages of our Solar System's 
evolution, he
concluded.

Our calculation shows how the 3-dimensional gravitational forces associated 
with spiral
arms in a gravitationally unstable disk at Jupiter's distance from the Sun (5 
times the
Earth-Sun distance), would produce a shock wave in the inner solar system (2.5 
times the
Earth-Sun distance, i.e., in the asteroid belt), Boss continued. It would 
have heated dust
aggregates to the temperature required to melt them and form tiny droplets. 
Durisen and his
research group at Indiana have independently made calculations of 
gravitationally unstable
disks that also support this picture.

While Boss is well known as a proponent of the rapid formation of gas giant 
planets by the
disk instability process, the same argument for chondrule formation works for 
the slower
process of core accretion. In order to make Jupiter in either process, the 
solar nebula had
to have been at least marginally gravitationally unstable, so that it would 
have developed
spiral arms early on and resembled a spiral galaxy.

Once Jupiter formed by either mechanism, it would have continued to drive shock 
fronts at
asteroidal distances, at least so long as the solar nebula was still around. In 
both cases,
chondrules would have been formed at the very earliest times, and continued to 
form for a
few million years, until the solar nebula disappeared. Late-forming chondrules 
are thus the
last grin of the Cheshire Cat that formed our planetary system.

Boss's research is supported in part by the NASA Planetary Geology and 
Geophysics Program
and the NASA Origins of Solar Systems Program. The calculations were performed 
on the
Carnegie Alpha Cluster, the purchase of which was supported in part by the NSF 
Major
Research Instrumentation Program. Durisen's research was also supported in part 
by the NASA
Origins of Solar Systems Program.

The Carnegie Institution (www.CarnegieInstitution.org) has been a pioneering 
force in basic
scientific research since 1902. It is a private, nonprofit organization with 
six research
departments throughout the U.S. Carnegie scientists are leaders in plant 
biology,
developmental biology, astronomy, materials science, global ecology, and Earth 
and planetary
science.


Cheers,

Peter Marmet


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules

2005-03-11 Thread Darren Garrison
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:21:12 -0800 (PST), Ron Baalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Check out this article on the birth of chondrules:
 
 http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=132866
 

That's a Carnegie press release that Red Nova copied over.
I sent it out already on the list on March 3, but here it is again.

Yeah, I thought that it was the recent Jupiter made the chondrules paper.  
Not to be confused with
the also recent gamma ray bursts made the chondrules paper.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


sunkist29@kiddomail.com was: Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules

2005-03-11 Thread Darren Garrison
I just got another idiotic e-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED].  I know that others 
of you are
getting them, too.  This is obviously some annoying child with access to his 
parent's computer.  Any
chance the list'll show that e-mail address the door like was done with Mister 
Boggy Creek? 



On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:07:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:07:25 -0500

stop it it it iyt

-= KiddoNet's SAFE email system for kids. Get your own account at 
http://www.kiddonet.com =-
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules

2005-03-11 Thread j . divelbiss
As I understand it...

most L, LL, H, E, C chondrule formations are thought to have occurred from 4.55 
billion to 4.70 billion years ago, with varied dating results typically found 
when analyzing the different elements in a rock being studied. Whole rock 
dating gives up an overall average age.

I think the idea is that CAI's were formed first, followed by chondrules, 
followed by carbonates (and matrix material). The whole process for a given 
chondrite material is thought to have taken no more than a 100 million years. 
Chump change in time, right !

My novice two cents,

John



-- Original message from Charles O'Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
-- 


 RE: Dating of Chondrules 
 
 I am researching the absolute ages of chondrules, specifically; 
 
 Within average chondrites, are all the chondrules the same age or do they 
 vary? If so, by how much? 
 
 Thanks in advance 
 Charles O'Dale 
 Meeting Chair 
 Ottawa RASC 
 http://www.ottawa.rasc.ca/astronomy/earth_craters/index.html (Pingualuit 
 Crater updated) 
 
 
  Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:17:53 -0500 
  From: Anita Westlake 
  Subject: [meteorite-list] The Birth of Chondrules 
  To: 
  Message-ID: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 
  
  Check out this article on the birth of chondrules: 
  
  http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=132866 
  
  
  Anita D. Westlake 
  
 
 __ 
 Meteorite-list mailing list 
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list