Re: Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?

2020-02-21 Thread Matt Mansour 
"Would be cool to see others develop something similar for AWS and the
like."

Agreed. I'll take a stab at it if I can make some time. Right now I am
swamped with multiple projects.

Most of my mezzanine stuff in on AWS. Right now I use the mezz fab file to
create the default stack on EC2, but then I tear the EC2 apart, and move
postgres to RDS, the caching to Elasticache, and the media to s3 through
Cloudfront with Boto.

It would be easier in the long run to just build out the fab file.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:28 PM Eduardo Rivas 
wrote:

> Glad to see the fabfile is still in use. I think it would be best to keep
> it as part of Mezzanine then.
>
>
>
> Regarding some of the questions/comments:
>
>
>
>- If you’re not using git or mercurial as version control, you can
>deploy using rsync by setting “DEPLOY_TOOL”: “rsync” in your FABRIC
>dictionary
>- I’m not aware of other fabfiles at the moment, only one I maintain
>over at https://github.com/jerivas/mezzanine-webf to deploy to
>Webfaction. Would be cool to see others develop something similar for AWS
>and the like.
>
>
>
> *From: *Roger van Schie 
> *Sent: *Friday, February 21, 2020 9:45 AM
> *To: *mezzanine-users@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?
>
>
>
> Hi Ed
>
>
>
> I believe the included fab files decreases the learning curve for new
> users dramatically, and it would be great to keep it in, not only to make
> it easier for new users to get going, but to avoid unnecessary traffic on
> the forums. I would suggest having multiple fab files though, for different
> types of  infrastructure. For example, one for normal rsync, one for git,
> one for Amazon web services etc.
>
>
>
> Thanks for all your hard work and help on the forums Ed!
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Roger
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 01:16, Eduardo Rivas 
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> I'm Ed, one of the collaborators helping maintain Mezzanine. As we prepare
> to release the next version of Mezzanine (supporting Python 3 and Django
> 2.2 only) an issue was recently filed
> <https://github.com/stephenmcd/mezzanine/issues/1957> wondering about the
> future of mezzanine's built-in fabfile (which only works with Python 2).
>
>
>
> This made me wonder: Are Fabric deployments widely used by the community?
> What are your thoughts on the following options:
>
>
>
>- Stop maintaining a fabfile of our own and just point people to
>general Django deployment docs
>- Extract the fabfile as a separate package/project
>- Keep the fabfile as part of Mezzanine
>
> Looking forward to hearing from the community.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Mezzanine Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Mezzanine Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/CAFny93BODzdekVAZ26ibsXXqFHrRH_G2M9o-b6Hs9kZ008acCw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/CAFny93BODzdekVAZ26ibsXXqFHrRH_G2M9o-b6Hs9kZ008acCw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Mezzanine Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/5e503d7f.1c69fb81.62210.9061%40mx.google.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/5e503d7f.1c69fb81.62210.9061%40mx.google.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mezzanine Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/CALizMdP5cJJ2nZFD-Dj3B3VqsBjCR2C3K4uFtp16iG%2By4y_HtQ%40mail.gmail.com.

RE: Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?

2020-02-21 Thread Eduardo Rivas 
Glad to see the fabfile is still in use. I think it would be best to keep it as part of Mezzanine then. Regarding some of the questions/comments: If you’re not using git or mercurial as version control, you can deploy using rsync by setting “DEPLOY_TOOL”: “rsync” in your FABRIC dictionaryI’m not aware of other fabfiles at the moment, only one I maintain over at https://github.com/jerivas/mezzanine-webf to deploy to Webfaction. Would be cool to see others develop something similar for AWS and the like. From: Roger van SchieSent: Friday, February 21, 2020 9:45 AMTo: mezzanine-users@googlegroups.comSubject: Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular? Hi Ed I believe the included fab files decreases the learning curve for new users dramatically, and it would be great to keep it in, not only to make it easier for new users to get going, but to avoid unnecessary traffic on the forums. I would suggest having multiple fab files though, for different types of  infrastructure. For example, one for normal rsync, one for git, one for Amazon web services etc. Thanks for all your hard work and help on the forums Ed! RegardsRoger On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 01:16, Eduardo Rivas <jerivasmel...@gmail.com> wrote:Hello everyone, I'm Ed, one of the collaborators helping maintain Mezzanine. As we prepare to release the next version of Mezzanine (supporting Python 3 and Django 2.2 only) an issue was recently filed wondering about the future of mezzanine's built-in fabfile (which only works with Python 2). This made me wonder: Are Fabric deployments widely used by the community? What are your thoughts on the following options: Stop maintaining a fabfile of our own and just point people to general Django deployment docsExtract the fabfile as a separate package/projectKeep the fabfile as part of MezzanineLooking forward to hearing from the community.-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mezzanine Users" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com.-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mezzanine Users" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/CAFny93BODzdekVAZ26ibsXXqFHrRH_G2M9o-b6Hs9kZ008acCw%40mail.gmail.com. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mezzanine Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/5e503d7f.1c69fb81.62210.9061%40mx.google.com.

Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?

2020-02-21 Thread Roger van Schie 
Hi Ed

I believe the included fab files decreases the learning curve for new users
dramatically, and it would be great to keep it in, not only to make it
easier for new users to get going, but to avoid unnecessary traffic on the
forums. I would suggest having multiple fab files though, for different
types of  infrastructure. For example, one for normal rsync, one for git,
one for Amazon web services etc.

Thanks for all your hard work and help on the forums Ed!

Regards
Roger

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 01:16, Eduardo Rivas  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm Ed, one of the collaborators helping maintain Mezzanine. As we prepare
> to release the next version of Mezzanine (supporting Python 3 and Django
> 2.2 only) an issue was recently filed
>  wondering about the
> future of mezzanine's built-in fabfile (which only works with Python 2).
>
> This made me wonder: Are Fabric deployments widely used by the community?
> What are your thoughts on the following options:
>
>
>- Stop maintaining a fabfile of our own and just point people to
>general Django deployment docs
>- Extract the fabfile as a separate package/project
>- Keep the fabfile as part of Mezzanine
>
> Looking forward to hearing from the community.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Mezzanine Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mezzanine Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/CAFny93BODzdekVAZ26ibsXXqFHrRH_G2M9o-b6Hs9kZ008acCw%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?

2020-02-18 Thread Danny 
Hi,

I do make use of a (modified version) of the included fabfile. However, I'm
using Python 3.6 on my dev and server machines, and use Fabric3 to do the
deployment. It works pretty well.
If this could be the supported version for Python3, that would be great.

Seeya. Danny.

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 12:46, Mike Dewhirst  wrote:

> Ed
>
> I really appreciate your work and love Mezzanine and Fabric.
>
> I would like to see the fabfile kept in Mezzanine and enhanced slightly
> by removing repo specifics to make it repo-agnostic.
>
> I use and support a number of Subversion repos. I have done this for
> more than a decade and although I have occasionally tried, I don't have
> the brainspace or need for Git (or Hg) as well as svn. Occasionally I'm
> forced to use it so I have to resort to googling Git recipes. It isn't
> pleasant and I always need a stiff whisky afterwards.
>
> I once enhanced the fabfile to work with svn and was about to contribute
> it back to the project when a new release came out. That meant I needed
> to redo the work and I never did find the time to do it again. Since
> then I have been muddling along manually and my Mezz work has gradually
> diminished.
>
> I'd be happy to contribute to any svn stuff and test it.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mike
>
> On 19/02/2020 12:16 pm, Eduardo Rivas wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'm Ed, one of the collaborators helping maintain Mezzanine. As we
> > prepare to release the next version of Mezzanine (supporting Python 3
> > and Django 2.2 only) an issue was recently filed
> >  wondering about
> > the future of mezzanine's built-in fabfile (which only works with
> > Python 2).
> >
> > This made me wonder: Are Fabric deployments widely used by the
> > community? What are your thoughts on the following options:
> >
> >   * Stop maintaining a fabfile of our own and just point people to
> > general Django deployment docs
> >   * Extract the fabfile as a separate package/project
> >   * Keep the fabfile as part of Mezzanine
> >
> > Looking forward to hearing from the community.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Mezzanine Users" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com
> > <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer
> >.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Mezzanine Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/ab47f973-5e3d-9c91-5eb8-613279cbd147%40dewhirst.com.au
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mezzanine Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/CAKyDYnc2Se%3DnWYOuotzFrAx-Zf1%3D8m7N%3DcXr8r%2BMCtHgyJoRAg%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?

2020-02-18 Thread Mike Dewhirst 

Ed

I really appreciate your work and love Mezzanine and Fabric.

I would like to see the fabfile kept in Mezzanine and enhanced slightly 
by removing repo specifics to make it repo-agnostic.


I use and support a number of Subversion repos. I have done this for 
more than a decade and although I have occasionally tried, I don't have 
the brainspace or need for Git (or Hg) as well as svn. Occasionally I'm 
forced to use it so I have to resort to googling Git recipes. It isn't 
pleasant and I always need a stiff whisky afterwards.


I once enhanced the fabfile to work with svn and was about to contribute 
it back to the project when a new release came out. That meant I needed 
to redo the work and I never did find the time to do it again. Since 
then I have been muddling along manually and my Mezz work has gradually 
diminished.


I'd be happy to contribute to any svn stuff and test it.

Cheers

Mike

On 19/02/2020 12:16 pm, Eduardo Rivas wrote:

Hello everyone,

I'm Ed, one of the collaborators helping maintain Mezzanine. As we 
prepare to release the next version of Mezzanine (supporting Python 3 
and Django 2.2 only) an issue was recently filed 
 wondering about 
the future of mezzanine's built-in fabfile (which only works with 
Python 2).


This made me wonder: Are Fabric deployments widely used by the 
community? What are your thoughts on the following options:


  * Stop maintaining a fabfile of our own and just point people to
general Django deployment docs
  * Extract the fabfile as a separate package/project
  * Keep the fabfile as part of Mezzanine

Looking forward to hearing from the community.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Mezzanine Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com 
.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mezzanine 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/ab47f973-5e3d-9c91-5eb8-613279cbd147%40dewhirst.com.au.

Re: [mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?

2020-02-18 Thread Matt Mansour 
I love the fab file that ships with Mezzanine.

My first vote would be extraction into a separate package.
Second vote: keeping it in Mezzanine.
Third, point to the Django deploy docs or ship Mezzanine with a docker file
(I wish I had time contribute a docker file).

Thanks for all the great work!



On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 5:16 PM Eduardo Rivas 
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm Ed, one of the collaborators helping maintain Mezzanine. As we prepare
> to release the next version of Mezzanine (supporting Python 3 and Django
> 2.2 only) an issue was recently filed
>  wondering about the
> future of mezzanine's built-in fabfile (which only works with Python 2).
>
> This made me wonder: Are Fabric deployments widely used by the community?
> What are your thoughts on the following options:
>
>
>- Stop maintaining a fabfile of our own and just point people to
>general Django deployment docs
>- Extract the fabfile as a separate package/project
>- Keep the fabfile as part of Mezzanine
>
> Looking forward to hearing from the community.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Mezzanine Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mezzanine Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/CALizMdN%3DSci%3DWgi4tPhSVGGV-njojQwWtzcX4zBbjCJHAAjUiA%40mail.gmail.com.

[mezzanine-users] Are fabric deployments popular?

2020-02-18 Thread Eduardo Rivas 
Hello everyone,

I'm Ed, one of the collaborators helping maintain Mezzanine. As we prepare 
to release the next version of Mezzanine (supporting Python 3 and Django 
2.2 only) an issue was recently filed 
 wondering about the 
future of mezzanine's built-in fabfile (which only works with Python 2).

This made me wonder: Are Fabric deployments widely used by the community? 
What are your thoughts on the following options:


   - Stop maintaining a fabfile of our own and just point people to general 
   Django deployment docs
   - Extract the fabfile as a separate package/project
   - Keep the fabfile as part of Mezzanine
   
Looking forward to hearing from the community.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mezzanine Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mezzanine-users/02b090b5-2d83-485d-aee3-f5997da14844%40googlegroups.com.