Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dmitry 
Baranovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes



I wrote f parser


Whatever character you have before that f isn't 7-bit Usenet 
compliant.


--
Andy Mabbett
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats p arser

2007-09-20 Thread Thom Shannon



Whatever character you have before that f isn't 7-bit Usenet compliant.


i'd imagine it was a micro symbol :)
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Ciaran McNulty
On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Whatever character you have before that f isn't 7-bit Usenet
 compliant.

Is this list available on Usenet?

-Ciaran McNulty
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Greek letter mu, if I'm not mistaken :)

Jim

Original Message:
-
From: Thom Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:25:38 +0100
To: microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats parser



 Whatever character you have before that f isn't 7-bit Usenet compliant.

i'd imagine it was a micro symbol :)
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss



mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Philip Tellis
On 20/09/2007, Ciaran McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Whatever character you have before that f isn't 7-bit Usenet
  compliant.

 Is this list available on Usenet?

well, what you do is, you blast all possible 8 bit sequences through
usenet, and the ones that come out alive... that's your list.
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Ciaran McNulty
On 9/20/07, Philip Tellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 well, what you do is, you blast all possible 8 bit sequences through
 usenet, and the ones that come out alive... that's your list.

Is this mailing list available on Usenet?

-Ciaran McNulty
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus — microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ciaran 
McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes



On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Whatever character you have before that f isn't 7-bit Usenet
compliant.


Is this list available on Usenet?


Ack, of course not - I have it configured as a pseudo-newsgroup in my 
combined news  mail client. Sorry.


Nonetheless, the character is not rendering properly, here, at least - 
though it does render properly at:


  
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-September/010710.html

--
Andy Mabbett
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


[uf-discuss] Optimus - microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dmitry
Baranovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

URL:   http://microformatique.com/optimus/

I've found a bug :-(

For:

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/birmingham/indoor.htm

Optimus is rendering the postal code in:

span class=postal-code
  abbr class=geo title=52.4703;-1.9239
B15 3AF
  /abbr
/span

as:

postal-code52.4703;-1.9239/postal-code

and likewise where that postal code is part of an hCalendar's
location.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


RE: [uf-discuss] Optimus - microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that a bug? The parsing rules at
http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-parsing
seem pretty unambiguous:

For all properties, when the element for a property is:

* abbr title: use the value of the 'title' attribute. If there is no
'title' attribute then use the contents of the element.

So am I right in understanding that a parser should always ignore the
contents of abbr? In which case, do the parsing rules need revisiting?

Jim

Original Message:
-
From: Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:16:26 +0100
To: microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Subject: [uf-discuss] Optimus - microformats parser


I've found a bug :-(

For:

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/birmingham/indoor.htm

Optimus is rendering the postal code in:

span class=postal-code
  abbr class=geo title=52.4703;-1.9239
B15 3AF
  /abbr
/span

as:

postal-code52.4703;-1.9239/postal-code

and likewise where that postal code is part of an hCalendar's
location.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss



myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting



___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus - microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Philip Tellis
On 20/09/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So am I right in understanding that a parser should always ignore the
 contents of abbr? In which case, do the parsing rules need revisiting?

except that in this case, the postal-code element is not abbr, but
span, and it has no title.
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


[uf-discuss] Re: Optimus — microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Edward O'Connor
 Is this list available on Usenet?

You can use an nntp-capable Usenet newsreader to read this list (and the
other microformats mailing lists) via the most excellent Gmane:

   http://dir.gmane.org/index.php?prefix=gmane.comp.web.microformats

N.B. Gmane's groups aren't propagated to other NNTP servers, so no, this
group isn't available via Usenet.

-- 
Edward O'Connor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Optimus ‹ microformats parser

2007-09-20 Thread Tantek Çelik
On 9/20/07 4:47 AM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ack, of course not - I have it configured as a pseudo-newsgroup in my
 combined news  mail client. Sorry.
 
 Nonetheless, the character is not rendering properly, here, at least -
 though it does render properly at:
 
  
 http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-September/0107
 10.html
 

Consider checking the UTF-8 compliance of your combined news  mail client,
as Dmitry Baranovskiy's message headers properly stated:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

And then simply included the UTF-8 mu (or micro symbol) character inline
in the message.

Thanks,

Tantek

P.S. Well done Dmitry Baranovskiy! I'm still playing with Optimus a bunch
more before following up with specific feedback.

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] hCard: title or role

2007-09-20 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In hCard, should a job title like Head of Marketing be classed as
 title or role, or both?

 What's the difference?

Off the top of my head:

role = executive
title = Head of Marketing

No?

:DG
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] hCard: title or role

2007-09-20 Thread Kevin Marks
from vcard:


3.5.1 TITLE Type Definition

Type name: TITLE

   Type purpose: To specify the job title, functional position or
   function of the object the vCard represents.


   Type example:

TITLE:Director\, Research and Development

3.5.2 ROLE Type Definition

   Type name: ROLE

   Type purpose: To specify information concerning the role, occupation,
   or business category of the object the vCard represents.

   Type special notes: This type is based on the X.520 Business Category
   explanatory attribute. This property is included as an organizational
   type to avoid confusion with the semantics of the TITLE type and
   incorrect usage of that type when the semantics of this type is
   intended.

   Type example:

ROLE:Programmer

So Head of Marketing is a Title, Marketing is a Role, I'd say.


On Sep 20, 2007 12:22 PM, Dimitri Glazkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  In hCard, should a job title like Head of Marketing be classed as
  title or role, or both?
 
  What's the difference?

 Off the top of my head:

 role = executive
 title = Head of Marketing

 No?

 :DG



 ___
 microformats-discuss mailing list
 microformats-discuss@microformats.org
 http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] hCard: title or role

2007-09-20 Thread Tantek Çelik
 On Sep 20, 2007 12:22 PM, Dimitri Glazkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 In hCard, should a job title like Head of Marketing be classed as
 title or role, or both?
 
 What's the difference?
 
 Off the top of my head:
 
 role = executive
 title = Head of Marketing
 
 No?

(resorting, please bottom-post! thanks! :)

On 9/20/07 12:55 PM, Kevin Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 from vcard:
 
 
 3.5.1 TITLE Type Definition
 
 Type name: TITLE
 
  Type purpose: To specify the job title, functional position or
  function of the object the vCard represents.
 
 
  Type example:
 
   TITLE:Director\, Research and Development
 
 3.5.2 ROLE Type Definition
 
  Type name: ROLE
 
  Type purpose: To specify information concerning the role, occupation,
  or business category of the object the vCard represents.
 
  Type special notes: This type is based on the X.520 Business Category
  explanatory attribute. This property is included as an organizational
  type to avoid confusion with the semantics of the TITLE type and
  incorrect usage of that type when the semantics of this type is
  intended.
 
  Type example:
 
   ROLE:Programmer
 
 So Head of Marketing is a Title, Marketing is a Role, I'd say.

Agreed with one minor change.

Marketing is an area.  From the example in RFC2426, it appears that the
role is a noun that describes the person with respect to that area. E.g.

TITLE:Head of Marketing
ROLE:Marketer

or perhaps

TITLE:Head of Marketing
ROLE:Manager


Tantek

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss