[uf-discuss] Semanticizin': Significance of order in argument lists
This is something I just now realized, and while all excited, I thought I'd send to the list: When using HTML lists (ul/ol) for representing operand argument lists, it appears very logical to identify the distinction between ordered and unordered as that of and and or, respectively. In other words, ol lithis/li lithat/li /ol Can mean this and that. While, ul lithis/li lithat/li /ul infers this or that. I am sure somebody has thought of this before, but I haven't. Don't you think it's beautiful? :DG ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
Re: [uf-discuss] Semanticizin': Significance of order in argument lists
Dimitri Glazkov wrote: When using HTML lists (ul/ol) for representing operand argument lists, it appears very logical to identify the distinction between ordered and unordered as that of and and or, respectively. ol Can mean this and that. While, ul infers this or that. I really don't understand how you can equate the significance of the list item's order with the items having an and or an or relationship like that, nor what purpose such a distinction has. Could you please elaborate? -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
