Re: [uf-discuss] hCard: title or role
On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In hCard, should a job title like Head of Marketing be classed as title or role, or both? What's the difference? Off the top of my head: role = executive title = Head of Marketing No? :DG ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
Re: [uf-discuss] hCard: title or role
from vcard: 3.5.1 TITLE Type Definition Type name: TITLE Type purpose: To specify the job title, functional position or function of the object the vCard represents. Type example: TITLE:Director\, Research and Development 3.5.2 ROLE Type Definition Type name: ROLE Type purpose: To specify information concerning the role, occupation, or business category of the object the vCard represents. Type special notes: This type is based on the X.520 Business Category explanatory attribute. This property is included as an organizational type to avoid confusion with the semantics of the TITLE type and incorrect usage of that type when the semantics of this type is intended. Type example: ROLE:Programmer So Head of Marketing is a Title, Marketing is a Role, I'd say. On Sep 20, 2007 12:22 PM, Dimitri Glazkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In hCard, should a job title like Head of Marketing be classed as title or role, or both? What's the difference? Off the top of my head: role = executive title = Head of Marketing No? :DG ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
Re: [uf-discuss] hCard: title or role
On Sep 20, 2007 12:22 PM, Dimitri Glazkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/20/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In hCard, should a job title like Head of Marketing be classed as title or role, or both? What's the difference? Off the top of my head: role = executive title = Head of Marketing No? (resorting, please bottom-post! thanks! :) On 9/20/07 12:55 PM, Kevin Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from vcard: 3.5.1 TITLE Type Definition Type name: TITLE Type purpose: To specify the job title, functional position or function of the object the vCard represents. Type example: TITLE:Director\, Research and Development 3.5.2 ROLE Type Definition Type name: ROLE Type purpose: To specify information concerning the role, occupation, or business category of the object the vCard represents. Type special notes: This type is based on the X.520 Business Category explanatory attribute. This property is included as an organizational type to avoid confusion with the semantics of the TITLE type and incorrect usage of that type when the semantics of this type is intended. Type example: ROLE:Programmer So Head of Marketing is a Title, Marketing is a Role, I'd say. Agreed with one minor change. Marketing is an area. From the example in RFC2426, it appears that the role is a noun that describes the person with respect to that area. E.g. TITLE:Head of Marketing ROLE:Marketer or perhaps TITLE:Head of Marketing ROLE:Manager Tantek ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
