Re: [uf-new] Closing outstanding hAudio issues
Manu Sporny wrote: The following hAudio issues have been resolved with the latest update to the hAudio proposal (hAudio v0.8). If there are no objections, I'd like to mark all of them as resolved. Seeing no objections, issues 2, 9, 10, 11 and 13 have been resolved. -- manu -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Bitmunk Launches World's First Open Music Recommendation Service http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2007/09/09/bitmunk-music-recommendation/ ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
[uf-new] Closing outstanding hAudio issues
The following hAudio issues have been resolved with the latest update to the hAudio proposal (hAudio v0.8). If there are no objections, I'd like to mark all of them as resolved: ISSUE #2: audio-title Property http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#audio-title_Property RESOLUTION: The latest proposal uses FN and most seem to be happy with that. ISSUE #9: album-title Property http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#album-title_Property RESOLUTION: The latest proposal uses ALBUM and most seem to be OK with that approach. ISSUE #10: Collection names http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Collection_Names RESOLUTION: We seem to have settled on ALBUM as the only explicit collection type for now. ISSUE #11: TRACK does not work in tables http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Problem:_TRACK_does_not_work_in_tables RESOLUTION: When we settled on ITEM containing hAudio properties, this problem went away. We have demonstrated that hAudio v0.8 works in tables. ISSUE #13: Container property naming http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Problem:_Container_property_naming RESOLUTION: The latest proposal uses ITEM to denote containers. -- manu ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
