Re: [uf-new] hAudio position and description properties
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 03:47 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 21:08 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: Most of the day today was spent re-analyzing all of the music service and podcast websites in audio-info-examples using Microformalyze. The raw analysis data is available here: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Microformalyze_Data_Files The analysis is available here: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Services http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Podcasts The new analysis shows very strong support for POSITION. This property is displayed in 70.73% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. I found No evidence of Position as far as podcasting is concerned although all the examples make a reference to episode I am not sure that this is the same thing, Can I also point out that podcasting Is NOT a problem area for this discussion. However Position Is something that should be supported As far as Music Downloads are concerned +1 for Position There is also enough support to meet the 80/20 rule for DESCRIPTION. This property is displayed in 39.02% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. +1 for Description PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into the Microformat. -- manu Manu are you also going to REMOVE the Album and Podcast properties and revert back to *audio-title* until any disputes have been resolved? I do not think that three votes was enough to warrant any changes to the existing proposal. I think you should have notified all the active participants in hAudio BEFORE you made any changes to OUR proposition. Sorry for seeming unreasonable but the additions of Album and Recording really was a bit of a surprise to me and something that wasn't fully discussed Anyway An easy solution The beginning of this conversation was about (in a nutshell) merging certain properties from hAlbum into hAudio right! so why don't we just do that From hAlbum we reuse both *album-title* http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Album_Title and *track* http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Track coupled with new properties *position* and *description* merge all that with the 0.6 version of hAudio and I think we have something that will suit everyone's situation The full property list would be hAudio album-title contributor published rel-sample rel-enclosure rel-payment photo track audio-title duration category price Comments? Thanks Martin Thanks Martin ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
Re: [uf-new] hAudio position and description properties
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 20:30 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 03:47 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 21:08 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: Most of the day today was spent re-analyzing all of the music service and podcast websites in audio-info-examples using Microformalyze. The raw analysis data is available here: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Microformalyze_Data_Files The analysis is available here: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Services http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Podcasts The new analysis shows very strong support for POSITION. This property is displayed in 70.73% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. I found No evidence of Position as far as podcasting is concerned although all the examples make a reference to episode I am not sure that this is the same thing, Can I also point out that podcasting Is NOT a problem area for this discussion. However Position Is something that should be supported As far as Music Downloads are concerned +1 for Position There is also enough support to meet the 80/20 rule for DESCRIPTION. This property is displayed in 39.02% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. +1 for Description PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into the Microformat. -- manu Manu are you also going to REMOVE the Album and Podcast properties and revert back to *audio-title* until any disputes have been resolved? I do not think that three votes was enough to warrant any changes to the existing proposal. I think you should have notified all the active participants in hAudio BEFORE you made any changes to OUR proposition. Sorry for seeming unreasonable but the additions of Album and Recording really was a bit of a surprise to me and something that wasn't fully discussed Anyway An easy solution The beginning of this conversation was about (in a nutshell) merging certain properties from hAlbum into hAudio right! so why don't we just do that From hAlbum we reuse both *album-title* http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Album_Title and *track* http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Track coupled with new properties *position* and *description* merge all that with the 0.6 version of hAudio and I think we have something that will suit everyone's situation The full property list would be hAudio album-title description contributor published rel-sample rel-enclosure rel-payment photo track position audio-title duration category price Comments? Thanks Martin Sorry, Its been a long weekend :) Thanks Martin ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
[uf-new] hAudio position and description properties
Most of the day today was spent re-analyzing all of the music service and podcast websites in audio-info-examples using Microformalyze. The raw analysis data is available here: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Microformalyze_Data_Files The analysis is available here: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Services http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Podcasts The new analysis shows very strong support for POSITION. This property is displayed in 70.73% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. There is also enough support to meet the 80/20 rule for DESCRIPTION. This property is displayed in 39.02% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into the Microformat. -- manu ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
Re: [uf-new] hAudio position and description properties
PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into the Microformat. I think you’re right and they both make perfect sense. ___ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
