Re: [Mikrotik Users] [WISPA Members] Did I miss the recall on the 951's?

[Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users]

What does support say ?

Justin  mailto:jus...@fd-ix.com>>
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 8, 2019, at 12:53 PM, alex phillips 
mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com>> wrote:

We are seeing port 5 poe out failures every week on the 951's.

Did I miss the recall on these?

There is no pattern.  Its not power, its not storms.  Just one day the port 
stops working and we install a poe to power the UBNT and give the customer the 
wall transformer to power the 951 and they are back in business.

We stopped using port 5 last year because of this but now we are still dealing 
with old installs.

Just wondering if anyone at MikroTik has any comments about this.


Alex Phillips
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net
HighSpeedLink.net
540-908-3993

___
Members mailing list
memb...@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability

[Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users]

OSPF is a good way.

Kevin Myers has a post about using ospf, ECMP, and clans for unequal load 
balancing.  
https://www.stubarea51.net/2016/10/27/wisp-design-using-ospf-to-build-a-transit-fabric-over-unequal-links/


Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net

www.mtin.net
www.midwest-ix.com

> On Dec 21, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users 
>  wrote:
> 
> Yep that would be the correct setup in this instance.  
> 
> 
> Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
> Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition" 
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services 
> Office: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net 
> Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
> Behalf Of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 12:56 PM
> To: Mikrotik Users 
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability
> 
> Thanks all, I will look at doing this with OSPF.
> 
> On 12/21/2018 11:43 AM, Robert Nickerson wrote:
>> We use OSPF for a setup of this type. It seems to work well.
>> 
>> Thx
>> 
>> RAN
>> 
>> On 12/20/2018 3:43 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>> 
>>> I'm looking at a configuration to set up bonding between two Mikrotik 
>>> routers (CCR1009 and RB2011), using two separate wireless links 
>>> between them (external radios).
>>> 
>>> I am concerned about one of the links having an issue where it stays 
>>> linked, but stops passing traffic.
>>> 
>>> Which bonding driver would be best suited to providing maximum 
>>> availability? Bonded capacity is not required, but the links aren't 
>>> the same speed; so I'd want to prefer the faster link if 
>>> non-aggregated capacity is required.
>>> 
>>> It seems like any method which only supports MII monitoring is out, 
>>> because the MII link wouldn't drop (it's Ethernet to the radio); 
>>> which rules out 802.11ad, active-backup, and balance-tlb.
>>> 
>>> broadcast seems like it would be limited to the slower link, rather 
>>> than the faster link.
>>> 
>>> balance-rr states that it requires equal bandwidth links.
>>> 
>>> This appears to only leave balance-xor and balance-alb. It seems like 
>>> balance-alb is most likely the best choice.
>>> 
>>> I am also unclear on how the ARP availability mechanism judges a port 
>>> to be available. I think that I would want to assign a unique probing 
>>> address to each port on each end of each router, and have those IP 
>>> addresses (one per port) set in the arp-ip-targets list? This should 
>>> allow the router to know which specific ports work, and which don't?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
> 
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---
> 
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> 

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] How are you doing your MK backups?

[Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users]

Unimus or Rancid.

We sell a backup service with Cloudstorage.  Unimus backs it up to a local or 
remote server,  and that is backed up to the cloud.


Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net

www.mtin.net
www.midwest-ix.com

> On Jun 29, 2018, at 2:00 AM, mike.lyon--- via Mikrotik-users 
>  wrote:
> 
> What is everyone doing for their MK backups besides having each MK email a 
> config file on a schedule?
> 
> Thank You,
> Mike
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> 

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night

[Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users]

The OSPF type makes a difference with Broacade as well.  NBMA is best from our 
experience. 


Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net

www.mtin.net
www.midwest-ix.com

> On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users 
>  wrote:
> 
> We run our own internal NTP as well all are synced.  Checking on the Brocade 
> now.  Maybe it is off. <>
>  
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Ops Manager
> NLBC.com 
>  
> From: Adair Winter [mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net] 
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 9:52 AM
> To: Faisal Imtiaz ; Mikrotik Users 
> 
> Cc: Steve Barnes 
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night
>  
> We run our own internal NTP server because of this. 
>  
> On Jan 15, 2018 8:46 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz via Mikrotik-users" 
> > wrote:
> It is very important to have the time synchronized on the different routers 
> for OSPF.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> http://www.snappytelecom.net 
> 
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 
> 
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518  Option 2 or Email: 
> supp...@snappytelecom.net 
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users"  > >
> > To: "Mikrotik Users"  > >
> > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 9:31:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night
> 
> > We are seeing very similar issues with ospf through our brocade.  It is 
> > kind of
> > like every so often a route goes stale and the brocade ignores it.  I don’t
> > have to kill upstream, Just change something in the /29 OSPF path and
> > everything wakes up.
> >
> > Have a Brocade Core and 3- 1072 distribution routers connected to Brocade 
> > onto
> > different network segments. One Dist router has no issue getting to all
> > sections but another will not be able to ping one or a few /29 or /30 even
> > though all devices have the same number of routes.  Quick change of a ospf
> > route or flushing the Brocade OSPF records on the Dist router port clears 
> > the
> > issue.
> >
> > Steve Barnes
> > Wireless Ops Manager
> > NLBC.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
> >  
> > [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
> > ]
> > On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
> > Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 9:49 AM
> > To: mike.l...@gmail.com ; Mikrotik Users 
> > >
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night
> >
> > Sounds like an internal routing issue on the 1032 to me. And/or something up
> > with your firewall. I would have to take a look.
> >
> > Dennis Burgess
> > www.linktechs.net  – 314-735-0270 x103 
> >  – dmburg...@linktechs.net 
> > 
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
> >  
> > [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
> > ]
> > On Behalf Of mike.lyon--- via Mikrotik-users
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 7:18 PM
> > To: christ...@cybernet1.com 
> > Cc: Mikrotik Users  > >
> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] CCR 1072 BGP trivia for your Friday Night
> >
> > No, i am only advertising the two /22s to my upstreams. Verified that they 
> > are
> > only recieving the two /22s.
> >
> > I should also mention that the CCR 1072 connects to a CCR 1036 and the 
> > various
> > /30s and /29s hang off the 1036. There is a 10.x /30 between the two 
> > routers.
> > The 1036 has a default route pointing to the 1072. The 1072 has two staric
> > routes routing the two /22s to the 1036.
> >
> > It would appear the route is getting dropped at the 1072.
> >
> > Joe Bob Random  /30 will report that he is unable to browse the internet at 
> > one
> > moment, traceroute stops at the 1072. Drop one of the two BGP upstreams 
> > (doesnt
> > matter which one) and Joe Bob Random /30 begins to work again.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
> >> On Jan 12, 2018, at 17:08,  >> >  >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Are you actually advertising /29's and /30's to your providers?
> >>
> >>
> >> Also, what exactly do you mean by dropping /30's?  Like the packets are 
> >> being
> >> 

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Need help with my mikrotik configuration

[Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users]

Connectivity Engineer.   http://connectivity.engineer/ 
  We can help you out.


Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net

---
http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth

http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric

> On Jan 18, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Alejandro Perez via Mikrotik-users 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hello.
> Does anyone know a compaby that remotely can help me to configure my mikrotik 
> router? Im almost done with my configuration, but im having some issues with 
> the Pppoe and management vlans.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Alex Perez
> 
> 956.236.4772 
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Updates

[Justin Wilson via Mikrotik-users]

We are still seeing OSPF issues with multiple areas.  Things like one side 
establishes, but the other does not.  The wrong subnets are advertised out 
interfaces they should not.  For example, we had a router that had a 
10.239.239.0/29 bound to ether1 on a CCR.  OSPF would not exchange routes, and 
would establish half the time.  After going through debugging we were seeing 
10.239.239.0/29 LSA’s on ether5.  Lots of checking done to make sure things 
were on proper interfaces, etc.  All was good.  Even did a hard reset on the 
router.  Helped for about 5 minutes, then the same.  Downgrading to 6.33.x 
fixed it.

Seeing PPPoE stability issues with 6.35 with concentrators with hundreds of 
sessions.


Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net

---
http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth

http://www.midwest-ix.com  COO/Chairman
Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric

> On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:07 PM, Matthew Brendle via Mikrotik-users 
>  wrote:
> 
> Steve, what OSPF issues were you seeing?
> 
> On Sep 13, 2016 10:57 AM, "Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users" 
> > wrote:
> Yap, have quite a few on 6.36.2 and 3 without pppoe issues.. so..  again, 
> don’t know what ti is. Keep in mind that those may be VERY specific issues 
> with something specific to that network. Who knows. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Dennis Burgess – Network Engineer/Consutant
> 
> MikroTik Certified Trianer/Consultant 
>  – MTCNA, 
> MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
> 
> Cambium ePMP Certified, Telrad Certified, Cisco CCNA
> 
>  
> 
> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net 
> 
> RF Mapping: www.towercoverage.com 
> Office: 314-735-0270 
> dmburg...@linktechs.net 
>  
> 
> From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
>  
> [mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Justin Miller via 
> Mikrotik-users
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 6:25 PM
> To: Steve Barnes >; Mikrotik Users 
> >
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Updates
> 
>  
> 
> I've heard that pppoe speeds are worse in some of the later versions, but 
> only for the client or servers. Not for PPPoE transiting through. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Justin Miller
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  VA SkyWire, LLC
> 
>  3114 W Marshall St, Ste A <>
>  Richmond, VA 23230 <>
>  Office: (804) 521-4212 
>  Desk: (804) 591-0500 ext 101 
>  Fax: (804) 591-1559 
>  jus...@vaskywire.com 
> 
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Steve Barnes via Mikrotik-users 
> > wrote:
> 
> I am on 6.29 across all my OSPF network and Seeing some goofy things from 
> time to time with Queues and all and there are some features that I would 
> like to add in 6.36 Is 6.36.3 stable treating networks well?  Any gotcha's 
> going form 6.29 to 6.36.3?
> 
> Steve Barnes
> Wireless Operations Manager
> PCSWIN.COM 
> NLBC.COM 
> 
> 
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users 
> 
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org 
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users 
> 
> 
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users