Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] vsbackup.idl: set default value for InitializeForBackup() bstrXML
Hi Biswapriyo On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:15 AM Biswapriyo Nath wrote: > > Opps! I have been caught for my `sed` cheats :) I may have missed many > of those default values. Can I add those defaultvalue() in one patch? > That would be great! thanks ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] vsbackup.idl: set default value for InitializeForBackup() bstrXML
Opps! I have been caught for my `sed` cheats :) I may have missed many of those default values. Can I add those defaultvalue() in one patch? ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] winpthreads: Add a missing (void) in the parameters for pthread_getevent
在 2/18/22 00:23, NightStrike 写道:
Adding unnecessary spam because of yet another poor choice of clang is
not something we should be catering towards. Users can compile with
-Wno-strict-prototypes if it bothers them that much.
No this is not 'unnecessary'. In C the declaration `void* pthread_getevent();` is equivalent to
`void* pthread_getevent(...);` despite lack of any means to get arguments (`va_start` requires a
named parameter). Ancient code that predated ISO C used to define functions like
int fputc(); /* declaration */
int fputc() /* definition*/
int c; /* arguments */
FILE* fp;
{ /* ... */ }
so empty parentheses are there to provide compatibility, and leaving them there for now is not only
not unnecessary, but totally incorrect in C.
--
Best regards,
LIU Hao
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] winpthreads: Add a missing (void) in the parameters for pthread_getevent
On 2/17/22, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:27 AM Martin Storsjö wrote:
>>>
>>> This avoids warnings if building code including it, with
>>> -Wstrict-prototypes. (Latest Clang defaults to enabling this warning
>>> by default.)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö
>>> ---
>>> mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h | 2 +-
>>> mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
>>> b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
>>> index fe0e821ce..5aadb1cfa 100644
>>> --- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
>>> +++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
>>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int WINPTHREAD_API pthread_barrierattr_getpshared(void
>>> **attr, int *s);
>>> /* Private extensions for analysis and internal use. */
>>> struct _pthread_cleanup ** WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getclean (void);
>>> void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_gethandle (pthread_t t);
>>> -void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent ();
>>> +void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent (void);
>>>
>>> unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_rel_time_in_ms(const
>>> struct timespec *ts);
>>> unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_time_in_ms(void);
>>> diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
>>> b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
>>> index 55361aec9..e3edbae8a 100644
>>> --- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
>>> +++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
>>> @@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ pthread_self (void)
>>>
>>> /* Internal helper for getting event handle of thread T. */
>>> void *
>>> -pthread_getevent ()
>>> +pthread_getevent (void)
>>> {
>>>_pthread_v *t = __pthread_self_lite ();
>>>return (!t ? NULL : t->evStart);
>>
>> Adding unnecessary spam because of yet another poor choice of clang is
>> not something we should be catering towards. Users can compile with
>> -Wno-strict-prototypes if it bothers them that much.
>
> Actually, my comment about Clang was wrong, I was misinformed - this
> doesn't have anything to do with Clang at all.
>
> I saw the warning fly by for every file built, when building a project
> that explicitly enables -Wstrict-prototypes.
>
> // Martin
IMO, the patch is good.
--
O.S.
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] winpthreads: Add a missing (void) in the parameters for pthread_getevent
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:27 AM Martin Storsjö wrote:
This avoids warnings if building code including it, with
-Wstrict-prototypes. (Latest Clang defaults to enabling this warning
by default.)
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö
---
mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h | 2 +-
mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
index fe0e821ce..5aadb1cfa 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
+++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int WINPTHREAD_API pthread_barrierattr_getpshared(void
**attr, int *s);
/* Private extensions for analysis and internal use. */
struct _pthread_cleanup ** WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getclean (void);
void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_gethandle (pthread_t t);
-void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent ();
+void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent (void);
unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_rel_time_in_ms(const struct
timespec *ts);
unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_time_in_ms(void);
diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
index 55361aec9..e3edbae8a 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
+++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ pthread_self (void)
/* Internal helper for getting event handle of thread T. */
void *
-pthread_getevent ()
+pthread_getevent (void)
{
_pthread_v *t = __pthread_self_lite ();
return (!t ? NULL : t->evStart);
Adding unnecessary spam because of yet another poor choice of clang is
not something we should be catering towards. Users can compile with
-Wno-strict-prototypes if it bothers them that much.
Actually, my comment about Clang was wrong, I was misinformed - this
doesn't have anything to do with Clang at all.
I saw the warning fly by for every file built, when building a project
that explicitly enables -Wstrict-prototypes.
// Martin
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] winpthreads: Add a missing (void) in the parameters for pthread_getevent
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:27 AM Martin Storsjö wrote:
This avoids warnings if building code including it, with
-Wstrict-prototypes. (Latest Clang defaults to enabling this warning
by default.)
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö
---
mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h | 2 +-
mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
index fe0e821ce..5aadb1cfa 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
+++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int WINPTHREAD_API pthread_barrierattr_getpshared(void
**attr, int *s);
/* Private extensions for analysis and internal use. */
struct _pthread_cleanup ** WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getclean (void);
void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_gethandle (pthread_t t);
-void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent ();
+void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent (void);
unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_rel_time_in_ms(const struct
timespec *ts);
unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_time_in_ms(void);
diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
index 55361aec9..e3edbae8a 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
+++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ pthread_self (void)
/* Internal helper for getting event handle of thread T. */
void *
-pthread_getevent ()
+pthread_getevent (void)
{
_pthread_v *t = __pthread_self_lite ();
return (!t ? NULL : t->evStart);
Adding unnecessary spam because of yet another poor choice of clang is
not something we should be catering towards. Users can compile with
-Wno-strict-prototypes if it bothers them that much.
Sorry, but in what way is declaring a correct function prototype "spam"?
We already do that for some other functions right above, see e.g.
pthread_getclean 2 lines above in the header.
// Martin
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] winpthreads: Add a missing (void) in the parameters for pthread_getevent
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:27 AM Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
> This avoids warnings if building code including it, with
> -Wstrict-prototypes. (Latest Clang defaults to enabling this warning
> by default.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö
> ---
> mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h | 2 +-
> mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
> b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
> index fe0e821ce..5aadb1cfa 100644
> --- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
> +++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int WINPTHREAD_API pthread_barrierattr_getpshared(void
> **attr, int *s);
> /* Private extensions for analysis and internal use. */
> struct _pthread_cleanup ** WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getclean (void);
> void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_gethandle (pthread_t t);
> -void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent ();
> +void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent (void);
>
> unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_rel_time_in_ms(const
> struct timespec *ts);
> unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_time_in_ms(void);
> diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
> b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
> index 55361aec9..e3edbae8a 100644
> --- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
> +++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
> @@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ pthread_self (void)
>
> /* Internal helper for getting event handle of thread T. */
> void *
> -pthread_getevent ()
> +pthread_getevent (void)
> {
>_pthread_v *t = __pthread_self_lite ();
>return (!t ? NULL : t->evStart);
Adding unnecessary spam because of yet another poor choice of clang is
not something we should be catering towards. Users can compile with
-Wno-strict-prototypes if it bothers them that much.
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] winpthreads: Add a missing (void) in the parameters for pthread_getevent
This avoids warnings if building code including it, with
-Wstrict-prototypes. (Latest Clang defaults to enabling this warning
by default.)
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö
---
mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h | 2 +-
mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
index fe0e821ce..5aadb1cfa 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
+++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int WINPTHREAD_API pthread_barrierattr_getpshared(void
**attr, int *s);
/* Private extensions for analysis and internal use. */
struct _pthread_cleanup ** WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getclean (void);
void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_gethandle (pthread_t t);
-void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent ();
+void * WINPTHREAD_API pthread_getevent (void);
unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_rel_time_in_ms(const struct
timespec *ts);
unsigned long long WINPTHREAD_API _pthread_time_in_ms(void);
diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
index 55361aec9..e3edbae8a 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
+++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/src/thread.c
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ pthread_self (void)
/* Internal helper for getting event handle of thread T. */
void *
-pthread_getevent ()
+pthread_getevent (void)
{
_pthread_v *t = __pthread_self_lite ();
return (!t ? NULL : t->evStart);
--
2.25.1
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] vsbackup.idl: set default value for InitializeForBackup() bstrXML
From: Marc-André Lureau This fixes the compilation against the QEMU Guest Agent. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau --- mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.h | 2 +- mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.idl | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.h index 0bf3ca0e9b01..30341794d0fc 100644 --- a/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.h +++ b/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.h @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ IVssBackupComponents : public IUnknown IVssWriterComponentsExt **ppWriter) = 0; virtual HRESULT STDMETHODCALLTYPE InitializeForBackup( -BSTR bstrXML) = 0; +BSTR bstrXML = 0) = 0; virtual HRESULT STDMETHODCALLTYPE SetBackupState( boolean bSelectComponents, diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.idl b/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.idl index 2740bb186a1f..92ac5945fae8 100644 --- a/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.idl +++ b/mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.idl @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ interface IVssBackupComponents : IUnknown [out] IVssWriterComponentsExt **ppWriter); HRESULT InitializeForBackup( -[in] BSTR bstrXML); +[in, defaultvalue(NULL)] BSTR bstrXML); HRESULT SetBackupState( [in] boolean bSelectComponents, -- 2.34.1.428.gdcc0cd074f0c ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt: Check the return value from MultiByteToWideChar in btowc
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, LIU Hao wrote: 在 2/16/22 06:09, Martin Storsjö 写道: If MultiByteToWideChar failed, it could still have overwritten the output variable. Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö --- mingw-w64-crt/misc/btowc.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) LGTM. Thanks. Pushed, thanks! // Martin ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
