Re: Privoxy lockups

2006-02-18 Thread Juha Erkkila
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:32PM +0100, Michael Frost wrote:
 Using OpenBSD-v3.8 and v3.9-BETA on i386 together with tor, privoxy
 stops working alfways after a few minutes up to a few hours. 'Stop
 working' means either the privoxy process isn't running anymore (so it
 needs to be restarted) or the process is running but no data stream is
 managed by privoxy (seen with tcpdump). The trouble maker is definitely
 privoxy and not tor.
 
 Is there anybody out here who can confirm this? Do you know a workaround
 to handle these lockups?

for me, privoxy hangs soon after i try doing any connection through
it.  i could ``fix'' the problem by enabling ``single-threaded''
in /etc/privoxy/config, so it's apparently a threads issue

Juha



Re: slow downloads to gateway

2006-02-18 Thread Bachman Kharazmi
bw_test_512MB:ETA:   1:08  101.21/512.00 MB6.03 MB/s

I increased the value to 10
thanks
/bkw
On 18/02/06, Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
  I'm running obsd 3.8 release on my gateway. Two xl nics are installed.
  The GW does NAT which works very well,
  All downloads from internet=hosts behind the gw with local IPs goes
  really fast.
  But from internet to the GW's harddisk is ~20% of what the LAN hosts
  speed are through the GW.
 
  I know the harddrive on the gw isn't the bottleneck.
 
  Are there anything else I should check?

 You don't really define what slow is, but you might want to try
 increasing net.inet.tcp.recvspace to start.




--
##
BKW - Bachman Kharazmi
bahkha AT gmail DOT com
uin: #24089491
SWEDEN
##



Workaround if your broadcom nic timed out when disabling ethernet mac

2006-02-18 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
i have EXACTLY the same issue on one of Samsung's notebook.

you need to UNPLUG power cord from your PC/notebook BEFORE
booting into OpenBSD/NetBSD.

see here http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2004/03/25/0005.html

Bryan Brake wrote:

 This annoyance started when I bought a brand-new Dell Inspiron 9300.  It
 comes with a Broadcom 4401 Ethernet NIC.  The NIC appeared to 
 initialize, but when I tried to set the interface to UP, the following 
 error message occurs:
 
 bce0: timed out when disabling ethernet mac
 bce0: timed out writing pkt filter ctl
 bce0: timed out writing pkt filter ctl
 bce0: timed out writing pkt filter ctl
 bce0: timed out writing pkt filter ctl
 bce0: timed out writing pkt filter ctl
 bce0: timed out writing pkt filter ctl
 
 I updated to the latest snapshot (15 Feb), with no luck.  I stumbled 
 upon this workaround by accident, as I was angry...
 
 I posted my problem to BSDforums, 
 (http://www.bsdforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39110) but received no 
 answer, so I am posting this to the list, so that until it is fixed, 
 this can be used as a work around.
 
 My system was setup for the NIC to catch an IP via dhcp, so when I get:
 bce0: no link
 
 I logged in and do a quick ifconfig bce0
 
 bce0: flags=8a43UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
   lladdr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
   media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
   status: no carrier
   inet6 :::::%bce0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
 
 no carrier, huh?  Well, I just used this nic and cable to access my home 
 network on windows XP, so it's not a hardware issue, or a cable issue.



strange ipv6 routing issue

2006-02-18 Thread Olivier Mehani
Hello list,

I'm playing with IPv6 in 3.8 and came up to this strange problem.

My IPv6 connectivity is given by a broker (xs26.net) and I have set up a gif
interface to use it (gif0):

/etc/hostname.gif0 contains:

tunnel SIS0IPv4 BROKERIPv4
inet6 IPv6PREFIX::1
!route add -inet6 default IPv6PREFIX::1

gif0: flags=8151UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,PROMISC,MULTICAST mtu 1500
groups: gif 
physical address inet SIS0IPv4 -- BROKERIPv4
inet6 fe80::202:6fff:fe21:ea79%gif0 -  prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
inet6 IPv6PREFIX::1 -  prefixlen 64

The funny thing is that I _can_ ping a given machine.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping6 DISTANTHOSTNAME
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) IPv6PREFIX::1 -- DISTANTHOSTIPv6
16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=0 hlim=53 time=207.974 ms
16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=1 hlim=53 time=176.176 ms
16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=2 hlim=53 time=241.964 ms
16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=3 hlim=53 time=253.56 ms
^C
--- zorglub.ssji.net ping6 statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 176.176/219.918/253.560/30.306 ms

but I get a no route to host when trying to ssh to it

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh -v6 DISTANTHOSTNAME
OpenSSH_4.1, OpenSSL 0.9.7g 11 Apr 2005
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Connecting to DISTANTHOSTNAME [DISTANTHOSTIPv6] port 22.
debug1: connect to address DISTANTHOSTIPv6 port 22: No route to host
ssh: connect to host DISTANTHOSTNAME port 22: No route to host

(/etc/ssh/ssh_config reads $OpenBSD: ssh_config,v 1.20 2005/01/28
09:45:53 dtucker Exp $ and has not been modified)

To be even weirder, the machines behind the router, which get IPv6 in the same
prefix manage to ssh to the very same host using IPv6 through the router.

Does somebody have some ideas/solutions about this problem ?

Useful information (note the illegal prefix len in the output of route for 
::/4, which seems to be what default resolves to when route -add'ing)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
OpenBSD mudrublic.narf.ssji.net 3.8 GENERIC#224 i386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ route -n show -inet6
Routing tables

Internet6:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs
UseMtu  Interface
route: illegal prefixlen
::/4   IPv6PREFIX::1  UGS 0
1591  -   gif0
::1::1UH  0
0  33224   lo0
IPv6PREFIX::/64link#8 UC  0
0  -   gif0
IPv6PREFIX::1  link#8 UHLc0
12  -   lo0
IPv6PREFIX:100::/64link#3 UC  0
0  -   sis1
IPv6PREFIX:100::1  00:00:24:c4:22:5d  UHLc0
0  -   lo0
IPv6PREFIX:101::/64link#1 UC  0
0  -   ath0
IPv6PREFIX:101::1  00:02:6f:21:ea:79  UHLc0
0  -   lo0
IPv6PREFIX:101:211:95ff:febb:812f 00:11:95:bb:81:2f  UHLc
0 1857  -   ath0
IPv6PREFIX:101:230:65ff:fe0f:2795 00:30:65:0f:27:95  UHLc
02  -   ath0
fe80::%ath0/64 link#1 UC  0
0  -   ath0
fe80::202:6fff:fe21:ea79%ath0  00:02:6f:21:ea:79  UHLc0
0  -   lo0
fe80::211:95ff:febb:812f%ath0  00:11:95:bb:81:2f  UHLc0
109  -   ath0
fe80::230:65ff:fe0f:2795%ath0  00:30:65:0f:27:95  UHLc0
4  -   ath0
fe80::%sis0/64 link#2 UC  0
0  -   sis0
fe80::%sis1/64 link#3 UC  0
0  -   sis1
fe80::%lo0/64  fe80::1%lo0U   0
0  -   lo0
fe80::%gif0link#8 UHLc0
0  -   gif0
fe80::%gif0/64 link#8 UC  0
0  -   gif0
fe80::202:6fff:fe21:ea79%gif0  link#8 UHLc0
0  -   lo0
fe80::260:8ff:fe34:275f%gif0   link#8 UHLc0
606  -   gif0
ff01::/32  ::1UC  0
0  -   lo0
ff02::%ath0/32 link#1 UC  0
0  -   ath0
ff02::%sis0/32 link#2 UC  0
0  -   sis0
ff02::%sis1/32 link#3 UC  0
0  -   sis1
ff02::%lo0/32  ::1UC  0
0  -   lo0
ff02::%gif0/32 link#8 UC  0
0  -   gif0

dmesg not included as it does not seem to be relevant for this problem,
correct me if I'm wrong (;

thanks

-- 
Olivier Mehani [EMAIL 

Re: strange ipv6 routing issue

2006-02-18 Thread David Hill
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:57:05PM +0100, Olivier Mehani wrote:
 Hello list,
 
 I'm playing with IPv6 in 3.8 and came up to this strange problem.
 
 My IPv6 connectivity is given by a broker (xs26.net) and I have set up a gif
 interface to use it (gif0):
 
 /etc/hostname.gif0 contains:
 
 tunnel SIS0IPv4 BROKERIPv4
 inet6 IPv6PREFIX::1
 !route add -inet6 default IPv6PREFIX::1
 
 gif0: flags=8151UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,PROMISC,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 groups: gif 
 physical address inet SIS0IPv4 -- BROKERIPv4
 inet6 fe80::202:6fff:fe21:ea79%gif0 -  prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
 inet6 IPv6PREFIX::1 -  prefixlen 64
 
 The funny thing is that I _can_ ping a given machine.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping6 DISTANTHOSTNAME
 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) IPv6PREFIX::1 -- DISTANTHOSTIPv6
 16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=0 hlim=53 time=207.974 ms
 16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=1 hlim=53 time=176.176 ms
 16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=2 hlim=53 time=241.964 ms
 16 bytes from DISTANTHOSTIPv6, icmp_seq=3 hlim=53 time=253.56 ms
 ^C
 --- zorglub.ssji.net ping6 statistics ---
 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
 round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 176.176/219.918/253.560/30.306 ms
 
 but I get a no route to host when trying to ssh to it
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh -v6 DISTANTHOSTNAME
 OpenSSH_4.1, OpenSSL 0.9.7g 11 Apr 2005
 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
 debug1: Connecting to DISTANTHOSTNAME [DISTANTHOSTIPv6] port 22.
 debug1: connect to address DISTANTHOSTIPv6 port 22: No route to host
 ssh: connect to host DISTANTHOSTNAME port 22: No route to host
 
 (/etc/ssh/ssh_config reads $OpenBSD: ssh_config,v 1.20 2005/01/28
 09:45:53 dtucker Exp $ and has not been modified)
 
 To be even weirder, the machines behind the router, which get IPv6 in the same
 prefix manage to ssh to the very same host using IPv6 through the router.
 
 Does somebody have some ideas/solutions about this problem ?
 
 Useful information (note the illegal prefix len in the output of route for 
 ::/4, which seems to be what default resolves to when route -add'ing)
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
 OpenBSD mudrublic.narf.ssji.net 3.8 GENERIC#224 i386
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ route -n show -inet6
 Routing tables
 
 Internet6:
 DestinationGatewayFlags
 Refs
 UseMtu  Interface
 route: illegal prefixlen
 ::/4   IPv6PREFIX::1  UGS 0
 1591  -   gif0
 ::1::1UH   0
 0  33224   lo0
 IPv6PREFIX::/64link#8 UC  0
 0  -   gif0
 IPv6PREFIX::1  link#8 UHLc0
 12  -   lo0
 IPv6PREFIX:100::/64link#3 UC  0
 0  -   sis1
 IPv6PREFIX:100::1  00:00:24:c4:22:5d  UHLc0
 0  -   lo0
 IPv6PREFIX:101::/64link#1 UC  0
 0  -   ath0
 IPv6PREFIX:101::1  00:02:6f:21:ea:79  UHLc0
 0  -   lo0
 IPv6PREFIX:101:211:95ff:febb:812f 00:11:95:bb:81:2f  UHLc
 0 1857  -   ath0
 IPv6PREFIX:101:230:65ff:fe0f:2795 00:30:65:0f:27:95  UHLc
 02  -   ath0
 fe80::%ath0/64 link#1 UC   0
 0  -   ath0
 fe80::202:6fff:fe21:ea79%ath0  00:02:6f:21:ea:79  UHLc 0
 0  -   lo0
 fe80::211:95ff:febb:812f%ath0  00:11:95:bb:81:2f  UHLc 0
 109  -   ath0
 fe80::230:65ff:fe0f:2795%ath0  00:30:65:0f:27:95  UHLc 0
 4  -   ath0
 fe80::%sis0/64 link#2 UC   0
 0  -   sis0
 fe80::%sis1/64 link#3 UC   0
 0  -   sis1
 fe80::%lo0/64  fe80::1%lo0U0
 0  -   lo0
 fe80::%gif0link#8 UHLc 0
 0  -   gif0
 fe80::%gif0/64 link#8 UC   0
 0  -   gif0
 fe80::202:6fff:fe21:ea79%gif0  link#8 UHLc 0
 0  -   lo0
 fe80::260:8ff:fe34:275f%gif0   link#8 UHLc 0
 606  -   gif0
 ff01::/32  ::1UC   0
 0  -   lo0
 ff02::%ath0/32 link#1 UC   0
 0  -   ath0
 ff02::%sis0/32 link#2 UC   0
 0  -   sis0
 ff02::%sis1/32 link#3 UC   0
 0  -   sis1
 ff02::%lo0/32  ::1UC   0
 0  -   lo0
 ff02::%gif0/32

Re: slow downloads to gateway

2006-02-18 Thread Bachman Kharazmi
By the way, when I now have a proper download speed, I have to ask why
the default vaule of net.inet.tcp.recvspace is set so low?
I have a 100MBit  inet connection so it was little confusing with my
earlier bandwidth limitation.
/bkw

On 18/02/06, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 bw_test_512MB:ETA:   1:08  101.21/512.00 MB6.03 MB/s

 I increased the value to 10
 thanks
 /bkw
 On 18/02/06, Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
   I'm running obsd 3.8 release on my gateway. Two xl nics are installed.
   The GW does NAT which works very well,
   All downloads from internet=hosts behind the gw with local IPs goes
   really fast.
   But from internet to the GW's harddisk is ~20% of what the LAN hosts
   speed are through the GW.
  
   I know the harddrive on the gw isn't the bottleneck.
  
   Are there anything else I should check?
 
  You don't really define what slow is, but you might want to try
  increasing net.inet.tcp.recvspace to start.



Re: slow downloads to gateway

2006-02-18 Thread Melameth, Daniel D.
I'm certain someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but the current
setting is optimized for low latency networks, like LANs, and reduces
kernel memory consumption.  Also, your use of a value of a million, is
overly high and might lead to problems--experiment and use the lowest
value that meets your needs.  For more information, google for bandwidth
delay product.

Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
 By the way, when I now have a proper download speed, I have to ask why
 the default vaule of net.inet.tcp.recvspace is set so low?
 I have a 100MBit  inet connection so it was little confusing with my
 earlier bandwidth limitation.
 /bkw
 
 On 18/02/06, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  bw_test_512MB:ETA:   1:08  101.21/512.00 MB   
  6.03 MB/s 
  
  I increased the value to 10
  thanks
  /bkw
  On 18/02/06, Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
I'm running obsd 3.8 release on my gateway. Two xl nics are
installed. The GW does NAT which works very well,
All downloads from internet=hosts behind the gw with local IPs
goes really fast. But from internet to the GW's harddisk is
~20% of what the LAN hosts speed are through the GW. 

I know the harddrive on the gw isn't the bottleneck.

Are there anything else I should check?
   
   You don't really define what slow is, but you might want to try
   increasing net.inet.tcp.recvspace to start.



Utilisation of free memory as disc cache: tweaking is required?

2006-02-18 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
Hello,

I have a box with 512MB of RAM, which is running a snapshot from 2006-02-13.

The box does not get used much, so most of the RAM stays still, i.e.
not used by the userland.

I am now quite surprised why OpenBSD does not use all of this RAM for
disc cache etc.


After rebooting the system, I took some measurements from the root
console (where only one other user was logged in, who ran a `top`
every once in a while).

In the fragment of my session below, you can see that running
identical `find /usr/src/sys/ -name *.[ch] | xargs grep qwertyuiop`
command does not seem to utilise any disc cache before the kernel
option gets modified. After we increase kern.maxvnodes by a factor of
16, we immediately get huge benefits of running identical 'find ..
grep ..' command the second time etc.


Before tweaking kern.maxvnodes:
free memory after 'find .. grep ..' is around 368MB
repeated 'find .. grep ..' always take as much as 14 seconds

After tweaking kern.maxvnodes:
free memory after 'find .. grep ..' is around 338MB
repeated 'find .. grep ..' take as little as 3,9 seconds


My question is thus:
Is there a reason no algorithm is used to automatically modify kernel
variables such as kern.maxvnodes to efficiently account free memory
for disc cache?


Here is the session log:


tvc# idate
2006-02-18T13:36:22Z
tvc# sysctl kern
kern.ostype=OpenBSD
kern.osrelease=3.9
kern.osrevision=200605
kern.version=OpenBSD 3.9-beta (GENERIC) #601: Sun Feb 12 21:39:52 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC

kern.maxvnodes=1310
kern.maxproc=532
kern.maxfiles=1772
kern.argmax=262144
kern.securelevel=1
kern.hostname=tvc.home.const.name
kern.hostid=0
kern.clockrate=tick = 1, tickadj = 40, hz = 100, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128
kern.posix1version=199009
kern.ngroups=16
kern.job_control=1
kern.saved_ids=1
kern.boottime=Sat Feb 18 13:33:45 2006
kern.domainname=
kern.maxpartitions=16
kern.rawpartition=2
kern.osversion=GENERIC#601
kern.somaxconn=128
kern.sominconn=80
kern.usermount=0
kern.random=29769 533248 0 28232 5 1032 0 0 0 0 0 0 10775 8441 0 23
8411 1 7 18 35 71 104 156 211 220 218 114 121 114 78 62 95 90 134 155
185 117 45 4 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 8408 0 81 1335 951 0 0 0 0 0 1369 12780
16079 0 0
kern.nosuidcoredump=1
kern.fsync=1
kern.sysvmsg=1
kern.sysvsem=1
kern.sysvshm=1
kern.arandom=151420742
kern.msgbufsize=16364
kern.malloc.buckets=16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192,16384,32768,65536,131072,262144,524288
kern.malloc.bucket.16=(calls = 25540 total_allocated = 3584 total_free
= 743 elements = 256 high watermark = 1280 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.32=(calls = 4861 total_allocated = 1280 total_free
= 145 elements = 128 high watermark = 640 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.64=(calls = 2479 total_allocated = 640 total_free =
90 elements = 64 high watermark = 320 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.128=(calls = 881 total_allocated = 320 total_free =
41 elements = 32 high watermark = 160 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.256=(calls = 615 total_allocated = 192 total_free =
12 elements = 16 high watermark = 80 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.512=(calls = 382 total_allocated = 112 total_free =
13 elements = 8 high watermark = 40 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.1024=(calls = 1247 total_allocated = 232 total_free
= 4 elements = 4 high watermark = 20 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.2048=(calls = 102 total_allocated = 92 total_free =
1 elements = 2 high watermark = 10 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.4096=(calls = 229 total_allocated = 33 total_free =
1 elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.8192=(calls = 10 total_allocated = 10 total_free =
0 elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.16384=(calls = 1 total_allocated = 1 total_free = 0
elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.32768=(calls = 1 total_allocated = 1 total_free = 0
elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.65536=(calls = 2 total_allocated = 2 total_free = 0
elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.131072=(calls = 0 total_allocated = 0 total_free =
0 elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.262144=(calls = 0 total_allocated = 0 total_free =
0 elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)
kern.malloc.bucket.524288=(calls = 0 total_allocated = 0 total_free =
0 elements = 1 high watermark = 5 could_free = 0)

Problem using Nslookup through VPN link

2006-02-18 Thread Todd Boyer
I have two 3.8 (GENERIC) IPSec VPN gateways using ISAKMP transforms for
negotiation. No complicated PF rules, everything is wide open between
networks. I can access and negotiate every protocol except when I call
an nslookup request from one side to a W2K3 server on the other. I
receive timeouts and server not available. A quick telnet (ip) 53
returns a response.  I can ping, tracert/traceroute, and map drives
between networks. Tcpdump shows outbound domain requests from one side,
tcpdump on the destination shows no domain requests coming in. No
restrictions or ACL security implemented in AD that would prevent a
lookup for a local zone.  Finally, I have additional Ipsec peers in the
same 3.8 (GENERIC) VPN gateway that have Sonicwall peers. From these
links, I can run nslookups between the networks without issue. Very
strange, any ideas? Thanks -T



Re: nat, pf, and ftp

2006-02-18 Thread Darrin Chandler

David Higgs wrote:


After reading the man pages for pf.conf and ftp-proxy, it's not 100%
clear to me how I should go about supporting ftp.  I have a basic
2-nic obsd box doing nat for my internal network, and run ftp-proxy
with the -n flag.  The relevant portions of my pf.conf are shown
below:
 

Don't forget the pf faq! Lots of good stuff there, and some simple, 
commented examples (yes, with ftp).


--
Darrin Chandler|  Phoenix BSD Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |



anoncvs as root or user?

2006-02-18 Thread Erwin Zbinden
Hi

Do I checkout source via anoncvs as root or as user?

Erwin

-- 
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie



Re: pix firewall question

2006-02-18 Thread Thomas Börnert
pix isn't so easy as openbsd :-|

rdr from outside:

global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 INTERNALPC 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp EXTERNALIP smtp INTERNALPC smtp netmask
255.255.255.255

Thomas

On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 13:13 -0500, Rod Dorman wrote:
 On Saturday, February 18, 2006, 12:26:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi there.  I am a long time user of openbsd and ipf/pf.  I just got
  stuck with the task of managing some pix firewalls for the next eight
  weeks until they can get someone else.  Could somebody reply to me off
  list?  I just need to do some simple redirects.  Simple in openbsd,
  that is, but I can't figure out how to do it on the pix.
 
 Never  used a PIX so I can't directly answer ya but have you browsed the
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco archive?



Re: Crash after halt -p (i386, current of feb. 5th)

2006-02-18 Thread Oliver J. Morais
For the archives:
Tried again with sysctl machdep.apmhalt=1, same game :-/

# halt -p
/etc/rc.shutdown in progress...
/etc/rc.shutdown complete.
syncing disks... done

Attempting to power down...
apm0: APM set power state: unrecognized device ID (9)
uvm_fault(0xd6930298, 0x8000, 0, 1) - e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at  trap+0x15f: movzbl  0(%edx),%eax
ddb ps
   PID   PPID   PGRPUID  S   FLAGS  WAIT   COMMAND
*31535  1  31535  0  7  0x4006 halt
12  0  0  0  30x100204  crypto_wa  crypto
11  0  0  0  30x100204  aiodoned   aiodoned
10  0  0  0  30x100204  syncer update
 9  0  0  0  30x100204  cleanercleaner
 8  0  0  0  30x100204  reaper reaper
 7  0  0  0  30x100204  pgdaemon   pagedaemon
 6  0  0  0  30x100204  pftm   pfpurge
 5  0  0  0  30x100204  usbtsk usbtask
 4  0  0  0  30x100204  usbevt usb0
 3  0  0  0  30x100204  apmev  apm0
 2  0  0  0  30x100204  kmallockmthread
 1  0  1  0  3  0x4084  wait   init
 0 -1  0  0  3 0x80204  scheduler  swapper
ddb trace
trap() at trap+0x15f
--- trap (number 4) ---
0x893d:
ddb



Re: nat, pf, and ftp

2006-02-18 Thread David Higgs
I'm beginning to wonder if I'm being dense and missing something
brutally simple.  I've looked at the pf FAQ, payed special attention
to the FTP section, and even used identical configuration without
success.

The problem is that with passive mode, the client is actively
attempting to connect to the server.  Port numbers on either end
cannot be predicted, and the block all rule denies the outgoing
connection since the client is in $untrusted.

Any further ideas?

--david

On 2/18/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 David Higgs wrote:

 After reading the man pages for pf.conf and ftp-proxy, it's not 100%
 clear to me how I should go about supporting ftp.  I have a basic
 2-nic obsd box doing nat for my internal network, and run ftp-proxy
 with the -n flag.  The relevant portions of my pf.conf are shown
 below:
 
 
 Don't forget the pf faq! Lots of good stuff there, and some simple,
 commented examples (yes, with ftp).

 --
 Darrin Chandler|  Phoenix BSD Users Group
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
 http://www.stilyagin.com/  |



Re: nat, pf, and ftp

2006-02-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2006/02/18 16:12, David Higgs wrote:
 The problem is that with passive mode, the client is actively
 attempting to connect to the server.  Port numbers on either end
 cannot be predicted

Well, that depends somewhat on your ftp server. Most modern ones allow
you to restrict the range of ports used.



Re: nat, pf, and ftp

2006-02-18 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2006-02-18 16:12:39 -0500, David Higgs wrote:
 Any further ideas?

Check the example. It uses ftp-proxy(8)

Best
Martin

PS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting
-- 
http://www.tm.oneiros.de



Problems with ath wireless card

2006-02-18 Thread Aaron Hsu
Hey all,

I have having trouble getting my Atheros based WG311T Netgear wireless
card to work. I have ruled out bad signal strength thus far, and the
driver seems to be working.

Dmesg (STABLE-branch GENERIC 3.8):

  ath0 at pci3 dev 7 function 0 Atheros AR5212 rev 0x01: irq 10
  ath0: AR5212 7.9 phy 4.5 rf2112 5.6 rf2112 5.6, FCC1A, address
  00:0f:b5:fd:28:f1

scanpci data:

  pci bus 0x0003 cardnum 0x07 function 0x00: vendor 0x168c device
  0x0013 Device unknown

hostname.ath0:

  inet 192.168.0.57 255.255.255.0 NONE media autoselect \
nwid Halo
nwkey 0xwebhexkey
chan 11

wephexkey is a 26-digit hexadecimal WEP key.

Running 'route flush; sh -x /etc/netstart' gets me with nothing that
works. All the settings seem fine when I do an 'ifconfig -a' but the
status still says that there is no network.

I notice that it alternates media and mode between (DS11) and (DS11
mode 11b) constantly.

I have a working resolv.conf file as well as /etc/mygate configured
correctly. 

I have also tried manually doing these settings with ifconfig (as per
the ath(4) man page), but that made no difference.

The only other seemingly noteworth thing is that my dmesg is littered
with the following entry:

  arp: attempt to add entry for 192.168.0.1 on ath0 by
  00:09:5b:ff:6f:54 on em0

Is there anyone out there who has had a similar problem or who knows
what I can do to fix this? Searching online gave me little in the way
of results that I could understand or that seemed relevant.

-- 
Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sacrificumdeo.net Extend beyond the Mortal . . . .
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin



Re: Error making devel/jdk

2006-02-18 Thread Jeff Quast
On 2/18/06, Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm trying to get the Java plugin for my browsers (Opera and Firefox),
 and from what I can tell from the documentation, this is done by
 installing the jdk package. The documentation I read said that only
 the 1.3 and 1.4 version have plugins for browsers, so I chose 1.4.

 Doing a make after installing the requisite files to
 /usr/ports/distfiles gives:

 bad class file: /usr/ports/devel/jdk/1.4/w-jdk-1.4.2p3/control/build/ \
 bsd-i586/classes/javax/swing/JList.class
 illegal start of class file
 Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of
 the classpath.
 JList list,
 ^
 1 error

 Could someone explain this to me, as well as how to fix it?

did 1.3 build successfully?

to get to jdk 1.5 I had to build the following packages first:

jdk-linux-1.3.1_15.tgz
jdk-1.4.2p2.tgz

In that order. It's been a while, but my understanding is that each
version needs the previous version as a prerequisite to build.

are you using 3.8 ports tree? 3.9? -current? -stable?

If you want help, post a more descriptive log of the build process you
did as well as the error.



Re: pix firewall question

2006-02-18 Thread Samurai Chef
At the risk of sounding like I'm a regular on this list, RTFM.  OR
look at other examples in the PIX config.

On 2/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi there.  I am a long time user of openbsd and ipf/pf.  I just got stuck 
 with the task of managing some pix firewalls for the next eight weeks until 
 they can get someone else.  Could somebody reply to me off list?  I just need 
 to do some simple redirects.  Simple in openbsd, that is, but I can't figure 
 out how to do it on the pix.

 --ja

 --



Re: Feb 13 X snapshot

2006-02-18 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Re!
Keyboard does not work in Feb 15 snapshot too.
Actually it work on my laptop, but not on my desktop.
On desktop I'm having the same error:
KbdOn: tcsetattr: Operation not supported

Complete X.log:

(--) checkDevMem: using aperture driver /dev/xf86
(--) Using wscons driver in pcvt compatibility mode (version 3.32)
(WW) GARTInit: AGPIOC_INFO failed (Device not configured)

X Window System Version 6.9.0 (for OpenBSD)
Release Date: 21 December 2005
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.9
Build Operating System: OpenBSD 3.9 i386 [ELF] 
Current Operating System: OpenBSD cerberus.home.unixconn.com 3.9 GENERIC#601 
i386
Build Date: 13 February 2006
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Sat Feb 18 16:13:20 2006
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf
(==) ServerLayout X.org Layout
(**) |--Screen Screen 1 (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor LG
(**) |   |--Device nvidia
(**) |--Input Device Mouse1
(**) |--Input Device Keyboard1
(WW) The directory /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/xcyrillic/75dpi does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(WW) The directory /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/xcyrillic/misc does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(WW) The directory /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/xcyrillic/100dpi does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(**) FontPath set to 
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled, 
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic,/home/en/artwiz_se,/usr/local/share/fonts
(**) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
(==) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
(II) Module ABI versions:
X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.2
X.Org Video Driver: 0.8
X.Org XInput driver : 0.5
X.Org Server Extension : 0.2
X.Org Font Renderer : 0.4
(II) Loader running on openbsd
(II) LoadModule: bitmap
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.so
(II) Module bitmap: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 6.9.0, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: X.Org Font Renderer
ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.4
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: pcidata
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.so
(II) Module pcidata: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 6.9.0, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.8
(II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
(II) PCI: Config type is 1
(II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1039,0648 card 1043,8086 rev 11 class 06,00,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1039,0003 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 1039,0963 card , rev 25 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:02:5: chip 1039,5518 card 1043,8087 rev 00 class 01,01,8a hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:02:7: chip 1039,7012 card 1043,80b0 rev a0 class 04,01,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:03:0: chip 1039,7001 card 1043,8087 rev 0f class 0c,03,10 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:03:1: chip 1039,7001 card 1043,8087 rev 0f class 0c,03,10 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:03:2: chip 1039,7002 card 1043,8087 rev 00 class 0c,03,20 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:04:0: chip 1039,0900 card 1043,80a7 rev 91 class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 8086,1229 card 8086,0001 rev 02 class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 8086,1229 card 8086,0001 rev 02 class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 10de,0322 card 10b0,041b rev a1 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: End of PCI scan
(II) Host-to-PCI bridge:
(II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set)
(II) Bus 0 I/O range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
(II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
(II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
(II) PCI-to-PCI bridge:
(II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set)
(II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0xe700 - 0xe7ff (0x100) MX[B]
(II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0xeff0 - 0xfebf (0xed0) MX[B]
(II) PCI-to-ISA bridge:
(II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:2:0), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set)
(--) PCI:*(1:0:0) nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] rev 161, Mem @ 
0xe700/24, 0xf000/27, BIOS @ 0xeffe/17
(II) Addressable bus resource ranges are
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
[1] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
(II) OS-reported resource ranges:
[0] -1  0   0xffe0 - 

Redundant Failover Firewalls

2006-02-18 Thread John Brooks
I am needing to build two identical failover firewalls 
with openbsd, pf, pfsync, and carp. So far simple enough, 
with so many articles and examples available. All of these
are using NAT.

However, I am needing to use public IP's out of a /25 
allocation, without NAT. I have not been able to find any 
articles or examples that discuss doing this in a routed 
manner.

Two articles on redundant bridging firewalls seem to
be workable, but either need expensive switches or have
extended failover times of greater than 1 minute.

Can anyone point me towards articles or examples of
non-nat routing on OpenBSD?

--
John Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Sera Systems no more

2006-02-18 Thread Matthew Closson
Maybe someone else has mentioned this already on the list, I happened to 
go to Sera Systems site today while looking for some 1U OpenBSD boxes, and 
I found this:


---
After many pleasurable years, we have decided to close SeraSystems and 
focus on other opportunities. We would like to thank our many customers 
for your patronage, support, and just being who you are. Questions or 
comments may be directed to serasystems (-: at :-) protectix.com or 
directly to our parent company, Protectix, Inc.



So long and thanks for all the fish!
---

Anyhow they are occasionaly mentioned when people ask about hardware so I 
figured I'd post it.  So long Sera Systems...


-Matt-



Re: Sera Systems no more

2006-02-18 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:09:21 -0500 (EST), Matthew Closson wrote:

Maybe someone else has mentioned this already on the list, I happened to 
go to Sera Systems site today while looking for some 1U OpenBSD boxes, and 
I found this:

---
After many pleasurable years, we have decided to close SeraSystems and 
focus on other opportunities. We would like to thank our many customers 
for your patronage, support, and just being who you are. Questions or 
comments may be directed to serasystems (-: at :-) protectix.com or 
directly to our parent company, Protectix, Inc.


So long and thanks for all the fish!
---

Anyhow they are occasionaly mentioned when people ask about hardware so I 
figured I'd post it.  So long Sera Systems...

   -Matt-



Que Sera Sera ..
From the land down under: Australia.
Do we look umop apisdn from up over?

Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.



Error making devel/jdk

2006-02-18 Thread Aaron Hsu
I'm trying to get the Java plugin for my browsers (Opera and Firefox),
and from what I can tell from the documentation, this is done by
installing the jdk package. The documentation I read said that only
the 1.3 and 1.4 version have plugins for browsers, so I chose 1.4.

Doing a make after installing the requisite files to
/usr/ports/distfiles gives:

bad class file: /usr/ports/devel/jdk/1.4/w-jdk-1.4.2p3/control/build/ \
bsd-i586/classes/javax/swing/JList.class
illegal start of class file
Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of 
the classpath.
JList list,
^
1 error

Could someone explain this to me, as well as how to fix it?

-- 
Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sacrificumdeo.net Extend beyond the Mortal . . . .
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin