Re: ftp: -: short write on current when using pkg_add on ftp mirrors
Hi, I'm still using the binary snapshot from July, 25th. maybe this strange problem is related to the other problem: tar -czvpf folder.tar.gz folder/ tar: Failed write to archive volume: 1: Broken pipe 'tar -cvpf ...' (without compression) works without problems. Could this problem be related to the short write problem during pkg_add? How can I fix it? regards, Andreas
Re: ftp: -: short write on current when using pkg_add on ftp mirrors
I'm not sure what snapshot I'm using. I updated from CVS and compiled it all from scratch...probably 2 or 3 days ago. I noticed the same problem, but was able to get around it using the C shell. --Bryan On 7/29/06, Andreas Bartelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm still using the binary snapshot from July, 25th. maybe this strange problem is related to the other problem: tar -czvpf folder.tar.gz folder/ tar: Failed write to archive volume: 1: Broken pipe 'tar -cvpf ...' (without compression) works without problems. Could this problem be related to the short write problem during pkg_add? How can I fix it? regards, Andreas
xf86OpenConsole: KDENABIO failed (Operation not permitted)
I'm getting this on the latest Zaurus snap when running startx. The X sets installed are a couple of months old which I suppose could be the problem but there are currently no Zaurus X sets in snaps. -- ajBAY294Lm5ldA==
PF redirect to another IP on LAN
Hi I've just successfully configured an OpenBSD bridge with two NICs to separate and filter traffic between our private LAN (192.168.1.0/24) and our router (192.168.1.120). I've given an IP address to one of the NICs (192.168.1.121) on the bridge and am running a Bind caching nameserver on it. Now, the next thing we'd need to do would be to redirect any traffic that comes throught the bridge destined to IP address 192.168.1.121 port 80 to another server in the LAN (192.168.1.103 port 80). From what i understand, this entails using PF and the rdr statement. Any ideas on how to do this successfully? Thanks. -- Elaconta.com webmaster --
serving DNS: the chicken and the egg
i've decided to stop using zoneedit.com for DNS services since i can't get the DNS A record TTL set properly for one of my domains using their services. however, i am confused about how to make this work. the registrar that i keep my domains with allows me to list the nameservers for the domain, but it does not allow me to list IPs for the nameservers. if i'm serving DNS from the same domain/IP that i want to list DNS records for, how do i get the registrar to point to my DNS server? i'm to understand this has to do with glue records, but i'm still working on how to do this. the domain in question is a .US domain. any advice is appreciated. cheers, jake
Re: serving DNS: the chicken and the egg
problem solved. had to add my nameserver in the hosts section of the registrar. Original message Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 09:33:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serving DNS: the chicken and the egg To: misc@openbsd.org i've decided to stop using zoneedit.com for DNS services since i can't get the DNS A record TTL set properly for one of my domains using their services. however, i am confused about how to make this work. the registrar that i keep my domains with allows me to list the nameservers for the domain, but it does not allow me to list IPs for the nameservers. if i'm serving DNS from the same domain/IP that i want to list DNS records for, how do i get the registrar to point to my DNS server? i'm to understand this has to do with glue records, but i'm still working on how to do this. the domain in question is a .US domain. any advice is appreciated. cheers, jake
Re: serving DNS: the chicken and the egg
You first need to register your server as a DNS with your registrar before you can set it as an authoritative server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Yocom-Piatt Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 10:34 AM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: serving DNS: the chicken and the egg i've decided to stop using zoneedit.com for DNS services since i can't get the DNS A record TTL set properly for one of my domains using their services. however, i am confused about how to make this work. the registrar that i keep my domains with allows me to list the nameservers for the domain, but it does not allow me to list IPs for the nameservers. if i'm serving DNS from the same domain/IP that i want to list DNS records for, how do i get the registrar to point to my DNS server? i'm to understand this has to do with glue records, but i'm still working on how to do this. the domain in question is a .US domain. any advice is appreciated. cheers, jake
Re: PF redirect to another IP on LAN
man pf.conf Secondly, it's been discussed numerous times on the list that bridges have their place (I use them in production environments at our data centre) but you'll find filtering a bridge much more difficult than filtering a NAT. On 7/29/06, elaconta.com Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've just successfully configured an OpenBSD bridge with two NICs to separate and filter traffic between our private LAN (192.168.1.0/24) and our router (192.168.1.120). I've given an IP address to one of the NICs (192.168.1.121) on the bridge and am running a Bind caching nameserver on it. Now, the next thing we'd need to do would be to redirect any traffic that comes throught the bridge destined to IP address 192.168.1.121 port 80 to another server in the LAN (192.168.1.103 port 80). From what i understand, this entails using PF and the rdr statement. Any ideas on how to do this successfully? Thanks. -- Elaconta.com webmaster --
Re: PF redirect to another IP on LAN
Peter Blair escreveu: man pf.conf Secondly, it's been discussed numerous times on the list that bridges have their place (I use them in production environments at our data centre) but you'll find filtering a bridge much more difficult than filtering a NAT. On 7/29/06, elaconta.com Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've just successfully configured an OpenBSD bridge with two NICs to separate and filter traffic between our private LAN (192.168.1.0/24) and our router (192.168.1.120). I've given an IP address to one of the NICs (192.168.1.121) on the bridge and am running a Bind caching nameserver on it. Now, the next thing we'd need to do would be to redirect any traffic that comes throught the bridge destined to IP address 192.168.1.121 port 80 to another server in the LAN (192.168.1.103 port 80). From what i understand, this entails using PF and the rdr statement. Any ideas on how to do this successfully? Thanks. -- Elaconta.com webmaster -- Wouldn't this do the trick? rdr on rl1 proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 - 192.168.1.103 This bridge has IP address 192.168.1.121 configured in one of the NIC's, so isn't the above like saying: Redirect any port 80 traffic originally meant for me to 192.168.1.103 Or is there something i'm not considering here? -- Elaconta.com webmaster --
Re: 3.9 freeze
Any news on this? -p.
Re: PF redirect to another IP on LAN
Wouldn't this do the trick? rdr on rl1 proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 - 192.168.1.103 Redirect any port 80 traffic originally meant for me to 192.168.1.103 Yes, but why are you asking if you already have the answer? As stated in the man page, your traffic will also need to pass filter evaluation AFTER the redirect rule is processed. Can't you just test that line? Kian
Re: 3.9 freeze
Pedro Martelletto wrote: Any news on this? I cannot declare that the problem is solved... but I had no more freezes since I'm using a custom GENERIC kernel with doubled NKMEMPAGES_MAX and maxusers, both with the i386 and the amd64 machines. But consider that this happened only 7 and 10 days ago... Bye. -- ___ __ |- [EMAIL PROTECTED] |ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it ___
Re: 3.9 freeze
Federico Giannici wrote: Pedro Martelletto wrote: Any news on this? I cannot declare that the problem is solved... but I had no more freezes since I'm using a custom GENERIC kernel with doubled NKMEMPAGES_MAX and maxusers, both with the i386 and the amd64 machines. But consider that this happened only 7 and 10 days ago... I have to add that both machines have a lot of memory (2GB) and often a lot of processes running. Bye. -- ___ __ |- [EMAIL PROTECTED] |ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it ___
Re: PF redirect to another IP on LAN
Kian Mohageri escreveu: Wouldn't this do the trick? rdr on rl1 proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 - 192.168.1.103 Redirect any port 80 traffic originally meant for me to 192.168.1.103 Yes, but why are you asking if you already have the answer? As stated in the man page, your traffic will also need to pass filter evaluation AFTER the redirect rule is processed. Can't you just test that line? Kian If i knew that was the correct answer, of course i wouldn't have asked :) As for passing the filter evaluation, i'll disable the PF filters and test just this redirecting rule then. Thanks. - Elaconta.com webmaster -
SATA DVD Support?
I'm building a systeme considering a SATA DVD drive (Plextor PX-755SA). Anyone used one of these in a recent version of OpenBSD, or have any other thoughts on SATA DVD compatibility? Thnx, Jay
Re: SATA DVD Support?
Original message Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:24:06 -0500 From: J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SATA DVD Support? To: misc@openbsd.org I'm building a systeme considering a SATA DVD drive (Plextor PX-755SA). Anyone used one of these in a recent version of OpenBSD, or have any other thoughts on SATA DVD compatibility? i've got a SATA DVD drive in this machine and it doesn't get recognized in the dmesg: pciide0 at pci1 dev 11 function 0 CMD Technology SiI3112 SATA rev 0x02: DMA pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt pciide0: port 0: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: ST3200822AS wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 190782MB, 390721968 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using BIOS timings, Ultra-DMA mode 6 VV pciide0: port 1: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s ^^ pciide1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 IDE rev 0xa2: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility wd1 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: Maxtor 6L300R0 wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 286188MB, 586114704 sectors wd1(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 6 pciide1: channel 1 disabled (no drives) it seems to detect that a device is present, but not any more than that. i am to understand that SATA DVD/CD-ROM drives are relatively rare. i have a plextor 712-SA or something like that. Thnx, Jay
Re: VPN help needed: OpenBSD in the corporate environment instead of Linux
After summarizing all the clues I think I'll give a chance to OpenVPN + OpenBSD 3.9 combination primarily due to questionable quality of windows clients IPsec+IP stack (as I said in my first post - windows clients will comprise about 99% of all my VPN client base). The differentiation between OS (OpenBSD) and the service (OpenVPN package) will be clearly stated to the upper management, including OpenBSD's proactive- and overall security reputation. Also, as this VPN service will be added to our existing service monitoring framework, and as the great majority of clients will be our own system administrators (VPN will be used for remote access in the case of interventions), this combination should probably suffice. The VPN service will not be sold to external clients. Thanks to everyone for valuable opinions and comments! j. Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
getmicrouptime/microuptime undefined reference to `microuptime'
Hi, I'm lookin for a solution on getting the system uptime via syscall. I tried to use the microuptime/getmicrouptime but every time I intended to compile it, I got the following error: /tmp//ccy16835.o(.text+0x20): In function `main': : undefined reference to `microuptime' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I included the appropriate headers: #include stdio.h #include sys/time.h I didn't find other funtions to get the uptime for a system. Did I miss something? (library or something) Thanks in advance -- Adam PAPAI D i g i t a l Influence http://www.digitalinfluence.hu E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +36 30 33-55-735 (Hungary) Phone: +49 176-67264167 (Germany)
Re: getmicrouptime/microuptime undefined reference to `microuptime'
Adam PAPAI wrote: Hi, I'm lookin for a solution on getting the system uptime via syscall. Hm. It seems sysctl(3) could tell me the uptime. #include sys/param.h #include sys/sysctl.h Thanks anyway :) -- Adam PAPAI D i g i t a l Influence http://www.digitalinfluence.hu E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +36 30 33-55-735 (Hungary) Phone: +49 176-67264167 (Germany)
Re: SATA DVD Support?
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:34:41PM -0500, the unit calling itself Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: Original message I'm building a systeme considering a SATA DVD drive (Plextor PX-755SA). Anyone used one of these in a recent version of OpenBSD, or have any other thoughts on SATA DVD compatibility? i've got a SATA DVD drive in this machine and it doesn't get recognized in the dmesg: pciide0 at pci1 dev 11 function 0 CMD Technology SiI3112 SATA rev 0x02: DMA pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt pciide0: port 0: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: ST3200822AS wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 190782MB, 390721968 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using BIOS timings, Ultra-DMA mode 6 VV pciide0: port 1: device present, speed: 1.5Gb/s ^^ pciide1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 NVIDIA nForce2 IDE rev 0xa2: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility wd1 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: Maxtor 6L300R0 wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 286188MB, 586114704 sectors wd1(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 6 pciide1: channel 1 disabled (no drives) it seems to detect that a device is present, but not any more than that. i am to understand that SATA DVD/CD-ROM drives are relatively rare. i have a plextor 712-SA or something like that. The PX-755SA is very similar to the 712SA, so I'm guessing that the 755 won't work either. I would have guessed that OpenBSD supported SATA DVD drives, but the Platforms page suggests support is very limited - I guess that squelches plans for a SATA HDD as well :( Too bad... the SATA drives are a lot faster relieve cable clutter. Thanks, Jay
Re: SATA DVD Support?
On 7/29/06, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess that squelches plans for a SATA HDD as well :( If by that you mean you expect OpenBSD to not support SATA HDDs, I can happily assure you you're wrong. OpenBSD supports various SATA controllers (such as your SiI 3112, the SiI 3114, etc.). I yet have to encounter a SATA HDD it does not support. Regarding SATA DVD drives, I have no experience with those (as in: I have yet to encounter them) so I cannot tell you whether they should work or not. Cheers, Rogier -- If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
Re: Nagios check_bioctl available
2006/7/29, andrew fresh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: One thing I ran into is that bioctl needs to run as root to get access to /dev/bio, even for read only access. Is there a way to query bioctl without needing root? Well, I think you only need the status of the drives and that is availlable using sysctl hw.sensors in current (you already mentioned sysctl). A monitoring system should not use the capabilities of bioctl, it just needs to know the status and report that. Now that I think of it, I should add support to the upwatch monitoring system too, but I am not that lucky to have hardware to actually test it :-) Wijnand
