Xorg problem

2009-08-15 Thread dimitry A.
I guys.
I have a problem with my IntelB video card, my X environment not run in my
netbook, this display the next error:
(WW) intel(0): xf86DeAllocateGARTMemory: deallocation gart memory with key 6
failed B (Bad address)
(WW) intel(0): xf86DeAllocateGARTMemory: deallocation gart memory with key 7
failed B (Bad address)
I atach my dmesg and my Xorg.0.log for review.
Any idea?
Tanks

Dimitry.-
http://deoxyt2.livejournal.com
OpenBSD - Free, Functional  Secure



Mujer, Motor, Gente... y las imC!genes mC!s visitadas. B!Visita el Top de
StarMedia!  http://us.starmedia.com/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had 
a name of dmesg.txt]

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had 
a name of Xorg.0.log]



Re: Xorg problem

2009-08-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
 I guys.
 I have a problem with my IntelB video card, my X environment not run in my
 netbook, this display the next error:
 (WW) intel(0): xf86DeAllocateGARTMemory: deallocation gart memory with key 6
 failed B (Bad address)
 (WW) intel(0): xf86DeAllocateGARTMemory: deallocation gart memory with key 7
 failed B (Bad address)
 I atach my dmesg and my Xorg.0.log for review.
 Any idea?
 Tanks

 Dimitry.-
 http://deoxyt2.livejournal.com
 OpenBSD - Free, Functional  Secure



 Mujer, Motor, Gente... y las imC!genes mC!s visitadas. B!Visita el Top de
 StarMedia!  http://us.starmedia.com/

 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which 
 had a name of dmesg.txt]

 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which 
 had a name of Xorg.0.log]



You need to send these in-line.



Re: NFS remote mount causes panic when trying to create a directory

2009-08-15 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:10:05AM -0700, Bryan wrote:
[snip]
 nfsrv_mkdir(d6965000,d1c85b80,d6a70578,dbf46e2c,1) at nfsrv_mkdir+0x3f8
  ^^
There were a number of vnode mishandlings in NFS which have been fixed
over f2k9 (and a few more undoubtedly remain, given the complexity
of their handling in macros), one of which was in the above function.

-current should probably fix this for you; if not, please let me know.



Re: Delete packages with dependencies

2009-08-15 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:59:42PM -0400, Stephen Takacs wrote:
 That might be a solution if you're stricly using package/ports.  But
 consider what happens when you manually build and install other programs
 that came in the form of plain old source code tarballs (make  make
 install, etc.)  Most of these programs will have library dependencies
 and some of those libraries will have already been installed as
 dependencies of official packages.  If you remove the whole shebang (a
 package and all its unique deps) then your custom-built programs won't
 find some of their libs anymore...

That's on my todo list, at some point I'll nove some of the library detection
code from ports to source so that you can easily record manually installed
stuff and not remove useful packages and libraries by mistake.

There is a plan. That part is the missing piece. Also, making sure
manual-installation is properly recorded. Then trimming outdated dependencies
(and more importantly, old .libs that are no longer in use) becomes rather
simple.

BUT you need to have a *simple* way to mesh code compiled outside of the ports
framework first...

This is moving slowly, because, as usual when dealing with packages, full
satisfying answers are hard to come by. 99% of the solution is not good enough.



Bypassing Kernel Code Integrity Protection Mechanisms

2009-08-15 Thread Siju George
Hi,

Can this happen on an OpenBSD also?

http://honeyblog.org/archives/30-Bypassing-Kernel-Code-Integrity-Protection-Mechanisms.html

thanks

Siju



ksplice

2009-08-15 Thread Siju George
Hi,

http://www.ksplice.com/technology

Do we have any plans to go towards this design?

thanks

Siju



Control noise of harddisk

2009-08-15 Thread obvvbooo obvvbooo
Hi,

BSD4.5 works well on my laptop, but I don't like the noise of the harddisk.
Is there a way to lower it? Such as slow the speed or sth? It's ok for me if
performance drop down to some extent, because I really don't like that
noise. I've tried to use command config -ef /bsd  - change wd to 0x8f9 or
0x9f9, but it seems nothing changed. After reboot, when I check the dmesg,
it still said wd work in PIO4, DMA 5. And because now I still can't give up
XP, when I comes into XP, the hard disk seems much more less noisy.

And it seems when I startx or start gnome, the noise come up much more
higher. Is this related or it's just my wrong feeling?

Any help is appreciated.



Re: Control noise of harddisk

2009-08-15 Thread Alexander Polakov
2009/8/15, obvvbooo obvvbooo obvvb...@googlemail.com:
 Hi,

 BSD4.5 works well on my laptop, but I don't like the noise of the harddisk.

atactl(8)



Re: ksplice

2009-08-15 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 06:42:36PM +0530, Siju George wrote:

 Hi,
 
 http://www.ksplice.com/technology
 
 Do we have any plans to go towards this design?

Not me. I would be very surprised if somebody I consider 'we' wrt
OpenBSD would have plans. But your definition of 'we' probably
differs. 

Anyway, scanning though the paper this looks like taking loadable
modules to the extreme. We already do not have real suport for classic
loadable modules.

-Otto



Re: ksplice

2009-08-15 Thread Siju George
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Otto Moerbeeko...@drijf.net wrote:

 Not me. I would be very surprised if somebody I consider 'we' wrt
 OpenBSD would have plans. But your definition of 'we' probably
 differs.


Thanks for the reply otto :-)
Do you have plans to introduce binary updates for OpenBSD so that
hours are not spent on compile time?.
One of these days I found during following stable that there was CVS
update for only one of the files. It is possible to just compile that
file only with its dependencies so that if it is not a file in kernel
I dont have to reboot but just restart the service/program in
question?

 Anyway, scanning though the paper this looks like taking loadable
 modules to the extreme. We already do not have real suport for classic
 loadable modules.


I noticed in one of Theo's mails that there wont be support for kernel
modules in OpenBSD. Is it because there has to me massive changes in
the source or is it because there is some problems with security?

Thanks again for the fast reply :-)

--Siju



Re: ksplice

2009-08-15 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 08:50:29PM +0530, Siju George wrote:

 On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Otto Moerbeeko...@drijf.net wrote:
 
  Not me. I would be very surprised if somebody I consider 'we' wrt
  OpenBSD would have plans. But your definition of 'we' probably
  differs.
 
 
 Thanks for the reply otto :-)
 Do you have plans to introduce binary updates for OpenBSD so that
 hours are not spent on compile time?.

We lack the manpower to set up such a mechanism and maintain it as
well. 

 One of these days I found during following stable that there was CVS
 update for only one of the files. It is possible to just compile that
 file only with its dependencies so that if it is not a file in kernel
 I dont have to reboot but just restart the service/program in
 question?


Depends on a lot of factors, so there's no easy way to tell. For
example, a libc fix would require rebuilding libc, plus relinking
statically linked programs. Followed by a restart of all programs.
That includes init(8), so you're probably better of just rebooting
after all. 

 
  Anyway, scanning though the paper this looks like taking loadable
  modules to the extreme. We already do not have real suport for classic
  loadable modules.
 
 
 I noticed in one of Theo's mails that there wont be support for kernel
 modules in OpenBSD. Is it because there has to me massive changes in
 the source or is it because there is some problems with security?

It's mostly a security thing.

-Otto



Kernel choice

2009-08-15 Thread obvvbooo obvvbooo
Hi,

My computer is Intel two core stuff..., and I used to compile kernel to use
original NTFS file system, and I'm using the kernel GENERIC, which is
without the .MP, Is it right? Will it have too much effect if I just keep
it the same as now?

Here's the information I found: When I boot computer, it will display two
cpu information; in dmesg, there's one cpu; and with the command sysctl, it
said ncput=1, do these matter ?

Thanks.
The following is my dmesg:
OpenBSD 4.5 (kernel) #0: Sun Aug  9 05:25:48 HKT 2009
r...@win7:/wk/other/build/kernel
cpu0: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2130 @ 1.86GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 1.87
GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,EST,TM2,xTPR
real mem  = 2137485312 (2038MB)
avail mem = 2058539008 (1963MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 02/26/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd690,
SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe0010 (67 entries)
bios0: vendor LENOVO version 7EETC9WW (2.19 ) date 02/26/2008
bios0: LENOVO 0657LN1
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT ECDT TCPA APIC MCFG HPET SLIC BOOT SSDT SSDT
SSDT SSDT SSDT
acpi0: wakeup devices LID_(S3) SLPB(S3) EXP0(S4) EXP1(S4) EXP2(S4) EXP3(S4)
PCI1(S4) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB7(S3) HDEF(S4)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: apic clock running at 133MHz
cpu at mainbus0: not configured
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 1 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 2, remapped to apid 1
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (AGP_)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP0)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP1)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (EXP2)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 12 (EXP3)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 21 (PCI1)
acpiec0 at acpi0
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2
acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature 127 degC
acpitz1 at acpi0: critical temperature 98 degC
acpibtn0 at acpi0: LID_
acpibtn1 at acpi0: SLPB
acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 model 92P1141 serial  1625 type LION oem SONY
acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1 not present
acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online
acpithinkpad0 at acpi0
acpivideo at acpi0 not configured
acpivideo at acpi0 not configured
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xea00! 0xcf000/0x1600 0xd0800/0x1000
0xe/0x1
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x06150e2806000e28
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1867 MHz (1340 mV): speeds: 1867, 800 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82945GM Host rev 0x03
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel 82945GM Video rev 0x03
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
intagp0 at vga1
agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xd000, size 0x1000
inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 1 int 16 (irq 11)
drm0 at inteldrm0
Intel 82945GM Video rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801GB HD Audio rev 0x02: apic 1
int 17 (irq 11)
azalia0: codecs: Analog Devices AD1981HD, Conexant/0x2bfa, using Analog
Devices AD1981HD
audio0 at azalia0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x02: apic 1 int 20
(irq 11)
pci1 at ppb0 bus 2
bge0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5751M rev 0x21, BCM5750 C1
(0x4201): apic 1 int 16 (irq 11), address 00:16:d3:be:27:c3
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 2 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x02: apic 1 int 22
(irq 11)
pci2 at ppb1 bus 4
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x02: apic 1 int 23
(irq 11)
pci3 at ppb2 bus 12
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x02: apic 1 int 16
(irq 11)
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x02: apic 1 int 17
(irq 11)
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x02: apic 1 int 18
(irq 11)
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x02: apic 1 int 19
(irq 11)
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x02: apic 1 int 19
(irq 11)
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI rev 0xe2
pci4 at ppb3 bus 21
cbb0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 TI PCI1510 CardBus rev 0x00: apic 1 int 16
(irq 11)
cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 22 device 0 cacheline 0x8, lattimer 0xb0
pcmcia0 at cardslot0
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801GBM LPC rev 0x02: PM
disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801GBM SATA rev 0x02: DMA,
channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: HITACHI HTS541612J9SA00
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 114473MB, 234441648 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: 

Re: Kernel choice

2009-08-15 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 01:51:40AM +0800, obvvbooo obvvbooo wrote:
 My computer is Intel two core stuff..., and I used to compile kernel to use
 original NTFS file system, and I'm using the kernel GENERIC, which is
 without the .MP, Is it right? Will it have too much effect if I just keep
 it the same as now?
 
 Here's the information I found: When I boot computer, it will display two
 cpu information; in dmesg, there's one cpu; and with the command sysctl, it
 said ncput=1, do these matter ?

There's nothing wrong about using GENERIC instead of GENERIC.MP, but
if you have two cores you might as well use GENERIC.MP and be able to
use both.

-- 
Darrin Chandler|  Phoenix BSD User Group  |  MetaBUG
dwchand...@stilyagin.com   |  http://phxbug.org/  |  http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |  Daemons in the Desert   |  Global BUG Federation



Re: ksplice

2009-08-15 Thread Maurice Janssen

Siju George wrote:

Do you have plans to introduce binary updates for OpenBSD so that
hours are not spent on compile time?.


A few years ago I started to create file sets of the -stable tree.  See 
http://www.z74.net/openbsd.html for more information.

It's far from perfect, but perhaps it's useful to you.

Maurice



Re: Control noise of harddisk

2009-08-15 Thread Martin Toft
Try adding 'atactl wd0 apmdisable' to /etc/rc.local. It should get rid
of clicking sounds...



RE:Xorg problem

2009-08-15 Thread dimitry A.
OK.

To day a tired changed /etc/sysctl.conf line machdep.allowaperture=2 to
machdep.allowaperture=1 but the is not solution.
This is dmesg:
OpenBSD 4.5 (GENERIC) #1749: Sat Feb 28 14:51:18 MST 2009
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80lt;clock_batterygt;
cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz (quot;GenuineIntelquot;
686-class) 1.60 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,DS,A
CPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,xTPR
real mem  = 1060163584 (1011MB)
avail mem = 1016815616 (969MB)
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80lt;clock_batterygt;
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286  BIOS, date 10/09/08, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe8e50 (32
entries)
bios0: vendor Packard Bell version quot;v0.3103quot; date 10/09/2008
bios0: Packard Bell DOA150
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT HPET APIC MCFG ASF! SLIC BOOT
acpi0: wakeup devices P32_(S4) UHC1(S3) UHC2(S3) UHC3(S3) UHC4(S3) ECHI(S3)
EXP1(S4) EXP2(S4) EXP3(S4) EXP4(S4) AZAL(S0) MODM(S0)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: apic clock running at 133MHz
cpu at mainbus0: not configured
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 4 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 4
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 5 (P32_)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (EXP1)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP2)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 3 (EXP3)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 4 (EXP4)
acpiec0 at acpi0
acpicpu0 at acpi0
acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
acpibtn1 at acpi0: LID0
acpibtn2 at acpi0: SLPB
acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT1 not present
acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit offline
acpivideo at acpi0 not configured
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xec00! 0xcf000/0x1000
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x060f0c2706000c27
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1600 MHz (1324 mV): speeds: 1600, 800 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 quot;Intel 82945GME Hostquot; rev 0x03
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 quot;Intel 82945GME Videoquot; rev 0x03
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
intagp0 at vga1
agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0x4000, size 0x1000
inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 4 int 16 (irq 11)
drm0 at inteldrm0
quot;Intel 82945GM Videoquot; rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not
configured
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 quot;Intel 82801GB HD Audioquot; rev 0x02:
apic 4 int 16 (irq 11)
azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC268
audio0 at azalia0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 quot;Intel 82801GB PCIEquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 16 (irq 255)
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 quot;Intel 82801GB PCIEquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 17 (irq 255)
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
re0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 quot;Realtek 8101Equot; rev 0x02: RTL8102EL
(0x2480), apic 4 int 17 (irq 11), address 00:23:8b:7e:01:e9
rlphy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8201L 10/100 PHY, rev. 1
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 2 quot;Intel 82801GB PCIEquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 18 (irq 255)
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
ath0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 quot;Atheros AR5424quot; rev 0x01: apic 4 int
18 (irq 11)
ath0: AR5424 14.2 phy 7.0 rf 0.0, WOR5_ETSIC, address 00:24:2b:a0:10:3d
ppb3 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 quot;Intel 82801GB PCIEquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 19 (irq 255)
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 quot;Intel 82801GB USBquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 16 (irq 11)
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 quot;Intel 82801GB USBquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 17 (irq 11)
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 quot;Intel 82801GB USBquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 18 (irq 11)
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 quot;Intel 82801GB USBquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 19 (irq 11)
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 quot;Intel 82801GB USBquot; rev 0x02: apic 4
int 16 (irq 11)
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 quot;Intel EHCI root hubquot; rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb4 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 quot;Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCIquot; rev 0xe2
pci5 at ppb4 bus 5
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 quot;Intel 82801GBM LPCquot; rev 0x02: PM
disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 quot;Intel 82801GBM SATAquot; rev 0x02:
DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: lt;ST9120817ASgt;
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 114473MB, 234441648 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 quot;Intel 82801GB SMBusquot; rev 0x02:
apic 4 int 17 (irq 11)
iic0 at ichiic0
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x51: 512MB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-5300CL5 SO-DIMM
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 quot;Intel UHCI root hubquot; rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 quot;Intel UHCI root hubquot; rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 quot;Intel 

Re: xterm: cannot type some iso8859-2 characters

2009-08-15 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:

 4.6-current on a HP EliteBook 8530w. I cannot get xterm
 to let me type some iso8859-2 (Czech) characters.

xterm will only accept characters valid for the encoding it uses.
By default, that encoding is ISO8859-1.

 some letters show up correct and some don't. Namely, the acute'd letters
 show up correct, and the check'd letters don't show up at all - does this
 have any significance?

The letters with acute happen to also exist in ISO8859-1.  The ones
with hacek don't.

You want to run xterm -en ISO8859-2.

 xterm -fn -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-2

Don't.  This only adds to the confusion because xterm will continue
to think it uses ISO8859-1 but actually display -2 glyphs.

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de



Re: stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby after make update on openBSD 4.5 i386

2009-08-15 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 01:36:49AM -0700, Robert Gilaard wrote:
 Hi guys,
 I'm trying to update my ports file based on the instructions at:
 http://www.openbsd101.com/updating.html and /lang/ruby stops with an error.
 I'm at the last part of step 2 of 3 - Updating and Building your Ports and
 have given the make update command in /usr/ports/lang/ruby directory.

 The interesting parts of the error log is this part:
 
 hecking whether to use xft...
 yes  
  

 checking for X11/Xft/Xft.h...
 no   

 /usr/ports/x11/tk/8.5/w-tk-8.5.6/tk8.5.6/generic/tk.h:78:29: X11/Xlib.h: No
 such file or
 directory

 Does anyone have a clue? Thanks in advanced.

did you install xbase45 _and_ xshare45?

-- 
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org



/altroot

2009-08-15 Thread 4625

Is it correct string for /etc/fstab? /dev/wd2d /altroot ffs xx 0 0
Should df display the /altroot?

--
4625



Re: /altroot

2009-08-15 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM, 46254625...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is it correct string for /etc/fstab? /dev/wd2d /altroot ffs xx 0 0

Assuming /dev/wd2d is the correct partition, yes.  (You're looking at
the daily(8) manpage, right?)


 Should df display the /altroot?

Only if you mount it yourself.  It is not normally mounted and
therefore does not appear in 'df' output.  (No point in displaying it,
what with it being a duplicate of the root filesystem)


Philip Guenther



An invitation from Crazy Online Discounts...

2009-08-15 Thread Greg C.
Save Up To 75% Off Of The Best Electronics, Sports Apparel And Office
Furniture!!!







Tired of sitting at your computer with weary eyes, looking
for the best deals on the web for hours and hours, only to find out that you
STILL paid too much??!! Looking for the best electronics, sports apparel, or
office furniture at up to 75% off of the regular price??!! 



Then,
CrazyOnlineDiscounts.com is the place for you!! 



At
CrazyOnlineDiscounts.com, we specialize in bringing the best, most insane
discounts on the web, directly to you, saving you precious TIME and MONEY!!
In the coming weeks, I will be dropping by with the best, most outrageous
deals in electronics, sports apparel, office furniture and sporting
goods/nutritional products found on the web!! 



Thanks you for your time and
we look forward to serving you.



Respectfully, 



Greg C.