Re: Finicky Website and Outbound Load Balancing

2010-09-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-09-08, dontek don...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have a small issue with a particular website a client uses that does not
 like the outbound load balancing I have put in place on their firewall.  The
 issue is, that form authentication to the site fails from the internal
 network if the many requests the login generates get split between their two
 ISP's.  Accessing the website from the firewall itself does not incur the
 same issue.

 I have put a band-aid on it by simply forcing all http traffic to that
 particular site out only one of the ISP's.

 This works until that ISP fails and I have to down that route.  While the
 other route keeps internet access working, if the link that I have forced
 this website to use is the one that dies, that site is no longer accessible
 to the internal network.

Since it sounds like you have a method that changes the routing for the
default gateway when a connection fails, can you just extend that to
changing the routing or route-to rules for this site as well (place the
rules in an anchor and switch them over?)


 I am looking for suggestions for a more elegant solution.  Ideally, I think
 that when a host on the internal network requests a login to this particular
 site, if all traffic from that particular internal host could be directed
 through the same gateway it initiated the connection on, all would work with
 this website over either ISP and with the load balancing.  Looking at
 tcpdump output, all traffic is standard http.

I can't even begin to think how you would write that as a PF rule even
if it were implemented..

 If you have any suggestions on how this might be accomplished, or have any
 insight as to why this is happening, please respond.

Seems like it's just as simple as the website not allowing a session to
be split between multiple IP addresses. This is not particularly uncommon
(though usually when people do this, it's for security concerns, so they
would also use https rather than http).



Re: OpenBSD 4.6 + carp + pf + pfsync lockup

2010-09-09 Thread Martin Pelikán
2010/9/8, Joe Warren-Meeks joe.warren.me...@gmail.com:
 I've had a weird problem happen twice now. It seems after about 4 - 6
 weeks of running very happily, both servers lock up completely at the
 same time. Both consoles show no error messages, but the cursor is
 blinking away happily. Neither console will take any input and the
 only remedy is to power cycle them. There is nothing unusual in any of
 the logfiles.

 # Set up some settings and configure for highish-load
 # note we can up these if we need to, loads of RAM!

I thought the same when I played with TCP buffers set to 1M and after
some heavy load tests I went out of RAM quite soon :-) The machine had
2G.
I assume ping doesn't work either. Have you raised the recv/send
space? Have you tried entering ddb? (you need to set the sysctl before
start)

-- 
Martin Pelikan



Re: Distribute bandwidth by IP's

2010-09-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-09-07, roberth rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:

 So just put ~150 (*2 for both directions) child queues in your config.

queues are per-interface anyway, so there's no need for the *2 in the
config (and the associated headaches in assigning traffic to the correct
queue)

altq on some_if cbq bandwidth 2048Kb queue (aa, ab, ac, ... es, et, eu)
altq on other_if cbq bandwidth 2048Kb queue (aa, ab, ac, ... es, et, eu)

queue aa bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)
queue ab bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)
...
queue et bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)
queue eu bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)

I think the users might be happier with hfsc rather than cbq though



Liderazgo de Impacto, Setiembre/MVD

2010-09-09 Thread 22/9/2010 Uruguay
EVENTO RECOMENDADO

Los lmderes no surgen de la nada. Deben ser desarrollados: educados de tal
manera que adquieran las cualidades del liderazgo.
Warren Bennis

 ESAG
ESCUELA DE ALTA GERENCIALiderazgo de impacto
Potencie sus habilidades en direccisn y comunicacisn
 22 de septiembre - Hotel Lafayette, Montevideo.
18:00 a 22:30 horas
En este seminario los participantes reconoceran la importancia del liderazgo
en las organizaciones, interpretando modelos actuales de liderazgo y
adquiriendo herramientas como base para el desarrollo de conductas propias de
un lmder efectivo, repercutiendo en el poder de influencia y resultados en las
empresas.
Resumen del temario
Que es un lmder
Tipos de lmder y liderazgos
Estrategia situacional
20 puntos para fortalecer lmderes
22 estrategias de influencia
Errores que debilitan nuestro liderazgo
Comunicacisn efectiva
Diferentes libros, diferentes consejos.


Expositor invitado
Pablo W. Dorrego Duarte
Consultor con mas de 10 aqos de experiencia en empresas nacionales,
extranjeras y multinacionales (Hewlett Packard, CRCOM, etc.). Formado en
Uruguay, Argentina, Estados Unidos y Espaqa en marketing, ventas, gerencia,
liderazgo, habilidades directivas y recursos humanos. Como conferencista ha
dictado mas de 150 seminarios. Docente en carreras de gerencia, recursos
humanos y liderazgo, ha colaborado con instituciones en Uruguay y
universidades en el exterior.
Director acadimico de EsAG-Uruguay y socio de Dorrego Esturla  Asociados,
habiendo capacitado o asesorado a mas de 600 organizaciones, y colaborado en
programas del estado en apoyo a PYMES o Unisn Europea. Ha escrito sobre
negocios para mas de 40 publicaciones (perisdicos, revistas y portales
especializados) de habla hispaqa en Amirica y Espaqa.
* Junto a otro invitado a confirmar.
Inscripciones
Telifono: 2314.1688 MVD
Arancel: $U 950 (pesos uruguayos)
Promocisn: Antes del 18/9: $U 750. Entran 3 pagan 2.
Cobrador (Mas de 2 inscripciones), Abitab o BROUFINANCIA
 VISA - OCA - MASTER
Hasta 3 pagos sin recargo


Solicite mas Informacisn




Este mail no es spam. Si usted entiende que le fue enviado por error o
si prefiere no recibir mas informacisn sobre los seminarios de ESAG-Uruguay,
simplemente responda este mail indicando en el asunto CANCELAR
y su direccisn sera dada de baja en nuestra base. Gracias.



Re: OpenBSD 4.6 + carp + pf + pfsync lockup

2010-09-09 Thread Joe Warren-Meeks
2010/9/9 Martin Pelikan martin.peli...@gmail.com:

Hello Martin,

 I thought the same when I played with TCP buffers set to 1M and after
 some heavy load tests I went out of RAM quite soon :-) The machine had
 2G.

Well, the machine has 6Gb of RAM and is only pushing 10Mbit/s of
traffic at peak. It does need to maintain a largeish state table, as
it is predominatly web traffic, but I've run much much larger and
busier sites behind much smaller hardware with the same configs
before.

 I assume ping doesn't work either. Have you raised the recv/send
 space? Have you tried entering ddb? (you need to set the sysctl before
 start)

No, both machines don't ping and they completely hardlock. I can only
think it is an issue with pfsync, which causes both to lock up at the
same time, but that is a guess.

I guess I'll just upgrade them to 4.7 speculatively and hope it
doesn't happen again.

recv/send:
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=16384
net.inet.udp.recvspace=41600
j...@f1:/home/joe sysctl -a |grep send
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=16384
net.inet.udp.sendspace=9216


Too low? What is a good value for them?

Thanks for your assistance.

 -- joe.



Re: OpenBSD 4.6 + carp + pf + pfsync lockup

2010-09-09 Thread Martin Pelikán
2010/9/9, Joe Warren-Meeks joe.warren.me...@gmail.com:
 Well, the machine has 6Gb of RAM and is only pushing 10Mbit/s of
 traffic at peak. It does need to maintain a largeish state table, as
 it is predominatly web traffic, but I've run much much larger and
 busier sites behind much smaller hardware with the same configs
 before.

No problem here.

 I guess I'll just upgrade them to 4.7 speculatively and hope it
 doesn't happen again.

In terms of driver improvement over the time, probably a good choice.

 recv/send:
 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=16384
 net.inet.udp.recvspace=41600
 j...@f1:/home/joe sysctl -a |grep send
 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=16384
 net.inet.udp.sendspace=9216


 Too low? What is a good value for them?

It depends on what do you need. The defaults suffice for most cases,
but on our most loaded router we use tcp both 256k and udp send space
65k (lots of dns). Just test it somewhere.

-- 
Martin Pelikan



Re: Activating ip6.forwarding and accept_rtadv at the same time

2010-09-09 Thread Martin Pelikán
2010/9/7, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
 As soon as you spilt a /64 into something smaler you left IPv6 land end
 entered something that looks like IPv6 but isn't. Sure it is possible but
 by doing it you make every IPv6 disciple scream in agony (which is
 probably a good thing anyway).

I don't understand that agonizing part. I've heard of companies with
so stupid network policies (read: corporate environment) that DHCP6
with one /112 per department and sequentially assigned addresses
against people's MAC addresses is like a spit in the ocean. Most
people that would make it scream use some automated system for keeping
track of their machines anyway.

 How would it look like? New ifconfig parameter?
 That was the plan.

And a new flag to struct in6_ifextra? Any particular ideas about the
loop prevention?

 What is wrong with arp?

Strange, I asked myself the same question :-) Theo is probably right.
Seems like they just wanted the whole concept separately. Were there
some political reasons for that?
Result? The code is written twice. Bad. But how does it bring down the
whole protocol?

 Why rely so massivly on multicast instead of a simple LAN broadcast?

Because not every machine in the network wants to speak IPv6? There
might be other local stuff (EtherSound is just a bad example)
demanding separate handling over the same L2 network and not to be
disturbed by anything else.
Multicasting ND traffic seems like a relief in huge L2 segments so
common to see these days instead of smaller routed subnets. But again,
the savings are like a spit in the ocean. I have yet to see network so
big that this is actually necessary performance-wise. People claim
there are...
But what's wrong with multicast these days?

 These two things are partially responsible for the failure of IPv6.

Failure? I don't know about America, but here in central Europe it
finally seems to be deploying well. And wait for China. (yes, I know
it's more like intranet, but they probably don't want to separate too
much)

 There is more political nonsense but on the technical side it is the thing
 that makes IPv6 so stupidly complex.

Again, I don't know about any political stuff (pointers?) but some of
the complexity surely is unnecessary. However it seems to be too late
to complain :-(

-- 
Martin Pelikan



Re: Activating ip6.forwarding and accept_rtadv at the same time

2010-09-09 Thread Joakim Aronius
* Martin Pelikan (martin.peli...@gmail.com) wrote:
 2010/9/7, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
  As soon as you spilt a /64 into something smaler you left IPv6 land end
  entered something that looks like IPv6 but isn't. Sure it is possible but
  by doing it you make every IPv6 disciple scream in agony (which is
  probably a good thing anyway).

 I don't understand that agonizing part. I've heard of companies with
 so stupid network policies (read: corporate environment) that DHCP6
 with one /112 per department and sequentially assigned addresses
 against people's MAC addresses is like a spit in the ocean. Most
 people that would make it scream use some automated system for keeping
 track of their machines anyway.

Why use smaller subnets than /64? Just keep it simple and go for /64s
everywhere, its even quite common to use /64s on point to point links.
The only reason is that net ops are used to IPv4 and try to conserve IP
addresses. In the end they will have an unnecessarily complicated network to
handle.

  What is wrong with arp?

ND does a lot more than ARP. (..which, in itself, makes it more complex.)

  These two things are partially responsible for the failure of IPv6.

 Failure? I don't know about America, but here in central Europe it
 finally seems to be deploying well. And wait for China. (yes, I know
 it's more like intranet, but they probably don't want to separate too
 much)

IPv6 is getting more and more attention, in the US too. So after a decade+ of
'IPv6 will happpen soon' it seems like things finaly start to happen.. and it
will surely be painfull :)

Cheers,
/Joakim



Re: OpenBSD 4.6 + carp + pf + pfsync lockup

2010-09-09 Thread Nick Gustas

Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:

Hey guys,

I'm running two HPDL360 G5 servers with OpenBSD 4.6+carp+pf+pfsync as
an active/passive firewall pair.

Both are running: (full dmesg at bottom, along with edited pf.conf, in
case it's relevant)

j...@f2:/home/joe uname -a
OpenBSD f2 4.6 GENERIC.MP#81 amd64

I've had a weird problem happen twice now. It seems after about 4 - 6
weeks of running very happily, both servers lock up completely at the
same time. Both consoles show no error messages, but the cursor is
blinking away happily. Neither console will take any input and the
only remedy is to power cycle them. There is nothing unusual in any of
the logfiles.

I'm planning on updating them to 4.7 anyway, but is this a problem
that people are aware of? Is there a fix?

Kind regards

  
I was running OpenBSD 4.6+carp+pf+pfsync+bgp+all errata patches (i386) 
combo on a pair of IBM x345s with 1G of ram and saw the same behavior as 
you roughly every 70 days. That hardware was running the same 
configuration under 4.4 and never had a problem.


State load is roughly:
State Table  Total Rate
 current entries 5140  
 searches 13374145144 4114.1/s

 inserts202444638   62.3/s
 removals   202439498   62.3/s

Memory/cpu load:
load averages:  0.08,  0.08,  0.08
31 processes:  30 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  3.2% interrupt, 96.8% 
idle

Memory: Real: 127M/323M act/tot  Free: 677M  Swap: 0K/2048M used/tot



I upgraded to 4.7 first to see if the problem went away before spending 
time trying to debug an unreported problem on an old release.  There 
were a lot of changes to the PF and pfsync code between 4.6 and 4.7.  So 
far so good, almost 53 days with no trouble.




Re: OpenBSD 4.8 pre-orders are up

2010-09-09 Thread Jasper Valentijn
2010/9/8 Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org:
 OpenBSD 4.8 can now be pre-ordered.  The release date will be Nov 1.
 As usual, the CDs will ship a bit before the official release.


Pre-order has been placed.

Thanks to all who've made it posible again!!


--
We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives teaching
them to walk and talk and the next twelve telling them to sit down and
shut up.



Re: Distribute bandwidth by IP's

2010-09-09 Thread Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
Ok. That's good. Using hfsc what's the advantage?
https://calomel.org/pf_hfsc.html

Can be assigned the altq rules with hsfc by ip? or only by kind of packets?

Thanks a lot for your reply. The comments help me so much to understand many
things.

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:

 On 2010-09-07, roberth rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
 
  So just put ~150 (*2 for both directions) child queues in your config.

 queues are per-interface anyway, so there's no need for the *2 in the
 config (and the associated headaches in assigning traffic to the correct
 queue)

 altq on some_if cbq bandwidth 2048Kb queue (aa, ab, ac, ... es, et, eu)
 altq on other_if cbq bandwidth 2048Kb queue (aa, ab, ac, ... es, et, eu)

 queue aa bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)
 queue ab bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)
 ...
 queue et bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)
 queue eu bandwidth 12Kb priority 2 cbq(borrow red)

 I think the users might be happier with hfsc rather than cbq though




-- 
Hermes Ojeda Ruiz



Ahora en México D.F. Taller para el Desarrollo de Asistentes Ejecutivas, Septiembre 27, Reserve Ya!

2010-09-09 Thread Ing.Tania Huerta
[IMAGE]

Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento. 
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos  un ejecutivo con gusto le
atendera
Tels. (33) 8851-2365, (33)8851-2741.

Copyright (C) 2010, PMS Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico  S.C. Derechos
Reservados. PMS de Mixico, El logo de PMS de Mixico son marcas
registradas. ADVERTENCIA PMS de Mixico no cuenta con alianzas
estratigicas de ningzn tipo dentro de la Republica Mexicana. NO SE DEJE
ENGAQAR - DIGA NO A LA PIRATERIA. Todos los logotipos, marcas comerciales
e imagenes son propiedad de sus respectivas corporaciones y se utilizan
con fines informativos solamente.

Este Mensaje ha sido enviado a misc@openbsd.org  como usuario de Pms de
Mixico o bien un usuario le refiris para recibir este boletmn.
Como usuario de Pms de Mixico, en este acto autoriza de manera expresa
que Pms de Mixico le puede contactar vma correo electrsnico u otros
medios.
Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, haga caso omiso de el y
reporte su cuenta respondiendo este correo con el subject BAJAASISTENTES

Unsubscribe to this mailing list, reply a blank message with the subject
UNSUBSCRIBE BAJAASISTENTES
Tenga en cuenta que la gestisn de nuestras bases de datos es de suma
importancia y no es intencisn de la empresa la inconformidad del
receptor.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 
6_asistentes.jpg]



Re: OpenBSD 4.6 + carp + pf + pfsync lockup

2010-09-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-09-09, Martin Pelik??n martin.peli...@gmail.com wrote:
 2010/9/9, Joe Warren-Meeks joe.warren.me...@gmail.com:
 recv/send:
 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=16384
 net.inet.udp.recvspace=41600
 j...@f1:/home/joe sysctl -a |grep send
 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=16384
 net.inet.udp.sendspace=9216


 Too low? What is a good value for them?

 It depends on what do you need. The defaults suffice for most cases,
 but on our most loaded router we use tcp both 256k and udp send space
 65k (lots of dns). Just test it somewhere.

these affect traffic sourced from the box itself, *not* routed through it.



Re: Distribute bandwidth by IP's

2010-09-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-09-09, Hermes Ojeda Ruiz hermes@gmail.com wrote:
 Ok. That's good. Using hfsc what's the advantage?
 https://calomel.org/pf_hfsc.html

You can allow an initial burst (good for standard web traffic etc) and
then slow things down. With this tool you can discourage file transfers
and streaming traffic which isn't sustainable over a very busy line,
while allowing standard http, ssh, imap, etc. to work more normally
(small transfers, or low-bandwidth transfers, get through ok; large/
high-bandwidth transfers are throttled). And the end result is much
nicer than allowing everyone to have a fair share i.e. 10-12Kbit/sec.

(Also I doubt that cbq can accurately control traffic down to this
sort of speed..)

On the down side, the documentation for hfsc is pretty bad, I was just
setting it up recently myself and had to to assemble information from
about 4 different sources in order to learn enough to start experimenting..

 Can be assigned the altq rules with hsfc by ip? or only by kind of packets?

You can assign packets to queues by any criteria PF can match on..

match proto tcp to port ssh queue (fast, highest)
match proto tcp queue (standard, fast)
match proto udp to port domain queue (highest)
match proto udp from 10.0.0.1 queue (aa)



4.8 Release and Download and

2010-09-09 Thread Keith
  Seeing that orders are being taken for the 4.8 release got me thinking 
about purchasing a copy, I don't need a copy on CD so just a download 
for my architecture would be fine. In the past I've sent a small donated 
to the project and was wondering if there's way that I could buy the 
right to download the OS before the official release.

Personally I would happily pay the same as the full CD costs and 
probably some more to just download the OS and the project would save on 
the production of the CD and the postage.

I'd defiantly pay for 802.11G, hope that it's working in this release.

Keith



Re: 4.8 Release and Download and

2010-09-09 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:58:40 +0100 Keith ke...@scott-land.net wrote:

   Seeing that orders are being taken for the 4.8 release got me
 thinking about purchasing a copy, I don't need a copy on CD so just a
 download for my architecture would be fine. In the past I've sent a
 small donated to the project and was wondering if there's way that I
 could buy the right to download the OS before the official release.
 
 Personally I would happily pay the same as the full CD costs and 
 probably some more to just download the OS and the project would save
 on the production of the CD and the postage.
 
 I'd defiantly pay for 802.11G, hope that it's working in this release.
 
 Keith
 

Keith,

It seems you're kind of missing the point. The developers *GIVE* the
code away free to everyone. If you appreciate all the time, effort and
expense the developers sink into giving away code for free, then the
right answer is to try to give back to them in some way. Donations are
always welcome.

Some people work at companies where they use OpenBSD in their
businesses. Since it's often impossible to get their companies to make a
straight forward donation, instead they *BUY* a big stack of release
CDs for their company. Of course, they don't actually need a big stack
of CDs, but it was the only way the could get approval from the bosses.

As for pre-ordering release CDs, yes, the discs are often (but not
always) delivered before the official release date. Of course, until the
actual release date when the CVS and package mirrors open up to public
access, having the CDs early really doesn't give you much of a head
start.

Some people don't want stacks and stacks of CDs around, so instead of
ordering release CDs, the order T-Shirts, posters or best of all, just
make donations to give back to the project and developers who give them
so much.

Personally, I buy the release CDs just for the stickers. ;)

Either way, release CD sales and donations really do help to fund 
continued development of OpenBSD.

jcr


--
The OpenBSD Journal - http://www.undeadly.org



Broadcom BCM4322 wifi support?

2010-09-09 Thread James Hozier
Since Broadcom has released their sources for drivers, will I be able to
get support for my BCM4322 wireless card for OpenBSD? The BCM4322 chipset
ID was removed from bwi(4) a while back:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=122116715708453w=2

It would be so awesome if it was supported now so that I don't have to
spend money on a wireless card. I've been using a wireless router as my
wireless card (putting it in bridge mode from my modem/wireless router and
connecting my bridge to my laptop via ethernet cable) and it's a hassle
lugging it around.



Vedi : Effacement de vos donn�es

2010-09-09 Thread info
Bonjour,

Nous vous confirmons l'effacement de votre adresse email de nos fichiers

Cordialement
VEDI - Service Marketing



!Su tarjeta SUPERCLAVE fue DESHABILITADA!!

2010-09-09 Thread Santander.cl
[IMAGE]
ESTE MENSAJE Y SUS ANEXOS PUEDEN CONTENER
INFORMACION
CONFIDENCIAL, PROTEGIDA Y LEGALMENTE PRIVILEGIADA
CON LA
INTENCION DE QUE SEA UTILIZADA POR LAS PERSONAS U
ORGANIZACIONES A QUIENES ESTA DIRIGIDA, POR LO QUE
SU USO
ES EXCLUSIVO PARA SU DESTINATARIO. SI USTED HA
RECIBIDO
ESTE MENSAJE POR ERROR, FAVOR DE ELIMINARLO E
INFORMAR AL
REMITENTE DEL MENSAJE A TRAVES DE UN CORREO DE
RESPUESTA.
SI ESTE ES EL CASO, LE NOTIFICAMOS QUE QUEDA
ESTRICTAMENTE
PROHIBIDA LA DISTRIBUCION O REPRODUCCION DE ESTE E-
MAIL Y/O
SUS ANEXOS. GRUPO SANTANDER-CHILE NO SE HACE RESPONSABLE
DE LAS
OPINIONES VERTIDAS EN ESTA COMUNICACION QUE NO
ESTEN
ACORDES CON SU QUEHACER Y FINES, Y QUE NO SE
REVISTAN DE UN
CARACTER OFICIAL. ESTA INSTITUCION NO ES
RESPONSABLE POR
CUALQUIER ACCION U OMISION DE TERCERAS PERSONAS
NO
AUTORIZADAS, RELACIONADAS A LA INFORMACION
CONTENIDA EN
ESTE MENSAJE O SUS ANEXOS.

GRACIAS.-
GRUPO SANTANDER-CHILE
THIS MESSAGE AND ITS ENCLOSURES MAY CONTAIN
CONFIDENTIAL, PROTECTED AND LEGALLY PRIVILEGED
INFORMATION
INTENDED FOR THE USE OF PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS
TO WHICH
IT IS DIRECTED AND ITS USE IS THUS LIMITED TO ITS
ADDRESSEE. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE BY
MISTAKE,
PLEASE ELIMINATE IT AND INFORM THE SENDER THROUGH A
REPLY
MESSAGE. SHOULD THIS BE THE CASE, YOU ARE ADVISED
THAT THE
DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS E-MAIL AND/OR
ANY
ATTACHMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN IS STRICTLY
FORBIDDEN. GRUPO
SANTANDER-CHILE IS NOT LIABLE FOR OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS
MESSAGE WHICH MAY NOT COINCIDE WITH ITS
RESPONSIBILITIES
AND PURPOSE AND WHICH MAY NOT EXPRESS OFFICIAL
MATTERS.
THIS INSTITUTION IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ACTION OR
OMISSION OF ACTION BY UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PERSONS
RELATED TO
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE OR ITS
ATTACHMENTS.

THANK YOU.-
GRUPO SANTANDER-CHILE



Ζητούνται 5 στελέχη πωλήσεων

2010-09-09 Thread Cosmos-GRS newsletter
*/NOON=ONN?O N$N?OON9OON9N:OO NON3N1N=N9ONOO/*/
N6N7ON, 5 OON5N;N-ON7 OON;N.ON5O   N= N3N9N1 OON?ON8N7ON7
ON5 N5ON1N3N3N5N;NN1ON9N:N-O N5ON1N9ON5N/N5O
N5OO   ON5ON9N:N?O
-N5NO  ON5ON9N:N?O
 *NN?N=N?OON;N9N1N:N?O

marketing*/
 
*/NON1ON1N/ON7ON1 OON?OON=ON1/*
/NNON5N9ON/N1 OON9O OON;N.ON5N9O /
/NON=N1NN9ONO-NN9N;N?N4N?NN/N1/
/NN=N5ON7 OON7N= N5ON9N:N?N9N=O N=N/N1/
/NON9OON7 N3N=OON7 NN3N3N;N9N:N.O N3N;OOOON1O/
/N%ON5ON8ON=OON7ON1 N:N1N9 NNN1N4N9N:O N N=N5O
NN1/
/N%ON7N;N?N/ N#OOON?N9/
/N N?N;O
 N:N1N;N. OON.ON7 N/N%/

*/N ON?OON-ON?N=ON1N9/*
/NN=ON1N3ON=N9OON9N:O ON1N:N-ON? N1ON?N4N?OON=/
/N#ON=N5ON.O N5N:ON1N/N4N5OON7/
/NON9OON5O OON=N8N.N:N5O N5ON3N1ON/N1O N:N1N9
N4ON=N1OOON7ON5O N5NN-N;N9NN7O/
/N#O
N3OON?N=N? N:N1N9 N5OON,ON9OON? ON5ON9N2N,N;N;N?N=/
/N ON?N?OON9N:N. N5ON1N3N3N5N;NN1ON9N:N.O
OON1N4N9N?N4ON?NN/N1O/
/N N;N.ON7O N:N,N;OON7 ON1NN9N4N/ON= OON7N= NN;N;N,N4N1
N:N1N9 ON? N5NO   ON5ON9N:O/
/NNN?N4N1 N:N1N8N7NN5ON9N=N.O NN5ON1N:N/N=N7ON7O/
/NN5N3N,N;N? N5N=N5ON3O ON5N;N1ON?N;ON3N9N?/

/NN9 N5N=N4N9N1ON5OONN5N=N?N9 ON1ON1N:N1N;N?O
N=ON1N9 N=N1
OON5N/N;N?ON= ON? N2N9N?N3ON1ON9N:O ON?OO ON7NN5N/O NN1
OON? *FAX* *210 9249206* N. OON?
*e-mail*:*karagian...@cosmos-grs.com* N. N=N1 ON7N;N5OO   N=N.ON?ON=
OON? *210* *9226930* N:N?N= NN1ON1N3N9N,N=N=N7/

/NOON1ON9OON?O
NN5/
 
*/COSMOS ONLINE/*
/www.cosmos-grs.com http://www.cosmos-grs.com/
 /
 

--
If you do not want to receive any more newsletters, 
http://mailer5.cosmosonline.gr/?p=unsubscribeuid=90fa2e6478760fb0b553ef5a6c432cb2

To update your preferences and to unsubscribe visit
http://mailer5.cosmosonline.gr/?p=preferencesuid=90fa2e6478760fb0b553ef5a6c432cb2
Forward a Message to Someone
http://mailer5.cosmosonline.gr/?p=forwarduid=90fa2e6478760fb0b553ef5a6c432cb2mid=120


--
Powered by PHPlist, www.phplist.com --



Re: maybe OT 6 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death

2010-09-09 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:01:43 -0600 (MDT) Diana Eichert
deich...@wrench.com wrote:

 I don't think it's off topic but others might.  I'm writing this post
 to remember Chuck Yerkes, a long time contributor to the m...@openbsd
 list. Chuck died 6 years ago this coming weekend while riding his
 motorcycle.
 http://web.archive.org/web/20041012235249/http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/9511974.htm
 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=109385676632581w=2
 
 Just wanted to remember you Chuck, take it easy wherever you are.
 
 diana
 

Thank You Diana.

Shirt, Shoes, Sober... --Pick Two 
Chuck Yerkes

jcr

--
The OpenBSD Journal - http://www.undeadly.org



Re: maybe OT 6 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death

2010-09-09 Thread Kit Halsted
I was just thinking of Chuck earlier tonight, as some pinhead suddenly swerved
in front of my bike without signaling. Recqiescat in pacem, Chuck, sorry we
never got the chance to knock a few back in person.

On Sep 9, 2010, at 9:43 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:

 On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:01:43 -0600 (MDT) Diana Eichert
 deich...@wrench.com wrote:

 I don't think it's off topic but others might.  I'm writing this post
 to remember Chuck Yerkes, a long time contributor to the m...@openbsd
 list. Chuck died 6 years ago this coming weekend while riding his
 motorcycle.

http://web.archive.org/web/20041012235249/http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld
/cctimes/news/9511974.htm
 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=109385676632581w=2

 Just wanted to remember you Chuck, take it easy wherever you are.

 diana


 Thank You Diana.

Shirt, Shoes, Sober... --Pick Two
Chuck Yerkes

 jcr



Comment puis-je investir dans votre pays/how can i invest in your country

2010-09-09 Thread Mr.Martin.humid
Cher Monsieur Je sais que cette lettre peut jtre une trhs grande surprise
pour vous. Je suis M. Martin humide a l'Afrique du Sud citoyen, mais de
base ici, au Royaume-Uni / Londres en raison de problhmes politiques dans
notre pays. J'itais un fonctionnaire dans mon pays, je travaille en tant
que prisident du comiti local d'organisation pendant le temps nous avons
gagni la candidature pour accueillir Coupe du Monde 2010 dans mon pays
d'Afrique du Sud. Depuis que je suis venu dans ce pays je tente de
dimarrer une entreprise, mais je ne pouvais pas le faire, car je n'ai
jamais fait une entreprise car, dans ma vie, des gens inutiles certains
de mes fonds que je suis venu ici avec. J'ai encore beaucoup d'argent `
investir, mais je crains que d'investir l'argent dans une autre
entreprise que mon ami m'a introduit dans, parce que l'argent que j'ai
pour le moment il est le seul espoir de ma famille, de qui, s'il arrivait
quelque chose dessus, il sera l'effet tout le monde dans la famille, y
compris moi, c'est pourquoi je suis tellement peur d'investir le fonds
avec quelque chose que je ne sais pas comment contrtler que quelqu'un qui
itait un fonctionnaire jamais faire des affaires dans sa vie. Je suis
avec vous pour me faire une faveur si vous pouvez accepter moi d'investir
l'argent dans votre entreprise pour acheter votre produit de la sociiti `
un taux bas prix pour me permettre de le vendre ici au Royaume-Uni /
Londres, afin que je puisse faire assez de profits. Je pense que ce sera
une bonne idie pour moi que de faire affaires avec des gens qui ne sont
pas dignes de confiance? Le sens de ma proposition est pour vous pour
m'aider et me donner quelques bonnes idies, peut-jtre mon idie n'est pas
trhs bien, mais je crois que d'investir dans mon fonds de votre produit
de la sociiti devrait jtre la seule fagon je peux survivre avec mon
argent sans perdre mon argent? Toujours me contacter sur mon E-mail
privi: (martins.hu...@gmail.com) parce que je tiens ` m'adresser ` vous
pour nous de s'habituer les uns aux autres, je voudrais que vous me faire
parvenir votre propre numiro de mobile me permettre de parler avec vous
Je vais jtre en attente de votre riponse urgente Merci et que Dieu vous
binisse Cordialement Mr.Martin.humid



Re: 4.8 Release and Download and

2010-09-09 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:58:40AM +0100, Keith wrote:
   Seeing that orders are being taken for the 4.8 release got me thinking 
 about purchasing a copy, I don't need a copy on CD so just a download 
 for my architecture would be fine. In the past I've sent a small donated 
 to the project and was wondering if there's way that I could buy the 
 right to download the OS before the official release.

In reality, you already can; at no point is there code that's being
held out for the CD release that isn't already in cvs; grabiing
a -current snapshot from a period of time reasonably near the tree
unlock that happens each cycle should be close enough for anything
that doesn't require soothing some sort of OCD.

 
 Personally I would happily pay the same as the full CD costs and 
 probably some more to just download the OS and the project would save on 
 the production of the CD and the postage.
 
 I'd defiantly pay for 802.11G, hope that it's working in this release.
 
 Keith



Re: Broadcom BCM4322 wifi support?

2010-09-09 Thread BSD

On 09/09/10 19:28, James Hozier wrote:

Since Broadcom has released their sources for drivers, will I be able to
get support for my BCM4322 wireless card for OpenBSD? The BCM4322 chipset
ID was removed from bwi(4) a while back:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=122116715708453w=2

It would be so awesome if it was supported now so that I don't have to
spend money on a wireless card. I've been using a wireless router as my
wireless card (putting it in bridge mode from my modem/wireless router and
connecting my bridge to my laptop via ethernet cable) and it's a hassle
lugging it around.


   
Code is not proper hardware documentation. Another factor to consider is 
the availability of the firmware to be distributed under real open 
conditions. So this announcement could really mean nothing to openbsd. 
The wifi hardware devs will know better than me though.


-luis



Re: OpenBSD 4.8 pre-orders are up

2010-09-09 Thread Luis Cortes
Thanks for making my life easier!  OpenBSD developers are AWESOME!

Your order currently is:
- 1 [CD48] OpenBSD 4.8 CD @ CDN $50.00
- 1 [T31] PuffyTron Shirt (L) @ CDN $25.00
- 1 [M1] Puffy Mug @ CDN $20.00
- Total: CDN $95.00 + Shipping.

--
Luis