Re: OpenBSD's webpage desing
On Jul 05 03:36:30, Peter Laufenberg wrote: On 2012-06-27 19:25, Peter Laufenberg wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Peter Laufenberg open...@laufenberg.ch wrote: I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional graphic designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio: that would be cool to presence as a bystander No te entiendo tío! pay the dude regardless of what anybody says, and have him send the patches to a public mailing list Maybe if this community wasn't so resistant to change (justified or not). I can't even see half of his website since it prompts me to download additional software (plugins). It's a /portfolio/ that includes video production. If you don't understand the concept of a portfolio, look it up. It might be nice to have a prettier website, with nicer colors, etc. But most of the people who'd manage to do that, would also want to add JS/CSS/flash, and other thing that would break current features (the ability to see the website in lynx, for example). Most being a number out of your statistically-relevant experience? A designer doesn't decide what technologies can be used -- whoever mandates him does. Web design is a piece of cake compared to tv broadcasting requirements. Now that's an idea: an OpenBSD FAQ TV Broadcast! Please mandate your multimedia friends to make that happen.
NFS-e No. 14469897
Esta mensagem refere-se à Nota Fiscal Paulistana - NFS-e No. 14469897 emitida pelo prestador de serviços:E-mail: misc@openbsd.orgPara visualizá- la acesse o link a seguir: https://nfe.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/nfe.aspx?ccm=32189060amp;nf=14469247amp;co d=FKT4XVPG
ANZ e-statement
Your ANZ new e-statement is available. To view, click on the ACCOUNTS tab and then click on Statements to verify your account transaction.
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:07:52PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: Thanks to the OpenBSD team and Miod Vallat for the Loongson port. I am trying to put together a MIPS development machine and I installed OpenBSD 5.1. I didn't see a change log for the Loongson snapshot referenced from the OpenBSD Loongson page so I don't know if there are any relevant changes for my intended use or whether the snapshots are supposed to be experimental. Which version should I use and should I be tracking current for this machine? Thanks. For sure better to use snapshots/current. Thanks, I'll reinstall then. Should I track current on this? I don't have any idea how many changes are being done on it. And I think it's valid for any similar experimental port. Is Loongson an experimental port? The OpenBSD page lists it under the officially support platforms...I realize it's a work in progress, but I didn't think it was experimental. Aside from the bootblocks not installing from either 5.1 release or the 5.2. snapshot, everything seems to be working. BTW this one http://lemote.kd85.com/ will work with Loongson port as well? Seems like it's slightly different CPU. Good question and I have no idea. Yes, it's a different CPU. The 2E and 2F are uniprocessors. The 3A is a quard. Maybe the port maintainer will chime in. Many patches are hitting the Linux kernel and binutils from Lemote and MIPS people so I believe there are significant differences. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X MIPS Loongson and OpenBSD and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
[codeb...@inbox.lv: Re: Lemote Fuloong]
For sure better to use snapshots/current. Thanks, I'll reinstall then. Should I track current on this? DOH! Sorry, I see you answered this already.
4g (LTE) modem
Hello, could anybody recommend OpenBSD compatible 4g (LTE) modem? -- Alexei Malinin
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:44:50AM +, Code Blue wrote: On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:07:52PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: Thanks to the OpenBSD team and Miod Vallat for the Loongson port. I am trying to put together a MIPS development machine and I installed OpenBSD 5.1. I didn't see a change log for the Loongson snapshot referenced from the OpenBSD Loongson page so I don't know if there are any relevant changes for my intended use or whether the snapshots are supposed to be experimental. Which version should I use and should I be tracking current for this machine? Thanks. For sure better to use snapshots/current. Thanks, I'll reinstall then. Should I track current on this? I don't have any idea how many changes are being done on it. And I think it's valid for any similar experimental port. Is Loongson an experimental port? The OpenBSD page lists it under the officially support platforms...I realize it's a work in progress, but I didn't think it was experimental. Aside from the bootblocks not installing from either 5.1 release or the 5.2. snapshot, everything seems to be working. Loongson is not experimental. There are less users using it compared to some other platforms, but the port is certainly stable enough to be used for real stuff. I'm running a Fuloong as my general purpose mai/file/dns/web server at home and i have had zero trouble with it. In fact I'm typing this mail on it ... BTW this one http://lemote.kd85.com/ will work with Loongson port as well? Seems like it's slightly different CPU. Good question and I have no idea. Yes, it's a different CPU. The 2E and 2F are uniprocessors. The 3A is a quard. Maybe the port maintainer will chime in. Many patches are hitting the Linux kernel and binutils from Lemote and MIPS people so I believe there are significant differences. ATM we do not run on these. One big practical problem is that so far these machines are not available for purchase. -Otto
Personnalisez votre tapis d'entrée
.courier { font-family: Courier; color: #00; } h1 {font-size:8px;}
Le tapis d'accueil personnaliseacute; qui donne la valeur
ajouteacute;e agrave; votre entreacute;e !
Contactez-nous pour un devis immeacute;diat
Offre valable jusqu'au 17 aoucirc;t 2012 - 10 % sur votre commande (
code promo P831 )
Madame, Mademoiselle, Monsieur,
Pour ne plus recevoir de courriels de notre part, veuillez utiliser le
lien ci-dessus.
Un délai de 48 heures peut être nécessaire, en raison des envois déjà
programmés et en cours.
Veuillez, s'il vous plaît, ne pas répondre à ce courriel. Merci à vous.
Re: processes dying on an old ALIX
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:00:27PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: On Jul 04 10:57:45, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: this is another problem. configure swap to be double the RAM size, or if you insist on loading the machine about 4 times the RAM size. you obviously forgot to or didn't want to configure swap. is the twice the RAM mantra still valid today? No, that only makes sense for relatively small systems. The disklabel auto allocation policy uses a max size if 2x physmem for physmem 256M. Otherwise it allocates a bit more than physical mem size. Well, this machine has 128M - does that mean that having 256M of swap would make my system generally better? Depends how much memory is actually used by the processes on it. If you never will hit swap having it or not should not make a difference. Running without swap should be no problem, though you might hit code paths otherwise not taken, so there is an buigger chance you'll find bugs. If that is good or not depends on your personal perspective. On machines that are not as fixed as the ALIX (128M soldered on board), I try to have enough RAM to not ever have to swap. I will probably reinstall this ALIX with 256M swap and see if this problem disappears. Before I do that, are there any hints on these code paths not usually taken, such as how I might hit this more often on a smallmem machine such as this? Or any specific tests? Sorry, dunno. It's just that having a machine without swap is an uncommon configuration. ut yo cold try to stress the machine memory wise and see what happens. -Otto
sppp_clear_ip_addresses() patch (was Re: splassert: assertwaitok: want -1 have 1 - possibly pppoe related)
On 06/27/12 10:59, RD Thrush wrote:
On 06/26/12 12:36, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
This looks similar to the pppoe(4) bug that stsp fixed last year:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=130288210121749w=2
Seems to me like sppp_clear_ip_addresses() needs the same workq
treatment that sppp_set_ip_addresses() received.
Thanks for the heads up. I made the attached patch and have been running with
it for the past 3 hours. So far, it has successfully gone through 7
disconnects
without the stack trace diagnostic. I'll report more later unless breakage
occurs.
Status update:
While running the patch, my DSL continued to fail in the same way for another
day or so until full service was regained. During that time, it handled 30+
disconnections without triggering the stack trace diagnostic. I'm confident
the patch fixed my problem and may be considered for the tree.
Thanks, Bob
I've appended the patch inline or [1] if tbird mangles it.
[1]http://arp.thrush.com/openbsd/pppoe/sys_net_if_spppsubr_c.diff
Give sppp_clear_ip_addresses() the same workq treatment
that sppp_set_ip_addresses() received in cvs r1.85 by stsp.
Index: sys/net/if_spppsubr.c
===
RCS file: /a8v/pub2/cvsroot/OpenBSD/src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.96 if_spppsubr.c
--- sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 28 Jan 2012 12:14:45 - 1.96
+++ sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 27 Jun 2012 11:35:01 -
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ HIDE void sppp_qflush(struct ifqueue *if
int sppp_update_gw_walker(struct radix_node *rn, void *arg, u_int);
void sppp_update_gw(struct ifnet *ifp);
HIDE void sppp_set_ip_addrs(void *, void *);
-HIDE void sppp_clear_ip_addrs(struct sppp *sp);
+HIDE void sppp_clear_ip_addrs(void *, void *);
HIDE void sppp_set_phase(struct sppp *sp);
/* our control protocol descriptors */
@@ -3014,6 +3014,10 @@ struct sppp_set_ip_addrs_args {
u_int32_t hisaddr;
};
+struct sppp_clear_ip_addrs_args {
+ struct sppp *sp;
+};
+
HIDE void
sppp_ipcp_tlu(struct sppp *sp)
{
@@ -3035,6 +3039,7 @@ sppp_ipcp_tlu(struct sppp *sp)
(sp-ipcp.flags IPCP_HISADDR_SEEN))
args-hisaddr = sp-ipcp.req_hisaddr;
+ printf(%s: workq_add_task(sppp_set_ip_addrs)\n, ifp-if_xname); /*
XXX */
if (workq_add_task(NULL, 0, sppp_set_ip_addrs, args, NULL)) {
free(args, M_TEMP);
printf(%s: workq_add_task failed, cannot set
@@ -3096,9 +3101,23 @@ sppp_ipcp_tls(struct sppp *sp)
HIDE void
sppp_ipcp_tlf(struct sppp *sp)
{
+ struct ifnet *ifp = sp-pp_if;
+ struct sppp_clear_ip_addrs_args *args;
+
+ args = malloc(sizeof(*args), M_TEMP, M_NOWAIT);
+ if (args == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ args-sp = sp;
+
if (sp-ipcp.flags (IPCP_MYADDR_DYN|IPCP_HISADDR_DYN))
/* Some address was dynamic, clear it again. */
- sppp_clear_ip_addrs(sp);
+ printf(%s: workq_add_task(sppp_clear_ip_addrs)\n,
ifp-if_xname); /* XXX */
+ if (workq_add_task(NULL, 0, sppp_clear_ip_addrs, args, NULL)) {
+ free(args, M_TEMP);
+ printf(%s: workq_add_task failed, cannot clear
+ addresses\n, ifp-if_xname);
+ }
/* we no longer need LCP */
sp-lcp.protos = ~(1 IDX_IPCP);
@@ -4755,21 +4774,33 @@ sppp_set_ip_addrs(void *arg1, void *arg2
return;
}
sppp_update_gw(ifp);
+ log(LOG_DEBUG, SPP_FMT sppp_set_ip_addrs succeeded\n,
SPP_ARGS(ifp)); /* XXX */
}
splx(s);
}
/*
- * Clear IP addresses. Must be called at splnet.
+ * Work queue task clearing addresses from process context.
+ * Clear IP addresses.
*/
HIDE void
-sppp_clear_ip_addrs(struct sppp *sp)
+sppp_clear_ip_addrs(void *arg1, void *arg2)
{
+ struct sppp_clear_ip_addrs_args *args = arg1;
+ struct sppp *sp = args-sp;
struct ifnet *ifp = sp-pp_if;
+ int debug = ifp-if_flags IFF_DEBUG;
struct ifaddr *ifa;
struct sockaddr_in *si;
struct sockaddr_in *dest;
+ int s;
+
+ /* Arguments are now on local stack so free temporary storage. */
+ free(args, M_TEMP);
+
+ s = splsoftnet();
+
u_int32_t remote;
if (sp-ipcp.flags IPCP_HISADDR_DYN)
remote = sp-ipcp.saved_hisaddr;
@@ -4792,6 +4823,7 @@ sppp_clear_ip_addrs(struct sppp *sp)
}
if (ifa si) {
+ int error;
struct sockaddr_in new_sin = *si;
in_ifscrub(ifp, ifatoia(ifa));
@@ -4800,10 +4832,18 @@ sppp_clear_ip_addrs(struct sppp *sp)
if (sp-ipcp.flags IPCP_HISADDR_DYN)
/* replace peer addr in place */
dest-sin_addr.s_addr = sp-ipcp.saved_hisaddr;
- if (!in_ifinit(ifp,
PF and altq isues...need advice please.
i start experimenting with alt-q ,and manage to make a nice test config.
my box has 3 LAN interfaces, but i am playing atm only with one network.
i manage to get the trafic that comes from the internet to each machine
nicely as i want it.
the global out speed to internet is set to 256Kbs.
while each machine is set with 1Mbit out
but the outspeed stays at the 256kbs ,and not the values i want,so my
question, what is wrong with my config ?
below my current pf.conf
START CONFIG ##
#
ext_if = fxp0
int0_if = re0
int2_if = rl0
int3_if = rl1
#
localnet0 =192.168.0.0/24
localnet2 =192.168.2.0/24
localnet3 =192.168.3.0/24
#
blockedport ={21,25,53,80,110,119, 2128}
openport={ 21,25,110,8002,45631 }
#
table firewall persist file /etc/table/firewall.table
#
# extern - intern IF-0
altq on $int0_if cbq bandwidth 1000Mb queue /
{ std0_in, core_in, soep_in, global0_in, server2_in }
queue std0_inbandwidth 15Mb priority 1 cbq(default)
queue global0_in bandwidth 192Kb cbq
queue core_inbandwidth 2024Kb cbq
queue soep_inbandwidth 1024Kb cbq
queue server2_in bandwidth 512Kb cbq
#
#
# intern - extern
altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth 10Mb queue /
{ std_ext , lan_ext ,core_ext, soep_ext, server2_ext }
queue std_ext bandwidth 6Mb cbq(default)
queue lan_ext bandwidth 256Kb cbq
queue core_extbandwidth 1024Kb cbq
queue soep_extbandwidth 1024Kb cbq
queue server2_ext bandwidth 512Kb cbq
#
match out on egress inet from !(egress) to any nat-to (egress:0)
#
block in on $ext_if all
block quick on $ext_if proto {tcp,udp} from firewall to any port /
$blockedport
antispoof for $ext_if inet
#
# Local servers (mail / ftp / other)
pass in quick on $ext_if proto { tcp,udp } from any to $ext_if port /
$openport rdr-to 192.168.0.254
# traffic from localnet0 to internet
pass out on $ext_if keep state queue lan_ext
pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.0.238 keep state queue core_ext
pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.0.227 keep state queue soep_ext
pass out on $ext_if from 192.168.0.254 keep state queue server2_ext
# Traffic from internet to localnet0 (this block work correct)
pass in on $int0_if from $localnet0 keep state queue global0_in
pass in on $int0_if from 192.168.0.238 keep state queue core_in
pass in on $int0_if from 192.168.0.227 keep state queue soep_in
pass in on $int0_if from 192.168.0.254 keep state queue server2_in
## END CONFIG
simply sayd.
i dont want a global CAP on outgoing trafic.
each machine should have his own CAP on outgoing trafic.
any advice ?
Kernel Panic (?)(!)
Hi, When I download from my OpenBSD server a lot of files with sftp, it crashes with Kernel Panic (disk error). I tested two times, and two times it crashed. I get a message telling: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion ccb-ccb_xa.state == ATA_S_ONCHIP failed: file ../../../../dev/pci/ahci.c, line 2841 Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave Question: should I report a bug ? My server is openbsd-current 5.1 GENERIC.MP#290 amd64, and maybe that's too old. Quick infos: I download files from Fedora 17 with FileZilla, which blocks when kernel panic occurs (of course). When I start downloading, it's after ~20 minutes that it crashes. The disk which stocks files I try download is SATA, and partition is a crypted softraid. I took photos of the screen. Thanks, Max
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: Loongson is not experimental. There are less users using it compared to some other platforms, but the port is certainly stable enough to be used for real stuff. I'm running a Fuloong as my general purpose mai/file/dns/web server at home and i have had zero trouble with it. In fact I'm typing this mail on it ... I was running fine on 5.1 but based on the comment from the previous poster I reinstalled the snapshot (5.2). I was then unable to install any packages from snapshots because of library errors. For example: # pkg_add mutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl Can't install libiconv-1.14 because of libraries |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Can't install qdbm-1.8.78: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3 because of libraries Can't install gettext-0.18.1p1: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install lmutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl: can't resolve cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3,libiconv-1.14,qdbm-1.8.78,gettext-0.18.1p1 I don't know whether I should reinstall 5.1 and use it until 5.2 comes out or whether I should continue and try to track -current and see if the issues are resolved, but I am not looking forward to compiling much source given the lack of framebuffer acceleration! I used to track -stable on i386 but I have been away from OpenBSD for a while so I am a little rusty on all this. Are you running -current or 5.1 and since you are using it for a server and it is working fine for you, what would you recommend? Thanks. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: I was running fine on 5.1 but based on the comment from the previous poster I reinstalled the snapshot (5.2). I was then unable to install any packages from snapshots because of library errors. What is the value of PKG_PATH? Now that you have moved from 5.1-release to -current, you will also have to change the location where packages are downloaded in order to keep both OS packages synchronized. See FAQ 15.4.1.
Re: Virtualizing firewalling scenarios in one physical OpenBSD host
C. L. Martinez carlopm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I wonder if with OpenBSD is possible to create virtualized firewalled implementations of conventional physical topologies and designs such as central and remote DMZs (my question has nothing to do with virtualization platforms like ESXi/vSphere or Xen or KVM), like for example CheckPoint VSX does: http://www.checkpoint.com/products/vpn-1-power-vsx/index.html. The idea is to configure different security scenarios on a single system. Is it possible?? Some example?? Thanks.
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:12:43PM +, Code Blue wrote: |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Your mirror is probably not so current. Try using another mirror.
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:53:29AM -0700, James Hartley wrote: On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: I was running fine on 5.1 but based on the comment from the previous poster I reinstalled the snapshot (5.2). I was then unable to install any packages from snapshots because of library errors. What is the value of PKG_PATH? Now that you have moved from 5.1-release to -current, you will also have to change the location where packages are downloaded in order to keep both OS packages synchronized. See FAQ 15.4.1. Thanks, I am aware of it. I changed it to point to the snapshots directory of packages rather than 5.1 as shown in FAQ 15.2.2. The errors were as shown in the previous post. I am not using ports at this time, only the pregenerated packages. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the newsgroup against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Kernel Panic (?)(!)
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:28:06PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: Question: should I report a bug ? Are you sure your disk is fine?
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0300, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:12:43PM +, Code Blue wrote: |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Your mirror is probably not so current. Try using another mirror. I tried 2 so far but I will try another one. Do you happen to know one that is surely current? Thanks. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the mailing list against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Kernel Panic (?)(!)
Le 05/07/2012 16:13, Daniel Bolgheroni a écrit : On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:28:06PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: Question: should I report a bug ? Are you sure your disk is fine? Fine ? How could I know ? I get operation not supported by device when trying to read smart infos with smartctl. In all cases, even if my disk is destroyed, OpenBSD shouldn't crash, because the disk in question is not the disk on which OpenBSD is installed.
Compiling Ruby 1.9.2 on OpenBSD 5.1
Hello, I need to use the exact version 1.9.2 of Ruby and therefore trying to compile Ruby on OpenBSD 5.1. My configure command is the following: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/ruby --with-baseruby=/usr/local/bin/ruby19 Unfortunately the make fails with the following errors: compiling socket gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/ruby-1.9.2-p320/ext/socket' generating constant definitions gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o init.o -c init.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o constants.o -c constants.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o basicsocket.o -c basicsocket.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o socket.o -c socket.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o ipsocket.o -c ipsocket.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o tcpsocket.o -c tcpsocket.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o tcpserver.o -c tcpserver.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o sockssocket.o -c sockssocket.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o udpsocket.o -c udpsocket.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o unixsocket.o -c unixsocket.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o unixserver.o -c unixserver.c gcc -I. -I../../.ext/include/x86_64-openbsd5.1 -I../.././include -I../.././ext/socket -DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\extconf.h\ -fPIC -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -o option.o -c option.c option.c: In function 'inspect_peercred': option.c:407: error: 'struct ucred' has no member named 'pid' option.c:407: error: 'struct ucred' has no member named 'uid' option.c:407: error: 'struct ucred' has no member named 'gid' gmake[1]: *** [option.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/ruby-1.9.2-p320/ext/socket' gmake: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 1 Does anyone have a clue what could be going wrong here? Many thanks in advance. Best, M.L.
Re: inteldrm0 gpu hung
Hi, Doesnt look like it. I'm running latest snapshots and still having the issue. Thanks all for the other suggestions. I have tried vesa driver without any luck. The gpu hung message disappears but as soon as X exits back to xdm it wont login again. Similarly if you close X altogether it wont run again. Just a black screen. I disabled intelagp no difference. I have the same setup agp slot doesnt get used. I have disabled DRI in xorg.conf changed monitors, changed computers (unfortunately all similar HP machines) and keep upgrading snapshots. Any other suggestions would be appreciated. From: Alexei Malinin alexei.mali...@mail.ru To: Steve fivering...@yahoo.com.au Cc: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2012 11:44 PM Subject: Re: inteldrm0 gpu hung Steve wrote: OK Thanks, Have you found any workaround ? No, I hope that upgrading to OpenBSD-5.1 will solve the problem. -- Alexei Malinin I read in a somewhat unrelated thread someone suggesting to disable drm in the kernel but once I do that X fails to load. Thanks again. From: Alexei Malinin alexei.mali...@mail.ru To: Steve fivering...@yahoo.com.au Cc: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2012 7:56 PM Subject: Re: inteldrm0 gpu hung Steve wrote: Sorry to push this again. Is anyone running X on HP d510 D530 dx2200 dc7600 machines successfully ? Was there any tricks ? see: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=131711567115611w=2 but this issue is still unsolved :( -- Alexei Malinin Can I grab a working xorg.conf Thanks. - Forwarded Message - From: Steve fivering...@yahoo.com.au To: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org Sent: Tuesday, 3 July 2012 6:30 PM Subject: inteldrm0 gpu hung Hi, I seem to be getting this on multiple models of HP machines from 5.0 release through to current. Is there a known issue with this ? Is there a way to disable it from the kernel. I can shoot through a dmesg but as mentioned it is on quite a few different machines. Any thoughts appreciated.
Re: Compiling Ruby 1.9.2 on OpenBSD 5.1
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:48 PM, ML mail mlnos...@yahoo.com wrote: option.c: In function 'inspect_peercred': option.c:407: error: 'struct ucred' has no member named 'pid' option.c:407: error: 'struct ucred' has no member named 'uid' option.c:407: error: 'struct ucred' has no member named 'gid' gmake[1]: *** [option.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/ruby-1.9.2-p320/ext/socket' gmake: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 1 Does anyone have a clue what could be going wrong here? This is because we use struct sockpeercred instead of struct ucred: you need to patch option.c Many thanks in advance. Best, M.L. Ciao, David
Re: Kernel Panic (?)(!)
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:33:37PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: Fine ? How could I know ? I get operation not supported by device when trying to read smart infos with smartctl. In all cases, even if my disk is destroyed, OpenBSD shouldn't crash, because the disk in question is not the disk on which OpenBSD is installed. And how can anyone know this if you didn't tell at first?
Re: Virtualizing firewalling scenarios in one physical OpenBSD host
* Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com [2012-07-04 17:42]: out of curiosity, how would you make pf(4) only handle rules pertaining to a certain anchor depending on the process that's interfacing with them? i ask because; e.g., pfctl -sr should only show rules for that client, and other pf(4) operations need to be equally restricted. i know that originally you said that the loading of the rules is not up to the client but a periodic batch job, however that does not match CheckPoint VSX geez, don't act so helpless, this is unix after all. write yourself a little wrapper that, depending on the caller/source, enforces a pfctl -a anchorinquestion ... -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/
Re: Kernel Panic (?)(!)
Le 05/07/2012 17:06, Daniel Bolgheroni a écrit : On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:33:37PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote: Fine ? How could I know ? I get operation not supported by device when trying to read smart infos with smartctl. In all cases, even if my disk is destroyed, OpenBSD shouldn't crash, because the disk in question is not the disk on which OpenBSD is installed. And how can anyone know this if you didn't tell at first? uh, sorry
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:15:06PM +, Code Blue wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0300, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:12:43PM +, Code Blue wrote: |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Your mirror is probably not so current. Try using another mirror. I tried 2 so far but I will try another one. Do you happen to know one that is surely current? Thanks. I tried downloading from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/`machine -a`/ and I am still getting the same errors. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the mailing list against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: Loongson is not experimental. There are less users using it compared to some other platforms, but the port is certainly stable enough to be used for real stuff. I'm running a Fuloong as my general purpose mai/file/dns/web server at home and i have had zero trouble with it. In fact I'm typing this mail on it ... I was running fine on 5.1 but based on the comment from the previous poster I reinstalled the snapshot (5.2). I was then unable to install any packages from snapshots because of library errors. For example: # pkg_add mutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl Can't install libiconv-1.14 because of libraries |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Can't install qdbm-1.8.78: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3 because of libraries Can't install gettext-0.18.1p1: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install lmutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl: can't resolve cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3,libiconv-1.14,qdbm-1.8.78,gettext-0.18.1p1 It shows that your system is newer then package you want to install. So look arround mirrors where is actual file/packages. It takes some time to distribute packages to all mirrors and build of packages for all platforms take some time as well. I don't know whether I should reinstall 5.1 and use it until 5.2 comes out or whether I should continue and try to track -current and see if the issues are resolved, but I am not looking forward to compiling much source given the lack of framebuffer acceleration! I used to track -stable on i386 but I have been away from OpenBSD for a while so I am a little rusty on all this. Are you running -current or 5.1 and since you are using it for a server and it is working fine for you, what would you recommend? Using snapshots is fine as you are doing just binary upgrades of system and packages and it's really very easy. In your case you can try compile from ports, but set FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in /etc/mk.conf to avoid compilation of packages which are available as binary. Don't forget on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsConfig Thanks. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:15:06PM +, Code Blue wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0300, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:12:43PM +, Code Blue wrote: |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Your mirror is probably not so current. Try using another mirror. I tried 2 so far but I will try another one. Do you happen to know one that is surely current? Thanks. I tried downloading from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/`machine -a`/ and I am still getting the same errors. It may mean as now it's Beta phase that packages are not yet build (can be confirmed only by devs) or are in process of build for your platform so the question is if you can wait. If not you can build them on your system. Result will be package anyway. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the mailing list against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:45:55PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: Loongson is not experimental. There are less users using it compared to some other platforms, but the port is certainly stable enough to be used for real stuff. I'm running a Fuloong as my general purpose mai/file/dns/web server at home and i have had zero trouble with it. In fact I'm typing this mail on it ... I was running fine on 5.1 but based on the comment from the previous poster I reinstalled the snapshot (5.2). I was then unable to install any packages from snapshots because of library errors. For example: # pkg_add mutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl Can't install libiconv-1.14 because of libraries |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Can't install qdbm-1.8.78: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3 because of libraries Can't install gettext-0.18.1p1: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install lmutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl: can't resolve cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3,libiconv-1.14,qdbm-1.8.78,gettext-0.18.1p1 It shows that your system is newer then package you want to install. So look arround mirrors where is actual file/packages. It takes some time to distribute packages to all mirrors and build of packages for all platforms take some time as well. I don't know whether I should reinstall 5.1 and use it until 5.2 comes out or whether I should continue and try to track -current and see if the issues are resolved, but I am not looking forward to compiling much source given the lack of framebuffer acceleration! I used to track -stable on i386 but I have been away from OpenBSD for a while so I am a little rusty on all this. Are you running -current or 5.1 and since you are using it for a server and it is working fine for you, what would you recommend? Using snapshots is fine as you are doing just binary upgrades of system and packages and it's really very easy. In your case you can try compile from ports, but set FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in /etc/mk.conf to avoid compilation of packages which are available as binary. Don't forget on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsConfig This is mostly caused by the relatively slow hardware. Packages take time to build. In almost all cases, the old packges you have installed continue to work fine. Patience is a virtue ;-) -Otto
Re: Lemote Fuloong
I was running fine on 5.1 but based on the comment from the previous poster I reinstalled the snapshot (5.2). I was then unable to install any packages from snapshots because of library errors. For example: # pkg_add mutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl Can't install libiconv-1.14 because of libraries |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Can't install qdbm-1.8.78: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3 because of libraries Can't install gettext-0.18.1p1: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install lmutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl: can't resolve cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3,libiconv-1.14,qdbm-1.8.78,gettext-0.18.1p1 I don't know whether I should reinstall 5.1 and use it until 5.2 comes out or whether I should continue and try to track -current and see if the issues are resolved, but I am not looking forward to compiling much source given the lack of framebuffer acceleration! I used to track -stable on i386 but I have been away from OpenBSD for a while so I am a little rusty on all this. Are you running -current or 5.1 and since you are using it for a server and it is working fine for you, what would you recommend? This is mostly caused by the relatively slow hardware. Packages take time to build. In almost all cases, the old packges you have installed continue to work fine. Patience is a virtue ;-) Yes but since I installed from the snapshot I have no old packages! This was a clean install on new hardware and now I cannot install any packages at least not any I have tried. Are you running -current or 5.1? Do you happen to know if -current has any advantages over 5.1 for a development machine? Thanks. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the mailing list against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:40:50PM +, Code Blue wrote: I was running fine on 5.1 but based on the comment from the previous poster I reinstalled the snapshot (5.2). I was then unable to install any packages from snapshots because of library errors. For example: # pkg_add mutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl Can't install libiconv-1.14 because of libraries |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Can't install qdbm-1.8.78: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3 because of libraries Can't install gettext-0.18.1p1: can't resolve libiconv-1.14 Can't install lmutt-1.5.21p0v0-sasl: can't resolve cyrus-sasl-2.1.25p3,libiconv-1.14,qdbm-1.8.78,gettext-0.18.1p1 I don't know whether I should reinstall 5.1 and use it until 5.2 comes out or whether I should continue and try to track -current and see if the issues are resolved, but I am not looking forward to compiling much source given the lack of framebuffer acceleration! I used to track -stable on i386 but I have been away from OpenBSD for a while so I am a little rusty on all this. Are you running -current or 5.1 and since you are using it for a server and it is working fine for you, what would you recommend? This is mostly caused by the relatively slow hardware. Packages take time to build. In almost all cases, the old packges you have installed continue to work fine. Patience is a virtue ;-) Yes but since I installed from the snapshot I have no old packages! This was a clean install on new hardware and now I cannot install any packages at least not any I have tried. Are you running -current or 5.1? Do you happen to know if -current has any advantages over 5.1 for a development machine? Thanks. Yes, you get rthreads for example. -Otto
Re: Lemote Fuloong
Are you running -current or 5.1? Do you happen to know if -current has any advantages over 5.1 for a development machine? Thanks. Yes, you get rthreads for example. Thanks.
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:05:48PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:15:06PM +, Code Blue wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0300, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:12:43PM +, Code Blue wrote: |library c.64.1 not found | /usr/lib/libc.so.65.0 (system): bad major Your mirror is probably not so current. Try using another mirror. I tried 2 so far but I will try another one. Do you happen to know one that is surely current? Thanks. I tried downloading from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/`machine -a`/ and I am still getting the same errors. It may mean as now it's Beta phase that packages are not yet build (can be confirmed only by devs) or are in process of build for your platform so the question is if you can wait. If not you can build them on your system. Result will be package anyway. Ok I don't mind trying to build from ports if there are ports for the few apps I want at this point. If that doesn't work I will go back to 5.1. Thanks for the help, guys.
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:45:55PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: It shows that your system is newer then package you want to install. So look arround mirrors where is actual file/packages. It takes some time to distribute packages to all mirrors and build of packages for all platforms take some time as well. Sounds reasonable but I have tried 4 different mirrors now including ftp.openbsd.org. I am starting to wonder if there is something else wrong and not sure what else to check. Using snapshots is fine as you are doing just binary upgrades of system and packages and it's really very easy. In your case you can try compile from ports, but set FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in /etc/mk.conf to avoid compilation of packages which are available as binary. Don't forget on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsConfig Thanks. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the mailing list against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
Is Loongson an experimental port? The OpenBSD page lists it under the officially support platforms...I realize it's a work in progress, but I didn't think it was experimental. It isn't. Aside from the bootblocks not installing from either 5.1 release or the 5.2. snapshot, everything seems to be working. Care to share details about this? Good question and I have no idea. Yes, it's a different CPU. The 2E and 2F are uniprocessors. The 3A is a quard. Maybe the port maintainer will chime in. That would be me. Many patches are hitting the Linux kernel and binutils from Lemote and MIPS people so I believe there are significant differences. The 3A systems are a completely different design. In addition to the CPU being multicore and using a completely different crossbar, the northbridge is now an AMD chip. A lot of work is needed to run on it, which is not worth starting until these systems are readily available. Unfortunately it seems Lemote can not produce enough of them for the foreign market, and I am told the ATX motherboard flavour (which would be much more interesting for server systems, or simply to use better disks than 2.5 ones) is not intended to be sold outside China. Miod
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Code Blue codeb...@inbox.lv wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:45:55PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: It shows that your system is newer then package you want to install. So look arround mirrors where is actual file/packages. It takes some time to distribute packages to all mirrors and build of packages for all platforms take some time as well. Sounds reasonable but I have tried 4 different mirrors now including ftp.openbsd.org. I am starting to wonder if there is something else wrong and not sure what else to check. As you already said you were off the OpenBSD for some time so you just lost touch with it. Nothing is wrong. It's part of normal development process here. Using snapshots is fine as you are doing just binary upgrades of system and packages and it's really very easy. In your case you can try compile from ports, but set FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in /etc/mk.conf to avoid compilation of packages which are available as binary. Don't forget on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsConfig Thanks. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the mailing list against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:26:54PM +, Miod Vallat wrote: Aside from the bootblocks not installing from either 5.1 release or the 5.2. snapshot, everything seems to be working. Care to share details about this? In my first couple of installs on this new machine using 5.1 release and the current snapshot I got the following messages at the end of the installation: Making all device nodes...done mkdir: /mnt2/boot: Invalid argument cp: /mnt2/boot/bsd: Invalid argument Failed to install bootblocks. You will not be able to boot OpenBSD from wd0 I fixed this by copying boot to the boot partition and PMON has no trouble booting it. The second install of the snapshot ended normally. Good question and I have no idea. Yes, it's a different CPU. The 2E and 2F are uniprocessors. The 3A is a quard. Maybe the port maintainer will chime in. That would be me. Yes I know. I thanked you in my first post. Thanks for porting this. The 3A systems are a completely different design. In addition to the CPU being multicore and using a completely different crossbar, the northbridge is now an AMD chip. A lot of work is needed to run on it, which is not worth starting until these systems are readily available. Unfortunately it seems Lemote can not produce enough of them for the foreign market, and I am told the ATX motherboard flavour (which would be much more interesting for server systems, or simply to use better disks than 2.5 ones) is not intended to be sold outside China. Thanks for the update.
Re: Virtualizing firewalling scenarios in one physical OpenBSD host
that's not exciting at all. maybe one day i will write a vpf device. benefits include not having to be root to check an agreed upon subset of your states, running proxies and other applications that insert rules completely non-root other details have to be worked out so that sub-pfs can't run the system out of resources, that's the main thing xoxo On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: * Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com [2012-07-04 17:42]: out of curiosity, how would you make pf(4) only handle rules pertaining to a certain anchor depending on the process that's interfacing with them? i ask because; e.g., pfctl -sr should only show rules for that client, and other pf(4) operations need to be equally restricted. i know that originally you said that the loading of the rules is not up to the client but a periodic batch job, however that does not match CheckPoint VSX geez, don't act so helpless, this is unix after all. write yourself a little wrapper that, depending on the caller/source, enforces a pfctl -a anchorinquestion ... -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/
Re: Romanian layout in OpenBSD
I wasn't surprised to find out that Romanian keyboard layout is not
supported by default OpenBSD installation.
Well, quoting pckbd(4): ``The list of built-in mappings doesn't follow
any logic. It grew as people submitted what they needed.''
It looks like you are the first person to dare asking for a romanian
keyboard layout.
Now, the last two characters (0x0219 and 0x021A) are tricky, they
should be s-comma and t-comma, not to be mistaken with s-cedilla and
t-cedilla. The cedilla variants are supported in
/usr/include/dev/wscons/wsksymdef.h, but I couldn't find the comma
ones.
Err, aren't your commas ogoneks, by chance? wscons is already a PITA
calling haceks `carons' (yes, I know this is legit, but it is just the
wrong name), please don't add any more confusion in there (-:
Is there a way to remap may keyboard so that I can use all the five
special characters (plus their corresponding uppercase variants)
mentioned above? I did read the FAQ (section 7.1) and the wsconsctl
help page, but the examples listed there did not helped me much in
this particular scenario.
Yes, this can be done with wsconsctl. But - pardon me - I am too lazy to
give this a try, so here is a diff to add a romanian keyboard layout to
the kernel. If you have an usb keyboard, you'll need to run `make' in
sys/dev/usb after applying the diff. Also, you'll need to copy
wsksymdef.h to /usr/include/dev/wscons and rebuild /sbin/wsconsctl and
/sbin/kbd to be able to use `ro' as a keyboard layout.
Miod
Index: sys/dev/pckbc/wskbdmap_mfii.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pckbc/wskbdmap_mfii.c,v
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -p -r1.42 wskbdmap_mfii.c
--- sys/dev/pckbc/wskbdmap_mfii.c 5 Apr 2011 19:12:13 - 1.42
+++ sys/dev/pckbc/wskbdmap_mfii.c 5 Jul 2012 18:39:54 -
@@ -1059,6 +1059,41 @@ static const keysym_t pckbd_keydesc_is_n
KC(40), KS_acute, KS_diaeresis, KS_asciicircum,
};
+static const keysym_t pckbd_keydesc_ro[] = {
+KC(2), KS_1, KS_exclam, KS_asciitilde,
+KC(3), KS_2, KS_at, KS_L2_caron,
+KC(4), KS_3, KS_numbersign, KS_asciicircum,
+KC(5), KS_4, KS_dollar, KS_L2_breve,
+KC(6), KS_5, KS_percent, KS_degree,
+KC(7), KS_6, KS_asciicircum, KS_L2_ogonek,
+KC(8), KS_7, KS_ampersand, KS_grave,
+KC(9), KS_8, KS_asterisk,KS_L2_dotabove,
+KC(10),KS_9, KS_parenleft, KS_apostrophe,
+KC(11),KS_0, KS_parenright, KS_L2_dblacute,
+KC(12),KS_minus, KS_underscore, KS_quotedbl,
+KC(13),KS_equal, KS_plus,KS_cedilla,
+KC(26),KS_L2_abreve, KS_L2_Abreve,
+ KS_bracketleft, KS_braceleft,
+KC(27),KS_icircumflex, KS_Icircumflex,
+ KS_bracketright, KS_braceright,
+KC(31),KS_s, KS_S, KS_ssharp,
+KC(32),KS_d, KS_D,
+ KS_eth, KS_ETH,
+KC(38),KS_l, KS_L,
+ KS_L2_lstroke, KS_L2_Lstroke,
+KC(39),KS_L2_scedilla, KS_L2_Scedilla,
+ KS_semicolon, KS_colon,
+KC(40),KS_L2_tcedilla, KS_L2_Tcedilla,
+ KS_apostrophe, KS_quotedbl,
+KC(43),KS_acircumflex, KS_Acircumflex,
+ KS_backslash, KS_bar,
+KC(51),KS_comma, KS_semicolon,
+ KS_less,KS_guillemotleft,
+KC(52),KS_period, KS_colon,
+ KS_greater, KS_guillemotright,
+KC(184), KS_Mode_switch, KS_Multi_key,
+};
+
#endif /* WSKBD_NO_INTL_LAYOUTS */
#define KBD_MAP(name, base, map) \
@@ -1118,6 +1153,7 @@ const struct wscons_keydesc pckbd_keydes
KBD_MAP(KB_NL | KB_NODEAD, KB_NL, pckbd_keydesc_nl_nodead),
KBD_MAP(KB_IS, KB_US, pckbd_keydesc_is),
KBD_MAP(KB_IS | KB_NODEAD, KB_IS, pckbd_keydesc_is_nodead),
+ KBD_MAP(KB_RO, KB_US, pckbd_keydesc_ro),
#endif /* WSKBD_NO_INTL_LAYOUTS */
{0, 0, 0, 0}
};
Index: sys/dev/wscons/wsksymdef.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/wscons/wsksymdef.h,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -p -r1.34 wsksymdef.h
--- sys/dev/wscons/wsksymdef.h 5 Apr 2011 19:12:13 - 1.34
+++ sys/dev/wscons/wsksymdef.h 5 Jul
Re: MPLS VPN with GRE tunnels between PEs
Hi,
Can anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks.
Bert
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Bert Smith
bertrand.c.sm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am trying to set up a Layer 3 MPLS VPN (RFC 4364) with GRE tunnels
between PEs (RFC 4797) instead of an MPLS backbone. I have followed the
instructions in the Demystifying MPLS paper (
http://2011.eurobsdcon.org/papers/jeker/MPLS.pdf), and on the following
mailing list posts:
http://old.nabble.com/BGP-MPLS-VPN-tt31327789.html#a31397215
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=127470697232025w=2
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=129112614017103w=2
Here is my setup:
| Juniper router 1 | lo0 192.168.20.2
| | VRF 8 with loopback 192.168.55.1
| 192.168.10.4
|
| 192.168.10.5
| Juniper router 2 | lo0 192.168.20.3
| | VRF 8 with loopback 192.168.56.1
| 10.0.4.1
|
| vlan4092 10.0.4.3
| OpenBSD box | lo0 192.168.20.5
| | rdomain 8 192.168.55.2
I want all three routers to act as PEs but without any MPLS connectivity
between them. RFC 4797 allows this by allowing the following encapsulation
scheme for say a ping from Juniper 1 to OpenBSD box:
[This is what I should ideally get]:
* Ping request:
IP header: src 192.168.20.2 dst 192.168.20.5
GRE header: just the GRE shim
MPLS label identifying the rdomain: 666
IP header: src 192.168.55.1 dst 192.168.55.2
ICMP ping request
* Ping reply:
IP header: src 192.168.20.5 dst 192.168.20.2
GRE header: just the GRE shim
MPLS label identifying the VRF: 300720
IP header: src 192.168.55.2 dst 192.168.55.1
ICMP ping reply
However, the following is what I actually get:
* Ping request:
IP header: src 192.168.20.2 dst 192.168.20.5
GRE header: just the GRE shim
MPLS label identifying the rdomain: 666
IP header: src 192.168.55.1 dst 192.168.55.2
ICMP ping request
* Ping reply:
MPLS label identifying the VRF: 300720
IP header: src 192.168.55.2 dst 192.168.55.1
ICMP ping reply
The reply back from the OpenBSD box does not GRE-encapsulate the MPLS
packet and since I don't have a MPLS LSP set up between OpenBSD box and
Juniper 1, the ping reply never reaches Juniper 1.
Here is the tcpdump where I see the above:
# tcpdump -i vlan4092 -s 1500 -Xvvv not tcp and not udp
13:52:39.188348 gre 192.168.20.2 192.168.20.5: [] gre-proto-0x8847 (DF)
(ttl 63, id 0, len 112)
: 4500 0070 4000 3f2f 9207 c0a8 1402 E..p..@.?/..��..
0010: c0a8 1405 8847 0029 a1ff 4500 0054 ��.G.)��E..T
0020: efee 4001 9b66 c0a8 3701 c0a8 3702
��..@..f��7.��7.
0030: 0800 6bf0 521e 0151 f8d4 ba4f 8c78 0e00 ..k�R..Q�ԺO.x..
0040: 0809 0a0b 0c0d 0e0f 1011 1213 1415 1617
0050: 1819 1a1b 1c1d 1e1f 2021 2223 2425 2627 !#$%'
0060: 2829 2a2b 2c2d 2e2f 3031 3233 3435 3637 ()*+,-./01234567
13:52:39.188374 MPLS(label 300720, exp 0, ttl 255) 192.168.55.2
192.168.55.1: icmp: echo reply (id:521e seq:337) (ttl 255, id 64891, len
84)
: 496b 01ff 4500 0054 fd7b ff01 ced8 Ik.�E..T�{..�.�
0010: c0a8 3702 c0a8 3701 73f0 521e 0151 ��7.��7...s�R..Q
0020: f8d4 ba4f 8c78 0e00 0809 0a0b 0c0d 0e0f �ԺO.x..
0030: 1011 1213 1415 1617 1819 1a1b 1c1d 1e1f
0040: 2021 2223 2425 2627 2829 2a2b 2c2d 2e2f !#$%'()*+,-./
0050: 3031 3233 3435 3637 01234567
Here are the various pieces of my configuration:
# ifconfig
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,
RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33152
priority: 0
groups: lo
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
re0: flags=88843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,MPLS mtu 1500
lladdr c8:9c:dc:dd:1a:f6
priority: 0
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,rxpause,txpause)
status: active
inet6 fe80::ca9c:dcff:fedd:1af6%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
pflog0: flags=141UP,RUNNING,PROMISC mtu 33152
priority: 0
groups: pflog
vlan4092: flags=88843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,MPLS mtu 1500
lladdr c8:9c:dc:dd:1a:f6
priority: 0
vlan: 4092 priority: 0 parent interface: re0
groups: vlan egress
status: active
inet 10.0.4.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.4.255
inet6 fe80::ca9c:dcff:fedd:1af6%vlan4092 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
lo1: flags=8149UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,PROMISC,MULTICAST mtu 33152
priority: 0
groups: lo
inet6 fe80::1%lo1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
inet 192.168.20.5 netmask 0x
gre0: flags=a9011UP,POINTOPOINT,LINK0,MULTICAST,NOINET6,MPLS
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:50:02PM +, Code Blue wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:26:54PM +, Miod Vallat wrote: Aside from the bootblocks not installing from either 5.1 release or the 5.2. snapshot, everything seems to be working. Care to share details about this? In my first couple of installs on this new machine using 5.1 release and the current snapshot I got the following messages at the end of the installation: Making all device nodes...done mkdir: /mnt2/boot: Invalid argument cp: /mnt2/boot/bsd: Invalid argument Failed to install bootblocks. You will not be able to boot OpenBSD from wd0 Were this whole disk installs? Please share some more details. I fixed this by copying boot to the boot partition and PMON has no trouble booting it. The second install of the snapshot ended normally. Second install of the same snap? -Otto
Re: Romanian layout in OpenBSD
Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote: Now, the last two characters (0x0219 and 0x021A) are tricky, they should be s-comma and t-comma, not to be mistaken with s-cedilla and t-cedilla. Err, aren't your commas ogoneks, by chance? No, ogonek it the little right-curling tail added to some vowel letters in Polish and Lithuanian. Totally different thing. -- Christian naddy Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:59:50PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:50:02PM +, Code Blue wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:26:54PM +, Miod Vallat wrote: Aside from the bootblocks not installing from either 5.1 release or the 5.2. snapshot, everything seems to be working. Care to share details about this? In my first couple of installs on this new machine using 5.1 release and the current snapshot I got the following messages at the end of the installation: Making all device nodes...done mkdir: /mnt2/boot: Invalid argument cp: /mnt2/boot/bsd: Invalid argument Failed to install bootblocks. You will not be able to boot OpenBSD from wd0 Were this whole disk installs? Please share some more details. No, as you probably know the disk is now 160G on the Fuloong. I couldn't imagine needing so much space for my intended use of OpenBSD so I decided to dual boot OpenBSD and some flavor of Linux. While I still had the original preinstalled Linux available I partitioned the drive for my OpenBSD and future Linux install and then did the OpenBSD installation in the OpenBSD partition. Custom layout. I fixed this by copying boot to the boot partition and PMON has no trouble booting it. The second install of the snapshot ended normally. Second install of the same snap? Yes, and I wondered if somehow the installer detected I had boot saved in an ext2 partition (which was not true of the first two installs but was by the third install, which was the second snapshot install), but I really can't imagine how it would know. -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Please follow up to the mailing list against HTML e-mail X and proprietary/ \ Mutt.org attachmentsCode Blue or Go Home!
Re: Lemote Fuloong
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:25:20PM +, Code Blue wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:59:50PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:50:02PM +, Code Blue wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:26:54PM +, Miod Vallat wrote: Aside from the bootblocks not installing from either 5.1 release or the 5.2. snapshot, everything seems to be working. Care to share details about this? In my first couple of installs on this new machine using 5.1 release and the current snapshot I got the following messages at the end of the installation: Making all device nodes...done mkdir: /mnt2/boot: Invalid argument cp: /mnt2/boot/bsd: Invalid argument Failed to install bootblocks. You will not be able to boot OpenBSD from wd0 Were this whole disk installs? Please share some more details. No, as you probably know the disk is now 160G on the Fuloong. I couldn't imagine needing so much space for my intended use of OpenBSD so I decided to dual boot OpenBSD and some flavor of Linux. While I still had the original preinstalled Linux available I partitioned the drive for my OpenBSD and future Linux install and then did the OpenBSD installation in the OpenBSD partition. Custom layout. I fixed this by copying boot to the boot partition and PMON has no trouble booting it. The second install of the snapshot ended normally. Second install of the same snap? Yes, and I wondered if somehow the installer detected I had boot saved in an ext2 partition (which was not true of the first two installs but was by the third install, which was the second snapshot install), but I really can't imagine how it would know. iirc one reason the EINVAL on mount can occur is with an unclean ext2/3 filesystem. Could that be the case here? -Otto
Re: gimp 2.8 on OpeBSD -current
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Fred Crowson fred.crow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi misc@ I'm getting the following errors when running gimp-2.8.0p0 on OpenBSD -current (Jun 28 i386 snapshot): x41:fred ~ gimp reading.jpg /usr/local/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-jpeg: fatal error: Segmentation fault (gimp:18542): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: gimp: gimp_wire_read(): error This issue is only with opening jpeg files - I can create new files and export them to jpeg or png or save the as .xcf files fine. Any clues to debugging this issue further? thanks gimp has gone to sh!t as of late. Here is how you get around this problem, if it is what I see once in a while as well. First quit gimp, then: *** AT YOUR OWN RISK *** (or make a back up of this dir first): $ rm -rf ~/.gimp-2.8/ Next, start gimp again. For me, this resolves the issue, until gimp fsck's up again. It is easy to get it into this state. HTH, --patrick Fred dmesg: OpenBSD 5.2-beta (GENERIC) #251: Thu Jun 28 01:30:25 MDT 2012 t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 1.60 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,TM,SBF,NXE,EST,TM2 real mem = 1600516096 (1526MB) avail mem = 1563533312 (1491MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 03/14/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd750, SMBIOS rev. 2.33 @ 0xe0010 (59 entries) bios0: vendor IBM version 74ET61WW (2.06 ) date 03/14/2006 bios0: IBM 2525FAG apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd6e0/0x920 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdec0/240 (13 entries) pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 82371FB ISA rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #5 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xe800! 0xce800/0x1600 0xd/0x1000 0xdc000/0x4000! 0xe/0x1 cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor) cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1597 MHz: speeds: 1600, 1500, 1400, 1300, 1200, 1100, 1000, 900, 800, 600 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) mem address conflict 0x5f70/0x8 io address conflict 0x5800/0x8 io address conflict 0x5808/0x4 io address conflict 0x5810/0x8 io address conflict 0x580c/0x4 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82915GM Host rev 0x03 vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel 82915GM Video rev 0x03 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) intagp0 at vga1 agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xc000, size 0x1000 inteldrm0 at vga1: no ifp : irq 11 drm0 at inteldrm0 Intel 82915GM Video rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801FB PCIE rev 0x03: irq 11 pci1 at ppb0 bus 2 bge0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5751M rev 0x11, BCM5750 B1 (0x4101): irq 11, address 00:16:d3:2f:63:7c brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0 uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 11 uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 11 uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 11 uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 11 ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801FB USB rev 0x03: irq 11 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI rev 0xd3 pci2 at ppb1 bus 4 cbb0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Ricoh 5C476 CardBus rev 0x8d: irq 11 sdhc0 at pci2 dev 0 function 1 Ricoh 5C822 SD/MMC rev 0x13: irq 11 sdmmc0 at sdhc0 iwi0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 2915ABG rev 0x05: irq 11, address 00:16:6f:c1:16:40 cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0 cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 5 device 0 cacheline 0x0, lattimer 0xb0 pcmcia0 at cardslot0 auich0 at pci0 dev 30 function 2 Intel 82801FB AC97 rev 0x03: irq 11, ICH6 AC97 ac97: codec id 0x41445374 (Analog Devices AD1981B) ac97: codec features headphone, 20 bit DAC, No 3D Stereo audio0 at auich0 Intel 82801FB Modem rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 30 function 3 not configured ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801FBM LPC rev 0x03: PM disabled pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801FBM SATA rev 0x03: DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: HTC426060G9AT00 wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 57231MB, 117210240 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: MATSHITA, DVD/CDRW UJDA775, CB03 ATAPI 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 Intel 82801FB SMBus rev 0x03: irq 11 iic0 at ichiic0 spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x51: 1GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-4200CL3 SO-DIMM usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
Re: processes dying on an old ALIX
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: This is 5.1-beta/i386 on an ALIX about five years old, running as my home server. Recently, processes started to die for reasons unknown, as in pid 20260 (postgres): user write of 118784@0x28052000 at 159088 failed: 14 pid 1872 (cron): user write of 118784@0x2b1e3000 at 30224 failed: 14 14 is EFAULT as per sys/errno,h - what can be causing it? Having briefly looked at this, I suspect there are (at least) two cases where that can occur: 1) a race in the code that prevents writing to a file that is mapped for execution, and 2) system runs out of memory when trying to do copy-on-write; the process is killed because of that and then the coredump logic hits the missing page when trying to write out the process's memory and logs that failure. I think (1) is what sthen@ described; I think you're hitting (2). It usually happens under a stress (the machine is pretty scarse on resources, so 'stress' can be accepting a batch of DNS queries). For example, the postgres EFAULT above happened exactly when a batch of emails arrived. When you have a reproducible test case, adding monitoring of the system resources and seeing what shows up when it occurs is a good idea. It seems to me that it's likely this case is a result of the system running out of total memory and that adding swap would alleviate the problem. But likely is not certainty. Monitor your system's resources, based on that make a hypothesis about the cause, figure out a way to test your hypothesis, then do it and check the result. Philip Guenther
Re: gimp 2.8 on OpeBSD -current
On 4 July 2012 00:54, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2012-07-03, Fred Crowson fred.crow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi misc@ I'm getting the following errors when running gimp-2.8.0p0 on OpenBSD -current (Jun 28 i386 snapshot): x41:fred ~ gimp reading.jpg /usr/local/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-jpeg: fatal error: Segmentation fault (gimp:18542): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: gimp: gimp_wire_read(): error This issue is only with opening jpeg files - I can create new files and export them to jpeg or png or save the as .xcf files fine. Any clues to debugging this issue further? Make sure everything is up to date: userland, kernel, all packages Thanks misc@ - yes my system was out of date. Fred
