CompraNet 5.0,Sea un Experto en la Plataforma! 655165
655165 [IMAGE] Taller de Subastas Electrónicas y Manejo de Plataforma CompraNet 5.0 29 de Octubre, Cd. de México. Un taller totalmente práctico y especializado guiado por un experto, desde los procedimientos más básicos de CompraNet 5.0 hasta los más avanzados Usted Aprenderá: - Que es lo que no debemos perder de vista sobre el Sistema - Alta y registro en CompraNet 5.0 - La Seguridad de las Propuestas electrónicas - Qué es la FIEL, requisito indispensable y cómo obtenerla. - Cómo filtrar licitaciones y contratos usando diferentes parámetros Optimice sus procesos y ahorre dinero con esta práctica herramienta! ¡Reciba la información completa, Inscríbase y Capacítese! Por favor responda este e-mail con los datos siguientes. Empresa, Nombre, Teléfono, Email, Número de Interesados En breve recibirá temario, reseña de expositor y tarifas. Si lo prefiere comuníquese a los teléfonos donde con gusto uno de nuestros ejecutivos le atenderá. Teléfonos: (0133) 8851-2365, (0133) 8851-2741 con más de 10 líneas. Pms Capacitación Efectiva de México es una empresa Registrada ante la STPS Trabajamos con expertos en la materia para poder brindar herramientas tácticas, vanguardistas y de fácil aplicación. Síguenos en Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de México Tip del día! Planea: Evita los problemas de vivir al momento y crear estrategias de último momento. Planea tus objetivos, elige un rumbo y mantente. Anticipa posibles causales de emergencia y diseña planes de contingencia previos que permitan conocer rutas a seguir. Esto ayudará a crear metas en su compañía, compartirlas con su equipo y anticipar obstáculos. Copyright (C) 2011, PMS Capacitación Efectiva de México S.C. Derechos Reservados. E-Mail MARKETING SERVICE POWERED BY MEDIAMKTOOLS. Este Mensaje ha sido enviado a misc@openbsd.org como usuario de Pms de México o bien un usuario le refirió para recibir este boletín. Como usuario de Pms de México, en este acto autoriza de manera expresa que Pms de México le puede contactar vía correo electrónico u otros medios. ALTO, si en esta ocasión la información recibida no fue de su interés pero desea recibir información personalizada en relación a otros temas favor de indicarlo. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, haga caso omiso de el y de antemano una sincera disculpa por la molestia, reporte su cuenta respondiendo este correo con el subject BAJACOMPRANET Unsubscribe to this mailing list, reply a blank message with the subject UNSUBSCRIBE BAJACOMPRANET Tenga en cuenta que la gestión de nuestras bases de datos es de suma importancia para nosotros y no es intención de la empresa la inconformidad del receptor, nuestra intención es promover herramientas de utilidad para el [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of image001.jpg]
Re: First order for KVM SWITCH -- Esunlink
Dear Purchasing Manager, Good day! Esunlink is professional Manufacturer which specialize in KVM Switch Accessories with high quality and reasonable price,OEM/ODM Services also can be offered upon your special request . We get a lot of high praise from our Long-term cooperation customers--- Lenovo, ZTE ,Huawei, etc. Some products as below for your reference: For more information, please log on: www.esunlink.com. Always here to support you! Best regards, [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Catch(09-26-15-2(10-22-13-51-24).jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of =?gb2312?B?NDY1MDNfw/vGrCgwOS0yNS0xKDEwLTIyLTEzLTUxLTI0KS5qcGc=?=]
Re: First order for KVM SWITCH -- Esunlink
Dear Purchasing Manager, Good day! Esunlink is professional Manufacturer which specialize in KVM Switch Accessories with high quality and reasonable price,OEM/ODM Services also can be offered upon your special request . We get a lot of high praise from our Long-term cooperation customers--- Lenovo, ZTE ,Huawei, etc. Some products as below for your reference: For more information, please log on: www.esunlink.com. Always here to support you! Best regards, [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Catch(09-26-15-2(10-22-14-43-17).jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of =?gb2312?B?NDY1MDNfw/vGrCgwOS0yNS0xKDEwLTIyLTE0LTQzLTE4KS5qcGc=?=]
Du har ett viktigt budskap *
Bäste Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken Kund Vänligen uppdatera information För att bekräfta Verified by Visa eller MasterCard SecureCode måste du registrera dig på Oct 24, 2012. För att uppdatera dina uppgifter går du vidare till vår säkra webbformulär med klicka här. Om du har några frågor, vi tillgängliga 24 timmar om dygnet, 7 dagar i veckan. Vänligen svara inte på detta automatiserade e-post © 2012 SEB (publ)
Re: Slow VPN Performance
I ran a few more tests on a local setup: * 2 x OpenBSD 5.1 (i386) w/ Gbit NICs connected on the same switch * `cat /etc/ipsec.conf`: ike esp from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 (and vice versa) * pf is disabled Running `isakmpd -K ; ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf` caps tcpbench at ~50Mbit speeds, same as our production tunnel. Without isakmpd the speed ramps up to ~800Mbit or so, which is reasonable. Right now, I have no idea what else I can try. Any suggestions are appreciated. On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Michael Sideris urg...@gmail.com wrote: `ping -c10` (L-VPN -- G-VPN) PING G.G.G.G (G.G.G.G): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=17.073 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=3.604 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=3.666 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=3.716 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3.639 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=3.685 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=3.734 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=3.658 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=3.707 ms 64 bytes from G.G.G.G: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=3.755 ms --- G.G.G.G ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 3.604/5.023/17.073/4.017 ms (G-VPN -- L-VPN) PING L.L.L.L (L.L.L.L): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=3.707 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=3.746 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=3.677 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=3.717 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3.754 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=3.670 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=3.703 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=3.742 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=3.654 ms 64 bytes from L.L.L.L: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=3.693 ms --- L.L.L.L ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 3.654/3.706/3.754/0.057 ms It is also worth mentioning that if I send anything from one endpoint to the other, the speed is ~7.5MB/s. Better than a transfer between 2 nodes from each site but still a bit slow for a 150Mbit/s -- 1Gbit/s link. On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Kent Fritz fritz.k...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't see anyone reply to this yet, so let me ask a really dumb question: what's the round-trip-time between G.G.G.G and L.L.L.L? Are you running into the TCP limits due to this? On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Michael Sideris urg...@gmail.com wrote: Hey @misc, --- ENDPOINT INFO --- `dmesg` (G-VPN) OpenBSD 5.1 (GENERIC.MP) #207: Sun Feb 12 09:42:14 MST 2012 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 2146172928 (2046MB) avail mem = 2074935296 (1978MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xfa850 (75 entries) bios0: vendor Dell Computer Corporation version A03 date 01/04/2006 bios0: Dell Computer Corporation PowerEdge SC1425 acpi0 at bios0: rev 0 acpi0: sleep states S0 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC SPCR HPET MCFG acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5) PALO(S5) PXH_(S5) PXHB(S5) PXHA(S5) PICH(S5) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz, 2800.48 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,CNXT-ID,CX16,xTPR,NXE,LONG cpu0: 1MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: apic clock running at 200MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz, 2800.11 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,CNXT-ID,CX16,xTPR,NXE,LONG cpu1: 1MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 2 ioapic1 at mainbus0: apid 3 pa 0xfec8, version 20, 24 pins ioapic1: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 3 ioapic2 at mainbus0: apid 4 pa 0xfec80800, version 20, 24 pins ioapic2: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 4 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (PALO) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 3 (PXHB) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (PXHA) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (PICH) acpicpu0 at acpi0 acpicpu1 at acpi0 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7520 Host rev 0x09 ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel E7520 PCIE rev 0x09 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel 6700PXH PCIE-PCIX rev 0x09 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 em0 at
Boleto Cliente
- Message - From: mo...@advogadosassociados.com.br Sent: qua 11/07/12 14:00 Prezado Cliente, Primeiramente agradecemos o seu contato. Conforme acordo firmado junto a empresa credora, estamos enviando o boleto de pagamento conforme o combinado: Caso tenha problemas para visualizar o boleto, clique aqui Instrucoes obrigatorias para impressao do boleto: Configure sua impressora para papel A4 e impressao em 1 unica pagina.
Re: Slow VPN Performance
It seems that changing to hmac-md5 boosted network throughput from ~50Mbit/s to ~100Mbit/s which is decent and reasonable. I am going to experiment a bit further with `scrub` options in pf.conf to see if I can squeeze more performance out of the link. The question now ishow much is security affected by using hmac-md5 vs the default hmac-sha2-256? Should I consider using better CPUs on the servers in order to gain better performance through a stronger algorithm? On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Michael Sideris urg...@gmail.com wrote: Both endpoints run stock OpenBSD 5.1 (amd64). We use the VPN link to manage our platform remotely and perform daily backups. G-VPN runs on a 150Mbit/s link while L-VPN on a 1Gbit/s link. On one hand, our VPN setup runs really nicely. The connections are routed properly, pf is godsent and authpf works wonders. On the other hand, network throughput over the VPN tunnel never exceeds 3.4MB/s (ftp, scp, rsync, etc...) I welcome any suggestions. Keep in mind that this is our production VPN tunnel, so I cannot shut it down at will. Thanks in advance. --- Mike Hi, I suggest a couple of changes: 1) use cheaper hash function (md5 or at least sha1) 2) use mss fixup so that your packets don't get fragmented The first point relates to your ike rules in ipsec.conf: ike esp from $local_net to $remote_net peer $remote_ip \ quick auth hmac-md5 enc aes The second point relates to pf rules in pf.conf: match in scrub (max-mss 1440) You can experiment with the values in the 1400-1480 range. Also, please make sure that you don't run tcpbench or any other benchmarking on the vpn gates themselves as it offsets the measurements.
Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
I did an update to my remote server using the ssh method, since I did not have Java built But it failed to reboot From an IP KVM on someone elses computer with Java. Boots into ddb right after boot (with message below) However, after I type boot -s to get into single user mode, I get ddb with a message similar to: kernal protection fault trap Stopped at calibrate_cyclecounter, etc If I type boot boot bsd.rd, the server immediately shuts down and reboots I am building Java right now. Does this sound like a hardware failure or bad upgrade?? I am going to try upgrade with IP KVM after Java finishes building Java built but I cannot get firefox35 to work. I am on latest snapshot for i386 [Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80570016 (NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE) [nsIJSCID.getService] nsresult: 0x80570016 (NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE) location: JS frame :: chrome://browser/content/utilityOverlay.js :: getShellService :: line 312 data: no] Chris Bennett
Re: Slow VPN Performance
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Michael Sideris urg...@gmail.com wrote: It seems that changing to hmac-md5 boosted network throughput from ~50Mbit/s to ~100Mbit/s which is decent and reasonable. I am going to experiment a bit further with `scrub` options in pf.conf to see if I can squeeze more performance out of the link. The question now ishow much is security affected by using hmac-md5 vs the default hmac-sha2-256? It's more a question of how often do you rekey? You also should not disable Perfect Forward Secrecy that recomputes DH values every time you renew your phase 2 key. And while there are no known serious attacks on HMAC-MD5 it all depends on how important the data that you're protecting is and if you have to be compliant with any regulations that might mandate use of SHA2. Should I consider using better CPUs on the servers in order to gain better performance through a stronger algorithm? You can get 600-750Mbps (depending on the CPU speed) in the AES-NI enabled setup (using AES-GCM that is). On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Michael Sideris urg...@gmail.com wrote: Both endpoints run stock OpenBSD 5.1 (amd64). We use the VPN link to manage our platform remotely and perform daily backups. G-VPN runs on a 150Mbit/s link while L-VPN on a 1Gbit/s link. On one hand, our VPN setup runs really nicely. The connections are routed properly, pf is godsent and authpf works wonders. On the other hand, network throughput over the VPN tunnel never exceeds 3.4MB/s (ftp, scp, rsync, etc...) I welcome any suggestions. Keep in mind that this is our production VPN tunnel, so I cannot shut it down at will. Thanks in advance. --- Mike Hi, I suggest a couple of changes: 1) use cheaper hash function (md5 or at least sha1) 2) use mss fixup so that your packets don't get fragmented The first point relates to your ike rules in ipsec.conf: ike esp from $local_net to $remote_net peer $remote_ip \ quick auth hmac-md5 enc aes The second point relates to pf rules in pf.conf: match in scrub (max-mss 1440) You can experiment with the values in the 1400-1480 range. Also, please make sure that you don't run tcpbench or any other benchmarking on the vpn gates themselves as it offsets the measurements.
UPDATE: net/openfire
Hi List, trivial diff to update Openfire to 3.7.1 (attached as file because thunderbird wraps the lines and breaks it). Tested on i386. ok? marc [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-patch which had a name of openfire-3.7.1.patch]
Re: UPDATE: net/openfire
On 10/22/2012 06:45 PM, Marc Peters wrote: Hi List, trivial diff to update Openfire to 3.7.1 (attached as file because thunderbird wraps the lines and breaks it). Tested on i386. ok? marc [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-patch which had a name of openfire-3.7.1.patch] sorry, choosed the wrong list :(
Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
Original Message Subject: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure? From: ch...@bennettconstruction.us Date: Mon, October 22, 2012 10:02 am To: misc@openbsd.org I did an update to my remote server using the ssh method, since I did not have Java built But it failed to reboot From an IP KVM on someone elses computer with Java. Boots into ddb right after boot (with message below) However, after I type boot -s to get into single user mode, I get ddb with a message similar to: kernal protection fault trap Stopped at calibrate_cyclecounter, etc If I type boot boot bsd.rd, the server immediately shuts down and reboots I am building Java right now. Does this sound like a hardware failure or bad upgrade?? I am going to try upgrade with IP KVM after Java finishes building Java built but I cannot get firefox35 to work. I am on latest snapshot for i386 [Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80570016 (NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE) [nsIJSCID.getService] nsresult: 0x80570016 (NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE) location: JS frame :: chrome://browser/content/utilityOverlay.js :: getShellService :: line 312 data: no] Chris Bennett I couldn't find anything on Google except diff's for this. Unhelpful. The server has been running since early 2007, so it seems reasonable that a reboot, including several hard reboots might bring up a hardware failure. These are unmanaged servers, so unless I decide that the hardware is broken, I have to solve the problem myself. Since I can't get F'ing firefox35 to work, I'm a little pissed! Chris Bennett
Contacto con Dto Comercial y Ventas
Si tienes una Empresa, Comercio, Institución. Etc. Deberías mirar esto Ver con audio http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jowa1ZCy_pQ /p
Re: Recommended new laptop under US$800 for OpenBSD
But returning, if possible, to the original question ... On Thu Oct 4 19:23:41 2012, Tito Mari Francis Escaño wrote: I'd like to seek your advise what new laptop brand and model should I buy that is fully functional (video, LAN, Wifi, sound) with OpenBSD 5.x. ... I have also been considering exactly this issue. Currently I'm using an elderly Thinkpad R61 with Fedora (Nvidia hardware) and XFCE. Frankly I'm starting to get a bit cheesed of with the seemingly ever increasing complexity or cruft of Linux and have been wondering what to do next. Also that R61 seems to be getting heavier and heavier :-) Well I don't fancy Windows. And while Macbook hardware looks both light and attractive, I'm not convinced that I'd really be any better off ... Can it be that there is really no good current solution using OpenBSD? Some Internet searching indicated that there are people using OpenBSD on laptops (including Apple laptop hardware?) but I also see a lot of issues mentioned e.g. in the areas of suspend/resume, wireless networking and power management. At least some of this info. maybe dated or simply cargo. I know I talked to Theo once at EuroBSDcon (2011? - Karlsruhe anyway) and I got the impression that a lot of work was going on then to improve acpi support. Does that continue to be the case? I guess I'm really asking if laptop platform support is a goal for OpenBSD? Would it be possible/feasible to sponsor the development of the necessary features/fixes in some way? My day to day requirements are quite basic: a lightweight, fast system, offering the standard Unix toolset and providing solid networking support (wired + wireless) together with good battery life (e.g. 4 or 5 hours). On top I typically use mutt, curl, ssh, screen/tmux, firefox, evince, libreoffice, etc. A windowing system desktop is necessary, but XFCE is fine for me - GNOME has gone a step too far (imho). Actually what might be ideal would be the new Google/Samsung Chromebook but with the ChromeOS replaced by OpenBSD - cheap too at ~200 UK Pounds. Comments? Yours, Robb. I keep six honest serving-men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who. Rudyard Kipling in his Just So Stories
Re: http/https timeouts with OpenBSD based firewall
On 10/22/12 15:16, Marcin wrote: Hi, I recently upgraded to 5.1, but I was able to reproduce the issue described below with 4.8, 5.0 and 5.2 snapshot. After the upgrade I discovered that workstations behind the OpenBSD firewall experience occasional timeouts while trying to access web servers running IIS 6.0 on Windows 2003 Server. The firewall itself is not affected. The problem is rather intermittent and happens with 30%-50% requests.The workstations are running Windows 7, Windows XP and Linux. I was also able to reproduce the issue by installing Windows 2003 R2 server in default configuration, setting up extremely basic PF rules to redirect port 80 and accessing the server from the Internet. I was unable to expose this issue in LAN, which suggests it might happen only on links slower than 100Mbit. However, it seems to be hardware independent (although all tests were run on i386 arch) as I achieve the same results on three different machines in three different geographic locations connected via independent ISPs. This is how the problem can be exposed with curl: #curl -vI http://www.startvbdotnet.com/ * About to connect() to www.startvbdotnet.com port 80 (#0) * Trying 64.79.160.13... connected HEAD / HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: curl/7.22.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.22.0 OpenSSL/1.0.1 zlib/1.2.3.4 libidn/1.23 librtmp/2.3 Host: www.startvbdotnet.com Accept: */* * Recv failure: Connection reset by peer * Closing connection #0 curl: (56) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer I uploaded the tcpdump from machine running curl here: http://pastebin.com/AkqCeQwW As far as I can tell, the Win 2008 and Win 2012 are not affected. Also, the 4.5 seemed to be free from this problem. Thanks in advance for any suggestions / workarounds! -- Regards, Marcin Please post the following things: - output of `pfctl -si` - your pf ruleset - output of `vmstat -m` -- James Shupe [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
From: Jan Stary h...@stare.cz
Date: Mon, October 22, 2012 3:20 pm
To: ch...@bennettconstruction.us
On Oct 22 09:31:24, ch...@bennettconstruction.us wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
From: Jan Stary h...@stare.cz
Date: Mon, October 22, 2012 11:10 am
To: ch...@bennettconstruction.us
On Oct 22 08:02:04, ch...@bennettconstruction.us wrote:
I did an update to my remote server using the ssh method, since I did
not have Java built
Have you properly aligned the quanizicants before?
Ha Ha,
I couldn't find anything on Google except diff's for this. Unhelpful.
diffs for what?
Srsly, what are you trying to do? What is the ssh method?
Why are you upgrading in the first place? To have java installed?
You don't need to upgrade for that.
The server has been running since early 2007, so it seems reasonable
that a reboot, including several hard reboots might bring up a hardware
failure.
Why?
These are unmanaged servers, so unless I decide that the hardware is
broken, I have to solve the problem myself. Since I can't get F'ing
firefox35 to work, I'm a little pissed!
So, you are running firefox35 on unmanaged servers?
Seriously, you message doesn't give a hint
what you are trying to do in the first place and why.
What are you doing?
Why are you doing it?
What problems are you having with that?
I guess that is why no one has replied.
I have a remote server for my websites and PostgreSQL databases for my
business.
I used the http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade51.html#upgrade:
Upgrading without install kernel (modified to -current files)
This is NOT the recommended process. Use the install kernel method if at
all possible!
I have successfully used this method (for -current, never release)
several times
I hadn't built Java addon for firefox35 recently because I always run
-current or close to it.
I built Java, but I cannot get any (including a slightly older version)
firefox35 to work.
I cannot achieve anything without IP access with Java.
If this is a hardware failure, I will ask for a replacement of whatever
it is that is broken.
If this is my fault, I can re-install or re-upgrade remotely, but I do
not have access to the interface I need until Wed.
Chris Bennett
Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
From: Jan Stary h...@stare.cz
Date: Mon, October 22, 2012 4:54 pm
To: ch...@bennettconstruction.us
On Oct 22 14:10:52, ch...@bennettconstruction.us wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
From: Jan Stary h...@stare.cz
Date: Mon, October 22, 2012 3:20 pm
To: ch...@bennettconstruction.us
On Oct 22 09:31:24, ch...@bennettconstruction.us wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problem with server upgrade, upgrade or hardware failure?
From: Jan Stary h...@stare.cz
Date: Mon, October 22, 2012 11:10 am
To: ch...@bennettconstruction.us
On Oct 22 08:02:04, ch...@bennettconstruction.us wrote:
I did an update to my remote server using the ssh method, since I
did
not have Java built
Have you properly aligned the quanizicants before?
Ha Ha,
I couldn't find anything on Google except diff's for this. Unhelpful.
diffs for what?
Srsly, what are you trying to do? What is the ssh method?
Why are you upgrading in the first place? To have java installed?
You don't need to upgrade for that.
The server has been running since early 2007, so it seems reasonable
that a reboot, including several hard reboots might bring up a hardware
failure.
Why?
These are unmanaged servers, so unless I decide that the hardware is
broken, I have to solve the problem myself. Since I can't get F'ing
firefox35 to work, I'm a little pissed!
So, you are running firefox35 on unmanaged servers?
Seriously, you message doesn't give a hint
what you are trying to do in the first place and why.
What are you doing?
Why are you doing it?
What problems are you having with that?
I guess that is why no one has replied.
I have a remote server for my websites and PostgreSQL databases for my
business.
I used the http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade51.html#upgrade:
Upgrading without install kernel (modified to -current files)
This is NOT the recommended process. Use the install kernel method if at
all possible!
I have successfully used this method (for -current, never release)
several times
I hadn't built Java addon for firefox35 recently because I always run
-current or close to it.
This where you are losing me.
You said it was a reopte server running webistes and PostgreSQL.
What does firefox35 and a java addon have to do with that?
I built Java,
On a PostgreSQL server? Why?
but I cannot get any (including a slightly older version)
firefox35 to work.
On a PostgreSQL server?
I cannot achieve anything without IP access with Java.
What does that sentence even mean?
What exactly are you trying to do and what exactly happens?
If this is a hardware failure,
What is? A nonworking java plugin for firefox?
Why would that be a hw failure? How do you even
run firefox _on_your_remote_server_ ?
I am in Austin Texas, with my cute little crappy laptop in a truck stop
with lousy Wifi.
I have had a remote server in Lansing Michigan since 2007.
They offer a remote IP based Keyboard, video and mouse attachment that
they connect to my server.
I must have a web browser with Java in order to use it, from this or any
other location in the world.
I do not own the server, I rent it.
account update
Please note that we have made new and important changes to your St.George Bank account. Login to view new updates.
