Re: Authenticating WiFi hotspot users

2014-01-25 Thread Marcus MERIGHI
fivering...@yahoo.com.au (Steve), 2014.01.25 (Sat) 05:34 (CET):
 I use AuthPF a fair bit to limit acces to external ports that I dont
 want globally accessible.
 The users that utilise this I I can plan for so they
 have an ssh client installed on the device
 
 
 I am now trying to authenticate
 unknown users that likey will not have an SSH client.
 The users will just need
 to browse the web.
 They need to be initially directed to a web page of terms
 and conditions and once accepted given permission to browse.
 
 
 Is there a
 simple answer to this problem ?
 
 I was thinking maybe a web based ssh client

www/ajaxterm

Bye, Marcus

 that can be loaded with apache or maybe an option to do something with relayd.
 I have a manual workaround by just changing wpa pass phrase periodically but
 any ideas to automate this would be appreciated.



[patch] /bin/mt print current file and block numbers

2014-01-25 Thread Oscar Endre Edvardsen
Hello misc,

Here's a tiny patch for bin/mt/mt.c to allow the command mt status to 
print current file and block numbers, like it does in most other Unixes. 
The information was already available in struct mtget, so only two printf 
lines was needed.

I have verified that the current file number is reported as expected using 
a HP DAT72 USB tape drive.


Index: bin/mt/mt.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/mt/mt.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -p -r1.36 mt.c
--- bin/mt/mt.c 12 Nov 2013 04:36:02 -  1.36
+++ bin/mt/mt.c 23 Jan 2014 20:42:12 -
@@ -281,6 +281,8 @@ status(struct mtget *bp)
(void)putchar('\n');
(void)printf(blocksize: %d (%d)\n, bp-mt_blksiz, bp-mt_mblksiz);
(void)printf(density: %d (%d)\n, bp-mt_density, bp-mt_mdensity);
+   (void)printf(current file number: %d\n, bp-mt_fileno);
+   (void)printf(current block number: %d\n, bp-mt_blkno);
 }
 
 /*



athn weirdness with two subnets

2014-01-25 Thread Eike Lantzsch
Hi:

I'm using 5.4 stable on an ALIX 2D13 with Compex WLM200NX

My internal network is 192.168.12.0/24
My ISP gives me 181.40.100.8 nm 255.255.255.0 gw 181.40.100.1 via DHCP 
with reserved IP address. This is on vr0
No problems here.

I wanted to set up two internal networks
on vr1:
192.168.12.0/25

and on vr2:
192.168.12.128/25

athn0 is also supposed to be on 192.168.12.0/25
The intended /etc/hostname.athn0 is:
inet 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.128

/etc/hostname.vr0
dhcp

/etc/hostname.vr1
inet 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.128

/etc/hostname.vr2
inet 192.168.12.129 255.255.255.128

The weirdness is as follows:
according to ifconfig all interfaces are active
BUT

athn0 does not want to be on the same subnet with vr1

I cannot ping the internal IP 192.168.12.1
as long as athn0 is on 192.168.12.2 or any other address up to 
192.168.12.126 that is in the subnet 192.168.12.128/25.

I have to change athn0 to the other subnet with
/etc/hostname.athn0
inet 192.168.12.130 255.255.255.128

In this case I can ping 192.168.12.1 and 192.168.12.130

(ping from inside the ALIX that is)

I pfctl -d to see if my PF rules have an influence, but no ...

You see that I followed the Book of PF 2nd edition to eventually being 
able to set up a DMZ on vr2 while WLAN on athn0 and wired vr1 are on 
the same subnet.

Is the weirdness in what I'm trying to do or is there some subtle bug?
Is there a reason that two different interfaces on the same system 
must not be on the same subnet?

As a sidenote for the record: If one brings network interfaces down 
and up and down and up and changes the hostnames in between eventually 
the ALIX wants a hard reset - reboot is not enough; it will leave one 
with all kinds of weird behaviour - mostly interfaces being active 
according to ifconfig but not being pingable nor from inside nor 
outside.

I hope someone can help.
Cheers
Eike

my dmesg:
OpenBSD 5.4 (GENERIC) #37: Tue Jul 30 12:05:01 MDT 2013
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS (AuthenticAMD 586-
class) 499 MHz
cpu0: FPU,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,CX8,SEP,PGE,CMOV,CFLUSH,MMX,MMXX,3DNOW2,3DNOW
real mem  = 267976704 (255MB)
avail mem = 252145664 (240MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 11/05/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 
0xfd088
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1
pcibios0: pcibios_get_intr_routing - function not supported
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing information unavailable.
pcibios0: PCI bus #0 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xe/0xa800
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 AMD Geode LX rev 0x33
glxsb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 2 AMD Geode LX Crypto rev 0x00: RNG 
AES
vr0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 VIA VT6105M RhineIII rev 0x96: irq 10, 
address 00:0d:b9:2d:cf:20
ukphy0 at vr0 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 3: OUI 
0x004063, model 0x0034
vr1 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 VIA VT6105M RhineIII rev 0x96: irq 11, 
address 00:0d:b9:2d:cf:21
ukphy1 at vr1 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 3: OUI 
0x004063, model 0x0034
vr2 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 VIA VT6105M RhineIII rev 0x96: irq 15, 
address 00:0d:b9:2d:cf:22
ukphy2 at vr2 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 3: OUI 
0x004063, model 0x0034
athn0 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 Atheros AR9280 rev 0x01: irq 9
athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address 04:f0:21:06:22:c4
glxpcib0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 AMD CS5536 ISA rev 0x03: rev 3, 
32-bit 3579545Hz timer, watchdog, gpio, i2c
gpio0 at glxpcib0: 32 pins
iic0 at glxpcib0
maxtmp0 at iic0 addr 0x4c: lm86
pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 2 AMD CS5536 IDE rev 0x01: DMA, 
channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: ULTIMATE CF CARD
wd0: 1-sector PIO, LBA48, 15247MB, 31227840 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
ohci0 at pci0 dev 15 function 4 AMD CS5536 USB rev 0x02: irq 12, 
version 1.0, legacy support
ehci0 at pci0 dev 15 function 5 AMD CS5536 USB rev 0x02: irq 12
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 AMD EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at glxpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com0: console
com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
spkr0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
usb1 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 AMD OHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
mtrr: K6-family MTRR support (2 registers)
nvram: invalid checksum
vscsi0 at root
scsibus0 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus1 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on wd0a (7fe077bfcb51b299.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
clock: unknown CMOS layout



athn(4) questions about Tx power, Rx gain, and setting media (AR9220)

2014-01-25 Thread Márton Drótos
Hi misc@,

I have an Alix 2d3 board with a RouterBoard R52Hn miniPCI wireless card,
featuring an AR9220 chip (full dmesg and debug messages are included in my mail
later), and I'm running it in hostap mode.

# dmesg | grep athn
   athn0 at
pci0 dev 12 function 0 Atheros AR9280 rev 0x01: irq 9
athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx

# uname -a

OpenBSD host.domain 5.4 GENERIC#37 i386

This is a high power card, with 25dBm output power @802.11g 6Mbit and 22dBm
@802.11g 54Mbit, and is connected to a pair of 8dBi omnidirectional antennae.
However, both its range and its signal level at the same distance is similar to
those of my generic wireless router provided by my ISP. An other interesting
aspect is that when I connect to it either with an Android phone or with a
laptop (Kubuntu or Linux Mint), they correctly connect with 802.11g 54Mbit, but
tend to randomly downgrade the connection to as low as 802.11g 1Mbit, despite
the fact that they are in less than 2m distance with direct visibility to the
antennae. Using wget on the laptop, I couldn't get transfer speeds above
~1.5MBps (~12Mbit).

Similarly, when I use my card to scan the neighboring networks, I get similar
readings as with my laptop, however I suspect that this hardware should be
capable of more.

At first, I tried to force the media setting in hostname.athn0 to 802.11g
54Mbit, however it seems that the media is in fact in autoselect mode:

# cat /etc/hostname.athn0
inet x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
media OFDM54 mode 11g mediaopt hostap
nwid xxx
wpakey xxx
chan 3
wpaciphers ccmp
wpaprotos wpa2

# ifconfig athn0
athn0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
priority: 4
groups: wlan
media: IEEE802.11 OFDM54 mode 11g hostap (autoselect mode 11g hostap)
status: active
ieee80211: nwid xxx chan 3 bssid xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx wpakey xxx
wpaprotos wpa2 wpaakms psk wpaciphers ccmp wpagroupcipher tkip
inet x.x.x.x netmask xxx broadcast x.x.x.x
inet6 xxx%athn0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4

Is this the correct behaviour?

As the next step, I looked for a way to set the txpower setting manually.
Unfortunately, athn(4) doesn't support this feature, so I can't perform this
test.
Sidenote: the manual of ifconfig(8) doesn't state that not all drivers support
the txpower option, and, by looking at the source code ieee80211_ioctl.c it
turns out that the same error message is given in this case and in case of an
out of bound value:
if ((ic-ic_caps  IEEE80211_C_TXPMGT) == 0) {
error = EINVAL;
break;
}
if (!(IEEE80211_TXPOWER_MIN = txpower-i_val 
txpower-i_val = IEEE80211_TXPOWER_MAX)) {
error = EINVAL;
break;
}
While this is logically correct, I think it would be more informative to provide
a different error, or to note this behaviour in the man page.

For the next step, I started looking around at the source code of the athn
driver, but I'm not familiar nor with driver programming nor with wireless
cards, although I realized that the debug messages may be informative. So I have
compiled a new kernel, which differs from 5.4 GENERIC only that it is compiled
with the ATHN_DEBUG option, and athn_debug is set to a high value in athn.c.

Before the debug findings, some netstat:
# netstat -I athn0
NameMtu   Network Address  Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs Colls
athn0   1500  Link  xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx78063 238708   119145  6479 0
athn0   1500  x.x.x.x/x   x.x.x.x  78063 238708   119145  6479 0
athn0   1500  xxx%athnxxx  78063 238708   119145  6479 0

Is it normal to have this amount of errors?

# netstat -W athn0
ieee80211 on athn0:
0 input packets with bad version
0 input packets too short
0 input packets from wrong bssid
551 input packet duplicates discarded
0 input packets with wrong direction
0 input multicast echo packets discarded
173 input packets from unassociated station discarded
0 input encrypted packets without wep/wpa config discarded
48768 input unencrypted packets with wep/wpa config discarded
0 input wep/wpa packets processing failed
65 input packet decapsulations failed
0 input management packets discarded
124996 input control packets discarded
0 input packets with truncated rate set
0 input packets with missing elements
0 input packets with elements too big
20 input packets with elements too small
0 input packets with invalid channel
989693 input packets with mismatched channel
0 node allocations failed
54151 input packets with mismatched ssid
0 input packets with unsupported auth algorithm
0 input authentications failed
0 input associations from wrong bssid
0 input associations without authentication
0 input associations with mismatched capabilities
0 input 

sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Markus Lude
Hello,

today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january).
When I run sysmerge after that I got

$ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz
*** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid 
etcXX.tgz set

Any ideas what might go wrong here?

Regards,
Markus



Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Markus Lude markus.l...@gmx.de wrote:
 Hello,

 today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january).
 When I run sysmerge after that I got

 $ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz
 *** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid 
 etcXX.tgz set


Try downloading it again. And/or try to unpack it somewhere else than
/. Is it a valid tar archive?

-- 
chs



Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Markus Lude
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:18:58PM +0100, Markus Lude wrote:
 Hello,
 
 today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january).
 When I run sysmerge after that I got
 
 $ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz
 *** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid 
 etcXX.tgz set
 
 Any ideas what might go wrong here?

sysmerge from -current doesn't complain here and works normal.

Regards,
Markus



Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
Use sysmerge -S -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz
And verify the etc archives manually as described in the signify manpage.

Looks like there is a problem with sysmerge and signify.

Fritjof

Markus Lude markus.l...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,

today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january).
When I run sysmerge after that I got

$ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz
*** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid
etcXX.tgz set

Any ideas what might go wrong here?

Regards,
Markus

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Norman Golisz
On Sat Jan 25 2014 18:18, Markus Lude wrote:
 Hello,
 
 today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january).
 When I run sysmerge after that I got
 
 $ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz
 *** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid 
 etcXX.tgz set
 
 Any ideas what might go wrong here?

try specifying the full (absolute) path to the sets.

It's a regression, where sysmerge doesn't handle implicit paths correctly.
ajacout@ has already fixed it in -current after Jan, 22.



pkg_add fails on clean snapshot install

2014-01-25 Thread Markus Bergkvist
Is it related to what is mentioned here and I should wait for updated snapshots?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=139064668614680w=2

$ sudo pkg_add minicom
Fatal error: Ustar
[ftp://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/quirks-1.109.tgz][+CONTENTS]:
Error while reading header at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/Ustar.pm line
83.

$ pkg_info
iwn-firmware-5.10p0 firmware binary images for iwn(4) driver
uvideo-firmware-1.2p1 firmware binary images for uvideo(4) driver

$ dmesg
OpenBSD 5.5-beta (GENERIC.MP) #279: Fri Jan 24 11:50:37 MST 2014
t...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
RTC BIOS diagnostic error
ffclock_battery,ROM_cksum,config_unit,memory_size,fixed_disk,invalid_time
real mem = 3127304192 (2982MB)
avail mem = 3035901952 (2895MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xbb8c4000 (22 entries)
bios0: vendor Hewlett-Packard version 68PDD Ver. F.16 date 10/21/2010
bios0: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq 6730b (GB987ET#AK8)
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP HPET APIC MCFG ASF! TCPA SSDT SLIC DMAR SSDT SSDT SSDT
acpi0: wakeup devices LANC(S5) HDEF(S4) RP02(S5) WNIC(S5) RP03(S5)
ECF0(S5) RP05(S5) ECF0(S5) RP06(S5) NIC_(S5) USB1(S3) USB2(S3)
USB3(S3) USB4(S3) USB5(S3) USB6(S3) [...]
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GHz, 2261.39 MHz
cpu0: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF
cpu0: 3MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 7 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges
cpu0: apic clock running at 265MHz
cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.2.2.2, IBE
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GHz, 2261.00 MHz
cpu1: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF
cpu1: 3MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 1 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 1
acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEGP)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (RP01)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (RP02)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 3 (RP03)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 68 (RP05)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 133 (RP06)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 134 (PCIB)
acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiec0 at acpi0
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C2, C1, PSS
acpicpu1 at acpi0: C2, C1, PSS
acpipwrres0 at acpi0: APPR, resource for HDEF
acpipwrres1 at acpi0: COMP, resource for COM1
acpipwrres2 at acpi0: LPP_, resource for LPT0
acpipwrres3 at acpi0: PFN0, resource for FAN0
acpipwrres4 at acpi0: PFN1, resource for FAN1
acpipwrres5 at acpi0: PFN2, resource for FAN2
acpipwrres6 at acpi0: PFN3, resource for FAN3
acpipwrres7 at acpi0: PFN4, resource for FAN4
acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature is 256 degC
acpitz1 at acpi0: critical temperature is 110 degC
acpitz2 at acpi0: critical temperature is 105 degC
acpitz3 at acpi0: critical temperature is 110 degC
acpitz4 at acpi0: critical temperature is 110 degC
acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 model Primary serial 04335 2009/01/20 type
LIon oem Hewlett-Packard
acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1 not present
acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online
acpibtn0 at acpi0: SLPB
acpibtn1 at acpi0: LID_
acpivideo0 at acpi0: GFX0
acpivout0 at acpivideo0: DD02
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 2261 MHz: speeds: 2267, 2266, 1600, 800 MHz
memory map conflict 0xfff8/0x7000
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel GM45 Host rev 0x07
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel GM45 Video rev 0x07
intagp0 at vga1
agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xc000, size 0x1000
inteldrm0 at vga1
drm0 at inteldrm0
inteldrm0: 1280x800
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (std, vt100 emulation)
Intel GM45 Video rev 0x07 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 16
uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 17
uhci2 at pci0 dev 26 function 2 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 18
ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 19
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801I HD Audio rev 0x03: msi
azalia0: codecs: Analog Devices AD1984A
audio0 at azalia0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x03: msi
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x03: msi
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
iwn0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel WiFi Link 

Re: pkg_add fails on clean snapshot install

2014-01-25 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 07:24:21PM +0100, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
 Is it related to what is mentioned here and I should wait for updated 
 snapshots?
 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=139064668614680w=2
 
 $ sudo pkg_add minicom
 Fatal error: Ustar
 [ftp://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/quirks-1.109.tgz][+CONTENTS]:
 Error while reading header at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/Ustar.pm line

Yes.



Re: athn(4) questions about Tx power, Rx gain, and setting media (AR9220)

2014-01-25 Thread Mihai Popescu
 If not, I'd like to ask what should be done to fix the errors. Thank you
in advance,
 Marton

Try to offer your hardware as donation and maybe a developer will pick it
up and make it shine. That dependes of his/her time and priorities. It may
be that athn driver is not fully reay yet for usage. But as I said, it may
be.



Re: NAT reliability in light of recent checksum changes

2014-01-25 Thread Richard Procter
On 22/01/2014, at 7:19 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:

 * Richard Procter richard.n.proc...@gmail.com [2014-01-22 06:44]:
 This fundamentally weakens its usefulness, though: a correct
 checksum now implies only that the payload likely matches
 what the last NAT router happened to have in its memory
 
 huh?
 we receive a packet with correct cksum - NAT - packet goes out with
 correct cksum.
 we receive a packet with broken cksum - NAT - we leave the cksum
 alone, i. e. leave it broken.

Christian said it better than me: routers may corrupt data
and regenerating the checksum will hide it.

That's more than a theoretical concern. The article I
referenced is a detailed study of real-world traces
co-authored by a member of the Stanford distributed systems
group that concludes Probably the strongest message of this
study is that the networking hardware is often trashing the
packets which are entrusted to it[0].

More generally, TCP checksums provide for an acceptable
error rate that is independent of the reliability of the
underlying network[*] by allowing us to verify its workings.
But it's no longer possible to verify network operation if 
it may be regenerating TCP checksums, as these may hide 
network faults. That's a fundamental change from the scheme 
Cerf and Khan emphasized in their design notes for what 
became known as TCP:

The remainder of the packet consists of text for delivery
to the destination and a trailing check sum used for
end-to-end software verification. The GATEWAY does /not/
modify the text and merely forwards the check sum along
without computing or recomputing it.[1]

 It doesn't seem you know what you are talking about. the
 cksum is dead simple, if we had bugs in claculating or
 verifying it, we really had a LOT of other problems.

I'm not saying the calculation is bad. I'm saying it's being
calculated from the wrong copy of the data and by the wrong
device. And it's not just me saying it: I'm quoting the guys 
who designed TCP. 

 There is no undetected error rate, nothing really changes
 there.

I disagree. Every TCP stream containing aribitrary data may
have undetected errors as checksums cannot detect all the
errors networks may make (being shorter than the data they
cover). The engineer's task is to make network errors
reliably negligible in practice.

As network regenerated checksums may hide any amount of
arbitrary data corruption I believe it's correct to say the
network error rate undetected by TCP is then unknown and
unbounded.

best, 
Richard. 

[*] Under reasonable assumptions of the error modes most likely
in practice. And some applications require lower error rates 
than TCP checksums can provide.

[0]
http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2000/conf/paper/sigcomm2000-9-1.pdf

Jonathan Stone and Craig Partridge. 2000. When the CRC and
TCP checksum disagree.  In Proceedings of the conference on
Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for
Computer Communication (SIGCOMM '00). ACM, New York, NY,
USA, 309-319.  DOI=10.1145/347059.347561
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/347059.347561

[1] A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication 
V. Cerf, R. Khan, IEEE Trans on Comms, Vol Com-22, No 5 May
1974 Page 3 in original emphasis.



Re: NAT reliability in light of recent checksum changes

2014-01-25 Thread Theo de Raadt
From owner-misc+M137142=deraadt=cvs.openbsd@openbsd.org Sat Jan 25 
12:41:53 2014
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; 
h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date 
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; 
bh=utWhBX3niMM2LVtE8mfHlY/ky3wCOdmsmIjoMdLaY5Q=; 
b=EDAHtMzwKNWiAeY56T7Fkl0Q29kOMAMn5QUkTmADQG5qZJ7k9mOWDRnjlN0DLClrDO 
TpAA7OUGMfA55tXh/dEkKgtjb3inl7IMNyhUahJrETz0uHedS9xyZSTKBbDi9zVWfey1 
V3broKdxZP3MA6jmF0aT4jdkaDfC/Hj7UhSX79Qc6zMkr3wZMN6e3sA+31RCnrCj/hwf 
8oDhmqPtNYVGBZMm9hyhX1x/FTp/3Ra6tWzUnDtnKozUq2ZeovgLwG3JjcFooQ5572Ef 
w1uIA4w2em5DRlUSdDtome8dVVewRb25ZeNkPMe8Gul6azVh2zqNNYx7a9b71mLTwGML YXwA==
X-Received: by 10.68.204.4 with SMTP id ku4mr21464025pbc.66.1390678851934; 
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: NAT reliability in light of recent checksum changes
From: Richard Procter richard.n.proc...@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 20140122061907.gk15...@quigon.bsws.de
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:40:44 +1300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: 8d493091-c15d-46a2-8004-32dd59395...@gmail.com 
20140122061907.gk15...@quigon.bsws.de
To: misc@openbsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
List-Help: mailto:majord...@openbsd.org?body=help
List-ID: misc.openbsd.org
List-Owner: mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org
List-Post: mailto:misc@openbsd.org
List-Subscribe: mailto:majord...@openbsd.org?body=sub%20misc
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:majord...@openbsd.org?body=unsub%20misc
X-Loop: misc@openbsd.org
Precedence: list
Sender: owner-m...@openbsd.org

On 22/01/2014, at 7:19 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:

 * Richard Procter richard.n.proc...@gmail.com [2014-01-22 06:44]:
 This fundamentally weakens its usefulness, though: a correct
 checksum now implies only that the payload likely matches
 what the last NAT router happened to have in its memory
 
 huh?
 we receive a packet with correct cksum - NAT - packet goes out with
 correct cksum.
 we receive a packet with broken cksum - NAT - we leave the cksum
 alone, i. e. leave it broken.

Christian said it better than me: routers may corrupt data
and regenerating the checksum will hide it.

That's more than a theoretical concern. The article I
referenced is a detailed study of real-world traces
co-authored by a member of the Stanford distributed systems
group that concludes Probably the strongest message of this
study is that the networking hardware is often trashing the
packets which are entrusted to it[0].

More generally, TCP checksums provide for an acceptable
error rate that is independent of the reliability of the
underlying network[*] by allowing us to verify its workings.
But it's no longer possible to verify network operation if 
it may be regenerating TCP checksums, as these may hide 
network faults. That's a fundamental change from the scheme 
Cerf and Khan emphasized in their design notes for what 
became known as TCP:

The remainder of the packet consists of text for delivery
to the destination and a trailing check sum used for
end-to-end software verification. The GATEWAY does /not/
modify the text and merely forwards the check sum along
without computing or recomputing it.[1]

 It doesn't seem you know what you are talking about. the
 cksum is dead simple, if we had bugs in claculating or
 verifying it, we really had a LOT of other problems.

I'm not saying the calculation is bad. I'm saying it's being
calculated from the wrong copy of the data and by the wrong
device. And it's not just me saying it: I'm quoting the guys 
who designed TCP. 

 There is no undetected error rate, nothing really changes
 there.

I disagree. Every TCP stream containing aribitrary data may
have undetected errors as checksums cannot detect all the
errors networks may make (being shorter than the data they
cover). The engineer's task is to make network errors
reliably negligible in practice.

As network regenerated checksums may hide any amount of
arbitrary data corruption I believe it's correct to say the
network error rate undetected by TCP is then unknown and
unbounded.

best, 
Richard. 

[*] Under reasonable assumptions of the error modes most likely
in practice. And some applications require lower error rates 
than TCP checksums can provide.

[0]
http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2000/conf/paper/sigcomm2000-9-1.pdf

Jonathan Stone and Craig Partridge. 2000. When the CRC and
TCP checksum disagree.  In Proceedings of the conference on
Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for
Computer Communication (SIGCOMM '00). ACM, New York, NY,
USA, 309-319.  DOI=10.1145/347059.347561
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/347059.347561

[1] A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication 
V. Cerf, R. Khan, IEEE Trans on Comms, Vol Com-22, No 5 May
1974 Page 3 in original emphasis.



Re: athn weirdness with two subnets

2014-01-25 Thread Eike Lantzsch
On Saturday 25 January 2014 11:11:43 you wrote:

if you want athn0 and vr1 to be on the same network, bridge them 
together then assign an IP address to only one of the two.


-ken

Thanks Ken for the hint!
I reckon that assigning IP addresses to both interfaces in the same 
network is not the correct approach.

I tried your hint and at least the ALIX 2d13 is routing again.

Just for the record:

athn0 is the interface to assign the IP address. Otherwise it gets 
status no network and will not come up.

# cat /etc/hostname.athn0
inet 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.128
chan 108
mediaopt hostap
nwid mywlanid
wpakey somelongkey

# cat /etc/hostname.vr1   
up media autoselect

# cat /etc/hostname.bridge0
add athn0
add vr1
up



And for the record again because somebody else had problems with this 
card:

I can now connect via WiFi with my MACbook-Air on 5GHz (channel 108) 
but my Samsung Galaxy3 does not want to connect although it sees the 
network and the field strength is -39dBm @ 5540MHz.

Trying the same on channel 6 results in nothing but a timeout error on 
both the MAC and the Samsung phone.

No idea if this is due to the Compex card, the athn driver or the 
Samsung phone.



On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Eike Lantzsch zp6...@gmx.net 
wrote:

I'm using 5.4 stable on an ALIX 2D13 with Compex WLM200NX

My internal network is 192.168.12.0/24
My ISP gives me 181.40.100.8 nm 255.255.255.0 gw 181.40.100.1 via DHCP
with reserved IP address. This is on vr0
No problems here.

I wanted to set up two internal networks
on vr1:
192.168.12.0/25

and on vr2:
192.168.12.128/25

athn0 is also supposed to be on 192.168.12.0/25
The intended /etc/hostname.athn0 is:
inet 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.128

/etc/hostname.vr0
dhcp

/etc/hostname.vr1
inet 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.128

/etc/hostname.vr2
inet 192.168.12.129 255.255.255.128

The weirdness is as follows:
according to ifconfig all interfaces are active
BUT

athn0 does not want to be on the same subnet with vr1

I cannot ping the internal IP 192.168.12.1
as long as athn0 is on 192.168.12.2 or any other address up to
192.168.12.126 that is in the subnet 192.168.12.128/25.

I have to change athn0 to the other subnet with
/etc/hostname.athn0
inet 192.168.12.130 255.255.255.128

In this case I can ping 192.168.12.1 and 192.168.12.130

(ping from inside the ALIX that is)

[rest snipped for brevity]



Cannot make state when using 'user' option in pf.conf

2014-01-25 Thread Jiri B
Hello,

I'm trying to understand why there's no PF state for a outgoing
rule dedicated to dnscrypt-proxy (668) daemon.

pf.conf says 'user' option needs effective ID...

# ps -axo uid,ruid,gid,rgid,pid,args | grep dnscrypt 
  688   688   688   688 16665 /usr/local/sbin/dnscrypt-proxy -d 
--local-address=127.0.0.1:5331 --user=_dnscrypt-proxy

# pfctl -sr 

  
block drop out log quick on egress from ! (egress:0) to any
anchor test-out all
pass out log quick on egress inet proto udp from any to 208.67.220.220 port = 
443 user = 688
pass out log quick on egress inet proto tcp from any to 208.67.220.220 port = 
443 user = 688 flags S/SA
pass out log quick on egress inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq
block drop in log quick from no-route to any
block drop in log quick from urpf-failed to any
block drop out log quick all
block drop in log quick on egress inet from any to 255.255.255.255
anchor test-in all
pass in log quick on egress inet proto icmp from any to (egress:0) icmp-type 
echoreq code 0
pass in log quick on egress inet proto tcp from any to (egress:0) port = 22 
flags S/SA
block drop in log quick all

Now when dnscrypt-proxy tries to make a connection it is blocked.
Interestingly there's even no logged outgoing connection, but just
blocked return.

# tcpdump -i pflog0 -n -e -ttt -vv  
   
tcpdump: WARNING: snaplen raised from 116 to 160
tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
Jan 26 00:41:00.884036 rule 7/(match) [uid 0, pid 23524] block out on iwn0: 
[uid 0, pid 16665] 192.168.1.100.10976  208.67.220.220.443: udp 512 (ttl 64, 
id 9876, len 540, bad cksum 208! differs by e108)

(from anchor)
# pfctl -ss 

  
all tcp 192.168.1.100:16505 - 66.7.199.108:22   ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED

Well it works if I add dnscrypt-proxy rule for root but why?

jirib



Re: Cannot make state when using 'user' option in pf.conf

2014-01-25 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2014/1/26 Jiri B ji...@devio.us:
 Hello,

 I'm trying to understand why there's no PF state for a outgoing
 rule dedicated to dnscrypt-proxy (668) daemon.

 pf.conf says 'user' option needs effective ID...

 # ps -axo uid,ruid,gid,rgid,pid,args | grep dnscrypt
   688   688   688   688 16665 /usr/local/sbin/dnscrypt-proxy -d 
 --local-address=127.0.0.1:5331 --user=_dnscrypt-proxy

 # pfctl -sr
 block drop out log quick on egress from ! (egress:0) to any
 anchor test-out all
 pass out log quick on egress inet proto udp from any to 208.67.220.220 port = 
 443 user = 688
 pass out log quick on egress inet proto tcp from any to 208.67.220.220 port = 
 443 user = 688 flags S/SA
 pass out log quick on egress inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq
 block drop in log quick from no-route to any
 block drop in log quick from urpf-failed to any
 block drop out log quick all
 block drop in log quick on egress inet from any to 255.255.255.255
 anchor test-in all
 pass in log quick on egress inet proto icmp from any to (egress:0) icmp-type 
 echoreq code 0
 pass in log quick on egress inet proto tcp from any to (egress:0) port = 22 
 flags S/SA
 block drop in log quick all

 Now when dnscrypt-proxy tries to make a connection it is blocked.
 Interestingly there's even no logged outgoing connection, but just
 blocked return.

 # tcpdump -i pflog0 -n -e -ttt -vv
 tcpdump: WARNING: snaplen raised from 116 to 160
 tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
 Jan 26 00:41:00.884036 rule 7/(match) [uid 0, pid 23524] block out on iwn0: 
 [uid 0, pid 16665] 192.168.1.100.10976  208.67.220.220.443: udp 512 (ttl 64, 
 id 9876, len 540, bad cksum 208! differs by e108)

 (from anchor)
 # pfctl -ss
 all tcp 192.168.1.100:16505 - 66.7.199.108:22   ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED

 Well it works if I add dnscrypt-proxy rule for root but why?

Because the socket (hint: 1024) was opened with root rights, and
therefore the uid=0 was saved there.

--
  WBR,
  Vadim Zhukov



Re: athn weirdness with two subnets

2014-01-25 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 25-01-2014 19:15, Eike Lantzsch escreveu:
 On Saturday 25 January 2014 11:11:43 you wrote:

 if you want athn0 and vr1 to be on the same network, bridge them 
 together then assign an IP address to only one of the two.


 -ken

 Thanks Ken for the hint!
 I reckon that assigning IP addresses to both interfaces in the same 
 network is not the correct approach.

 I tried your hint and at least the ALIX 2d13 is routing again.

 Just for the record:

 athn0 is the interface to assign the IP address. Otherwise it gets 
 status no network and will not come up.

 # cat /etc/hostname.athn0
 inet 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.128
 chan 108
 mediaopt hostap
 nwid mywlanid
 wpakey somelongkey

 # cat /etc/hostname.vr1   
 up media autoselect

 # cat /etc/hostname.bridge0
 add athn0
 add vr1
 up

 

 And for the record again because somebody else had problems with this 
 card:

 I can now connect via WiFi with my MACbook-Air on 5GHz (channel 108) 
 but my Samsung Galaxy3 does not want to connect although it sees the 
 network and the field strength is -39dBm @ 5540MHz.

 Trying the same on channel 6 results in nothing but a timeout error on 
 both the MAC and the Samsung phone.

 No idea if this is due to the Compex card, the athn driver or the 
 Samsung phone.

 

 On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Eike Lantzsch zp6...@gmx.net 
 wrote:

 I'm using 5.4 stable on an ALIX 2D13 with Compex WLM200NX

 My internal network is 192.168.12.0/24
 My ISP gives me 181.40.100.8 nm 255.255.255.0 gw 181.40.100.1 via DHCP
 with reserved IP address. This is on vr0
 No problems here.

 I wanted to set up two internal networks
 on vr1:
 192.168.12.0/25

 and on vr2:
 192.168.12.128/25

 athn0 is also supposed to be on 192.168.12.0/25
 The intended /etc/hostname.athn0 is:
 inet 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.128

 /etc/hostname.vr0
 dhcp

 /etc/hostname.vr1
 inet 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.128

 /etc/hostname.vr2
 inet 192.168.12.129 255.255.255.128

 The weirdness is as follows:
 according to ifconfig all interfaces are active
 BUT

 athn0 does not want to be on the same subnet with vr1

 I cannot ping the internal IP 192.168.12.1
 as long as athn0 is on 192.168.12.2 or any other address up to
 192.168.12.126 that is in the subnet 192.168.12.128/25.

 I have to change athn0 to the other subnet with
 /etc/hostname.athn0
 inet 192.168.12.130 255.255.255.128

 In this case I can ping 192.168.12.1 and 192.168.12.130

 (ping from inside the ALIX that is)

 [rest snipped for brevity]

Or even better, bridge them and a vether(4) and assign the ip address to
it, instead of one of the physical interfaces.

Cheers,

-- 
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC