Re: Dell FX2 or Huawei E9000 dmesg(s), anyone?
On 16.7.2015. 1:46, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: On 13.7.2015. 7:52, OpenBSD user wrote: Would anyone care to share amd64 dmesg(s) from Dell FX2 or Huawei E9000? Would be truly grateful! next week i will get access to dell fc630. i'm quite sure that fc630 have dual port QLogic 577xx/578xx 10 GbE BCM57810 card which is not supported in OpenBSD. dmesg from Dell PowerEdge FC630 on 0 Intel E5 v3 Host rev 0x02 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel E5 v3 PCIE rev 0x02 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 1:0:0: mem address conflict 0xfff8/0x8 1:0:1: mem address conflict 0xfff8/0x8 Broadcom BCM57810 rev 0x10 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 not configured Broadcom BCM57810 rev 0x10 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 not configured ppb1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel E5 v3 PCIE rev 0x02 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 mfii0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS3008 rev 0x02: msi mfii0: PERC H330 Mini, firmware 25.3.0.0016 scsibus0 at mfii0: 32 targets sd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: DELL, PERC H330 Mini, 4.25 SCSI3 0/direct fixed naa.644a84202682df001d01986f0a483a1d sd0: 915200MB, 512 bytes/sector, 1874329600 sectors scsibus1 at mfii0: 256 targets ppb2 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 Intel E5 v3 PCIE rev 0x02 pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 ppb3 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 vendor PLX, unknown product 0x8733 rev 0xca pci4 at ppb3 bus 4 ppb4 at pci4 dev 8 function 0 vendor PLX, unknown product 0x8733 rev 0xca pci5 at ppb4 bus 5 ppb5 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 vendor PLX, unknown product 0x8780 rev 0xab pci6 at ppb5 bus 6 Intel E5 v3 Address Map rev 0x02 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 not configured Intel E5 v3 Hot Plug rev 0x02 at pci0 dev 5 function 1 not configured Intel E5 v3 Error Reporting rev 0x02 at pci0 dev 5 function 2 not configured Intel E5 v3 I/O APIC rev 0x02 at pci0 dev 5 function 4 not configured Intel C610 MS SPSR rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 not configured ahci0 at pci0 dev 17 function 4 Intel C610 AHCI rev 0x05: msi, AHCI 1.3 scsibus2 at ahci0: 32 targets Intel C610 MEI rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 22 function 0 not configured Intel C610 MEI rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 22 function 1 not configured ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel C610 USB rev 0x05: apic 8 int 18 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb6 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel C610 PCIE rev 0xd5 pci7 at ppb6 bus 7 ppb7 at pci0 dev 28 function 7 Intel C610 PCIE rev 0xd5: msi pci8 at ppb7 bus 8 ppb8 at pci8 dev 0 function 0 vendor Renesas, unknown product 0x001d rev 0x00 pci9 at ppb8 bus 9 ppb9 at pci9 dev 0 function 0 vendor Renesas, unknown product 0x001d rev 0x00 pci10 at ppb9 bus 10 ppb10 at pci10 dev 0 function 0 vendor Renesas, unknown product 0x001a rev 0x00 pci11 at ppb10 bus 11 vga1 at pci11 dev 0 function 0 Matrox MGA G200eR rev 0x01 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel C610 USB rev 0x05: apic 8 int 18 usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1 at usb1 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 Intel C610 LPC rev 0x05 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 not configured ahci1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel C610 AHCI rev 0x05: msi, AHCI 1.3 scsibus3 at ahci1: 32 targets pci12 at mainbus0 bus 255 Intel E5 v3 QPI rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 8 function 0 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 8 function 2 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 8 function 3 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 9 function 0 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 9 function 2 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 9 function 3 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI Monitor rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 11 function 0 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI Monitor rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 11 function 1 not configured Intel E5 v3 QPI Monitor rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 11 function 2 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 0 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 1 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 2 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 3 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 4 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 5 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 6 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 12 function 7 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 13 function 0 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 13 function 1 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 13 function 2 not configured Intel E5 v3 Unicast rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 13 function 3 not configured Intel E5 v3 Ring Agent rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 15 function 0 not configured Intel E5 v3 Ring Agent rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 15 function 1 not configured Intel E5 v3 Ring Agent rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 15 function 2 not configured Intel E5 v3 Ring Agent rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 15 function 3 not configured Intel E5 v3 SAD rev 0x02 at pci12 dev 15 function 4 not
hp dl360 gen9
Hi, I'm just starting to use hp dl360 gen9 servers with OpenBSD. With a few tweaks in the bios most stuff works fine: System Options o Processor Options - Hyperthreading - disable # HT does not help on a OpenBSD firewall - Core disable - 4 # That way the other cores can run at # higher speed - Processor x2apic support - disabled # if enabled OpenBSD only sees cpu0 and # not the others o USB Options - USB 3.0 Mode - disabled # with usb3 enabled the keyboard does not # work in boot promt o Boot Options - Boot Mode - legacy bios mode # disable uefi Unfortunately the serial console does not work. I try to use the virtual serial port via iLO. While I have access to the BIOS and the boot loader it stops working once the kernel starts. dmesg says: com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo com1: probed fifo depth: 0 bytes On gen8 servers also a ns16550a is recoginized and it works nicely. Anybody knows how to make this work? Below outputs from dmesg, pcidump and usbdevs. Remi OpenBSD 5.7 (GENERIC.MP) #881: Sun Mar 8 11:04:17 MDT 2015 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 68572934144 (65396MB) avail mem = 66743619584 (63651MB) mpath0 at root scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.8 @ 0x79173000 (218 entries) bios0: vendor HP version P89 date 03/05/2015 bios0: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP UEFI MCEJ SSDT HEST BERT ERST EINJ HPET PMCT WDDT APIC MCFG SRAT SPMI RASF SPCR MSCT BDAT PCCT SSDT SSDT SSDT DMAR acpi0: wakeup devices PEX4(S4) BR05(S4) BR03(S4) BR07(S4) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz, 2397.54 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 10 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges cpu0: apic clock running at 99MHz cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.2.0, IBE cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 12 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz, 2397.23 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu1: smt 0, core 6, package 0 cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor) cpu2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz, 2397.23 MHz cpu2: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu2: smt 0, core 1, package 0 cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 14 (application processor) cpu3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz, 2397.23 MHz cpu3: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu3: smt 0, core 7, package 0 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 8 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins ioapic1 at mainbus0: apid 9 pa 0xfec01000, version 20, 24 pins acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0x8000, bus 0-255 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 255 (UNC0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (PEX2) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (PEX4) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 3 (BR01) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 4 (BR05) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 5 (BR03) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 8 (BR07) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C2, C1 acpicpu1 at acpi0: C2, C1 acpicpu2 at acpi0: C2, C1 acpicpu3 at acpi0: C2, C1 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E5 v3 Host rev 0x02 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel E5 v3 PCIE rev 0x02 pci1 at ppb0 bus 3 ciss0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Hewlett-Packard Smart
Re: taking a shot from the webcamera
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:00:15PM +0300, Joseph Oficre wrote: | hello! | i know i can write some video with video utility, but how can i take a | shot from it? I cant find any information. I dont want to install something | big like Mplayer or what to do that, just i small command line stuff. | Maybe im too dumb to understand video man, but can u guys help me with it? There was a thread on this very topic just one month ago. I replied to it too: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=143445803307171w=2 Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd -- [++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+ +++-].++[-]+.--.[-] http://www.weirdnet.nl/
taking a shot from the webcamera
hello! i know i can write some video with video utility, but how can i take a shot from it? I cant find any information. I dont want to install something big like Mplayer or what to do that, just i small command line stuff. Maybe im too dumb to understand video man, but can u guys help me with it?
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote: The only non-intel machines that could be used as a desktop were PPC macs, but even those suffer today. Do you have any experience with SPARC64 VI/VII? I'm curious since I've thought this is the only chip which can give some hope for this so I'm curious if I've been wrong on this. Thanks, Karel
Re: taking a shot from the webcamera
Wow, thank u a lot, i saw this thread, but didnt see this reply. Ill try it! 2015-07-17 16:15 GMT+03:00 Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:00:15PM +0300, Joseph Oficre wrote: | hello! | i know i can write some video with video utility, but how can i take a | shot from it? I cant find any information. I dont want to install something | big like Mplayer or what to do that, just i small command line stuff. | Maybe im too dumb to understand video man, but can u guys help me with it? There was a thread on this very topic just one month ago. I replied to it too: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=143445803307171w=2 Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd -- [++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+ +++-].++[-]+.--.[-] http://www.weirdnet.nl/
Re: Audio Boost for Sndio
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:01:17AM -0700, tekk wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with audio on my 5.7 box (Thinkpad T430.) Audio is just a bit too quiet to be comfortable even when I have everything maxed out. I had a similar problem on Linux and I was able to create a boost device to feed audio through before it went to the speakers, could I do the same in OpenBSD? I've thrown in dmesg as well as mixerctl and audioctl output, not sure if anything else is needed. I remember reading that there was already some boost by default as well, but it defaulted to being maxed for me so it's not much help. I have the same troubles (with the same hardware). In most cases this is due to sound channels of movie clip - 6 or more channels. 2 channels' movies almost always playing perfect for me. Here is my solution for mplayer: mplayer -channels 6 -af pan=2:1:0:0:1:1:0:0:1:1.3:1.3:1:1 (see http://hddaudio.net/viewtopic.php?pid=105601#p105601 for more info) If it does not help, try to enable software mixer: mplayer -softvol -softvol-max 1000 (but it damage sound when player's volume is max) If you will find another solution for OpenBSD, please email me.
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
Hi, Mihai Popescu wrote: What are the minimum requirements for a decent SPARC machine? I mean by that a machine who is able to run OpenBSD as a desktop. I am currently use a Pentium 4 3.2GHz with 2 GB DDR and it barely meets my needs. Tell me please the CPU or the machine name, I will search the prices:-). if desktop includes browsing the answer is none. None that can won't be too big or too noisy. Your P4 is still a mighty machine as a CPU, but it is single-core and has a terribly long pipeline too: today for browsing and most web-based stuff it is just not enough, even a slower, but dual-core cpu works better. And you need a decent graphics card too. The only non-intel machines that could be used as a desktop were PPC macs, but even those suffer today. For all the rest, including development, compilation, email, newsgroup... even a decently fitted Ultra workstation could do. I used to have non intel hardware for everything, but today it is not feasible anymore. You just need an intel laptop for that convenience. Not only for the power, but also because Firefox friends often show bugs on non-intel. Furthermore if you do need Skype or other proprietary crap, you need Linux at least or directly Windows/Mac. I love all my alternative architectures and OS's... but I need to have a standard piece of hardware handy. A pity, but for my even basic needs it is that way. SSH to your sparc box, export display. Riccardo
Re: Softraid crypto - howto mount partitions from multiple devices at boot?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:17:16PM +0200 or thereabouts, Jan Vlach wrote: Hello misc, I have a small netbook with two flash devices - 32G and 4G. I'm using softraid crypto discipline with passphrase on the 32G one. That works fine. I would also like to use softraid crypto on the second (4G) device and have it also mounted at boot. How to achieve this? What is current best practice? Can the passphrase be shared between the devices or should a key device be used? I've checked the manual pages for softraid and bioctl, but I don't understand what is supposed to be a keydisk (partition? device holding a binary file to be used as a key? ) Thank you for clues Jan Isthis any help? http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20131112031806 M
Re: nat on addresses with different default routes
9 июля 2015 г., в 17:14, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com
написал(а):
Em 09-07-2015 02:27, lausg...@gmail.com escreveu:
Thank you for the answer! Indeed its a more correct approach.
Is there a simple way to teach (any openbsd compliant) dhcp client to use
mpath? Also not sure whether it will work in this
case:http://www.rinta-aho.org/blog/?p=214
I don't recall if the openbsd base dhclient have it, but you could possibly
use some that is on ports and make it not add the default routes. And, you
could make it call a script that creates them. They need to be created with
the -mpath modifier anyway.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Ok, so isc-dhclient + dhclient-script with this modification
http://www.rinta-aho.org/docs/openbsd-pf/dhclient-script.patch supplied to it +
route-to rules used like in http://www.rinta-aho.org/docs/openbsd-pf/pf.conf do
work.
However round-robin http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
construction doesn't work for this case.
Rule like
pass in on lan inet from lan:network to !lan:0 route-to { (cnmac1
gw_cnmac1), (cnmac2 gw_cnmac2) } round-robin
fails with
multiple tables or dynamic interfaces not supported for translation or routing
and I don't know other way of dynamic passing of gateways from dhclient to pf
for this rule without usage of multiple tables.
Re: hp dl360 gen9
Hey Remi, I'm just starting to use hp dl360 gen9 servers with OpenBSD. With a few tweaks in the bios most stuff works fine: System Options o Processor Options - Hyperthreading - disable # HT does not help on a OpenBSD firewall - Core disable - 4 # That way the other cores can run at # higher speed - Processor x2apic support - disabled # if enabled OpenBSD only sees cpu0 and # not the others o USB Options - USB 3.0 Mode - disabled # with usb3 enabled the keyboard does not # work in boot promt o Boot Options - Boot Mode - legacy bios mode # disable uefi Unfortunately the serial console does not work. I try to use the virtual serial port via iLO. While I have access to the BIOS and the boot loader it stops working once the kernel starts. dmesg says: com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo com1: probed fifo depth: 0 bytes On gen8 servers also a ns16550a is recoginized and it works nicely. Anybody knows how to make this work? To my knowledge it doesn’t ( I have a many gen9 systems in various configs ). Even on linux - to get the virtual serial console to work on the gen9 - it requires an iLO driver ( which is bundled with the linux kernel ). So unless some one ports that over, me are pretty much out of luck on any of the BSDs at the moment (unless you find a magical work around, but even HP has said this is the case). I’ve been working with a few HP engineers on allowing direct access to the serial device in a future iLO firmware, but in the mean time.. later, -bp
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:09:30 +0300 Mihai Popescu mih...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I never used a SPARC machine but I recall there are some people on the list doing this. What are the minimum requirements for a decent SPARC machine? I mean by that a machine who is able to run OpenBSD as a desktop. I am currently use a Pentium 4 3.2GHz with 2 GB DDR and it barely meets my needs. Tell me please the CPU or the machine name, I will search the prices :-). Thanks Hello Misc, As a new user, I find myself in the same position as the OP: very interested in non-Intel products. But there seems to be a vacuum of information around this topic. (Which tells me I'm on the right track) No operating system can protect itself from its own hardware. So how does one protect one's family in these hostile and trying times and what-not? The replies to the OP seem discouraging. If not Oracle, and not Fujitsu, then what? If not a sparc desktop, then what about a sparc router? A RISC anything?? I have yet to achieve that warm fuzzy feeling, and I fear that it is not within my reach. Long live Puffy! All the best, Keith Larsen CPS Coatings 318-222-6100
Re: Audio Boost for Sndio
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:47:16AM -0700, Артур Истомин wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:01:17AM -0700, tekk wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with audio on my 5.7 box (Thinkpad T430.) Audio is just a bit too quiet to be comfortable even when I have everything maxed out. I had a similar problem on Linux and I was able to create a boost device to feed audio through before it went to the speakers, could I do the same in OpenBSD? I've thrown in dmesg as well as mixerctl and audioctl output, not sure if anything else is needed. I remember reading that there was already some boost by default as well, but it defaulted to being maxed for me so it's not much help. I have the same troubles (with the same hardware). In most cases this is due to sound channels of movie clip - 6 or more channels. 2 channels' movies almost always playing perfect for me. Here is my solution for mplayer: mplayer -channels 6 -af pan=2:1:0:0:1:1:0:0:1:1.3:1.3:1:1 (see http://hddaudio.net/viewtopic.php?pid=105601#p105601 for more info) If it does not help, try to enable software mixer: mplayer -softvol -softvol-max 1000 (but it damage sound when player's volume is max) If you will find another solution for OpenBSD, please email me. I'm certain it's not an issue of sound channels since most of what I'm using sound for is stereo videos on youtube. I'll give the -softvol parameter a shot next time I'm on OpenBSD; hopefully mpv has it since it's an mplayer fork, but an actual way to fix this would be ideal; the fact that my mix device is capping out at 174 rather than 255 is very suspicious to me. Do you actually experience the same? When you run mixerctl it should say something like inputs.mix-0-2: 174,174 when you have your volume turned all the way up. I don't remember the device name exactly but it's along those lines.
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
Have you seen TemLib[1]? That's may be the way for SPARC, otherwise MIPS64/Octeon or ARM. Good luck! Karel [1]: http://temlib.org/site/ On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, BSD b...@cpscoatings.net wrote: On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:09:30 +0300 Mihai Popescu mih...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I never used a SPARC machine but I recall there are some people on the list doing this. What are the minimum requirements for a decent SPARC machine? I mean by that a machine who is able to run OpenBSD as a desktop. I am currently use a Pentium 4 3.2GHz with 2 GB DDR and it barely meets my needs. Tell me please the CPU or the machine name, I will search the prices :-). Thanks Hello Misc, As a new user, I find myself in the same position as the OP: very interested in non-Intel products. But there seems to be a vacuum of information around this topic. (Which tells me I'm on the right track) No operating system can protect itself from its own hardware. So how does one protect one's family in these hostile and trying times and what-not? The replies to the OP seem discouraging. If not Oracle, and not Fujitsu, then what? If not a sparc desktop, then what about a sparc router? A RISC anything?? I have yet to achieve that warm fuzzy feeling, and I fear that it is not within my reach. Long live Puffy! All the best, Keith Larsen CPS Coatings 318-222-6100
Re: nat on addresses with different default routes
Em 17-07-2015 14:17, lausg...@gmail.com escreveu:
Ok, so isc-dhclient + dhclient-script with this
modificationhttp://www.rinta-aho.org/docs/openbsd-pf/dhclient-script.patch
supplied to it + route-to rules used like
inhttp://www.rinta-aho.org/docs/openbsd-pf/pf.conf do work.
Nice to hear that. This script can sure be improved.
However round-robinhttp://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
construction doesn't work for this case.
Rule like
pass in on lan inet from lan:network to !lan:0 route-to { (cnmac1 gw_cnmac1), (cnmac2
gw_cnmac2) } round-robin
fails with
multiple tables or dynamic interfaces not supported for translation or routing
and I don't know other way of dynamic passing of gateways from dhclient to pf
for this rule without usage of multiple tables.
As I mentioned, I would use least-states, instead of round-robin. Also,
I had a similar issue and solved it using (egress). Since your
interfaces will have default routes, they will be all part of the egress
group. You can exploit that. Use tags and tcpdump to debug your rules, I
believe you can find a solution.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:45:23PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2015-07-17, BSD b...@cpscoatings.net wrote: As a new user, I find myself in the same position as the OP: very interested in non-Intel products. But there seems to be a vacuum of information around this topic. You're 15 years too late. x86 has won. Generally yes but there's still POWER8 and OpenPOWER group. They claim docs should be open and TYAN[1] has a cheap server with POWER8. IBM won't kill this HW as they invested money to have OpenStack running on it, they also ported KVM on POWER8. [1] http://www.tyan.com/solutions/tyan_openpower_system.html I suspect your diff was MIME encoded, and therefore got removed... Please be realistic.
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:45:23PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2015-07-17, BSD b...@cpscoatings.net wrote: As a new user, I find myself in the same position as the OP: very interested in non-Intel products. But there seems to be a vacuum of information around this topic. You're 15 years too late. x86 has won. Generally yes but there's still POWER8 and OpenPOWER group. They claim docs should be open and TYAN[1] has a cheap server with POWER8. IBM won't kill this HW as they invested money to have OpenStack running on it, they also ported KVM on POWER8. [1] http://www.tyan.com/solutions/tyan_openpower_system.html j.
PPPOE issue
Greetings I already posted this question here but i think i didn't explain very well, i have a issue in a openbsd 5.7 (tried also 5.6 and 5.5 same thing) with pppoe internet broadband connection , when i start the pppoe0 interface the connection does not estabilish and shows the message below repeatdly ,how can i troubleshoot this , does anyone here have any idea ? pppoe0: host unique tag found , but it belongs to a connection in state 3 pppoe: received PADO but could not find request for it Best Regards Dante F. B. Colò
Re: nat on addresses with different default routes
Em 17-07-2015 17:38, lausg...@gmail.com escreveu: Thanks much for all your good help! I will try it. No problem. For now I'm just still using probabilistic rules with quick keyword + fallback rule but using mpath instead of rdomain and this works smoothly now! If I recall correctly, you could mix mpath with rdomains. But, as much as I like rdomains, I still prefer mpath for multiple ISP's setups. If I'll need to setup multi-isp setup ever, I'll use anchors and make ifstated check for the gateways availability, and update the rules accordingly like you suggested. ifstated works great in this. It's a state machine, so you can code any scripts into it and handle very complex setups. The most complex I ever recall I've done was a firewall with 4 different ISP's, and a complex ruleset. There were all sorts of checks and failovers, lots of anchors. This was almost 10 years ago. Things have changed. But some didn't. Cheers, Giancarlo Razzolini
Re: PPPOE issue
Em 17-07-2015 18:56, Dante F. B. Colò escreveu: I already posted this question here but i think i didn't explain very well, i have a issue in a openbsd 5.7 (tried also 5.6 and 5.5 same thing) with pppoe internet broadband connection , when i start the pppoe0 interface the connection does not estabilish and shows the message below repeatdly ,how can i troubleshoot this , does anyone here have any idea ? pppoe0: host unique tag found , but it belongs to a connection in state 3 pppoe: received PADO but could not find request for it With only this there isn't much we can do to help you. How are you configuring you pppoe interface? What does tcpdump on the physical device tells you? I had some problems with more than one concentrator replying to PADI requests. Had to block it's MAC address requests using a bridge and mac filter rules. It wasn't ideal, but it worked. My ISP had a broken configuration where more than one concentrator would reply. They eventually fixed it, but I had to debug a lot to get to this. Perhaps you're seeing something similar. But without more information it's difficult to know. Cheers, Giancarlo Razzolini
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
On Jul 17, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote: On 2015-07-17, BSD b...@cpscoatings.net wrote: As a new user, I find myself in the same position as the OP: very interested in non-Intel products. But there seems to be a vacuum of information around this topic. You're 15 years too late. x86 has won. I couldn’t have said it better. To my knowledge - the fastest non-x86 desktop type system that OpenBSD runs on in the PowerMac G5, it’s 10 years old, and a nicely specked can cost almost as much as a much faster x86 box. Things like the BeagleBones and Edge Routers are great for what they are - be it a router or embedded platform or simple web server, etc. - but the modern desktop environment and things like firefox are just to slow on anything non intel esp. w/o accelerate graphics. Just how it is. -bp @creepingfur
Re: nat on addresses with different default routes
17 июля 2015 г., в 22:35, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com
написал(а):
Em 17-07-2015 14:17, lausg...@gmail.com escreveu:
Ok, so isc-dhclient + dhclient-script with this
modificationhttp://www.rinta-aho.org/docs/openbsd-pf/dhclient-script.patch
supplied to it + route-to rules used like
inhttp://www.rinta-aho.org/docs/openbsd-pf/pf.conf do work.
Nice to hear that. This script can sure be improved.
However round-robinhttp://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
construction doesn't work for this case.
Rule like
pass in on lan inet from lan:network to !lan:0 route-to { (cnmac1
gw_cnmac1), (cnmac2 gw_cnmac2) } round-robin
fails with
multiple tables or dynamic interfaces not supported for translation or
routing
and I don't know other way of dynamic passing of gateways from dhclient to
pf for this rule without usage of multiple tables.
As I mentioned, I would use least-states, instead of round-robin. Also, I had
a similar issue and solved it using (egress). Since your interfaces will have
default routes, they will be all part of the egress group. You can exploit
that. Use tags and tcpdump to debug your rules, I believe you can find a
solution.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Thanks much for all your good help! I will try it.
For now I'm just still using probabilistic rules with quick keyword + fallback
rule but using mpath instead of rdomain and this works smoothly now!
If I'll need to setup multi-isp setup ever, I'll use anchors and make ifstated
check for the gateways availability, and update the rules accordingly like you
suggested.
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
On 2015-07-17, BSD b...@cpscoatings.net wrote: As a new user, I find myself in the same position as the OP: very interested in non-Intel products. But there seems to be a vacuum of information around this topic. You're 15 years too late. x86 has won. -- Christian naddy Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Re: SPARC minimum hardware specification
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote: Generally yes but there's still POWER8 and OpenPOWER group. They claim docs should be open and TYAN[1] has a cheap server with POWER8. I would not bet on POWER8 on desktop, it's too big beast, rather on smaller ARMv8 which is already winning on mobile...
