Re: Xrandr.7.0 not found at packages install

[Theo de Raadt]

> Is it a common problem of "syncronization" for packages? If so, I can
> wait for another snapshot.

If someone doesn't update the X sets after a shlib crank, I update them as
soon as I notice the problem.  A new amd64 snap is 1 hour away, i386 a bit
longer, etc etc

Re: OpenBSD on AMD Embedded G-Series T40E APU?

[Theo de Raadt]

> Hey folks,
> 
> The website does not seem to have a lot of info on what CPUs are
> supported.  I'm looking at this box for a home firewall with OpenBSD
> 
> http://www.corpshadow.biz/bizstore/apu1d-red-combo-kit-p-345.html?cPath=51

All of them work.

OpenBSD on AMD Embedded G-Series T40E APU?

[Alan McKay]

Hey folks,

The website does not seem to have a lot of info on what CPUs are
supported.  I'm looking at this box for a home firewall with OpenBSD

http://www.corpshadow.biz/bizstore/apu1d-red-combo-kit-p-345.html?cPath=51

thanks,
-Alan

-- 
"You should sit in nature for 20 minutes a day.
 Unless you are busy, then you should sit for an hour"
 - Zen Proverb

Re: openbsd on an ibm power 5

[Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado]

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:43:20PM +0100, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have an IBM INTELLISTATION 285 POWER 5+ and i was thinkig about running 
> OpenBSD on it. Has anyone tried it before and would so kind as to share his 
> experience?

POWER systems are not supported by OpenBSD.

-- 
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info

Re: openbsd on an ibm power 5

[Michael McConville]

Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
> I have an IBM INTELLISTATION 285 POWER 5+ and i was thinkig about
> running OpenBSD on it. Has anyone tried it before and would so kind as
> to share his experience?

I think we only support Apple PowerPC machines (the macppc port). I've
often wondered how easily this could be ported to more recent POWER
machines, but I seriously doubt it'd run out of the box.

Re: BGPD not adding routes

[Claudio Jeker]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 10:10:37PM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Hello @misc,
> 
> I am running OpenBSD 5.8 release and I am finding that BGPD is not adding
> routes. When I type bgpctl show rib, I don't see any routes added. Did I
> goof up this configuration? Below are my bgpd.conf files. I do not even see
> any routes added when I run route -T1 show. I have no problems with my OSPF
> and LDPD setup.
> 
> /etc/bgpd.conf
> router-id 10.254.254.1
> AS 65001
> rdomain 1 {
>  descr CUSTOMER1
>  rd 65001:1
>  import-target rt 65001:1
>  export-target rt 65001:1
>  network inet connected
>  network 0.0.0.0/0
> }
> group ibgp {
>  announce IPv4 unicast
>  announce IPv4 vpn
>  remote-as 65001
>  depend on mpe0
>  local-address 10.254.254.1
>  neighbor 10.254.254.2 {
>   descr PE2
>  }
> }

You should move the "depend on mpe0" into the rdomain specification.
Make sure with bgpctl show nei that the session is up and running.
Also check with bgpctl show fib and bgpctl show fib table 1 if routes are
picked up.

> 
> /etc/bgpd.conf
> router-id 10.254.254.2
> AS 65001
> rdomain 1 {
>  descr CUSTOMER1
>  rd 65001:1
>  import-target rt 65001:1
>  export-target rt 65001:1
>  network inet connected
> }
> group ibgp {
>  announce IPv4 unicast
>  announce IPv4 vpn
>  remote-as 65001
>  depend on mpe0
>  local-address 10.254.254.2
>  neighbor 10.254.254.1 {
>   descr PE1
>  }
> }
> 
> Thanks much,
> Matt
> 

-- 
:wq Claudio

openbsd on an ibm power 5

[Maciej Jan Broniarz]

Hi,

I have an IBM INTELLISTATION 285 POWER 5+ and i was thinkig about running 
OpenBSD on it. Has anyone tried it before and would so kind as to share his 
experience?

All best,
mjb

Xrandr.7.0 not found at packages install

[Mihai Popescu]

Hello,

I am using a snapshot #1902 for amd64 downloaded from
ftp2.eu.openbsd.org, dated March 6, 2016. The install works fine, i
selected all sets for install, but whenever i try to install some
packages after that i get the following message:

Can't install  because of libraries
| library Xrandr.7.0 not found
| not found anywhere

Is it a common problem of "syncronization" for packages? If so, I can
wait for another snapshot.

Dmesg with the first 2 lines removed (they are from an old snapshot):

real mem = 8029429760 (7657MB)
avail mem = 7781957632 (7421MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.6 @ 0xeebc0 (57 entries)
bios0: vendor LENOVO version "9VKT33AUS" date 09/11/2013
bios0: LENOVO 1990RZ2
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC TCPA MCFG SLIC MCFG HPET SSDT
acpi0: wakeup devices PCE2(S4) PCE3(S4) PCE4(S4) PCE5(S4) PCE6(S4)
PCE7(S4) PCE9(S4) PCEA(S4) PCEB(S4) PCEC(S4) SBAZ(S4) PS2K(S3)
PS2M(S3) P0PC(S4) PE20(S4) PE21(S4) [...]
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 32 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 B26 Processor, 3194.57 MHz
cpu0: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,M
\
MX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT,SSE3,MWAIT,CX16,POPCNT,NXE,MMXX,FFXSR,PAGE1GB,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW,L
\

AHF,CMPLEG,SVM,EAPICSP,AMCR8,ABM,SSE4A,MASSE,3DNOWP,OSVW,IBS,SKINIT,NO
\
DEID,ITSC
cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 1MB
64b/line 16-way L2 cache
cpu0: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 16 4MB entries fully associative
cpu0: DTLB 48 4KB entries fully associative, 48 4MB entries fully associative
cpu0: AMD erratum 721 detected and fixed
cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 8 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges
cpu0: apic clock running at 199MHz
cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, IBE
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
cpu1: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 B26 Processor, 3192.02 MHz
cpu1: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,M
\
MX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT,SSE3,MWAIT,CX16,POPCNT,NXE,MMXX,FFXSR,PAGE1GB,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW,L
\

AHF,CMPLEG,SVM,EAPICSP,AMCR8,ABM,SSE4A,MASSE,3DNOWP,OSVW,IBS,SKINIT,NO
\
DEID,ITSC
cpu1: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 1MB
64b/line 16-way L2 cache
cpu1: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 16 4MB entries fully associative
cpu1: DTLB 48 4KB entries fully associative, 48 4MB entries fully associative
cpu1: AMD erratum 721 detected and fixed
cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 3 pa 0xfec0, version 21, 24 pins
acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255
acpimcfg1 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318180 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P1)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE2)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE3)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE4)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE5)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE6)
acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE7)
acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE9)
acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCEA)
acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus 2 (P0PC)
acpiprt11 at acpi0: bus 3 (PE20)
acpiprt12 at acpi0: bus -1 (PE21)
acpiprt13 at acpi0: bus -1 (PE22)
acpiprt14 at acpi0: bus 4 (PE23)
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C1(@1 halt!), PSS
acpicpu1 at acpi0: C1(@1 halt!), PSS
acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
cpu0: 3194 MHz: speeds: 3200 2500 1900 800 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "AMD RS880 Host" rev 0x00
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 unknown vendor 0x17aa product 0x9602 rev 0x00
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
radeondrm0 at pci1 dev 5 function 0 "ATI Radeon HD 4250" rev 0x00
drm0 at radeondrm0
radeondrm0: apic 3 int 18
ahci0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "ATI SBx00 SATA" rev 0x00: apic 3 int
19, AHCI 1.2
ahci0: port 0: 3.0Gb/s
ahci0: port 1: 1.5Gb/s
scsibus1 at ahci0: 32 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0:  SCSI3
0/direct fixed naa.50014ee1018094dc
sd0: 305245MB, 512 bytes/sector, 625142448 sectors
cd0 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0:  ATAPI
5/cdrom removable
ohci0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 "ATI SB700 USB" rev 0x00: apic 3 int
18, version 1.0, legacy support
ehci0 at pci0 dev 18 function 2 "ATI SB700 USB2" rev 0x00: apic 3 int 17
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 "ATI EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ohci1 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 "ATI SB700 USB" rev 0x00: apic 3 int
18, version 1.0, legacy support
ehci1 at pci0 dev 19 function 2 "ATI SB700 USB2" rev 0x00: apic 3 int 17
usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0
uhub1 at usb1 "ATI EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
piixpm0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "ATI SBx00 SMBus" rev 0x42: polling
iic0 at piixpm0
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x52: 4GB DDR3 SDRAM PC3-10600
spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x53: 4GB DDR3 SDRAM PC3-10600
azalia0 at pci0 dev 20 function 2 "ATI SBx00 HD Audio" rev 0x40: apic 3 int 16
azalia0: codecs: Realtek 

Re: iMac computer. Which architecture. macppc?

[Chris Bennett]

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:36:02PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:34:18AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> 
> > A friend found one outside at an apartment complex.
> > The display is messed up but it boots cleanly to whatever OS it has.
> > I didn't care, could see enough on screen to be sure it works.
> > It's a one piece system.
> > I assume I just need to get a display port adaptor.
> > I'm going to bring it here in about a week or two.
> > 
> > Which 5.9 -current should I download?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Chris Bennett
> 
> Just look up the model number on the case and google it. It is not
> hard, and better than us guessing.
> 
>   -Otto
> 

I will. I was extremely rushed to get to Mexico to bring my Dad his
heart medicines. Just hoping that there was an obvious answer, I didn't
have time to do a tenth of the things I had to do.

Thanks for the help. Will see when I get back. I would like to add
macppc for testing.

Chris Bennett

Re: Supermicro AOC-SG-I2 (two ports Intel 82575EB) hwfeatures

[Atanas Vladimirov]

Hi,
Here is the output from Linux[0] and FreeBSD[1].
It seems that hwfeatures (CSUM_TCPv4,CSUM_UDPv4,VLAN_HWTAGGING and even 
more) are working.

My doubt for hardware problem is no more.
Do you have any thoughts? Shall I send a report to bugs@?

[0] Linux ubuntu 4.2.0-16-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 8 15:35:06 UTC 
2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


# ethtool enp2s0f0
Settings for enp2s0f0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supported pause frame use: Symmetric
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 1
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: on (auto)
Supports Wake-on: pumbg
Wake-on: g
Current message level: 0x0007 (7)
   drv probe link
Link detected: yes

# ethtool -k enp2s0f0
Features for enp2s0f0:
rx-checksumming: on
tx-checksumming: on
tx-checksum-ipv4: on
tx-checksum-ip-generic: off [fixed]
tx-checksum-ipv6: on
tx-checksum-fcoe-crc: off [fixed]
tx-checksum-sctp: off [fixed]
scatter-gather: on
tx-scatter-gather: on
tx-scatter-gather-fraglist: off [fixed]
tcp-segmentation-offload: on
tx-tcp-segmentation: on
tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-tcp6-segmentation: on
udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed]
generic-segmentation-offload: on
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-offload: on
tx-vlan-offload: on
ntuple-filters: off [fixed]
receive-hashing: on
highdma: on [fixed]
rx-vlan-filter: on [fixed]
vlan-challenged: off [fixed]
tx-lockless: off [fixed]
netns-local: off [fixed]
tx-gso-robust: off [fixed]
tx-fcoe-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gre-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-ipip-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-sit-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed]
fcoe-mtu: off [fixed]
tx-nocache-copy: off
loopback: off [fixed]
rx-fcs: off [fixed]
rx-all: off
tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed]
l2-fwd-offload: off [fixed]
busy-poll: off [fixed]

NIC statistics:
 rx_packets: 2794435
 tx_packets: 2794311
 rx_bytes: 285057480
 tx_bytes: 285025784
 rx_broadcast: 289
 tx_broadcast: 17
 rx_multicast: 300
 tx_multicast: 196
 multicast: 300
 collisions: 0
 rx_crc_errors: 196
 rx_no_buffer_count: 0
 rx_missed_errors: 0
 tx_aborted_errors: 0
 tx_carrier_errors: 0
 tx_window_errors: 0
 tx_abort_late_coll: 0
 tx_deferred_ok: 0
 tx_single_coll_ok: 0
 tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
 tx_timeout_count: 0
 rx_long_length_errors: 0
 rx_short_length_errors: 0
 rx_align_errors: 0
 tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
 tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
 rx_flow_control_xon: 0
 rx_flow_control_xoff: 0
 tx_flow_control_xon: 0
 tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
 rx_long_byte_count: 285057480
 tx_dma_out_of_sync: 0
 tx_smbus: 0
 rx_smbus: 0
 dropped_smbus: 0
 os2bmc_rx_by_bmc: 0
 os2bmc_tx_by_bmc: 0
 os2bmc_tx_by_host: 0
 os2bmc_rx_by_host: 0
 tx_hwtstamp_timeouts: 0
 rx_hwtstamp_cleared: 0
 rx_errors: 357
 tx_errors: 0
 tx_dropped: 0
 rx_length_errors: 0
 rx_over_errors: 0
 rx_frame_errors: 0
 rx_fifo_errors: 0
 tx_fifo_errors: 0
 tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
 tx_queue_0_packets: 69
 tx_queue_0_bytes: 5189
 tx_queue_0_restart: 0
 tx_queue_1_packets: 2794091
 tx_queue_1_bytes: 273827770
 tx_queue_1_restart: 0
 tx_queue_2_packets: 118
 tx_queue_2_bytes: 12713
 tx_queue_2_restart: 0
 tx_queue_3_packets: 33
 tx_queue_3_bytes: 1900
 tx_queue_3_restart: 0
 rx_queue_0_packets: 412
 rx_queue_0_bytes: 47167
 rx_queue_0_drops: 0
 rx_queue_0_csum_err: 0
 rx_queue_0_alloc_failed: 0
 rx_queue_1_packets: 191
 rx_queue_1_bytes: 26850
 rx_queue_1_drops: 0
 rx_queue_1_csum_err: 0
 rx_queue_1_alloc_failed: 0
 rx_queue_2_packets: 2793730
 rx_queue_2_bytes: 273785540
 rx_queue_2_drops: 0
 rx_queue_2_csum_err: 0
 rx_queue_2_alloc_failed: 0
 rx_queue_3_packets: 102
 rx_queue_3_bytes: 20387
 rx_queue_3_drops: 0
 rx_queue_3_csum_err: 0
 rx_queue_3_alloc_failed: 0

[1] FreeBSD-current

# ifconfig
igb0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 
1500


options=403bb
ether 

Re: root partition is 105%, what will happen if I just leave it?

[Nick]

I eventually found the culprit after a 'du -h /dev'

..found a file '/dev/sd2' there with 937M! No idea how or what I had done to 
create it, but my guess is it was whilst learning how to properly mount 
devices. Anyway, I deleted it. All fine and back to normal. System working fine.





 Original Message 
Subject: Re: root partition is 105%, what will happen if I just leave it?
Local Time: March 6, 2016 11:47 AM
UTC Time: March 6, 2016 11:47 AM
From: es...@nerim.net
To: s...@protonmail.com
CC: misc@openbsd.org

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 11:49:37AM -0500, Nick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used the default partition layout when I set up this system (5.8 - CD 
> release) a few weeks ago..
>
> Just realised after a 'du -h' that the root partition is at 105%.. Now, I 
> know that OpenBSD has a safeguard in place of 5% of partition capacity for 
> scenarios like these and I of course have hit thatmax extra 5%.. question is, 
> what happens if I were to not try to expand the partition - what problems 
> might I start facing? i.e. Could I afford to be lazy until 5.9 is sent out.

Did you get some kind of crash ? the simplest culprit is lost+found.

Re: iMac computer. Which architecture. macppc?

[Otto Moerbeek]

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:34:18AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:

> A friend found one outside at an apartment complex.
> The display is messed up but it boots cleanly to whatever OS it has.
> I didn't care, could see enough on screen to be sure it works.
> It's a one piece system.
> I assume I just need to get a display port adaptor.
> I'm going to bring it here in about a week or two.
> 
> Which 5.9 -current should I download?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris Bennett

Just look up the model number on the case and google it. It is not
hard, and better than us guessing.

-Otto

Re: iMac computer. Which architecture. macppc?

[Brandon Vincent]

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas  wrote:
> If it has a display port, I think it must be amd64. I’m not sure PPC mac
had
> something else than DVI.

PPC iMacs were dead by the time DisplayPort was conceptualized.

Brandon Vincent

Re: updating src with cvs

[Edgar Pettijohn]

On 03/06/16 00:18, Philip Guenther wrote:

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Edgar Pettijohn
 wrote:

I've noticed a lot of my source files seem to get globbed up.  Below is an
example:

...

What could cause this?

Source files expect your viewer/editor to have tabstops on 8 character
boundaries.  Files that have spaces before tabs can confuse some
viewers, causing them to misalign output.


Philip Guenther

That was it.  I forgot I had changed tabstop in .vimrc

Re: root partition is 105%, what will happen if I just leave it?

[Alexander Hall]

On March 5, 2016 8:24:23 PM GMT+01:00, Nick Holland 
 wrote:
>On 03/05/16 11:49, Nick wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I used the default partition layout when I set up this system (5.8 -
>> CD release) a few weeks ago..
>> 
>> Just realised after a 'du -h' that the root partition is at 105%..
>> Now, I know that OpenBSD has a safeguard in place of 5% of partition
>> capacity for scenarios like these and I of course have hit thatmax
>> extra 5%.. question is, what happens if I were to not try to expand
>> the partition - what problems might I start facing? i.e. Could I
>> afford to be lazy until 5.9 is sent out.
>
>1) note that you are at 105%, not 104%...so most likely, you have
>already run out of space and lost some data somewhere.

Well, it's not 5% extra but 5% less, and 1/0.95 = 1.0526... So, depending on 
how the calculation is done, he could be crazy lucky so far. ;-)

That said, waiting for disaster when you could have fixed it beforehands, 
you'll get what you deserve. Also, unless your disk is really small, you really 
shouldn't have anything filling up your root partition... 

/Alexander 

>
>2) if you have anything resembling a healthy partitioning scheme, you
>shouldn't be at this point.  So either your partitioning is really bad
>or you have some other error taking place (i.e., lost data "under" a
>mount, storing data in /etc, /dev, /root or some other root partition
>directory).
>
>3) The only way this gets easier with time is getting hit by a bus so
>you don't have to deal with it.
>
>Thus... I'd suggest fixing it now.  Depending on the error, it might be
>an easy fix.
>
>"du" is your friend.
>
>Nick.

Re: iMac computer. Which architecture. macppc?

[Jean-Daniel Dupas]

If it has a display port, I think it must be amd64. I’m not sure PPC mac had
something else than DVI.

> Le 6 mars 2016 à 14:59, Bryan Everly  a écrit :
>
> Depends on the age. If it is basically "all screen" and indicates G5
> on the back then macppc. If not a G5, then amd64. If it is a crt or
> the one that looks like a desk lamp, macppc.
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan
>
>> On Mar 6, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Chris Bennett
 wrote:
>>
>> A friend found one outside at an apartment complex.
>> The display is messed up but it boots cleanly to whatever OS it has.
>> I didn't care, could see enough on screen to be sure it works.
>> It's a one piece system.
>> I assume I just need to get a display port adaptor.
>> I'm going to bring it here in about a week or two.
>>
>> Which 5.9 -current should I download?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris Bennett

Re: iMac computer. Which architecture. macppc?

[Bryan Everly]

Depends on the age. If it is basically "all screen" and indicates G5
on the back then macppc. If not a G5, then amd64. If it is a crt or
the one that looks like a desk lamp, macppc.

Thanks,
Bryan

> On Mar 6, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Chris Bennett 
>  wrote:
>
> A friend found one outside at an apartment complex.
> The display is messed up but it boots cleanly to whatever OS it has.
> I didn't care, could see enough on screen to be sure it works.
> It's a one piece system.
> I assume I just need to get a display port adaptor.
> I'm going to bring it here in about a week or two.
>
> Which 5.9 -current should I download?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris Bennett

iMac computer. Which architecture. macppc?

[Chris Bennett]

A friend found one outside at an apartment complex.
The display is messed up but it boots cleanly to whatever OS it has.
I didn't care, could see enough on screen to be sure it works.
It's a one piece system.
I assume I just need to get a display port adaptor.
I'm going to bring it here in about a week or two.

Which 5.9 -current should I download?

Thanks,
Chris Bennett

Re: root partition is 105%, what will happen if I just leave it?

[Marc Espie]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 11:49:37AM -0500, Nick wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I used the default partition layout when I set up this system (5.8 - CD 
> release) a few weeks ago..
> 
> Just realised after a 'du -h' that the root partition is at 105%.. Now, I 
> know that OpenBSD has a safeguard in place of 5% of partition capacity for 
> scenarios like these and I of course have hit thatmax extra 5%.. question is, 
> what happens if I were to not try to expand the partition - what problems 
> might I start facing? i.e. Could I afford to be lazy until 5.9 is sent out.

Did you get some kind of crash ? the simplest culprit is lost+found.

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

[ludovic coues]

2016-03-06 11:21 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
> On 2016/03/06 09:07, ludovic coues wrote:
>> 2016-03-05 22:56 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
>> >
>> > For OpenSMTPD I haven't tried it but I suspect you may be able to do
>> > this with a virtual map using a python script via table-python (in
>> > ooensmtpd-extras in ports) but there isn't much documentation for
>> > this. Though actually a quick search for "opensmtpd table-python"
>> > throws up https://gist.github.com/unconfigured/e72a18f3dd12f7c4fc5c
>> > which looks pretty much like what you need there.
>> >
>>
>> OpenSMTPD in base 5.8 support sqlite table which might be enough.
>
> The mapping would need to be something like 'foo-...@example.com' -> 'foo'
> or 'foo-...@example.com' -> 'example', I don't see how to do this with the
> string handling functions available in sqlite. (And in 5.9+ the sqlite
> table is in opensmtpd-extras as well).
>

I might be missing some corner-case but "instr" look like a good fit.

  sqlite > create table user (username text, uid int, gid int, home text);
  sqlite > insert into user values ("foo", 1000, 10, "/home/foo");
  sqlite > insert into user values ("bar", 1001, 10, "/home/bar");
  sqlite > select * from user where instr("foo-...@exemple.com", username) = 1;
  foo

I assume it would work roughly the same for alias.
In the end, it's a matter of personal preference, even more if support
for sqlite is dropped from base.



-- 

Cordialement, Coues Ludovic
+336 148 743 42

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

[Stuart Henderson]

On 2016/03/06 09:07, ludovic coues wrote:
> 2016-03-05 22:56 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
> >
> > For OpenSMTPD I haven't tried it but I suspect you may be able to do
> > this with a virtual map using a python script via table-python (in
> > ooensmtpd-extras in ports) but there isn't much documentation for
> > this. Though actually a quick search for "opensmtpd table-python"
> > throws up https://gist.github.com/unconfigured/e72a18f3dd12f7c4fc5c
> > which looks pretty much like what you need there.
> >
> 
> OpenSMTPD in base 5.8 support sqlite table which might be enough.

The mapping would need to be something like 'foo-...@example.com' -> 'foo'
or 'foo-...@example.com' -> 'example', I don't see how to do this with the
string handling functions available in sqlite. (And in 5.9+ the sqlite
table is in opensmtpd-extras as well).

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

[ludovic coues]

2016-03-05 22:56 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
>
> For OpenSMTPD I haven't tried it but I suspect you may be able to do
> this with a virtual map using a python script via table-python (in
> ooensmtpd-extras in ports) but there isn't much documentation for
> this. Though actually a quick search for "opensmtpd table-python"
> throws up https://gist.github.com/unconfigured/e72a18f3dd12f7c4fc5c
> which looks pretty much like what you need there.
>

OpenSMTPD in base 5.8 support sqlite table which might be enough.

-- 

Cordialement, Coues Ludovic
+336 148 743 42