Re: Modern browser for OpenBSD powerpc

2019-05-25 Thread Riccardo Mottola

Hi Jordan,


On 5/25/19 8:13 PM, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:


Riccardo

[1] : Official Repo: https://github.com/wicknix/Arctic-Fox

[2] : My current working fork, which gets regularly pulled into main: 
https://github.com/rmottola/Arctic-Fox






If you're going down that path, you should see if you can get 
TenFourFox to compile. TenFourFox does have a jit and supports altivec.



http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/

https://github.com/classilla/tenfourfox



I do know about TenFourFox - having contributed to it myself and having 
worked on making on i386 again. An interesting fork, the best thing you 
can get on a PPC 10.4 or 10.5 Mac! However, the code is very Mac specific.


ArcticFox derives from PaleMoon 27 and thus is more portable, but 
improved build and compiler compatibility. Of course, in the long term, 
it would be delicious to merge in TenFourFox's PPC JIT! AF and PaleMoon 
are not so "refined" as TenFourFox which really backported a lot of 
FireFox stuff


Yet, ArcticFox allows you to use stuff like yahoo mail, gmail and 
facebook, if needed. It doesn't work well enough for github, which is 
now a monster.


I'd be interested to know if OpenBSD/PPC works... or try to help, in case.

In the meanwhile, I think ArcticFox will fit the OP needs: you can 
access gmail and yahoo mail



Help for ArcticFox... generally appreciated!




Riccardo



Re: Missing file and Man page for out-of-date

2019-05-25 Thread Marc Espie
As for the full story, this is a whole sequence of events.

Committee decided ports/infrastructure/man  didn't belong in default
manpath, because it's not part of sacro-sanct base.

Fine, let's move the man pages to base.

And then, Theo said some of those names are way too generic, we can't
have manpages with such names (and on that point, he is right).

Fine, I renamed generic programs to port-something, or pkg_whatever.

Sorry about the README, I plain forgot about that.



Re: Missing file and Man page for out-of-date

2019-05-25 Thread Patrick Harper
It was renamed to pkg_outdated.

-- 
  Patrick Harper
  paia...@fastmail.com

On Sat, 25 May 2019, at 22:17, Michael Alaimo wrote:
> The /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/out-of-date program is missing.
> 
> I remember it being in OpenBSD 6.3.
> 
> It is still referenced in /usr/ports/infrastructure/README in OpenBSD 6.5.
> 
> It is listed with description:
> bin/out-of-date
> Compare installed registered packages with INDEX, try to find out
> of date ports.
> 
> Is it possible to get the script back into ports for OpenBSD 6.5?
> 
> Does anyone know what happened with it?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael
> 
> http://quantum-foam.org/
> 
>



Missing file and Man page for out-of-date

2019-05-25 Thread Michael Alaimo
The /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/out-of-date program is missing.

I remember it being in OpenBSD 6.3.

It is still referenced in /usr/ports/infrastructure/README in OpenBSD 6.5.

It is listed with description:
bin/out-of-date
Compare installed registered packages with INDEX, try to find out
of date ports.

Is it possible to get the script back into ports for OpenBSD 6.5?

Does anyone know what happened with it?

Regards,

Michael

http://quantum-foam.org/



Re: Modern browser for OpenBSD powerpc

2019-05-25 Thread Patrick Harper
Binaries stopped being committed to the Mozilla archive after 52.0.2 but the 
port seems to be active. I assume 60esr is supposed to work on sparc (still) as 
some recent patches refer to it in the filenames.

-- 
  Patrick Harper
  paia...@fastmail.com

On Sat, 25 May 2019, at 18:54, john o goyo wrote:
> On 05/25/19 11:41, Patrick Harper wrote:
> > Oracle's Beijing Team maintains a port of FF60esr for Solaris/sparc that 
> > might be useful (another mostly big-endian arch).
> >
> > https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/tree/master/components/desktop/firefox
> Excuse my ignorance but is it really Sparc?  When Oracle laid off Ginn 
> Chen, who contributed the Sparc build to Mozilla, I thought that was the 
> end of Firefox on Sparc.
> 
> jog
> 
>



Re: Modern browser for OpenBSD powerpc

2019-05-25 Thread Jordan Geoghegan



On 5/25/19 4:00 AM, Riccardo Mottola wrote:

Hi,

On 5/23/19 8:19 AM, John Gould wrote:

Can someone suggest a modern graphical browser for OpenBSD PowerPC?
I'm trying to run
several G5's and g4 mini's on 6.5 as desktop machines. The basic
install works really well but there doesn't seem to be an up to date
graphically browser.

It's thanks to all the work the devs have put into OpenBSD powerpc
that these machine are still very usable. They are hopelessly out of
date as far as the Mac OS are concerned!



you might try ArcticFox, it has a decent success on Linux PowerPC. 
Several endianness fixes were imported.


It is not "totally" modern, but still more modern than Dillo. Beware 
that you need at least 1G of RAM to be of decent use with modern 
websites, 2GB is better.


Although it is of PaleMoon heritage and thus Linux/Mac heritage, I 
fixed compilation on NetBSD, OpenBSD and lately even FreeBSD compiles 
out of the box.



Beware however, that while perfectly usable on older x86, it has no 
working JIT, so JS intensive websites will be slow on PowerPC. Also 
compilation on OpenBSD/ppc was never attempted by me, only on 
Linux/PPC. OpenBSD amd64 however does work.



Riccardo

[1] : Official Repo: https://github.com/wicknix/Arctic-Fox

[2] : My current working fork, which gets regularly pulled into main: 
https://github.com/rmottola/Arctic-Fox






If you're going down that path, you should see if you can get TenFourFox 
to compile. TenFourFox does have a jit and supports altivec.



http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/

https://github.com/classilla/tenfourfox



Re: Modern browser for OpenBSD powerpc

2019-05-25 Thread john o goyo

On 05/25/19 11:41, Patrick Harper wrote:

Oracle's Beijing Team maintains a port of FF60esr for Solaris/sparc that might 
be useful (another mostly big-endian arch).

https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/tree/master/components/desktop/firefox
Excuse my ignorance but is it really Sparc?  When Oracle laid off Ginn 
Chen, who contributed the Sparc build to Mozilla, I thought that was the 
end of Firefox on Sparc.


jog



Re: PF firewall for desktop

2019-05-25 Thread James Huddle
I like your suggestion!  I am security paranoid to a fault.  For me, a
system is either rock solid or wide open.  obsd is the closest I've found
to rock solid, and frankly a virtualbox vm running on win7 feels wide
open.  But the more I thought about your idea, the more I liked it.  Win7
w/o the virtual firewall is more simply at risk, so why not?
Seeing as I am still new to OpenBSD, I would probably have 2 vms: bsd1
passes everything incoming to bsd2 (the firewall), then bsd1 quietly logs
what goes out to check for nefarious-looking packets.  That would take two
separate boxes to even start building, without vms.  The VMs can fight and
die and be replaced, and even a noob like myself can learn what works
better and harder.

Can't wait to set something up.
-Jim

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:38 PM Jean-Francois Simon 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Out of interest, I'd like to let you know a specific use of OpenBSD with
> PF, in virtualbox, 2 virtual network card Bridged to physical NIC, and
> building up a subnet with NAT and hence running Packet Filter as the
> machine's firewall.
>
>
> That's the firewall I use under Win7, OpenBSD running in a VM, out of
> pure interest into running BSD and let it purify the network access to
> desktop (without need for additional hardware).
>
>
> Works well, love it.
>
>
> Jean-François
>
>


Re: Modern browser for OpenBSD powerpc

2019-05-25 Thread Patrick Harper
Oracle's Beijing Team maintains a port of FF60esr for Solaris/sparc that might 
be useful (another mostly big-endian arch).

https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/tree/master/components/desktop/firefox

-- 
  Patrick Harper
  paia...@fastmail.com

On Sat, 25 May 2019, at 12:54, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/23/19 8:19 AM, John Gould wrote:
> > Can someone suggest a modern graphical browser for OpenBSD PowerPC?
> > I'm trying to run
> > several G5's and g4 mini's on 6.5 as desktop machines. The basic
> > install works really well but there doesn't seem to be an up to date
> > graphically browser.
> >
> > It's thanks to all the work the devs have put into OpenBSD powerpc
> > that these machine are still very usable. They are hopelessly out of
> > date as far as the Mac OS are concerned!
> 
> 
> you might try ArcticFox, it has a decent success on Linux PowerPC. 
> Several endianness fixes were imported.
> 
> It is not "totally" modern, but still more modern than Dillo. Beware 
> that you need at least 1G of RAM to be of decent use with modern 
> websites, 2GB is better.
> 
> Although it is of PaleMoon heritage and thus Linux/Mac heritage, I fixed 
> compilation on NetBSD, OpenBSD and lately even FreeBSD compiles out of 
> the box.
> 
> 
> Beware however, that while perfectly usable on older x86, it has no 
> working JIT, so JS intensive websites will be slow on PowerPC. Also 
> compilation on OpenBSD/ppc was never attempted by me, only on Linux/PPC. 
> OpenBSD amd64 however does work.
> 
> 
> Riccardo
> 
> [1] : Official Repo: https://github.com/wicknix/Arctic-Fox
> 
> [2] : My current working fork, which gets regularly pulled into main: 
> https://github.com/rmottola/Arctic-Fox
> 
> 
> 
> 
>



Re: OpenBSD on thinkpad x280

2019-05-25 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
> On 25/05/2019, Timo Myyrä  wrote:
> > Tristan Pilat  writes:
> >
> >> Hi OpenBSD users and devs!
> >>
> >> I got a new laptop in January, a thinkpad x280. At that time my system
> >> running 'current' was very slow and I assumed the video acceleration
> >> wasn't working so I just sadly stuck with Debian for a while. I then
> >> saw that an update of the inteldrm landed in current a month ago or so
> >> so I tried yesterday to reinstall current. Unfortunately the system is
> >> still barely usable. Could you guys tell me why the video acceleration
> >> isn't handled? Isn't Kaby lake compatible for now? I saw this article
> >> (https://jcs.org/2017/05/22/xiaomiair) which says it is.
> >>
> 
> You may have to adjust the aperture
> See /etc/examples/sysctl.conf
> 
> #machdep.allowaperture=2  # See xf86(4)
> 

Nope. That does not help. I bet the issue is not related to anything
related to inteldrm. It is most probably an interrupt storm happening
because of Thunderbolt 3. At least that seems to be something people
complained about.

-- 
:wq Claudio



Re: OpenBSD on thinkpad x280

2019-05-25 Thread Maurice McCarthy
On 25/05/2019, Timo Myyrä  wrote:
> Tristan Pilat  writes:
>
>> Hi OpenBSD users and devs!
>>
>> I got a new laptop in January, a thinkpad x280. At that time my system
>> running 'current' was very slow and I assumed the video acceleration
>> wasn't working so I just sadly stuck with Debian for a while. I then
>> saw that an update of the inteldrm landed in current a month ago or so
>> so I tried yesterday to reinstall current. Unfortunately the system is
>> still barely usable. Could you guys tell me why the video acceleration
>> isn't handled? Isn't Kaby lake compatible for now? I saw this article
>> (https://jcs.org/2017/05/22/xiaomiair) which says it is.
>>

You may have to adjust the aperture
See /etc/examples/sysctl.conf

#machdep.allowaperture=2# See xf86(4)

Good Luck



Re: OpenBSD on thinkpad x280

2019-05-25 Thread Timo Myyrä
Tristan Pilat  writes:

> Hi OpenBSD users and devs!
>
> I got a new laptop in January, a thinkpad x280. At that time my system
> running 'current' was very slow and I assumed the video acceleration
> wasn't working so I just sadly stuck with Debian for a while. I then
> saw that an update of the inteldrm landed in current a month ago or so
> so I tried yesterday to reinstall current. Unfortunately the system is
> still barely usable. Could you guys tell me why the video acceleration
> isn't handled? Isn't Kaby lake compatible for now? I saw this article
> (https://jcs.org/2017/05/22/xiaomiair) which says it is.
>
> The weird thing is that sometimes the computer is usable (not that fast 
> though) and sometimes it's very slow.
>
> Here's the dmesg:
>
>>OpenBSD 6.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #38: Thu May 23 22:22:19 MDT 2019
>>   dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>>real mem = 8322945024 (7937MB)
>>avail mem = 8060583936 (7687MB)
>>mpath0 at root
>>scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
>>mainbus0 at root
>>bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 3.0 @ 0x6f0bb000 (63 entries)
>>bios0: vendor LENOVO version "N20ET36W (1.21 )" date 09/06/2018
>>bios0: LENOVO 20KF001QFR
>>acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
>>acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5
>>acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT SSDT TPM2 UEFI SSDT SSDT HPET APIC MCFG
>>ECDT SSDT SSDT BOOT BATB SLIC SSDT SSDT SSDT LPIT WSMT SSDT SSDT SSDT
>>DBGP DBG2 MSDM DMAR ASF! FPDT UEFI BGRT
>>acpi0: wakeup devices GLAN(S4) XHC_(S3) XDCI(S4) HDAS(S4) RP01(S4)
>>PXSX(S4) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) PXSX(S4) RP04(S4) PXSX(S4) RP05(S4) PXSX(S4)
>>RP06(S4) PXSX(S4) RP07(S4) [...]
>>acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
>>acpihpet0 at acpi0: 2399 Hz
>>acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
>>cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
>>cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.89 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>>cpu0:
>>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>>cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>>cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0
>>mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 10 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges
>>cpu0: apic clock running at 23MHz
>>cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.2.4.1.1.1, IBE
>>cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor)
>>cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>>cpu1:
>>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>>cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>>cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0
>>cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 4 (application processor)
>>cpu2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>>cpu2:
>>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>>cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>>cpu2: smt 0, core 2, package 0
>>cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 6 (application processor)
>>cpu3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>>cpu3:
>>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>>cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>>cpu3: smt 0, core 3, package 0
>>cpu4 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
>>cpu4: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>>cpu4:

Re: Modern browser for OpenBSD powerpc

2019-05-25 Thread Riccardo Mottola

Hi,

On 5/23/19 8:19 AM, John Gould wrote:

Can someone suggest a modern graphical browser for OpenBSD PowerPC?
I'm trying to run
several G5's and g4 mini's on 6.5 as desktop machines. The basic
install works really well but there doesn't seem to be an up to date
graphically browser.

It's thanks to all the work the devs have put into OpenBSD powerpc
that these machine are still very usable. They are hopelessly out of
date as far as the Mac OS are concerned!



you might try ArcticFox, it has a decent success on Linux PowerPC. 
Several endianness fixes were imported.


It is not "totally" modern, but still more modern than Dillo. Beware 
that you need at least 1G of RAM to be of decent use with modern 
websites, 2GB is better.


Although it is of PaleMoon heritage and thus Linux/Mac heritage, I fixed 
compilation on NetBSD, OpenBSD and lately even FreeBSD compiles out of 
the box.



Beware however, that while perfectly usable on older x86, it has no 
working JIT, so JS intensive websites will be slow on PowerPC. Also 
compilation on OpenBSD/ppc was never attempted by me, only on Linux/PPC. 
OpenBSD amd64 however does work.



Riccardo

[1] : Official Repo: https://github.com/wicknix/Arctic-Fox

[2] : My current working fork, which gets regularly pulled into main: 
https://github.com/rmottola/Arctic-Fox







OpenBSD on thinkpad x280

2019-05-25 Thread Tristan Pilat
Hi OpenBSD users and devs!

I got a new laptop in January, a thinkpad x280. At that time my system running 
'current' was very slow and I assumed the video acceleration wasn't working so 
I just sadly stuck with Debian for a while. I then saw that an update of the 
inteldrm landed in current a month ago or so so I tried yesterday to reinstall 
current. Unfortunately the system is still barely usable. Could you guys tell 
me why the video acceleration isn't handled? Isn't Kaby lake compatible for 
now? I saw this article (https://jcs.org/2017/05/22/xiaomiair) which says it is.

The weird thing is that sometimes the computer is usable (not that fast though) 
and sometimes it's very slow.

Here's the dmesg:

>OpenBSD 6.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #38: Thu May 23 22:22:19 MDT 2019
>   dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>real mem = 8322945024 (7937MB)
>avail mem = 8060583936 (7687MB)
>mpath0 at root
>scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
>mainbus0 at root
>bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 3.0 @ 0x6f0bb000 (63 entries)
>bios0: vendor LENOVO version "N20ET36W (1.21 )" date 09/06/2018
>bios0: LENOVO 20KF001QFR
>acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
>acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5
>acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT SSDT TPM2 UEFI SSDT SSDT HPET APIC MCFG
>ECDT SSDT SSDT BOOT BATB SLIC SSDT SSDT SSDT LPIT WSMT SSDT SSDT SSDT
>DBGP DBG2 MSDM DMAR ASF! FPDT UEFI BGRT
>acpi0: wakeup devices GLAN(S4) XHC_(S3) XDCI(S4) HDAS(S4) RP01(S4)
>PXSX(S4) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) PXSX(S4) RP04(S4) PXSX(S4) RP05(S4) PXSX(S4)
>RP06(S4) PXSX(S4) RP07(S4) [...]
>acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
>acpihpet0 at acpi0: 2399 Hz
>acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
>cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
>cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.89 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>cpu0:
>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0
>mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 10 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges
>cpu0: apic clock running at 23MHz
>cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.2.4.1.1.1, IBE
>cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor)
>cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>cpu1:
>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0
>cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 4 (application processor)
>cpu2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>cpu2:
>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>cpu2: smt 0, core 2, package 0
>cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 6 (application processor)
>cpu3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>cpu3:
>FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,IBRS,IBPB,STIBP,L1DF,SSBD,SENSOR,ARAT,XSAVEOPT,XSAVEC,XGETBV1,XSAVES,MELTDOWN
>cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
>cpu3: smt 0, core 3, package 0
>cpu4 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
>cpu4: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz, 1496.51 MHz, 06-8e-0a
>cpu4: