Re: Some prbs playing with webGL animations..
from Console, they seem pertaining to BadWolf: ERR: Display.cpp:1038 (initialize): ANGLE Display::initialize error 12289: Could not dlopen native EGL: File not found ** (badwolf:2931): CRITICAL **: 01:22:25.919: WebKitWebView web-context property can't be set when related-view is set too, passed web-context value is ignored Nowarez Market wrote: > Hello > > While this evening I played a while on 5 Mode website with a webGL > 3D animation (the result is live) I found some prbs generated in the > e console, you can find the screenshot attached. > > Thnx! > > > N0\/\/@r€Z > > -- > > /\/\@rk€T > >
Some prbs playing with webGL animations..
Hello While this evening I played a while on 5 Mode website with a webGL 3D animation (the result is live) I found some prbs generated in the e console, you can find the screenshot attached. Thnx! > N0\/\/@r€Z > -- > /\/\@rk€T
Re: Backup ISP
Hi Lars Maybe this might be helpful? https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:14 AM Lars Bonnesen wrote: > > I now have two ISPs > > A primary on vmx2 and a backup (4G) on vmx4 > > Both needs to initiate connection with a dhcp request, so I have: > inet autoconf description Internet > in hostname.vmx2 > and > inet autoconf description Internet4Gbackup > in hostname.vmx4 > > My idea is to have an active/passive setup being able to ssh from the > internet to both vmx2 and vmx4 > > Seems that I am only able to access vmx2 from the internet > > vmx2: flags=808843 mtu > 1500 > lladdr 00:0c:29:e0:88:a6 > description: Internet > index 3 priority 0 llprio 3 > groups: egress > media: Ethernet autoselect (10GbaseT) > status: active > > vmx4: flags=808843 mtu > 1500 > lladdr 00:0c:29:e0:88:7e > description: Internet4Gbackup > index 5 priority 0 llprio 3 > media: Ethernet autoselect (10GbaseT) > status: active > > > I cannot see "egress" under vmx4 - I guess this is part of the problem. > > How do I get incoming traffic via vmx2 to return out via vmx2 and visa > versa incoming traffic via vmx4 to return out vmx4 > > Regards, Lars. -- Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict I've taken my software vows - for beta or for worse
issues booting with single softraid raid 1 drive
Hi misc, I'm practicing data recovery scenarios with a RAID 1 array on softraid0. optiplex# bioctl -i softraid0 Volume Status Size Device softraid0 0 Online64022953984 sd0 RAID1 0 Online64022953984 0:0.0 noencl 1 Online64022953984 0:1.0 noencl When I remove one or the other drive, only the M4 (wd0) will boot on its own. I've run installboot on both drives separately. However my machine says No OS when I attempt to boot with only the CT250MX (wd1) in the system, no matter which sata port. I did have this array on two identical M4 drives, which I think might be how wd1a came to be first in that list, but I'm working on migrating the array to a pair of CT250MX drives. I had the same issue with the other M4 drive. Only the one still in the sytem boots. I still have that other drive with the data intact if it's somehow useful. How can I get the CT250MX to boot so I can remove the one remaining M4 and replace it with the other CT250MX, as well as ensure a bootable system if the wrong drive fails? Thank you very much for your time. disklabel, fdisk, and dmesg to follow optiplex# disklabel wd0 # /dev/rwd0c: type: ESDI disk: SCSI disk label: M4-CT064M4SSD2 duid: ca557cab281e33f2 flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 7783 total sectors: 125045424 boundstart: 64 boundend: 125045424 16 partitions: #size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] a:125045360 64RAID c:1250454240 unused optiplex# disklabel wd1 # /dev/rwd1c: type: ESDI disk: ESDI/IDE disk label: CT250MX500SSD1 duid: 56e90ff073a823cb flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 30401 total sectors: 488397168 boundstart: 64 boundend: 488397168 16 partitions: #size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] a:125045360 64RAID c:4883971680 unused optiplex# fdisk wd0 Disk: wd0 geometry: 7783/255/63 [125045424 Sectors] Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55 Starting Ending LBA Info: #: id C H S - C H S [ start:size ] --- 0: 00 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 [ 0: 0 ] Unused 1: 00 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 [ 0: 0 ] Unused 2: 00 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 [ 0: 0 ] Unused *3: A6 0 1 2 - 7783 182 63 [ 64: 125045360 ] OpenBSD optiplex# fdisk wd1 Disk: wd1 geometry: 30401/255/63 [488397168 Sectors] Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55 Starting Ending LBA Info: #: id C H S - C H S [ start:size ] --- 0: 00 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 [ 0: 0 ] Unused 1: 00 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 [ 0: 0 ] Unused 2: 00 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 [ 0: 0 ] Unused *3: A6 0 1 2 - 30401 80 63 [ 64: 488397104 ] OpenBSD OpenBSD 7.4 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Fri Dec 8 15:39:04 MST 2023 r...@syspatch-74-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/ GENERIC.MP real mem = 4173328384 (3979MB) avail mem = 4027121664 (3840MB) random: good seed from bootblocks mpath0 at root scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xf0450 (82 entries) bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version "A03" date 02/13/2010 bios0: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 780 acpi0 at bios0 acpi0: TCPA checksum error: ACPI 3.0 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT APIC BOOT ASF! MCFG HPET TCPA SLIC acpi0: wakeup devices VBTN(S4) PCI0(S5) PCI4(S5) PCI3(S5) PCI1(S5) PCI5(S5) PCI6(S5) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB3(S3) USB4(S3) USB5(S3) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz, 2660.05 MHz, 06-17-0a, patch 0a0b cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,XSAVE,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF,SENSOR,MELTDOWN cpu0: 32KB 64b/line 8-way D-cache, 32KB 64b/line 8-way I-cache, 3MB 64b/line 12-way L2 cache cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 7 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges cpu0: apic clock running at 332MHz cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.2.2.2, IBE cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz, 2660.05 MHz, 06-17-0a, patch 0a0b cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
On 2024-02-28, Pontus Stenetorp wrote: > On Wed 28 Feb 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2024-02-28, Pontus Stenetorp wrote: >> > On Tue 27 Feb 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> On 2024-02-27, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> > On 2024-02-27, Peter Kay wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Just been to upgrade a rather old system I keep OpenBSD on for fun all >> >> >> the way up from 6.9, and found bytemark no longer seem to be hosting >> >> >> any OpenBSD content. >> >> > >> >> > That's why they have been removed from the mirrors list since 2022. >> >> >> >> Oh hmm, seems I readded them as they had started working again, I'll drop >> >> them again. >> > >> > Since it has crossed my mind that scripting together some sort of "mirror >> > health" tool would be a fairly easy (yet probably valuable) contribution >> > to the community, is there currently anything akin to that in use by you >> > or others when maintaining the mirrors list? A few searches of mine turned >> > up empty, but it could equally well be that my search skills were lacking. >> >> No need for another tool, we have mirmon and mirrorcheck.sh. The problem >> is finding time to review results of checks, and making decisions >> about what to include in ftp.html (for parts of the world with low >> connectivity, a mirror which is slightly behind on snapshots can still >> be very useful). > > Firstly, thank you of course for all your efforts maintaining the list. > Agreed about usefulness being very much circumstancial and thank you for > pointing me in the directions of two tools I have overlooked. mirmon is of > course net/mirmon in ports, but I have failed to locate mirrorcheck.sh in > both ports and src (even with a grep -ir), as well as with a web search. > Where does it live? It's in the www tree.
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
On Wed 28 Feb 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2024-02-28, Pontus Stenetorp wrote: > > On Tue 27 Feb 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> On 2024-02-27, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> > On 2024-02-27, Peter Kay wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Just been to upgrade a rather old system I keep OpenBSD on for fun all > >> >> the way up from 6.9, and found bytemark no longer seem to be hosting > >> >> any OpenBSD content. > >> > > >> > That's why they have been removed from the mirrors list since 2022. > >> > >> Oh hmm, seems I readded them as they had started working again, I'll drop > >> them again. > > > > Since it has crossed my mind that scripting together some sort of "mirror > > health" tool would be a fairly easy (yet probably valuable) contribution to > > the community, is there currently anything akin to that in use by you or > > others when maintaining the mirrors list? A few searches of mine turned up > > empty, but it could equally well be that my search skills were lacking. > > No need for another tool, we have mirmon and mirrorcheck.sh. The problem > is finding time to review results of checks, and making decisions > about what to include in ftp.html (for parts of the world with low > connectivity, a mirror which is slightly behind on snapshots can still > be very useful). Firstly, thank you of course for all your efforts maintaining the list. Agreed about usefulness being very much circumstancial and thank you for pointing me in the directions of two tools I have overlooked. mirmon is of course net/mirmon in ports, but I have failed to locate mirrorcheck.sh in both ports and src (even with a grep -ir), as well as with a web search. Where does it live?
Backup ISP
I now have two ISPs A primary on vmx2 and a backup (4G) on vmx4 Both needs to initiate connection with a dhcp request, so I have: inet autoconf description Internet in hostname.vmx2 and inet autoconf description Internet4Gbackup in hostname.vmx4 My idea is to have an active/passive setup being able to ssh from the internet to both vmx2 and vmx4 Seems that I am only able to access vmx2 from the internet vmx2: flags=808843 mtu 1500 lladdr 00:0c:29:e0:88:a6 description: Internet index 3 priority 0 llprio 3 groups: egress media: Ethernet autoselect (10GbaseT) status: active vmx4: flags=808843 mtu 1500 lladdr 00:0c:29:e0:88:7e description: Internet4Gbackup index 5 priority 0 llprio 3 media: Ethernet autoselect (10GbaseT) status: active I cannot see "egress" under vmx4 - I guess this is part of the problem. How do I get incoming traffic via vmx2 to return out via vmx2 and visa versa incoming traffic via vmx4 to return out vmx4 Regards, Lars.
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
I think to have already advised about Stu smelling of ChapGPT Feb 28, 2024 11:54:24 Crystal Kolipe : > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:26:31AM +0100, Janne Johansson wrote: >> Stuart is already testing listed mirrors. > > And tests have indeed shown that Stuart locked in a room with a workstation > for 15 hours a day repeatedly and reliably outperforms an AI running on any of > the top 500 supercomputers for this task :-).
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
On 2024-02-28, Pontus Stenetorp wrote: > On Tue 27 Feb 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2024-02-27, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> > On 2024-02-27, Peter Kay wrote: >> >> >> >> Just been to upgrade a rather old system I keep OpenBSD on for fun all >> >> the way up from 6.9, and found bytemark no longer seem to be hosting >> >> any OpenBSD content. >> > >> > That's why they have been removed from the mirrors list since 2022. >> >> Oh hmm, seems I readded them as they had started working again, I'll drop >> them again. > > Since it has crossed my mind that scripting together some sort of "mirror > health" tool would be a fairly easy (yet probably valuable) contribution to > the community, is there currently anything akin to that in use by you or > others when maintaining the mirrors list? A few searches of mine turned up > empty, but it could equally well be that my search skills were lacking. No need for another tool, we have mirmon and mirrorcheck.sh. The problem is finding time to review results of checks, and making decisions about what to include in ftp.html (for parts of the world with low connectivity, a mirror which is slightly behind on snapshots can still be very useful). -- Please keep replies on the mailing list.
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:26:31AM +0100, Janne Johansson wrote: > Stuart is already testing listed mirrors. And tests have indeed shown that Stuart locked in a room with a workstation for 15 hours a day repeatedly and reliably outperforms an AI running on any of the top 500 supercomputers for this task :-).
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
> > >> Just been to upgrade a rather old system I keep OpenBSD on for fun all > > >> the way up from 6.9, and found bytemark no longer seem to be hosting > > >> any OpenBSD content. > > > > > > That's why they have been removed from the mirrors list since 2022. > > > > Oh hmm, seems I readded them as they had started working again, I'll drop > > them again. > > Since it has crossed my mind that scripting together some sort of "mirror > health" tool would be a fairly easy (yet probably valuable) contribution to > the community, is there currently anything akin to that in use by you or > others when maintaining the mirrors list? A few searches of mine turned up > empty, but it could equally well be that my search skills were lacking. Stuart is already testing listed mirrors. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
On Wed 28 Feb 2024, Crystal Kolipe wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:25:35AM +, Pontus Stenetorp wrote: > > scripting together some sort of "mirror health" tool would be a fairly easy > > (yet probably valuable) > > In principle it might sound 'fairly easy', but once you start to add code to > deal with things such as sites going down for planned maintenance, being > unavailable from certain locations due to network problems and so on, your > simple tool would quickly start to grow in complexity. > > In any case, the list of mirrors needs to be manually reviewed. I vaguely > remember some years ago a previously good mirror started serving a pre-release > copy of the distribution as if it was the actual release, and was subsequently > removed. > > A simple mirror health tool likely wouldn't catch that. Agreed, I do not think the task should be fully automated. Rather, I think it would be helpful to have a couple of easy checks that could indicate the health of a mirror, rather than fully determine the health of it. I for example was on a Japanese mirror last year that "lagged" behind security patches for days, if not all the way up to a week, and this is a fairly easy check to automate. I would imagine just a list of all the mirrors on the mirrors list coupled with say a list of outage events, "lag events", releases available, etc. that could be used to get a better overview of the health of a mirror than a sample of a single point in time, while still not aiming for any sort of complete automation. Hopefully this is just a few hundred lines of Perl feeding data into a static page served by httpd(8).
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:25:35AM +, Pontus Stenetorp wrote: > scripting together some sort of "mirror health" tool would be a fairly easy > (yet probably valuable) In principle it might sound 'fairly easy', but once you start to add code to deal with things such as sites going down for planned maintenance, being unavailable from certain locations due to network problems and so on, your simple tool would quickly start to grow in complexity. In any case, the list of mirrors needs to be manually reviewed. I vaguely remember some years ago a previously good mirror started serving a pre-release copy of the distribution as if it was the actual release, and was subsequently removed. A simple mirror health tool likely wouldn't catch that.
Re: mirror.bytemark.co.uk appears to have removed all OpenBSD content?
On Tue 27 Feb 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2024-02-27, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2024-02-27, Peter Kay wrote: > >> > >> Just been to upgrade a rather old system I keep OpenBSD on for fun all > >> the way up from 6.9, and found bytemark no longer seem to be hosting > >> any OpenBSD content. > > > > That's why they have been removed from the mirrors list since 2022. > > Oh hmm, seems I readded them as they had started working again, I'll drop > them again. Since it has crossed my mind that scripting together some sort of "mirror health" tool would be a fairly easy (yet probably valuable) contribution to the community, is there currently anything akin to that in use by you or others when maintaining the mirrors list? A few searches of mine turned up empty, but it could equally well be that my search skills were lacking.
