Re: Url checker
Maybe you mean something like: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/www/linkchecker/ ? Cheers, Jasper Op 3/10/2005 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi list, Anyone knows a good URL checker that runs on OpenBSD? My boss wants me to monitor web site traffic and present a report with all visits to all websites per user (pc). I've searched the internet but did not find an appropriate (free) solution. I have been playing with the idea to use snort, but that seems a lot of work to me. Any suggestions are more then welcome. Nils = A disclaimer applies to this email and any attachments. Refer to http://www.sparkholland.com/emaildisclaimer for the full text of this disclaimer.
Re: complex.h under OpenBSD
Is /usr/include/g++/backward/complex.h what you mean? Jasper On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:49:19 +0200 Ramiro Aceves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello dear OpenBSD fans. I am trying to compile a C program (Numerical Electromagnetics Code, NEC, for antenna modelling) that needs complex numbers. I compiled it with gcc on Linux with no special problems. It is an originaly fortran written program that nowadays is translated into C for convenience. I used to work with complex.h header file on Linux, but I have not been able to find the complex.h file on OpenBSD. In OpenBSD, I see that (as said in info gcc) things like: _Complex float variable_name; __real__ variable; __imag__ variable; work perfectly. Do you know where can I get the complex.h file, or please can you point me in the right direction? I am puzzled now. Thanks in advance Ramiro. EA1ABZ. -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: sysctl tuning for maximum network performance
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:47:54 -0300 Diego Augusto Dalmolin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where I could find a material for studding how to improve OBSD network performance to maximum, using sysctl, man sysctl kernel compilation, etc... Well, simple, DON'T compile your own kernel. Because those few KB's won't slow your system that much that's it's worth all the hassle you can get from compiling your own kernel. Jasper -- Diego Augusto Dalmolin (41) 9648-0882 -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: 3.8 beta requests
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:33:40 -0600 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are heading towards making the real 3.8 release soonish. I was wondering, when can we start pre-ordering our cd-sets? Cheers, Jasper -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: 3.8 beta requests
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:37:12 -0600 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are heading towards making the real 3.8 release soonish. I was wondering, when can we start pre-ordering our cd-sets? We normally setup pre-orders 1 month before. We might do it a bit earlier... dunno. But it is hard to do when artwork is not final yet :) I wonder what the theme for this release will be... Jasper -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: Laptop met tekortkoming
This is an English mailinglist, so please don't speak Dutch. If you'de like to speak Dutch, mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . And by the way, why should this be OpenBSD related? Jasper dutch Stuur het maar naar [EMAIL PROTECTED] in het Engels, daar hoort het thuis. Als het over OpenBSD gaat tenminste... /dutch On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:00:43 +0200 Ton de Zwart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mijn pas 3 maanden oude laptop is van het merk Cybermaxx (medion) type MD95264 Gekocht bijTrekpleisterof was het Kruidvat, iin van die twee in elk geval. Deze laptop heeft iin grote tekortkoming wat ik niet wist toen ik 'm aanschafte. Je kunt n.m.l. het toughpad niet uitschakelen. Normaal gebruik ik een USB muisje van Microsoft, maar het toughpad is tegelijkertijd actief. Dat is uitermate lastig. Als je een tekst aan het tikken bent, raakt de muis van je hand om de haveklap het toughpad en schiet een gedeelte van je tekst ergens anders tussen, kortom je tekst is een puinhoop. Er is geen enkele mogelijkheid, ook niet softwarematig om het lastige toughpad uit te zetten. Uitschakelen in apparaatbeheer helpt niet, bij de volgende Windowsstart vind hij nieuwe hardware en zet Windows het toughpad er weer in. Voor de rest is het een prima laptop al zijn de twee bijgeleverde accu's wel erg gauw leeg, een uurtje hooguit. Groeten, Ton de Zwart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: binary compatibility with Linux
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:21:00 -0300 Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'd like to know what are the necessary steps to run GNU/Linux binaries under OpenBSD, or where I could get a good paper about it. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq9.html#Interact and http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=compat_linuxsektion=8 But you could've looked it up yourself! [snip] Thanks. -- Joco Salvatti Undergraduating in Computer Science Federal University of Para - UFPA web: http://salvatti.expert.com.br e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: backup filesystem
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:35:25 -0400 (EDT) Joseph C. Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Siju George wrote: then you wont be able to preserve the permissions exactly. If you do it as a tarball on that vfat filesystem, no problem. But how does Solaris handles vfat filessystems? -- Signing off, Joseph C. Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does the government fear us? Or do we fear the government? When the people fear the government, tyranny has found victory. The federal government is our servant, not our master. ---Thomas Jefferson -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: OBSD on Dell C640
According to http://www.openbsd.org/i386-laptop.html, yes. But you could've found it out yourself! If you did some research. Jasper On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:26:54 +0600 Chanka A. Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If anyone has successfully installed OBSD 3.7 on Dell Latitude C640 please let me know. Thanks, Chanka Perera -- http://www.linux.lk/~chanka -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: backup filesystem
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:35:31 -0400 Masoud Sharbiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, How about a _encrypted_ tarball on a filesystem that both of the OS'es understand? Like FFS, right? cheers, Masoud On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:03:58PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: Hi, I shall be transporting a hard disk between two sites for backup purposes. The backup shall be on a RAID-1 mirror in an openbsd server. The disk will primarily be used in a sun workstation running solaris. My question is, which filesystem do you guys recommend. If possible I would like to preserve permssions and filename exactly. Best Regards Edd -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: make breakage in /usr/src
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:43:42 -0400 Timothy Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 17 August 2005 11:06 am, Dave Feustel wrote: I just updated via cvs(sudo cvs -q -d $CVSROOT up -r OPENBSD_3_7), did a 'cd /ports/src;sudo make' and got the following error: [snip] Ummm... you mean cd /usr/src; sudo make build right? Have you done an make obj? Anyway, your tree is borked I get no errors in /usr/src/sbin/wsconsctl after running a cvs update. I would start by dumping your cvs tree and cvs get it again. Same here, so re-fetch the tree and you should be out of probs. Tim Donahue Jasper -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: XDM spoils consoles.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Vladislav Belogrudov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dell Inspiron 1150, starting X via xdm makes consoles unusable - Do you have the same problem with other login managers? Or just XDM? snip Cheers, Jasper -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: NEW: GNU Smalltalk and Portable Forth Environments ports
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:35:50 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robbert Haarman wrote: I have created OpenBSD ports for GNU Smalltalk (http://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/) and the Portable Forth Environment (http://pfe.sourceforge.net/). Both are attached for those who want to test. Comments welcome. [zap] Any you waist the time of people, that not knowingly we have it in tree, test pfe. Sort of yes, because if I test a port, I think the creator double checked whether it's already in the ports collection. Oh well, nevermind. Jasper -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: NEW: GNU Smalltalk and Portable Forth Environments ports
Sorry, it should've gone to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:25:08 +0200 J. Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:35:50 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robbert Haarman wrote: I have created OpenBSD ports for GNU Smalltalk (http://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/) and the Portable Forth Environment (http://pfe.sourceforge.net/). Both are attached for those who want to test. Comments welcome. [zap] Any you waist the time of people, that not knowingly we have it in tree, test pfe. Sort of yes, because if I test a port, I think the creator double checked whether it's already in the ports collection. Oh well, nevermind. Jasper -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: httpd error wile compiling -current
Try re-fetching the sources and try again. Since the Makefile has recently (at the moment 16 hours ago) been changed. Jasper On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:08:39 -0500 Francisco Valladolid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the next error compiling the userland into -current (3.8 beta) some suggestions please. === usr.sbin/httpd nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/dbmmanage.1 src/suport/dbmmanage.cat1 nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/htdigest.1 src/supprt/htdigest.cat1 nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/htpasswd.1 src/supprt/htpasswd.cat1 nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/apachectl.8 src/suport/apachectl.cat8 nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/logresolve.8 src/suport/logresolve.cat8 nroff -Tascii -mandoc httpd.8 httpd.cat8 nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/rotatelogs.8 src/suport/rotatelogs.cat8 nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/apxs.8 src/support/pxs.cat8 nroff -Tascii -mandoc /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/support/suexec.8 src/suppor/suexec.cat8 Makefile, line 5: Need an operator Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd (line 629 of /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/Makefile.bd-wrapper). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src (line 72 of Makefile). admin:/usr/src I'm running: OpenBSD 3.8-beta (GENERIC) #4: Fri Aug 12 11:49:24 CDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC real mem = 1073278976 (1048124K) avail mem = 909127680 (887820K) using 22937 buffers containing 107536384 bytes (105016K) of memory ... -- --- BSD - Unix simplicity. Francisco Valladolid Hdez. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: 3.7 problem: replacing xdm with kdm
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:34:54 -0500 Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am now running 3.7. I got graphical logins via xdm working and decided to replace xdm with kdm. I changed the call of xdm in rc to a call to kdm and rebooted. kdm comes up and accepts input, but I cannot log in with any id, including root. (I always get the message 'login failed'.) Are there additional changes that I need to make to use kdm instead of xdm? Thanks, Dave Feustel Capslock? And DON'T log as root using *DM or whatever! -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: Major Surprise with xdm on 3.7
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:25:38 -0500 Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 11 August 2005 11:59, Henning Brauer wrote: * Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-11 18:57]: I just discovered that even though xdm is running, terminals C[0-3] are running in character mode ie. if, while logged in via xdm, I enter ctl-alt-F[0-3], I get a tty login!!! eh, yes, of course. This may be obvious to you, but it is not to me. Well why are you running OpenBSD then? This ain't no Linux where you can drop in and ask stupid and dumb questions (as you have been doing this today), without doing your homework. Jasper -- Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
Re: C programming question
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:53:21 -0500 imEnsion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Again, look at the original date from the email... It looks like some old e-mails finally got through...a whole load of them. apparently he's having some hardcore issues with his mail client and/or computer in general. On 7/6/05, chaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:43:21 -0700 Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need some help understanding some C code. int (*if_ioctl) (struct ifnet *, int, caddr_t); int (*if_watchdog) (int); Can someone break down these declarations (if that's what they are)? Is this a form of typecasting? Thanks for your help. You already posted the *exact* same question a while ago and many people, including me, have answered it already. -- http://www.nedbsd.nl/~jasper/wth/ -- What The Hack!
Re: help
You too, it help to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :) Jasper On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:06:28 +0200 (CEST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: help With? I guess you missed mijordomo ;-) Kind regards, Sebastian
Re: W32 codecs
It's on it's way. Jasper On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:58:17 -0700 Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:38:14PM -0500, eric wrote: On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 15:15:21 -0500, Steve Tornio proclaimed... Looks like the port needs to be updated. The filename currently offered is all-20050412.tar.bz2. It doesn't look like mplayer keeps the older codecs around. Yep, that's all I changed all-20050216.tar.bz2 to all-20050412.tar.bz2 in the Makefile and used `NO_CHECKSUM=YES make install` you _could_ of course run 'make makesum', and then send a diff to the listed MAINTAINER ... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: clamav package upgrade
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:58:12 -0300 FBN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I had installed clamav-0.83.tgz package in my OpenBSD 3.7, but it displays: LibClamAV Warning: LibClamAV Warning: *** This version of ClamAV engine is outdated. *** LibClamAV Warning: *** Please update it IMMEDIATELY!*** LibClamAV Warning: Do i have to uninstall the clamav package and install it again from source ? Thanks Version 0.85.1 is in the ports collection. So you can try that instead. Good luck, Jasper
Re: Theo gave an interview to Forbes Mag. about Linux
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:06:27 -0400 Haroon Khalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought Theo never used Linux? Again, the is a clear difference between using Linux, and reading the source of it or observing it's development model! Jasper On 6/18/05, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18/06/05, Harry Tormey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The register has put up a very lazy opinion piece on the article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/17/de_raadt_channels_ballmer/ In it they dismiss Theo as a bitter, egotistical, Steve Ballmeresque character. Ah well, the register = cheap uk tech tabloid rag so who cares what they think. -Harry Can't you read between the lines? :-) In the last passage, they basically say that Steve Ballmer and Theo de Raadt are correct in slashing linux, however, the 'vendors' are to be blamed and not the developers (???). Pardon me, but who are the vendors? It's like vendors don't have any developers that are to be blamed? Or do the releases happen by themselves? No developers are involved? And doesn't OpenBSD also have a six-months release schedule? I think the article clearly supports Theo's viewpoint, as it turns out. :-) P.S. I did a text highlighting in the Forbes article for 'dev', and there is no quote to be found that 'developers are to be blamed, not the vendors'. What support The Register has to show that Theo is not blaming the vendors? Cheers, Constantine. On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:02:15AM -0700, Vladislav Belogrudov wrote: 100% right words! --- Dissapointed Linux user/admin/developer since 1998 --- J. Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Theo gave an interview to Forbes Magazine, in which he stated: It's terrible, De Raadt says. Everyone is using it, and they don't realize how bad it is. And the Linux people will just stick with it and add to it rather than stepping back and saying, 'This is garbage and we should fix it.' Nice to read though as an ex-Linsux'er :) Jasper -- checking whether you're still watching...probaly not :-) /usr/ports/x11/wmx configure script. Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- checking whether you're still watching...probaly not :-) /usr/ports/x11/wmx configure script.
Re: Theo gave an interview to Forbes Mag. about Linux
Darnforget the link (again): http://www.forbes.com/intelligentinfrastructure/2005/06/16/linux-bsd-unix-cz_dl_0616theo.html -- checking whether you're still watching...probaly not :-) /usr/ports/x11/wmx configure script.
Re: Theo gave an interview to Forbes Mag. about Linux
Not everybody there is happy about Theo's words...oh well, what gives ;-) Jasper On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:25:56 +0100 Stephen Marley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:48:31PM +0200, J. Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: Theo gave an interview to Forbes Magazine, in which he stated: It's terrible, De Raadt says. Everyone is using it, and they don't realize how bad it is. And the Linux people will just stick with it and add to it rather than stepping back and saying, 'This is garbage and we should fix it.' Heh. Theo never did pull his punches. I suppose there's now a war going on in /. ? :) -- stephen -- checking whether you're still watching...probaly not :-) /usr/ports/x11/wmx configure script.
Re: Theo gave an interview to Forbes Mag. about Linux
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:13:37 -0600 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:48:31PM +0200, J. Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: Theo gave an interview to Forbes Magazine, in which he stated: It's terrible, De Raadt says. Everyone is using it, and they don't realize how bad it is. And the Linux people will just stick with it and add to it rather than stepping back and saying, 'This is garbage and we should fix it.' Heh. Theo never did pull his punches. I suppose there's now a war going on in /. ? :) If the Linux people actually cared about Quality, as we do, they would not have had as many localhost kernel security holes in the last year. How many is it... 20 so far? Yes indeed, or at least something very close to the 20 ;) -- checking whether you're still watching...probaly not :-) /usr/ports/x11/wmx configure script.
