Great 4.2 song!
just received my openbsd 4.2 CD set. And THANKS for this great song. A kind of funky mixed with good old rock ;)
Re: Great 4.2 song!
Matthias Pfeifer wrote: just received my openbsd 4.2 CD set. And THANKS for this great song. A kind of funky mixed with good old rock ;) Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere? My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-( -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/
Re: Great 4.2 song!
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Florin Andrei wrote: Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere? My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-( Not a flac or wav, but see http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html Jeremy C. Reed
Re: Great 4.2 song!
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:17:13AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere? My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-( Maybe that would violate the copyright on the song... but I don't know... The public mp3 and ogg versions are very high quality (in my ears). You can download the 4.2 song here: ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/songs/song42.ogg Martin [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Re: Great 4.2 song!
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:17:13AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: | Matthias Pfeifer wrote: | just received my openbsd 4.2 CD set. | | And THANKS for this great song. | A kind of funky mixed with good old rock ;) | | Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere? | My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-( The songs should be in ogg or mp3 format on ftp.openbsd.org (filedate Oct 3). Maybe you can also find it on your mirror. Cheers, Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd -- [++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+ +++-].++[-]+.--.[-] http://www.weirdnet.nl/
Re: Great 4.2 song!
Jeremy C. Reed wrote: On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Florin Andrei wrote: Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere? My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-( Not a flac or wav, but see http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html Well, I was hoping to rebuild the scratched CD (track 1 is fine) and use the lossless version for that, but perhaps I'm too pedantic. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/
Re: Great 4.2 song!
3.6 is the best one irregardless... On Oct 17, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Florin Andrei wrote: Jeremy C. Reed wrote: On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Florin Andrei wrote: Anybody can put a .flac or even .wav.gz copy for me on a server somewhere? My CD is scratched about 2/3 into the song. :-( Not a flac or wav, but see http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html Well, I was hoping to rebuild the scratched CD (track 1 is fine) and use the lossless version for that, but perhaps I'm too pedantic. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/
Re: 4.2 song
Theo de Raadt wrote: And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. Gifts from the water chicken no doubt. As usual, OpenBSD marches to the sound of its own drum :-)) Nice one.
Re: 4.2 song
On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Theo de Raadt wrote: And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11 and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of ASCII ! and U. But I just don't get it. Is anybody in a mood to enlighten me? Cheers, ropers
Re: 4.2 song
I think it should have been 101 instead of 11. But if it's not than it's a good easter egg :-p (and I don't get it). ropers wrote: On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Theo de Raadt wrote: And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11 and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of ASCII ! and U. But I just don't get it. Is anybody in a mood to enlighten me? Cheers, ropers
Re: 4.2 song
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:55:11AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: [snip] And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve image... Someone is giving it a go: http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027 Gord
Re: 4.2 song
On 10/8/07, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Theo de Raadt wrote: And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11 and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of ASCII ! and U. But I just don't get it. Is anybody in a mood to enlighten me? ASCII ! and U. Merged: !U As in: Not U As in: Not you As in: Not you to us (the seventh to last the line in the song) That's how I've interpreted it.
Re: 4.2 song
And of course, 1001001 011 1010101 lacks the sexual innuendo, but it's a super nice thing to tell your one and only. :) --ropers
Re: 4.2 song
Theo de Raadt wrote: And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:43 AM, ropers wrote: Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11 and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of ASCII ! and U. But I just don't get it. Is anybody in a mood to enlighten me? On 08/10/2007, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure sounds like bang you to me. I don't know if that's the intended Easter egg, but that's the kwelorzest explanation yet. Ok, so I just now came up with this: 1001001 011 011 1010101 Using the good old IBM code page 437 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page_437 ) that we know and love --and which is still encountered in some .NFO files, cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.nfo -- the above translates to: I [heart] ! U In other words: I'd love to bang you. It's one for that special girl's poetry book, methinks. Or it would make a cool T-shirt if you're out skirt-chasing among the geekette crowd. All in good humour of course. :o) --ropers
Re: 4.2 song
On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it should have been 101 instead of 11. Gord wrote: Someone is giving it a go: http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027 That's real interesting, guys. TheRaven64 writes that (0)11 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext for Au. But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 101 1010101 is plaintext for AU. So is Gold the answer or is it not you? I dunno, but me likey! :) --ropers
Re: 4.2 song
Perhaps: Regarding ...these are ! and U... As in not equal to proprietary (UNIX=$? unix=free?) Or in other words, free (I'm a newbie in the Unix-world so my apologies if I'm confusing free vs $ with UNIX vs unix/unix-like.) [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a name of Message 367.21814DEFANGED-eml]
Re: 4.2 song
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:04:15 +0200, ropers wrote: On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it should have been 101 instead of 11. Gord wrote: Someone is giving it a go: http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027 That's real interesting, guys. TheRaven64 writes that (0)11 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext for Au. But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 101 1010101 is plaintext for AU. So is Gold the answer or is it not you? I dunno, but me likey! :) --ropers Well back on last Sunday I put my guess on undeadl at: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20071007002942mode=expanded; count=26 and it was Gold as you can easily see. I didn't explain my reasoning because it might have been a spoiler but now there are two others getting gold, both differing from mine in the method. Listen to the song. The two strings are broken and come out as: 100 001 that gives 41 which is A in hex 101 0101 that gives 55 which is U in hex. Gosh, three ways to make gold. OpenBSD is Alchemy! I'd award it gold in the marathon for sure. From the land down under: Australia. Do we look umop apisdn from up over?
Re: 4.2 song
Nothing gets any nerdier than this, O - M - G. *thinks of revenge of the nerds* On 10/6/07, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2 song has been added to the lyrics page at http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html Yes, it is designed to sound like a mid-era Rush song, ie. something from Grace Under Pressure or such. And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve image...
Re: 4.2 song
2007/10/6, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2 song has been added to the lyrics page at http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html Yes, it is designed to sound like a mid-era Rush song, ie. something from Grace Under Pressure or such. And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve image... Cool! As a big fan of Rush, I like it so much! Artwork is also incredible! You are the best, guys.
4.2 song
Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2 song has been added to the lyrics page at http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html Yes, it is designed to sound like a mid-era Rush song, ie. something from Grace Under Pressure or such. And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve image...
