Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-31 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:52:00PM -0800, smith wrote:
 On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:28:41 -0400, STeve Andre' wrote
  On Thursday 26 October 2006 20:16, smith wrote:
Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure
they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc.  Personally, I
think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
their own machines rather than relying on the kindness of others.
  
   I second that.  Why waste server resources and decrease server security,
   when all Windows machines should be running their own antivirus software 
   to
   begin with.
  
  Why?  Because an OpenBSD system isn't subject to the possibility of being
  co-opted as a Windows machine can, thats why.
  
  Different perspectives are a good thing.
 
 If openbsd is running 3rd party software (clamav) it can.

If OpenBSD isn't running third party software, we have no reason to
assume it can't.

As to clamav, my new mail server configuration might include a
systrace'd version. But ClamAV isn't that dangerous once it is put in a
chroot, and that is not hard to do.

Joachim



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-30 Thread smith
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:53:00 -0400, stuartv wrote
 
 working on it).  The reason we run AV at the border AND on the 
 inside boxes is quite simply that I have seen way too many times in 
 my carreer a virus be ignored by one AV package but caught by 
 another.  Security is a must where I work and the added protection

Good point.

 Running anti-malware software on border machines, such as STMP 
 servers, proxies, etc. is an important countermeasure for network 
 wide infection.
 
 It's very much possible to have an outdated or undefended node in the
 network but in border defense line, that's not the case.

On a border server, I wouldn't recommend clamav or any antivirus software. 
Clamav has had many vulnerabilities and some of them remotely exploitable. 
And it's not just the antivirus software you have to keep up-to-date, but all
the other software that is required to make it function, like the software
that transports the email from the email server to the antivirus software and
back again.

b = clamav or any antivirus product that checks for viruses in email on some
server

w = any antivirus software that runs on the users' windows computer such as
norton antivirus

assume b and w are always updated.

Protect email?
b = yes
w = yes

Protect users from malicious websites?
b = no
w = yes

Protect from infected media, like floppy, cd, dvd, or usb drive?
b = no
w = yes

Put load on server?
b = yes
w = no

Protect files that have managed to be distributed by any other means other
than email?

b = no
w = yes

Protect laptop users who take their laptops off the company site?

b = no
w = yes

Protect a network from an infected laptop?

b = no
w = yes

Protect users who use file-sharing programs like bittorrent or kazaa?
b = no
w = yes

If b or w stopped working, would users still get their email?
b = very possibly no
w = very possibly yes

With all the complexity that b needs in comparison to w, I'd rather just stick
with w (kiss, keep it simple stupid).  But you do bring up a good point,
security in layers and one software doesn't catch everything.



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-30 Thread Chris Kuethe

On 10/30/06, smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Put load on server?
b = yes
w = no


*snicker*


Protect a network from an infected laptop?

b = no
w = yes


Pfff!

At best I'd say w = possibly yes having seen various antivirus
programs pop and say i detected that i'm propagating this malware,
but i'm not stopping it! or i just received this malware and i
dropped the ball now i'm infected too!

--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-30 Thread smith
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:28:41 -0400, STeve Andre' wrote
 On Thursday 26 October 2006 20:16, smith wrote:
   Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure
   they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc.  Personally, I
   think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
   their own machines rather than relying on the kindness of others.
  
   -Damian
 
  I second that.  Why waste server resources and decrease server security,
  when all Windows machines should be running their own antivirus software to
  begin with.
 
 Why?  Because an OpenBSD system isn't subject to the possibility of being
 co-opted as a Windows machine can, thats why.
 
 Different perspectives are a good thing.
 
 --STeve Andre'

If openbsd is running 3rd party software (clamav) it can.



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-27 Thread Berk D. Demir

smith wrote:


I second that.  Why waste server resources and decrease server security, when
all Windows machines should be running their own antivirus software to begin 
with.



That's the difference between border defense and field defense.

Running anti-malware software on border machines, such as STMP servers, 
proxies, etc. is an important countermeasure for network wide infection.


It's very much possible to have an outdated or undefended node in the 
network but in border defense line, that's not the case.


You shouldn't get this as waste of resources. Security is a process 
and it's not cheap to achieve.


Field defense (node is protecting itself) and border defense are 
complemental approach to so-called self defending network (Hello, 
Cizzz-coeee)




Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-27 Thread stuartv
Hello List,

Guess I have to weigh in on this one.  My shop runs ClamAV on the (OpenBSD)
mail server and NOD32 on the win* file servers and desktops (yes I know an
OpenBSD file server would be neat, I'm working on it).  The reason we run
AV at the border AND on the inside boxes is quite simply that I have seen
way too many times in my carreer a virus be ignored by one AV package but
caught by another.  Security is a must where I work and the added protection
(for free i might add) is a very small price to pay for a little bit more.

Remember, Security is like onions lots of layers...

stuart

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Berk D. Demir
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 4:49 AM
To: smith
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?


smith wrote:

 I second that.  Why waste server resources and decrease server security,
when
 all Windows machines should be running their own antivirus software to
begin with.


That's the difference between border defense and field defense.

Running anti-malware software on border machines, such as STMP servers,
proxies, etc. is an important countermeasure for network wide infection.

It's very much possible to have an outdated or undefended node in the
network but in border defense line, that's not the case.

You shouldn't get this as waste of resources. Security is a process
and it's not cheap to achieve.

Field defense (node is protecting itself) and border defense are
complemental approach to so-called self defending network (Hello,
Cizzz-coeee)



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-26 Thread smith
 Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure 
 they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc.  Personally, I
 think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
 their own machines rather than relying on the kindness of others.
 
 -Damian

I second that.  Why waste server resources and decrease server security, when
all Windows machines should be running their own antivirus software to begin 
with.



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-26 Thread STeve Andre'
On Thursday 26 October 2006 20:16, smith wrote:
  Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure
  they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc.  Personally, I
  think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
  their own machines rather than relying on the kindness of others.
 
  -Damian

 I second that.  Why waste server resources and decrease server security,
 when all Windows machines should be running their own antivirus software to
 begin with.

Why?  Because an OpenBSD system isn't subject to the possibility of being
co-opted as a Windows machine can, thats why.

Different perspectives are a good thing.

--STeve Andre'



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-25 Thread Lars Hansson
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 13:41, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
 Or another really good antivirus that I may
 consider?



ClamAV works fine on OpenBSD and it's even in ports.

---
Lars Hansson



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-25 Thread edgarz

All free antiviruses sucks (except a clamav version for UNIX/BSD/Linux). Virus 
signatures almost are outdated and don't know a lot of vires
and you have no support for ir. In corporate networs you should use commercial 
software. For OpenBSD it might be Dr.Web, very good AV
software :)

Lars Hansson wrote:

On Tuesday 24 October 2006 13:41, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:

Or another really good antivirus that I may
consider?




ClamAV works fine on OpenBSD and it's even in ports.

---
Lars Hansson




Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-25 Thread Lars Hansson
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 15:22, edgarz wrote:
 All free antiviruses sucks (except a clamav version for UNIX/BSD/Linux).
 Virus signatures almost are outdated and don't know a lot of vires

Detecting DOS boot sector viruses from the 1980's isn't all that important. 
It's not how many viruses you can detect that's important, it's what active 
viruses you detect and how fast that's important.

 In corporate networs you should use commercial 
 software.

ClamAV works great in a corporate network, especially for scanning email.

---
Lars Hansson



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-25 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:41:11AM -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues said that
 I'm thinking on purchasing this NOD32 anti-virus solution from
 ESET.COM and use it here at work. I really want to use it with

nod is a breeze to install and maintain,
i've installed a couple of linux versions in the past.


some 2-3 years ago they had an official openbsd version.
3.4 - 3.6-ish times if i remember correctly.

but this is the niche of niche markets, i don't think
they have sold a single copy, why maintain the codebase?

quite possibly the linux and/or freebsd version would
run nicely in binary emulation, but that is never recommended
in production environment, losing support is not fun at all.

-f
-- 
sex is not the answer.  sex is the question.  yes is the answer.



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-25 Thread Didier Wiroth
Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
 with NOD32 and OpenBSD? Or another really good antivirus that I may
 consider?

Hello,
I don't know how good it is, but f-prot has bsd version that used to
work on openbsd.
http://www.f-prot.com/support/helpfiles/unix/workstation/index.html
May be you want to have a look at it.

Kind regards,
Didier



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-24 Thread Der Engel

lol?

On 10/24/06, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello everyone,

I'm thinking on purchasing this NOD32 anti-virus solution from
ESET.COM and use it here at work. I really want to use it with
OpenBSD, since every other server machine runs OpenBSD as well. The
problem is that eset.com claims that their product will run on Linux
and FreeBSD, they say nothing about OpenBSD. I've heard rumors of
NOD32 being also able to run on OpenBSD, but I *think* that was for
earlier versions of NOD32. I'm not very fond of rumors, so I came here
to ask your opinion about it. Does anyone here have any experience
with NOD32 and OpenBSD? Or another really good antivirus that I may
consider?

Thanks in advance,

Leonardo Rodrigues
--
An OpenBSD user... and that's all you need to know =)




Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-24 Thread Andreas Schweitzer
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:41:11AM -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
 Or another really good antivirus that I may
 consider?

You could try to check out avira's server tools:
http://www.avira.com/en/products/index.html
most of which seem to support OpenBSD. The Windows personal
edition is quite popular, since it's free.

Or, while digging through bsdtalk, I came across:
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/2006/09/bsdtalk071-interview-with-einar-th.html
where f-prot.com's antivirus tools were presented. Also running on OpenBSD.

I think both have free or free trial versions.

Cheers,
Andreas



Re: NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-24 Thread Damian Wiest
 On 10/24/06, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello everyone,
 
 I'm thinking on purchasing this NOD32 anti-virus solution from
 ESET.COM and use it here at work. I really want to use it with
 OpenBSD, since every other server machine runs OpenBSD as well. The
 problem is that eset.com claims that their product will run on Linux
 and FreeBSD, they say nothing about OpenBSD. I've heard rumors of
 NOD32 being also able to run on OpenBSD, but I *think* that was for
 earlier versions of NOD32. I'm not very fond of rumors, so I came here
 to ask your opinion about it. Does anyone here have any experience
 with NOD32 and OpenBSD? Or another really good antivirus that I may
 consider?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Leonardo Rodrigues
 --
 An OpenBSD user... and that's all you need to know =)

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:07:36AM -0500, Der Engel wrote:
 lol?

Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure 
they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc.  Personally, I
think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
their own machines rather than relying on the kindness of others.

-Damian



NOD32 Antivirus and OpenBSD?

2006-10-23 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues

Hello everyone,

I'm thinking on purchasing this NOD32 anti-virus solution from
ESET.COM and use it here at work. I really want to use it with
OpenBSD, since every other server machine runs OpenBSD as well. The
problem is that eset.com claims that their product will run on Linux
and FreeBSD, they say nothing about OpenBSD. I've heard rumors of
NOD32 being also able to run on OpenBSD, but I *think* that was for
earlier versions of NOD32. I'm not very fond of rumors, so I came here
to ask your opinion about it. Does anyone here have any experience
with NOD32 and OpenBSD? Or another really good antivirus that I may
consider?

Thanks in advance,

Leonardo Rodrigues
--
An OpenBSD user... and that's all you need to know =)