Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-07 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 08:40:01 am Clint Pachl wrote:
 Anthony Bentley wrote:
  This happens when there are multiple PDFs embedded in a single PDF file.
  I remember reading a Ghostscript bug about this (could probably find it
  again if I had the exact error message), but unfortunately Mupdf still
  doesn't support it.
 
  Here is the Ghostscript bug:
  http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690422
 
   From here it looks like you might be able to get it with gs after all.

 Good research Anthony. That bug describes my situation exactly. The only
 thing is that I didn't know what the hell a portfolio PDF was until now.

 Unfortunately, the gs ports is version 8.63 (released 2008-08-01). This
 bug report/fix happened in April 2009.

 Shit, now Mr. Schroder is going to be on my ass about patches again. :-P

kili@ posted a ghostscript update to ports@ in October IIRC, you may consult 
the archives.

cheers,
Sebastian



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-07 Thread Greg Jones

You may want to look at Pdftk at http://www.pdflabs.com/.

You may be able to use Pdftk to massage the pdf file you can open it.

I don't know if it will build on OpenBSD (although there is a FreeBSD port.)

Regards,


On 12/07/10 03:47, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:

On Tuesday 07 December 2010 08:40:01 am Clint Pachl wrote:

Anthony Bentley wrote:

This happens when there are multiple PDFs embedded in a single PDF file.
I remember reading a Ghostscript bug about this (could probably find it
again if I had the exact error message), but unfortunately Mupdf still
doesn't support it.

Here is the Ghostscript bug:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690422

  From here it looks like you might be able to get it with gs after all.

Good research Anthony. That bug describes my situation exactly. The only
thing is that I didn't know what the hell a portfolio PDF was until now.

Unfortunately, the gs ports is version 8.63 (released 2008-08-01). This
bug report/fix happened in April 2009.

Shit, now Mr. Schroder is going to be on my ass about patches again. :-P

kili@ posted a ghostscript update to ports@ in October IIRC, you may consult
the archives.

cheers,
Sebastian




Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:28:04PM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
 When I open [the UPS developer's guide] with xpdf(1) I get a [message]
 to download the the latest Adobe crapware to view it.

This is cheating, but have you tried throwing it into Google docs?

Joachim



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Clint Pachl

Joachim Schipper wrote:

On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:28:04PM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
   

When I open [the UPS developer's guide] with xpdf(1) I get a [message]
to download the the latest Adobe crapware to view it.
 

This is cheating, but have you tried throwing it into Google docs?

Joachim
   



Damn Joachim, nice cheat! I can't believe I didn't think of giving this 
a try.


I was hopeful it would work. Unfortunately, I get the same error:

For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat 9 or Adobe 
Reader 9, or later.



I'd also like to mention I tried the pdftops and pdf2ps commands without 
success. Still get a single page PDF stating the above message.


I guess it has to do with this PDF being a portfolio, like Anthony 
Bentley mentioned.


Thanks,
Clint



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Joel Wiramu Pauling
I would be surprised if okular didn't open it. (okular being the KDE viewer)

On 7 December 2010 10:42, Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
 Joachim Schipper wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:28:04PM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:


 When I open [the UPS developer's guide] with xpdf(1) I get a [message]
 to download the the latest Adobe crapware to view it.


 This is cheating, but have you tried throwing it into Google docs?

 B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B Joachim



 Damn Joachim, nice cheat! I can't believe I didn't think of giving this a
 try.

 I was hopeful it would work. Unfortunately, I get the same error:

 For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat 9 or Adobe
 Reader 9, or later.


 I'd also like to mention I tried the pdftops and pdf2ps commands without
 success. Still get a single page PDF stating the above message.

 I guess it has to do with this PDF being a portfolio, like Anthony Bentley
 mentioned.

 Thanks,
 Clint



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Anthony Bentley
 This happens when there are multiple PDFs embedded in a single PDF file.
 I remember reading a Ghostscript bug about this (could probably find it
 again if I had the exact error message), but unfortunately Mupdf still
 doesn't support it.

Here is the Ghostscript bug:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690422

From here it looks like you might be able to get it with gs after all.

This forum thread claims that Okular can view PDF portfolios as well:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/pdf-portfolio-833748/

--
Anthony J. Bentley



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Clint Pachl

Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:

I would be surprised if okular didn't open it. (okular being the KDE viewer)
   


I don't have KDE so I can't test. But I did find this link:

http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=20t=91242

It looks like portfolio PDFs are not supported, although someone there 
mentions a possible hack. okular apparently uses poppler as the backend. 
Poppler is a fork of xpdf-3.0, so we're back to square one.




Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Martin Schröder
2010/12/6 Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com:
 mentions a possible hack. okular apparently uses poppler as the backend.
 Poppler is a fork of xpdf-3.0, so we're back to square one.

To quote the mailing list motto: Stop whining. Where's the patch? ;-}

I can find no bug report in the podofo bugzilla.

Best
   Martin



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread ropers
On 6 December 2010 22:42, Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
 Still get a single page PDF stating the above message.

 I guess it has to do with this PDF being a portfolio, like Anthony Bentley
 mentioned.

How are the constituent PDFs stored in the portfolio PDF? Unencrypted?
Would it be possible to simply use file carving
http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/File_Carving to extract them?
There are unix file carving programs such as scalpel or foremost, but
I don't think there is an OpenBSD port. One can try to do things
manually with a hex editor of course. Does anyone have a link to a
copy of the OP's original offending PDF, so I could try to poke it in
this way? (I'm not gonna register w/ UPS just to see that guide.)

NB: When googling for the guide, I found this:
http://aricmackey.com/2008/04/fail-ups-developers-guide/ Not sure if
it still applies.

PS I just did some groping around inside some other portfolio PDF
file, but it doesn't seem to be just simple concatenation.



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Clint Pachl

ropers wrote:

On 6 December 2010 22:42, Clint Pachlpa...@ecentryx.com  wrote:
   

Still get a single page PDF stating the above message.

I guess it has to do with this PDF being a portfolio, like Anthony Bentley
mentioned.
 

How are the constituent PDFs stored in the portfolio PDF? Unencrypted?
   


pdfinfo says they are encrypted, although it is probably only reporting 
on the container file.



Does anyone have a link to a
copy of the OP's original offending PDF, so I could try to poke it in
this way? (I'm not gonna register w/ UPS just to see that guide.)
   


I posted one here for you to play with: http://pachl.us/ups.pdf

Thanks,
Clint



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-06 Thread Clint Pachl

Anthony Bentley wrote:

This happens when there are multiple PDFs embedded in a single PDF file.
I remember reading a Ghostscript bug about this (could probably find it
again if I had the exact error message), but unfortunately Mupdf still
doesn't support it.
 

Here is the Ghostscript bug:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690422

 From here it looks like you might be able to get it with gs after all.
   


Good research Anthony. That bug describes my situation exactly. The only 
thing is that I didn't know what the hell a portfolio PDF was until now.


Unfortunately, the gs ports is version 8.63 (released 2008-08-01). This 
bug report/fix happened in April 2009.


Shit, now Mr. Schroder is going to be on my ass about patches again. :-P



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
 UPS is so annoying. The UPS developer's guide is in a 9MB PDF file. When
 I open it with xpdf(1) I get a (1) page PDF that states I need to
 download the the latest Adobe crapware to view it.

 How can I get around this? Why does xpdf even abide?

 I tried the following gs(1) command hoping it would convert it, but
 failed with an unrecoverable error (I can paste the error output here if
 someone thinks it will be helpful):

 gs -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=foo.pdf
 guide.pdf

 I also tried without the options, NOPAUSE, etc.

 Any suggestions?


This happens when there are multiple PDFs embedded in a single PDF file.
I remember reading a Ghostscript bug about this (could probably find it
again if I had the exact error message), but unfortunately Mupdf still
doesn't support it.

Standard Adobe Reader lets you view but not extract, even. I had to go
to a computer lab and use Acrobat on a Mac to pull out the individual
files. It's probably not a hard problem to solve, but I don't know of
any open-source programs that do this yet.

--
Anthony J. Bentley
b



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread Brynet
Hi,

Why are you using xpdf? it's so old and crummy :-).

print/epdfview, which uses the poppler library.
textproc/mupdf, independent renderer, pretty good.

-Bryan.



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread patrick keshishian
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Why are you using xpdf? it's so old and crummy :-)

Not addressed to me, but my opinions below.


 print/epdfview, which uses the poppler library.

I haven't tried this, but I'm not a fan of GTK apps. most are fugly and clunky.

 textproc/mupdf, independent renderer, pretty good.

i have pdfs that mupdf doesn't display properly.

--patrick



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Why are you using xpdf? it's so old and crummy :-).

 print/epdfview, which uses the poppler library.
 textproc/mupdf, independent renderer, pretty good.

 -Bryan.



There is also textproc/zathura.



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread Clint Pachl

Brynet wrote:

Hi,

Why are you using xpdf? it's so old and crummy :-).

print/epdfview, which uses the poppler library.
textproc/mupdf, independent renderer, pretty good.

-Bryan.
   


All I can say is that I use cwm and don't like interfaces, GTK, gnome, 
or KDE. I highly agree with Patrick.




Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread Brynet
On 12/04/10 23:09, Clint Pachl wrote:
 All I can say is that I use cwm and don't like interfaces, GTK, gnome,
 or KDE. I highly agree with Patrick.

I also use cwm, but that doesn't means I completely avoid applications
using GTK+ or even Qt, there aren't a whole lot of programs using xlib
or xcb directly.

You just asked for a way to display your files, my apologies for
suggesting that you step outside of your comfort zone. ;-)

Good luck,
-Bryan.



Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread shwegime

On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:


On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi,

Why are you using xpdf? it's so old and crummy :-).

print/epdfview, which uses the poppler library.
textproc/mupdf, independent renderer, pretty good.

-Bryan.




There is also textproc/zathura.


zathura is really cool! Didn't know about it. But the default key bindings 
are really weird. I did tried many in the past, but had always to go back 
to acroread.




Re: How to open PDF that requires Adobe 9

2010-12-04 Thread Jona Joachim
On 2010-12-05, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Why are you using xpdf? it's so old and crummy :-).

 print/epdfview, which uses the poppler library.

AFAIK the poppler library is based on xpdf code so the result would be
about the same.


Best regards,
Jona

-- 
Worse is better
Richard P. Gabriel