Re: Scheduled packages bulk build for i386 ?

2007-06-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Landry Breuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there a scheduled packages build ?

A fresh i386 packages snapshot should be making its way to the
mirrors right now.

 I tried a newfs -O2, but mounted partition still shows 'ffs' in mount
 output... how can we verify the created partition is _real_ FFS2 ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] dumpfs /dev/rccd0d | head -1
magic   19540119 (FFS2) timeSun Jun 10 19:06:27 2007

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Scheduled packages bulk build for i386 ?

2007-06-10 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Landry Breuil wrote:

 Hello,
 
 Just for the record, i know this is normal as we're tracking -current, but
 we can't install/update packages on an installation updated with latests
 snapshots (packages are lagging two weeks behind) :
 Can't install screen-4.0.3p0: lib not found c.40.3
 c.40.3: partial match in /usr/lib: major=41, minor=0 (bad major)
 (noticed the nice message from pkg_add ?)
 
 Btw, i'm NOT complaining !! I know i can still install/update through ports
 :)
 
 Is there a scheduled packages build ? And last question, is it possible to
 use/test FFS2 for root filesystem ? Will it be enabled someday by default in
 installer, or even better, having the choice between FFS1/FFS2 ?
 I tried a newfs -O2, but mounted partition still shows 'ffs' in mount
 output... how can we verify the created partition is _real_ FFS2 ?

Check dumps output.

FFS2 for a root filesystem won't buy you much. The benefits of FFS2
only come into play with very large filesystems.

It's a bit too early to use FFS2 for anything but testing. But test
reports are appreciated.

-Otto



Re: Scheduled packages bulk build for i386 ?

2007-06-10 Thread Landry Breuil
2007/6/10, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Landry Breuil wrote:

  Hello,
 
  Just for the record, i know this is normal as we're tracking -current,
 but
  we can't install/update packages on an installation updated with latests
  snapshots (packages are lagging two weeks behind) :
  Can't install screen-4.0.3p0: lib not found c.40.3
  c.40.3: partial match in /usr/lib: major=41, minor=0 (bad major)
  (noticed the nice message from pkg_add ?)
 
  Btw, i'm NOT complaining !! I know i can still install/update through
 ports
  :)
 
  Is there a scheduled packages build ? And last question, is it possible
 to
  use/test FFS2 for root filesystem ? Will it be enabled someday by
 default in
  installer, or even better, having the choice between FFS1/FFS2 ?
  I tried a newfs -O2, but mounted partition still shows 'ffs' in mount
  output... how can we verify the created partition is _real_ FFS2 ?

 Check dumps output.

 FFS2 for a root filesystem won't buy you much. The benefits of FFS2
 only come into play with very large filesystems.

 It's a bit too early to use FFS2 for anything but testing. But test
 reports are appreciated.


Yes, that's only for testing purposes, i don't plan to create king-size fs,
only want to see if it works and report eventual breakages.

Thanks for the hint (and for the mirror update !)

Landry