Re: sparc64 5.0

2012-01-25 Thread Anonymous Remailer (austria) 
 Now that I have it setup with the correct package path, etc, I am finding
 out 5.0 is much better than 4.9 was;

Can you say exactly what is better? I found 4.9 very nice and had no issues
running it on a server.

Re: sparc64 5.0

2012-01-24 Thread Fred Crowson 
On 24 January 2012 22:51, Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
 Now that I have it setup with the correct package path, etc, I am finding
 out 5.0 is much better than 4.9 was;

That's the beauty of OpenBSD - it keeps getting better, thanks to all
the developers efforts.

 Someone recently told me that Solaris uses SMI labels on its disks, is this
 the same with OpenBSD?

No. See disklabel (8) and newfs(8) for more information.

hth

Fred