Replacement functionality if systrace is to be removed.

2007-12-04 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi there,

I was speaking to someone at OpenCON about the fundamental systrace
flaw regarding processes forking in order to bypass the checks. The
general impression I was given was that systrace is to be removed at
some point.

If this is the case, will there be a similar tool available?

I ask because I find USE_SYSTRACE (/etc/mk.conf)  essential for the
TeXLive port. It writes all over the place during the build.

Thanks

-- 
Best Regards

Edd

---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett



Re: Replacement functionality if systrace is to be removed.

2007-12-04 Thread Antoine Jacoutot

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Edd Barrett wrote:

I ask because I find USE_SYSTRACE (/etc/mk.conf)  essential for the
TeXLive port. It writes all over the place during the build.


Better fix the port then.

--
Antoine



Re: Replacement functionality if systrace is to be removed.

2007-12-04 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi,

On 04/12/2007, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Better fix the port then.

I think you misunderstood. The port is fixed, but only because
systrace allowed me to cut the build short when the build offended.

-- 
Best Regards

Edd

---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett



Re: Replacement functionality if systrace is to be removed.

2007-12-04 Thread Antoine Jacoutot

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Edd Barrett wrote:

On 04/12/2007, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Better fix the port then.


I think you misunderstood. The port is fixed, but only because
systrace allowed me to cut the build short when the build offended.


Ah ok yes, I did misunderstand. Well this is the use for 
USE_SYSTRACE in ports indeed.


--
Antoine