Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-12-18, Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
 On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:56 +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
 ALIX boards serve me well.  See www.pcengines.ch.

 I can second that. Alix boards have served me as a robust drop-in
 replacement for Soekris while being cheaper at the same time (maybe not
 for non-Swiss customers, though).

They don't support 1GB of RAM as was the original requirement though.



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread Laurence Tratt
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:38:43PM -0500, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:

 Is anyone aware of an equivalent for the Soekris Net 5501-70. I'm looking
 to prototype an OpenBSD border gateway that offers web proxy capabilities
 through squid cache but squid is a bit of a memory hog and I'd like to have
 something with a Gig of RAM. Power footprint is a consideration which is
 why the Soekris is at the top of the list.

I started off looking at Soekris but, to be honest, thought they were
expensive given their lack of horsepower. After a lot of hunting, I ended up
with a Tranquil (http://www.tranquilpc.co.uk/) T7, which is a passively
cooled Intel Atom solution. Depending on where you site it, you might want
to fiddle with its positioning to maximise its ability to cool itself (I
found that if I floor mounted it, raising it half an inch above the floor
meant it ran much cooler; I suspect the available wall mount would have a
similar beneficial effect), It works fine with OpenBSD, draws very little
power, can be ordered in a bare bones version (sans OS etc.), and is very
well engineered. As with most Atom machines, it's a little sparse on the
peripherals, but adding a USB NIC or two would probably do the trick for
most gateway purposes.


Laurie
-- 
http://tratt.net/laurie/ -- Personal
http://fetegeo.org/  -- Free text geocoding
http://convergepl.org/   -- The Converge programming language



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread Diana Eichert

I've seen various references to PoC (AKA Piece of Crap) generic
motherboards.  None of these are good comparisons to either the
PC Engines or Soekris boards because of their limited serial
port boot rom access.  Anyone who has ever worked with PC BIOS
serial port redirection knows how crappy it is.

my quickly devaluing US$.02 worth

diana



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread Marco Peereboom
I love my crusoe, no moving parts and less than 1A:
OpenBSD 4.4-beta (GENERIC) #976: Fri Jul 11 16:41:38 MDT 2008
pvalc...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Transmeta(tm) Crusoe(tm) Processor TM5800 (GenuineTMx86 586-class) 732 
MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,CX8,SEP,CMOV,SER,MMX
real mem  = 251146240 (239MB)
avail mem = 234598400 (223MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 10/10/03, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfa2b0, SMBIOS 
rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0800 (31 entries)
bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies, LTD version 786W2 v1.07 date 10/10/2003
bios0: Hewlett-Packard hp t5000 series
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP
acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5) LAN0(S5) USB0(S4) USB1(S4)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2
acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0xa000
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Transmeta LongRun Northbridge rev 0x03
Transmeta Mem1 rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 not configured
Transmeta Mem2 rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 not configured
em0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq 11, 
address 00:04:23:ab:6e:68
em1 at pci0 dev 11 function 1 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq 10, 
address 00:04:23:ab:6e:69
vga1 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 ATI Rage XL rev 0x27
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pcib0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 VIA VT8231 ISA rev 0x10
pciide0 at pci0 dev 17 function 1 VIA VT82C571 IDE rev 0x06: ATA100, channel 
0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0:  256MB ATA Flash Disk
wd0: 1-sector PIO, LBA, 245MB, 501760 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
uhci0 at pci0 dev 17 function 2 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x1e: irq 5
uhci1 at pci0 dev 17 function 3 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x1e: irq 5
viaenv0 at pci0 dev 17 function 4 VIA VT8231 PMG rev 0x10: failed to map PM 
I/O space
vr0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 VIA RhineII-2 rev 0x51: irq 15, address 
00:0b:cd:6d:81:ae
ukphy0 at vr0 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 5: OUI 0x004063, 
model 0x0032
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker
spkr0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0 VIA UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 VIA UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
biomask 71ed netmask fded ttymask 
umass0 at uhub1 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 SMI Corporation USB DISK 
rev 2.00/11.00 addr 2
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus0 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: , , 1100 SCSI0 0/direct removable
sd0: 991MB, 126 cyl, 255 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 2030592 sec total
uhidev0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 Tripplite B015-000 R0.74 
USB to PS2 adapter. rev 1.10/1.00 addr 2
uhidev0: iclass 3/1
ukbd0 at uhidev0: 8 modifier keys, 6 key codes, country code 3
wskbd1 at ukbd0 mux 1
wskbd1: connecting to wsdisplay0
uhidev1 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 1 Tripplite B015-000 R0.74 
USB to PS2 adapter. rev 1.10/1.00 addr 2
uhidev1: iclass 3/1
ums0 at uhidev1: 5 buttons, Z dir
wsmouse0 at ums0 mux 0
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:38:43PM -0500, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
 Is anyone aware of an equivalent for the Soekris Net 5501-70. I'm  
 looking to prototype an OpenBSD border gateway that offers web proxy  
 capabilities through
 squid cache but squid is a bit of a memory hog and I'd like to have  
 something with a Gig of RAM. Power footprint is a consideration which is 
 why the Soekris is at the top of the list.

 -- Chris

 Chris Hilton   tildeChris -- http://myblog.vindaloo.com
 email -- chris/at/vindaloo/ 
 dot/com
 .~~.--.~ 
 ~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.
  I'm on the outside looking inside, What do I 
 see?
Much confusion, disillution, all around 
 me.
  -- Ian McDonald / Peter  
 Sinfield



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread bofh
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
 I love my crusoe, no moving parts and less than 1A:

Wasn't it kinda expensive in the beginning (definitely more than a
soekris iirc) and even more expensive as museum pieces nowadays?

-- 
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks
factory where smoking on the job is permitted.  -- Gene Spafford
learn french:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread Marco Peereboom
No idea; it was a gift.  Love it though; soekris, not so much.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:49:56AM -0500, bofh wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
  I love my crusoe, no moving parts and less than 1A:
 
 Wasn't it kinda expensive in the beginning (definitely more than a
 soekris iirc) and even more expensive as museum pieces nowadays?
 
 -- 
 http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
 This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
 -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
 Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
 internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks
 factory where smoking on the job is permitted.  -- Gene Spafford
 learn french:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread Anathae Townsend
the same site that has the atom based board from msi also has a jetway
board.

http://www.logicsupply.com/products/nc92_230_lf

with add on, it can do 4 10/100/1000 network attachments.



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-18 Thread Gerry Weaver
Hello,

FYI: We deployed 25 of the jetway boards as thin clients. We had many problems
and have recently replaced the last one. I would stay away from these.

-G


  _

From: Anathae Townsend [mailto:atowns...@nucleus.com]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:37:23 -0600
Subject: Re: Soekris equivalent

the same site that has the atom based board from msi also has a jetway
  board.

  http://www.logicsupply.com/products/nc92_230_lf

  with add on, it can do 4 10/100/1000 network attachments.




Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
Is anyone aware of an equivalent for the Soekris Net 5501-70. I'm  
looking to prototype an OpenBSD border gateway that offers web proxy  
capabilities through
squid cache but squid is a bit of a memory hog and I'd like to have  
something with a Gig of RAM. Power footprint is a consideration which  
is why the Soekris is at the top of the list.


-- Chris

Chris Hilton   tildeChris -- http://myblog.vindaloo.com
email -- chris/at/vindaloo/ 
dot/com
.~ 
~ 
.--.~ 
~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.
 I'm on the outside looking inside, What do  
I see?
   Much confusion, disillution, all  
around me.
 -- Ian McDonald / Peter  
Sinfield




Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread Marc Balmer
* Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
 Is anyone aware of an equivalent for the Soekris Net 5501-70. I'm  
 looking to prototype an OpenBSD border gateway that offers web proxy  
 capabilities through
 squid cache but squid is a bit of a memory hog and I'd like to have  
 something with a Gig of RAM. Power footprint is a consideration which is 
 why the Soekris is at the top of the list.

ALIX boards serve me well.  See www.pcengines.ch.


 -- Chris

 Chris Hilton   tildeChris -- http://myblog.vindaloo.com
 email -- chris/at/vindaloo/ 
 dot/com
 .~~.--.~ 
 ~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.--.~~.
  I'm on the outside looking inside, What do I 
 see?
Much confusion, disillution, all around 
 me.
  -- Ian McDonald / Peter  
 Sinfield

-- 
Marc Balmer, Micro Systems, Wiesendamm 2a, Postfach, CH-4019 Basel, Switzerland
http://www.msys.ch/ http://www.vnode.ch/   In God we trust, in C we code.



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton
ch...@vindaloo.com wrote:
 Is anyone aware of an equivalent for the Soekris Net 5501-70. I'm looking to
 prototype an OpenBSD border gateway that offers web proxy capabilities
 through
 squid cache but squid is a bit of a memory hog and I'd like to have
 something with a Gig of RAM. Power footprint is a consideration which is why
 the Soekris is at the top of the list.

I never used a gig of ram for squid even when I put the cache in a ramdisk.

-B



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread Martin Schröder
2008/12/17 Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch:
 * Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
 Is anyone aware of an equivalent for the Soekris Net 5501-70. I'm

 ALIX boards serve me well.  See www.pcengines.ch.

Btw: Has anybody seen Intel Atom boards with 1 NIC for use as
routers/firewalls?

Best
   Martin



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread bofh
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Martin Schrvder mar...@oneiros.de wrote:
 Btw: Has anybody seen Intel Atom boards with 1 NIC for use as
 routers/firewalls?

Intel won't allow it.  Doesn't want it to cannibalize their celeron
sales.  That's why atom boards only have one pci slot too.

--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks
factory where smoking on the job is permitted.  -- Gene Spafford
learn french:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread Daniel E. Hassler
http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832

Spec says it has dual LAN ports.

Dan

bofh wrote:

  On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Martin Schrvder   mar...@oneiros.de   
wrote:

Btw: Has anybody seen Intel Atom boards with 1 NIC for use as
routers/firewalls?

  Intel won't allow it.  Doesn't want it to cannibalize their celeron
  sales.  That's why atom boards only have one pci slot too.
  
  --  http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk  This officer's men seem to follow 
him merely out of idle curiosity.
  -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
  Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
  internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks
  factory where smoking on the job is permitted.  -- Gene Spafford
  learn french:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related  



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread bofh
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Daniel E. Hassler
hass...@speakeasy.net wrote:
 http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832


Interesting.  I read somewhere that it is one of the things Intel is
limiting customers to, via chipsets and whatnots.  I wonder if these
guys are using a 3rd party chipset.


-- 
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks
factory where smoking on the job is permitted.  -- Gene Spafford
learn french:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0feature=related



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread ropers
 On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Daniel E. Hassler wrote:
 http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832


2008/12/18 bofh goodb...@gmail.com:
 Interesting.  I read somewhere that it is one of the things Intel is
 limiting customers to, via chipsets and whatnots.  I wonder if these
 guys are using a 3rd party chipset.

First sentence on that page:

 The IM-945GC is MSI's Intel-Atom-based offeringtouting the 1.6GHz Atom 230
processor and Intel 945GC chipset.

PS: Sent this off-list by mistake:

 On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Martin Schrvder mar...@oneiros.de
wrote:
 Btw: Has anybody seen Intel Atom boards with 1 NIC for use as
 routers/firewalls?

 2008/12/18 bofh goodb...@gmail.com:
 Intel won't allow it.  Doesn't want it to cannibalize their celeron
 sales.  That's why atom boards only have one pci slot too.

2008/12/18 ropers rop...@gmail.com:
 Really? What influence do Intel have over how a manufacturer designs
 their mainboards? Do Atom CPUs only work with Intel chipsets? Or are
 they making Atom buyers sign terrible contracts? (Wouldn't the
 doctrine of first sale torpedo such efforts?)

 regards,
 --ropers



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread Louis V. Lambrecht

bofh wrote:

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Daniel E. Hassler
hass...@speakeasy.net wrote:


http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832




Interesting.  I read somewhere that it is one of the things Intel is
limiting customers to, via chipsets and whatnots.  I wonder if these
guys are using a 3rd party chipset.




There is a review of five Atom boards here
http://www.mini-itx.com/reviews/atoms/

also check the list od Intel Atom CPU's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors

As usual, OEM boards perform better than original Intel boards,
MSI seems to be the first to introduce passive cooling.
Worth of note is, from the logicsupply.com page
 Please choose Mainboard Test
http://www.logicsupply.com/faq?faq1=9faq2=147 to ensure that the
board is free from
manufacturers defects, errors, etc.
If Mainboard Test is selected, please allow 1-2 full business days
for completion before shipment date.
;-)
Not speaking of OS glitches (even in Win).

In any case, I would chose an OpenBSD friendly manufacturer.
http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm has already been mentioned.



Re: Soekris equivalent

2008-12-17 Thread Stephan A. Rickauer
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:56 +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
 ALIX boards serve me well.  See www.pcengines.ch.

I can second that. Alix boards have served me as a robust drop-in
replacement for Soekris while being cheaper at the same time (maybe not
for non-Swiss customers, though).