Re: Time conversion

2012-12-05 Thread Eric Furman
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012, at 09:49 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:55:37 +1300, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> >> I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
> >> 
> >> I often have cause to use "date -r " to show me what the date stamp is
> >> in human terms.
> >> It is usually in spamd or on some documents I get that are time stamped
> >> using the seconds since the epoc.
> >> 
> >> Now I have a need to generate some timestamps of my own and, whilst I'm
> >> sure I've done it in the past, I cannot remember it now.
> >> 
> >> Cluebat?
> >> 
> >
> >date +%s --date="January 01, 1970 00:00 GMT"
> >
> 
> The "--" in there says you are running linux... this is an OpenBSD
> list.

When will people learn that GNU's not UNIX



Re: Time conversion

2012-12-05 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:55:37 +1300, m...@extensibl.com wrote:

>On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
>> 
>> I often have cause to use "date -r " to show me what the date stamp is
>> in human terms.
>> It is usually in spamd or on some documents I get that are time stamped
>> using the seconds since the epoc.
>> 
>> Now I have a need to generate some timestamps of my own and, whilst I'm
>> sure I've done it in the past, I cannot remember it now.
>> 
>> Cluebat?
>> 
>
>date +%s --date="January 01, 1970 00:00 GMT"
>

The "--" in there says you are running linux... this is an OpenBSD
list.

8-)

*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I  subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is 
tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to 
reply off list. Thankyou.

Rod/
---
This life is not the real thing.
It is not even in Beta.
If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.



Re: Time conversion

2012-12-05 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 23:47:32 +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:

>On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>| Cluebat?
>
>date +%s

Ah yes. Reading the date man page won't do one any good unless you
follow the pointer to strftime.

Thanks for the wakeup which was the result of looking at your example
code.
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I  subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is 
tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to 
reply off list. Thankyou.

Rod/
---
This life is not the real thing.
It is not even in Beta.
If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.



Re: Time conversion

2012-12-05 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:55:37AM +1300, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
| On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
| > I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
| > 
| > I often have cause to use "date -r " to show me what the date stamp is
| > in human terms.
| > It is usually in spamd or on some documents I get that are time stamped
| > using the seconds since the epoc.
| > 
| > Now I have a need to generate some timestamps of my own and, whilst I'm
| > sure I've done it in the past, I cannot remember it now.
| > 
| > Cluebat?
| > 
| 
| date +%s --date="January 01, 1970 00:00 GMT"

This is not gnu date.  If that's what you want, use -j and specify a
date in ccyymmddHHMM.SS format:

[weerd@despair] $ date -j +%s 201212052355.13
1354748113

Note that this is TZ dependant...:

[weerd@despair] $ date -r 1354748113
Wed Dec  5 23:55:13 CET 2012

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

-- 
>[<++>-]<+++.>+++[<-->-]<.>+++[<+
+++>-]<.>++[<>-]<+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/ 



Re: Time conversion

2012-12-05 Thread ml
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
> 
> I often have cause to use "date -r " to show me what the date stamp is
> in human terms.
> It is usually in spamd or on some documents I get that are time stamped
> using the seconds since the epoc.
> 
> Now I have a need to generate some timestamps of my own and, whilst I'm
> sure I've done it in the past, I cannot remember it now.
> 
> Cluebat?
> 

date +%s --date="January 01, 1970 00:00 GMT"



Re: Time conversion

2012-12-05 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
| Cluebat?

date +%s

-- 
>[<++>-]<+++.>+++[<-->-]<.>+++[<+
+++>-]<.>++[<>-]<+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/ 



Time conversion

2012-12-05 Thread Rod Whitworth
I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)

I often have cause to use "date -r " to show me what the date stamp is
in human terms.
It is usually in spamd or on some documents I get that are time stamped
using the seconds since the epoc.

Now I have a need to generate some timestamps of my own and, whilst I'm
sure I've done it in the past, I cannot remember it now.

Cluebat?

Thanx,

*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I  subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is 
tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to 
reply off list. Thankyou.

Rod/
---
This life is not the real thing.
It is not even in Beta.
If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.