Re: Wim

2009-04-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Kili,

On Thu, 02.04.2009 at 22:15:13 +0200, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de 
wrote:
 Wim *does* filter traffic from cvs.openbsd.org. At least on ports
 25 and 80:
 
 $ telnet  www.kd85.com 25
 Trying 62.116.6.182...
 
 [nothing]

 Silly. So silly.

I've seen many kinds of breakage, but right now, I can telnet to his
server to port 25 from here. If you can't, then I tend to agree that
port 25 is filtered.

I also think that such kind of filtering - for policy reasons - is a
stupid idea.

-- 
Kind regards,
--Toni++



Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Theo de Raadt
This guy some of you think is so honest.  He's filtering port 25
from cvs.openbsd.org.

For what reason would he do that?

Today was the first time I tried to mail him, cc'd to misc@openbsd.org,
in a couple of months.

So what's that all about?  He's so honest, some of you think, because
he bought you a beer.

--n3263RVP013810.1238652361/cvs.openbsd.org

**
**  THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY  **
**  YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE  **
**

The original message was received at Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:59:25 -0600 (MDT)
from localhost [127.0.0.1]

   - Transcript of session follows -
wvdpu...@kd85.com... Deferred: Connection timed out with ok13.kd85.com.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old

--n3263RVP013810.1238652361/cvs.openbsd.org
Content-Type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; cvs.openbsd.org
Arrival-Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:59:25 -0600 (MDT)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; wvdpu...@kd85.com
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; ok13.kd85.com
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:06:01 -0600 (MDT)
Will-Retry-Until: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:59:25 -0600 (MDT)

--n3263RVP013810.1238652361/cvs.openbsd.org
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Return-Path: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cvs.openbsd.org (8.14.3/8.12.1) with ESMTP id n321xOYL019813;
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:59:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: 200904020159.n321xoyl019...@cvs.openbsd.org
To: wvdpu...@kd85.com
cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Where did the donation money go, Wim?
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:59:24 -0600
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org

I have been in commuinication with a few people who have told me
stories that Wim received donations, obviously meant for the OpenBSD
project, collected at European conference tables -- and that this
money has not made it to the OpenBSD project.  These reports are not
coming from people who gave these donatiosn, but from people who
collected them at tables and gave them to Wim to give to the project.
[...]



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Humberto PĂ©rez Romero
2009/4/2 Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org:
 This guy some of you think is so honest.  He's filtering port 25
 from cvs.openbsd.org.

 For what reason would he do that?

 Today was the first time I tried to mail him, cc'd to misc@openbsd.org,
 in a couple of months.

 So what's that all about?  He's so honest, some of you think, because
 he bought you a beer.

 in a couple of months.

 So what's that all about?  He's so honest, some of you think, because
 he bought you a beer.

Hi Teo:

Did you try to mail him to wim.vandepu...@gmail.com?

This message appear in his web.

Important: Email is working fine but because I use greylisting, if
it's urgent, don't just email me at w...@kd85.com but also put
wim.vandepu...@gmail.com in cc:.
Greylisting inserts a 30 to 60 minute latency

Humberto Pirez



Re: Where did the donation money go, Wim?

2009-04-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:

 I have been in commuinication with a few people who have told me
 stories that Wim received donations, obviously meant for the OpenBSD
 project, collected at European conference tables -- and that this
 money has not made it to the OpenBSD project.

At all the European conference tables where I've been with Wim over
the years, all the money from T-shirt, poster, CD sales *and* cash
donations went into the same glass jar, and at the end of the day
Wim collected the money.

I don't know what happened afterwards and if Wim's accounting ever
led him to separate out the donations money.

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de



Re: Where did the donation money go, Wim?

2009-04-02 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:13:03PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
 Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:

  I have been in commuinication with a few people who have told me
  stories that Wim received donations, obviously meant for the OpenBSD
  project, collected at European conference tables -- and that this
  money has not made it to the OpenBSD project.

 At all the European conference tables where I've been with Wim over
 the years, all the money from T-shirt, poster, CD sales *and* cash
 donations went into the same glass jar, and at the end of the day
 Wim collected the money.

 I don't know what happened afterwards and if Wim's accounting ever
 led him to separate out the donations money.


I can't add much more. However, when I helped out at a conference (Linux
Expo Live, held in london last october), similar things happened:

There wasn't much in the way of donations (a few quid here and there for
a lanyard), OpenBSD wasn't a major feature there. On the other hand,
again the money went all went into the same jar with tshirt, cd etc
sales. I've no idea what happened to it.

-0-
--
Larkinson's Law:
All laws are basically false.



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi,

On Thu, 02.04.2009 at 00:17:35 -0600, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org 
wrote:
 This guy some of you think is so honest.  He's filtering port 25
 from cvs.openbsd.org.

did you try sending from a different server thereafter?



I've seen a failure mode where a machine appears to be up, but slowly
stops accepting ever more tcp connections over time, until the system
comes to a grinding halt, the last thing being becoming unresponsive to
ping and finally, console lockup, on several machines. They are all
different hardware, but are intel or AMD CPUs. I've seen this for a
long time (years), but have no way to reproduce it, and also no way to
catch debug info in the actual cases (eg. boot crash doesn't do
anything), and therefore not reported it, since you don't want
incomplete bug reports. I was so far unable to detect a pattern. A
machine usually runs fine for months, then takes a few hours or up to
2-3 days, to get into that state. If it happens, I can usually only
press the reset button.

If I may have a wish granted, then please, pretty please, try to keep
USB, and especially USB keyboards, alive for as long as possible,
because otherwise, I can't do anything in most cases of such a lockup.

 For what reason would he do that?

I don't know, either, but since he's allegedly on the road, it might be
difficult for him to fix it soonish, if it is a problem like the one
described above.


Kind regards,
--Toni++



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Theo de Raadt
 On Thu, 02.04.2009 at 00:17:35 -0600, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org 
 wrote:
  This guy some of you think is so honest.  He's filtering port 25
  from cvs.openbsd.org.
 
 did you try sending from a different server thereafter?
 
 
 
 I've seen a failure mode where a machine appears to be up, but slowly
 stops accepting ever more tcp connections over time, until the system
 comes to a grinding halt, the last thing being becoming unresponsive to
 ping and finally, console lockup, on several machines. They are all
 different hardware, but are intel or AMD CPUs. I've seen this for a
 long time (years), but have no way to reproduce it, and also no way to
 catch debug info in the actual cases (eg. boot crash doesn't do
 anything), and therefore not reported it, since you don't want
 incomplete bug reports. I was so far unable to detect a pattern. A
 machine usually runs fine for months, then takes a few hours or up to
 2-3 days, to get into that state. If it happens, I can usually only
 press the reset button.

thanks for lesson in how the Internet works.



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:59:38PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
  This guy some of you think is so honest.  He's filtering port 25
  from cvs.openbsd.org.
 
 did you try sending from a different server thereafter?

Wim *does* filter traffic from cvs.openbsd.org. At least on ports
25 and 80:

$ telnet  www.kd85.com 25
Trying 62.116.6.182...

[nothing]

$ telnet  www.kd85.com 80
Trying 62.116.6.182...

[nothing]

Silly. So silly.

Ciao,
Kili



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez
Come on!!

2009/4/2 Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de:
 On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:59:38PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
  This guy some of you think is so honest.  He's filtering port 25
  from cvs.openbsd.org.

 did you try sending from a different server thereafter?

 Wim *does* filter traffic from cvs.openbsd.org. At least on ports
 25 and 80:

 $ telnet  www.kd85.com 25
 Trying 62.116.6.182...

 [nothing]

 $ telnet  www.kd85.com 80
 Trying 62.116.6.182...

 [nothing]

 Silly. So silly.

 Ciao,
Kili



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hi!

On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:15:13PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Wim *does* filter traffic from cvs.openbsd.org. At least on ports
25 and 80:

$ telnet  www.kd85.com 25
Trying 62.116.6.182...

[nothing]

$ telnet  www.kd85.com 80
Trying 62.116.6.182...

[nothing]

Port 80 works from a private dialup as well as a private rented server.

Do you want to send mail to x...@*www.*kd85.com? I'd rather try the MX
record of kd85.com, which is ok13.kd85.com. That worked for me too, from
the same both sources (spamd's greeting with the first few octets
stuttered).

But JFTR, www.kd85.com also responds on 25, with a Sendmail greeting.

Did you retry to double-check that it wasn't the machine being rebooted
and just coming up pre-start of the daemons?

Kind regards,

Hannah.



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread ropers
2009/4/2 Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de:

 Wim *does* filter traffic from cvs.openbsd.org. At least on ports
 25 and 80:

 $ telnet  www.kd85.com 25
 Trying 62.116.6.182...

 [nothing]

By way of comparison -- this is from an Ubuntu PC NOT at cvs.openbsd.org:

$ netstat -ie | grep inet\ addr
  inet addr:95.***.***.***  Bcast:95.***.***.***
Mask:255.***.***.***
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0

$ telnet  www.kd85.com 25
Trying 62.116.6.182...
Connected to spargel.kd85.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 spargel.kd85.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.8/8.13.6; Fri, 3 Apr 2009
00:26:06 +0200 (CEST)
HELO podgeandrodge.ballydung.com
250 spargel.kd85.com Hello 95-***-***-***-***.***.*** [95.***.***.***]
(may be forged), pleased to meet you
MAIL FROM:podgeandspamandro...@ballydung.com
250 2.1.0 podgeandspamandro...@ballydung.com... Sender ok
^]

telnet quit
Connection closed.

 $ telnet  www.kd85.com 80
 Trying 62.116.6.182...

 [nothing]

Also from here:

$ telnet www.kd85.com 80
Trying 62.116.6.182...
Connected to spargel.kd85.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: www.kd85.com

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:11:41 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.8.16 OpenSSL/0.9.7j
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html

1000
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN
link rev= made href= mailto:w...@kd85.com
(...)

$ date
Fri Apr  3 00:30:35 CEST 2009

Any questions?

Thanks and regards,
--ropers



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Hannah Schroeter han...@schlund.de wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:15:13PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Wim *does* filter traffic from cvs.openbsd.org. At least on ports
25 and 80:

 Port 80 works from a private dialup as well as a private rented server.

The problem is a man in the middle attack stealing all the ARP packets from cvs.



Re: Wim

2009-04-02 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hi!

On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:48:48PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Hannah Schroeter han...@schlund.de wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:15:13PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Wim *does* filter traffic from cvs.openbsd.org. At least on ports
25 and 80:

 Port 80 works from a private dialup as well as a private rented server.

The problem is a man in the middle attack stealing all the ARP packets from 
cvs.

That must be it. That I haven't thought of that... *rolls eyes* The
gaping security hole in OpenBSD... *rolls eyes more* I can't sleep
anymore as long as I keep running any OpenBSD host...

SCNR,

Hannah.



Re: Where did the donation money go, Wim?

2009-04-02 Thread Pedro la Peu
 (Linux Expo Live, held in london last october)

Fun times... though that was a dead, unattended event. At other events 
there were eager punters who wanted OpenSSH/OpenBSD t-shirts, posters, 
cds, lanyards, soft toys, etc. Lots of 'em.

There was no indication the proceeds were going anywhere other than to 
OpenBSD. Not for the buyers or the volunteer sellers.

Sadly said. 



Where did the donation money go, Wim?

2009-04-01 Thread Theo de Raadt
I have been in commuinication with a few people who have told me
stories that Wim received donations, obviously meant for the OpenBSD
project, collected at European conference tables -- and that this
money has not made it to the OpenBSD project.  These reports are not
coming from people who gave these donatiosn, but from people who
collected them at tables and gave them to Wim to give to the project.

The amounts are not large, but this should not be happening.

These transactions happened after the last time that Wim transferred
money to the project in April 8, 2008.  These transactions could not
have come to the project in any other way that we are aware of, since
the Computer Shop and Wim stopped doing transfers of donation money
directly quite a while back since there were problems with that
system.  There is no other way this money made it to the project that
we can think of.

So Wim, where is the donation money from those events?

therefore, I would like a record of all donation money ever accepted
into the Belgian Bank account on behalf of the OpenBSD project.  You
set up a special Belgian bank account just for this purpose, so I am
certain you can provide me with the official bank statements so that I
can check them over.

I would also like a report about the money ever collected at
conference events.  If you cannot come up with exact figures, I will
accept estimates.

Thank you very much for getting that report to me soon.

I know what you transferred to the project on Dec 15, 2006 and on
April 8, 2008 (when you apparently closed that account), but I do not
believe there is any possible way that the sum of donations for the
entire period could only be so little.  The amount seems extremely
low, basically it boggles the mind to think that the Belgian account
pulled in donations at less than 10% the rate that the replacement
German bank account pulls it in.

All this donation money received by you, of course, was not spent by
you on anything for the OpenBSD project.  How so?  Ok, everyone stay
with me for a second here and let me explain.

When kd85 (Wim's company) was found to be very late in payments to the
Computer Shop, Wim and Austin and I came to an agreement where all the
previous OpenBSD project bills paid by Wim in Europe were requested by
Austin, and then those bills were considered as credit against kd85's
debt.  All the spending kd85 / Wim did in the past which was approved
by me was credited; and thus these things were paid for by the
Computer Shop.  Furthermore, the Computer Shop even accepted some
bills that had not been approved; Austin convinced me to be generous
in this regard.  (The Computer Shop went further, and purchased back
almost all of Wim's old CDs, too, as a credit against his debt).  Yet
even after that operation done last year, kd85's debt still remains
substantial.  Understand what this means -- it means all the things
ever bought for the OpenBSD project in Europe were paid for by the
Computer Shop.

So I ask -- did you buy things for the project out of the Belgian
donation account?  Then, when the Computer Shop came asking for
receipts, did you submit receipts which were in fact paid for by the
donation account, but which the Computer Shop was now credited against
your company's debt?  You will surely say no, but I remain sceptical.
  
I would also like an explanation of why two transactions of 5,000 EUR
were made from the Belgian donation account with an annotation saying
that they were paying for OpenBSD 4.1.  The sale of OpenBSD CDs was
a kd85 business, and had nothing to do with donations.  So why would
you have transferred money from the donation account to pay for a debt
owed by your business?

ps. If other people know of donations made to Wim since April of last
year, please let me kno



Re: Where did the donation money go, Wim?

2009-04-01 Thread Theo de Raadt
I need to correct a few details.

 I have been in commuinication with a few people who have told me
 stories that Wim received donations, obviously meant for the OpenBSD
 project, collected at European conference tables -- and that this
 money has not made it to the OpenBSD project.  These reports are not
 coming from people who gave these donatiosn, but from people who
 collected them at tables and gave them to Wim to give to the project.
 
 The amounts are not large, but this should not be happening.
 
 These transactions happened after the last time that Wim transferred
 money to the project in April 8, 2008.  These transactions could not
 have come to the project in any other way that we are aware of, since
 the Computer Shop and Wim stopped doing transfers of donation money
 directly quite a while back since there were problems with that
 system.  There is no other way this money made it to the project that
 we can think of.
 
 So Wim, where is the donation money from those events?
 
 therefore, I would like a record of all donation money ever accepted
 into the Belgian Bank account on behalf of the OpenBSD project.  You
 set up a special Belgian bank account just for this purpose, so I am
 certain you can provide me with the official bank statements so that I
 can check them over.
 
 I would also like a report about the money ever collected at
 conference events.  If you cannot come up with exact figures, I will
 accept estimates.
 
 Thank you very much for getting that report to me soon.
 
 I know what you transferred to the project on Dec 15, 2006 and on
 April 8, 2008 (when you apparently closed that account), but I do not
 believe there is any possible way that the sum of donations for the
 entire period could only be so little.  The amount seems extremely
 low, basically it boggles the mind to think that the Belgian account
 pulled in donations at less than 10% the rate that the replacement
 German bank account pulls it in.

I now realize that I cannot exactly tell the source accounts apart
from each other on the statements I have.  But this is hardly
relevant, since I have a mail saying that the donation account was set
up seperately to not confuse it with kd85's business operation
(ie. good fiscal practice).  So the donation account records must be
seperatable, and I want to see them.

 All this donation money received by you, of course, was not spent by
 you on anything for the OpenBSD project.  How so?  Ok, everyone stay
 with me for a second here and let me explain.
 
 When kd85 (Wim's company) was found to be very late in payments to the
 Computer Shop, Wim and Austin and I came to an agreement where all the
 previous OpenBSD project bills paid by Wim in Europe were requested by
 Austin, and then those bills were considered as credit against kd85's
 debt.  All the spending kd85 / Wim did in the past which was approved
 by me was credited; and thus these things were paid for by the
 Computer Shop.  Furthermore, the Computer Shop even accepted some
 bills that had not been approved; Austin convinced me to be generous
 in this regard.  (The Computer Shop went further, and purchased back
 almost all of Wim's old CDs, too, as a credit against his debt).  Yet
 even after that operation done last year, kd85's debt still remains
 substantial.  Understand what this means -- it means all the things
 ever bought for the OpenBSD project in Europe were paid for by the
 Computer Shop.
 
 So I ask -- did you buy things for the project out of the Belgian
 donation account?  Then, when the Computer Shop came asking for
 receipts, did you submit receipts which were in fact paid for by the
 donation account, but which the Computer Shop was now credited against
 your company's debt?  You will surely say no, but I remain sceptical.
   
 I would also like an explanation of why two transactions of 5,000 EUR
 were made from the Belgian donation account with an annotation saying
 that they were paying for OpenBSD 4.1.  The sale of OpenBSD CDs was

 these say OPENBSD 4.0 RELEASE PART I dated Feb 28, 2007
   OPENBSD 4.0 RELEASEdated Mar 19, 2007

Oops, 4.0 not 4.1; a very late payment.  Yet it still is not clear why
the payment was sent to the German donation receiving account.  Austin
and I had to resolve this issue carefully, since I cannot receive
payment for CDs, that is business. the payment was supposed to be made
to the Computer Shop, since it is _CD sales business_ and does not
involve me financially.

 a kd85 business, and had nothing to do with donations.  So why would
 you have transferred money from the donation account to pay for a debt
 owed by your business?

I now see that I cannot discern the exact accounts in use.  But the
final transfer is OVERBOEKING + CLOSING ACCOUNT for a total sum of
donations from Europe of 2802.48 EUR, for a long enough time that this
cannot be enough.

And remember I also asked what happened to the conference table
donations given to OpenBSD over

Paging Wim v/d Putte

2008-07-08 Thread Michiel van der Kraats
If you get this message, could you contact me off-list please.
kd85.com is not responding and I need some Soekris gear.

Now move along, nothing more to see here.

-- 
Michiel van der Kraats