Re: ftp-proxy man page out of date?

2016-01-18 Thread Harald Dunkel 
On 01/05/2016 04:35 PM, Sonic wrote:
> 
> Divert-to is the proper way to send the packets to the proxy, but the
> dynamic rules that the proxy creates use rdr-to which is why the man
> page may appear a bit confusing at first reading.
> 

I see, my mistake.

Thanx very much for your support.
Harri

Re: ftp-proxy man page out of date?

2016-01-05 Thread Sonic 
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Jason McIntyre  wrote:
> these are dynamically inserted rules.  and they must be
> redirects.  so you don't have to change them.  divert-to
> would be incorrect.

Divert-to is the proper way to send the packets to the proxy, but the
dynamic rules that the proxy creates use rdr-to which is why the man
page may appear a bit confusing at first reading.

ftp-proxy man page out of date?

2016-01-04 Thread Harald Dunkel 
Hi folks,

Would it be possible to update ftp-proxy(8) wrt "divert-to"?
I had the impression that rdr-to is out of date in this
context; see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade50.html.

Thanx very much. Best season's greetings
Harri

Re: ftp-proxy man page out of date?

2016-01-04 Thread Jason McIntyre 
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:35:43PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Would it be possible to update ftp-proxy(8) wrt "divert-to"?
> I had the impression that rdr-to is out of date in this
> context; see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade50.html.
> 
> Thanx very much. Best season's greetings
> Harri
> 

hi. i'll quote mikeb:

these are dynamically inserted rules.  and they must be
redirects.  so you don't have to change them.  divert-to
would be incorrect.

so no change needed.

jmc