Re: could use some spamdb output
Op Fri, 21 Dec 2018 17:10:46 +0100 schreef Gilles Chehade : spamdb | grep -E '^(GREY|WHITE)\|' | cut -d\| -f1,2 -- Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/
could use some spamdb output
hello misc@, If you are comfortable with sharing your spamdb output with me, it would be very helpful in confirming or not some theories I have. I do not need the sender/recipient parts, only the first two fields that disclose if the connection is in GREY or WHITE list and IP address of MX that initated the connection: $ spamdb | grep -E '^(GREY|WHITE)\|' | cut -d\| -f1,2 Do not spam misc@ with that output, send it directly to me. Thanks ! -- Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
Re: spamdb output
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:47:37 -0700, Bob Beck wrote: RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-11 22:39]: It seems that the migrated database works but new entries go on the end - no SORT of order, and SPAMTRAP entries (that I entered using a script) ended up showing in two bunches in the midst of other unordered entries. My question is: Is this normal with spamd a la 4.2 or is it because I migrated a database? This is normal in 4.2 - the change happened post 4.0 when spamdb stopped using DB_BTREE Thanks Bob. I'm already using a script to sort the list to emulate the previous behaviour but at least I know I'll have to keep a copy for any future wipe and re-install upgrade. Looking at today's output showed me another puzzle which you will probably shoot down, but here goes. Here is one line fro spamdb: GREY|69.28.223.134|mta5br.cmpgnr.com|gotb1103621_1102728_683443_1138134 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|1195673789|1195675648|1195688189|2|0 but here is a line from my spamlog: Nov 22 07:08:14 mail spamd[28826]: whitelisting 69.28.223.134 in /var/db/spamd Why does the spamdb output show GREY instead of WHITE three hours later? It does show the 2 knocks which date -r will show were more than a half hour apart and so the whitelisting should have happened. Colour me puzzled. BTW the envelope recipient address shown is a spamtrap and is my only edit of the output. Thanks again for spamd. I absolutely love it. I have never known of it causing loss of genuine mail and also grepping the mail log daily for reject has only shown two emails in the last six months being blocked by zen.spamhaus having passed spamd. Both were really spammers anyway so apmd has an extremely good batting average. Two domains hosted on that box and zero customer complaints = mail admin happiness. In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain The Word of Rod.
Re: spamdb output
* RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-11 22:39]: It seems that the migrated database works but new entries go on the end - no SORT of order, and SPAMTRAP entries (that I entered using a script) ended up showing in two bunches in the midst of other unordered entries. My question is: Is this normal with spamd a la 4.2 or is it because I migrated a database? This is normal in 4.2 - the change happened post 4.0 when spamdb stopped using DB_BTREE -Bob
spamdb output
I just got through updating a mailserver that had been running 4.0 to 4.2 using a new HDD, fresh install of OS and required packages. All old scripts settings etc preserved on original HDD now sitting in an accessible older box so I can grab anything forgotten. The one thing that hit me was the output of spamdb. Back on 4.0 all the entries came out (sort of) sorted. All the SPAMTRAP entries last but sorted on the trap address field. All the GREY, WHITE or TRAPPED entries first sorted on the IP field (but sorted alphabetically i.e. 101.x.y.z precedes 99.x.y.z) All that was fine because I could easily see if there were two entries for the one IP which happened when a script that runs every few minutes evaluates a GREY entry and enters it as TRAPPED. It seems that the migrated database works but new entries go on the end - no SORT of order, and SPAMTRAP entries (that I entered using a script) ended up showing in two bunches in the midst of other unordered entries. My question is: Is this normal with spamd a la 4.2 or is it because I migrated a database? I can always use: spamdb |sort -n -t | -k 2 |less to get a fully sorted list if I have to, but curiosity makes me ask about expected behaviour. Of course (to cut off pedants) I could have used: spamdb |sort -t | -k 2 -n|less to get the output looking like that from 4.0. Thanx, Rod/ /earth: write failed, file system is full cp: /earth/creatures: No space left on device
Spamdb Output Format Mismatch
From man spamdb: = For GREY or WHITE entries, the format is: type|source IP|helo|from|to|first|pass|expire|block|pass = When I at the spamdb output on my box I get (2 representative entries): = GREY|194.242.40.177|tlnordic.moduleweb.net||[EMAIL PROTECTED] apture.com|1175098496|1175112896|1175112896|1|0 = Yep, looks like it should. = WHITE|91.89.52.244|||1175062170|1175064001|1178174455|3|0 = Hm, there is a field missing. It should display instead of |||. Can anyone confirm this? Or is my box messed up in the head? Thanks, -Jason
Re: Spamdb Output Format Mismatch
On 2007/03/28 16:28, Jason Haag wrote: For GREY or WHITE entries, the format is: type|source IP|helo|from|to|first|pass|expire|block|pass When I at the spamdb output on my box I get (2 representative entries): WHITE|91.89.52.244|||1175062170|1175064001|1178174455|3|0 Can anyone confirm this? Or is my box messed up in the head? Mine does the same. I don't know whether it's a doc-bug or sw-bug. Of course this gets especially confusing when somebody sends a helo with | in it...
